9/9 FRI 4:15 | Avon Park AFR: Joint Land Use Study 2
Download as PPTX, PDF
1 like367 views
Michael B. Bomar Incompatible growth near military facilities can threaten our national defense. Learn what types of development can conflict with military training. Explore the challenges of conducting multi-jurisdictional studies to promote appropriate land uses, around military facilities. Panelists will discuss lessons learned during the course of a Joint Land Use Study (JLUS) of four counties and three cities for the Avon Park Air Force Range, and close coordination with conservation groups. Strategies to develop support from the community and public officials for measures such as transfer of development rights to buffer the public from the impacts of necessary military activities will be discussed.
9/9 FRI 4:15 | Avon Park AFR: Joint Land Use Study 2
- 1. FLORIDA AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION CONFERENCEMichael Bomar, PETetra TechSeptember 9, 2011
- 2. APPROACHIDENTIFY ISSUES FOR EACH JURISDICTIONDEVELOP POTENTIALSTRATEGIESPROVIDE JLUS RECOMMENDATIONS
- 4. IDENTIFY ISSUES FOR EACH JURISDICTIONDEVELOP POTENTIALSTRATEGIESPROVIDE JLUS RECOMMENDATIONSHighlands CountyAvon ParkSebringOkeechobee CountyOsceola CountyPolk CountyFrostproofAPAFRDesign & Construction Standards
- 7. Educational Handouts on Radio Frequency
- 9. Implement Sound Attenuation Construction Requirements
- 10. Identify Military Operations Areas on Public Documents
- 11. Military Influence Planning Area (MIPA) Ordinance
- 13. Comprehensive Plan & Land Development Code Updates
- 14. Military and Inter-Governmental Coordination
- 16. Airspace Studies
- 17. Designate Specific Use Restrictions to Maintain Compatibility
- 18. Voluntary Land or Development Rights Acquisition Program
- 20. Site Specific R/AICUZ for APAFR
- 21. Types of Development Near APAFR Boundary
- 22. Military Operations Areas (MOAs)
- 23. Aircraft Noise
- 24. Blast Noise Intensity & Frequency
- 25. Low Level Flight Area
- 26. Outdoor Lighting-Night Vision Goggle Training
- 27. Bird / Aircraft Strike Hazard (BASH)
- 29. Transportation Corridors & Study Areas
- 31. General Aviation & Military Aircraft ConflictsINTEGRATED ROLESAPAFR JLUSPublic JLUS Technical Working GroupJLUS Policy Committee
- 39. NOISE
- 40. LAND USE
- 41. COORDINATION
- 42. FLORIDA AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION CONFERENCEMichael Bomar, PETetra TechSeptember 9, 2011
- 43. RECOMMENDATIONS
- 45. MILITARY INFLUENCE PLANNING AREAS (MIPAs)MIPA-I:Focused on addressing compatibility issues in a three mile buffer zone around the perimeter of the Range and those areas where a moderate risk of blast noise complaints occur. It also includes a portion of low level flight training areas and areas where night vision training is conducted. MIPA-Is are focused on limiting density, object height, and nighttime light encroachment. The designation of MIPA-Is are not recommended for all jurisdictions participating in this study.
- 46. MIPA-II: Identified to address compatibility issues related to blast noise, low level flight training and areas where night vision training is conducted. MIPA-IIs are focused on limiting density, object height, and nighttime light encroachment. MIPA-II designations are not recommended for all jurisdictions participating in this study.
- 47. MIPA-III: Related to Areas of low risk of blast noise complaints, the presence of civilian aircraft operations and this areas general proximity to MIPAs I and II. The distance beyond the Range boundary for MIPA-IIIs vary but the MIPA-III areas generally exist in the low level of blast noise risk areas outside MIPAs I and II.