際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Europeana Licensing Framework
Current status & future developments
Paul Keller, Luxembourg 13 june 2013
Current status
2
Europeana Licensing Framework - Current status & future developments
Europeana Licensing Framework - Current status & future developments
Europeana Licensing Framework -
Original design considerations
All metadata must be available under the same (non
restrictive) terms
CC zero as the universal rights statement for all
metadata
Each digital object carries its own rights statement
limited list of statements (in the form of URLs) for
edm:rights
Previews are treated as an instance of the digital
object
no separate rights statement for previews
Europeana Licensing Framework - Current status & future developments
Europeana Licensing Framework - Current status & future developments
Europeana Licensing Framework - Current status & future developments
Europeana Licensing Framework - Current status & future developments
Europeana Licensing Framework - Current status & future developments
Rights label per category
(by total objects)
12,730,870
12,702,892
12,604,814
12,185,341
11,939,921
7,304,034
8,111,655
8,066,757
8,048,943
7,987,367
7,922,549
6,435,328
6,554,402
6,341,643
6,798,274
6,920,029
7,537,284 8,091,931
8,188,874 9,201,290 10,424,723
10,896,955
725,471 753,461
814,209 929,188
988,580
979,771
1,448,193
1,635,022
1,802,538
2,284,395 2,463,718
3,515,3823,519,391
3,670,5844,108,396
4,191,261
4,342,583
4,359,195 4,431,411
4,544,653
5,201,067 5,503,856
03/12
04/12
06/12
07/12
08/12
09/12
10/12
11/12
12/12
02/13
3/13Unmarked
All Rights Reserved
Creative Commons
Public Domain
Rights label per category
(as percentage of total)
54%
54%
54%
51%
50%
36%
37%
36%
34%
31%
30%
27% 28%
27%
28%
29%
37% 37%
37%
39%
40%
41%
3% 3% 3%
4% 4%
5% 7%
7% 8%
9%
9%
15% 15% 16% 17% 17%
22% 20% 20% 19% 20% 21%
03/12
06/12
08/12
10/12
12/12
3/13Unmarked
All Rights Reserved
Creative Commons
Public Domain
Future developments
13
Metadata
We are working on a plan to improve the quality of
metadata that is useful for rights checking
We are working with some types of data providers
to increase acceptance of our approach (CC0)
Digital objects
We are exploring how rights statements can
become more granular (attaching them to speci鍖c
views instead of the aggregation/metadata record)
Available rights statements
Add a rights statement for Orphan works
Add a rights statement for works that are out of
copyright but whose use is restricted by
contractual agreements.
Remodel the rights reserved statements
retire restricted access
add a paid version indicator and review use of paid access
Explore the ability to move rights statements to a
non-Europeana namespace that can be shared
with similar projects
A content re-use framework for
Europeana
The framework needs to be open for all Europeana
data providers on a voluntary basis.
It needs to set minimum requirements for digital
objects that are available via the framework
In terms of rights status (must allow re-use)
In terms of relevance of the content (no census records)
In terms of quality (minimum size / quality)
Direct access to the digital object (speci鍖c 鍖le formats?)
The framework needs to provide the ability to
specify conditional access rules.
Kennisland works with Europeana and its partners to
improve the accessibility of Europes cultural heritage
online. Learn more about Kennisland at www.kl.nl
thank you!
pk@kl.nl
@paul_keller

More Related Content

Europeana Licensing Framework - Current status & future developments

  • 1. Europeana Licensing Framework Current status & future developments Paul Keller, Luxembourg 13 june 2013
  • 5. Europeana Licensing Framework - Original design considerations All metadata must be available under the same (non restrictive) terms CC zero as the universal rights statement for all metadata Each digital object carries its own rights statement limited list of statements (in the form of URLs) for edm:rights Previews are treated as an instance of the digital object no separate rights statement for previews
  • 11. Rights label per category (by total objects) 12,730,870 12,702,892 12,604,814 12,185,341 11,939,921 7,304,034 8,111,655 8,066,757 8,048,943 7,987,367 7,922,549 6,435,328 6,554,402 6,341,643 6,798,274 6,920,029 7,537,284 8,091,931 8,188,874 9,201,290 10,424,723 10,896,955 725,471 753,461 814,209 929,188 988,580 979,771 1,448,193 1,635,022 1,802,538 2,284,395 2,463,718 3,515,3823,519,391 3,670,5844,108,396 4,191,261 4,342,583 4,359,195 4,431,411 4,544,653 5,201,067 5,503,856 03/12 04/12 06/12 07/12 08/12 09/12 10/12 11/12 12/12 02/13 3/13Unmarked All Rights Reserved Creative Commons Public Domain
  • 12. Rights label per category (as percentage of total) 54% 54% 54% 51% 50% 36% 37% 36% 34% 31% 30% 27% 28% 27% 28% 29% 37% 37% 37% 39% 40% 41% 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 5% 7% 7% 8% 9% 9% 15% 15% 16% 17% 17% 22% 20% 20% 19% 20% 21% 03/12 06/12 08/12 10/12 12/12 3/13Unmarked All Rights Reserved Creative Commons Public Domain
  • 14. Metadata We are working on a plan to improve the quality of metadata that is useful for rights checking We are working with some types of data providers to increase acceptance of our approach (CC0)
  • 15. Digital objects We are exploring how rights statements can become more granular (attaching them to speci鍖c views instead of the aggregation/metadata record)
  • 16. Available rights statements Add a rights statement for Orphan works Add a rights statement for works that are out of copyright but whose use is restricted by contractual agreements. Remodel the rights reserved statements retire restricted access add a paid version indicator and review use of paid access Explore the ability to move rights statements to a non-Europeana namespace that can be shared with similar projects
  • 17. A content re-use framework for Europeana The framework needs to be open for all Europeana data providers on a voluntary basis. It needs to set minimum requirements for digital objects that are available via the framework In terms of rights status (must allow re-use) In terms of relevance of the content (no census records) In terms of quality (minimum size / quality) Direct access to the digital object (speci鍖c 鍖le formats?) The framework needs to provide the ability to specify conditional access rules.
  • 18. Kennisland works with Europeana and its partners to improve the accessibility of Europes cultural heritage online. Learn more about Kennisland at www.kl.nl thank you! pk@kl.nl @paul_keller