際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
2009 Non-life insurance in the North-West of Russia
Premium collected in 2004-2009 in Leningrad region, th.Rbls (total, property, MTPL, casualty+medical)
Premium collected in 2004-2009 in Leningrad region, th.Rbls with and without SOGAZ (state-linked captive insurer) 1,69% 7 596 449 633 47 227 30 010 14 816 4 217 弌, 于亠亞仂 83,10% 2 370 249 2 852 233 2 147 279 2 112 751 2 541 780 1 995 928 于亠亞仂,  弍亠亰 弌舒 72,02% 2 377 845 3 301 866 2 194 506 2 142 761 2 556 596 2 000 145 于亠亞仂 2009/2008 (%) 2009 亞. 2008 亞. 2007 亞. 2006 亞. 2005 亞. 2004 亞. 亠仆仂弍仍舒, 弍仂 .弍 ,
Justified ratio of markets of Leningrad region  ( LR) and St. Petersburg (StP) is equal to MTPL = 12,63% (columns  ratio of LR vs StP in 2009 in total premium, property, MTPL, casualty + medical insurance)
Drop in premium collected  in Leningrad region (blue) and St. Petersburg (red) in 2009 vs 2008 (columns  total premium, property, MTPL, casualty + medical insurance)
Ratio of claims settled vs premium collected in Leningrad region in 2009  ( columns - total premium, property, MTPL, casualty + medical insurance)
Top  20  insurers in Leningrad   region in  2008  and  2009 , total premium
Top  20  insurers in Leningrad   region in  2009 , casco and MTPL
Executive summary, 2009 Collected premium is falling faster in Leningrad region than in St. Petersburg. Loss ratio is growing however so far it is smaller in Leningrad region than in St. Petersburg. Consolidation of market continues. Public demand in better service quality (of claims  settlements) increases. One can note some interest of regional public authorities in interaction with insurance companies.

More Related Content

2009 Non-life insurance in the North-West of Russia.ppt

  • 1. 2009 Non-life insurance in the North-West of Russia
  • 2. Premium collected in 2004-2009 in Leningrad region, th.Rbls (total, property, MTPL, casualty+medical)
  • 3. Premium collected in 2004-2009 in Leningrad region, th.Rbls with and without SOGAZ (state-linked captive insurer) 1,69% 7 596 449 633 47 227 30 010 14 816 4 217 弌, 于亠亞仂 83,10% 2 370 249 2 852 233 2 147 279 2 112 751 2 541 780 1 995 928 于亠亞仂, 弍亠亰 弌舒 72,02% 2 377 845 3 301 866 2 194 506 2 142 761 2 556 596 2 000 145 于亠亞仂 2009/2008 (%) 2009 亞. 2008 亞. 2007 亞. 2006 亞. 2005 亞. 2004 亞. 亠仆仂弍仍舒, 弍仂 .弍 ,
  • 4. Justified ratio of markets of Leningrad region ( LR) and St. Petersburg (StP) is equal to MTPL = 12,63% (columns ratio of LR vs StP in 2009 in total premium, property, MTPL, casualty + medical insurance)
  • 5. Drop in premium collected in Leningrad region (blue) and St. Petersburg (red) in 2009 vs 2008 (columns total premium, property, MTPL, casualty + medical insurance)
  • 6. Ratio of claims settled vs premium collected in Leningrad region in 2009 ( columns - total premium, property, MTPL, casualty + medical insurance)
  • 7. Top 20 insurers in Leningrad region in 2008 and 2009 , total premium
  • 8. Top 20 insurers in Leningrad region in 2009 , casco and MTPL
  • 9. Executive summary, 2009 Collected premium is falling faster in Leningrad region than in St. Petersburg. Loss ratio is growing however so far it is smaller in Leningrad region than in St. Petersburg. Consolidation of market continues. Public demand in better service quality (of claims settlements) increases. One can note some interest of regional public authorities in interaction with insurance companies.