際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
2010; MEP TOUR OF DUTY
& RISKS OBSERVATION



  PT. Berau Coal
Background
B k      d
 UU N 1/1970
    No.1/1970
 KEPMEN 555/1995
 BeGeMS
 Corporate Philosophy
Risk Mapping
       pp g

Measure the Hazard
M         h H      d
Exposure at every activity.
Hazard Finding.
Immediately Action Taken.
Implementation
  p
measurement the current
system.
Baseline Data.
B li D
Next Strategic Plan.
Risk Mapping
                                 pp g

                                 Establish the context
Com municate an consult




                                      Identify risks




                                                         Monitor and review
              nd




                                     Analyse risks

                                                         M
                                     Evaluate risks

                            Assess risks

                                       Treat risks
Consequences
     q




     CAUSE     EFFECT
Consequences
     q




     CAUSE     EFFECT
Significant Trends
     g

                                                       Major/Fatal
                                                       M j /F l
                                       1
Year of 2008,   Dec 09  Jan 10,
                                                             Minor
                                      10
  1                0
                                                 Property Damaged
                                                 P     t D      d
                                       30
  2 [3]            2
  285              21                 600
                                                        Near Miss


  2145             728
   2000            ???                                   At Risk
                                     20.000
                                                        Behavior &
                                                           At Risk
                                                        Conditions



                                              Frank E. Bird ratio; 1982
Preventive Actions




                 At Risk Behavior   Incident
  Basic Causes       & At Risk                 Injury   Losses
                    Conditions      Occurred
Gap Analysis
   p     y

Findings
Fi di              PTBC St d d
                         Standard

  Inspections       Yes; no CARs
  Compliances        How far ?
  Understandings    Only 50%
  Risk Assessment    ASDAM; too general
  Awareness          Mostly lack
  MSDS               Yes; b t
                     Y but no evidence
                                   id
  Implementations    Very low
OBJECTIVES
 The effort to prevent any loss
                 and fatalities 
                     fatalities.
Objectives
  j

 Commitments
 Implementations
 Engineering Control
 Document Control
 Measurement
 Involvement
How to do it ?

Raising of Sense
Daily Commitment
Management Touch
Document Review
                     g
Sustainable Monitoring
Duty of Care
HAZARD CONTROL STANDARD
      was th b t practice
            the best     ti
  approached to achieved our
   pp
        objective and target:
   a Prevention of Fatalities
2010; Risk Mapping & Observations
Thank you and Have a Safe W
                       f Work

                Walk the Talk;
             Trust the Worthy;
           and Living Example.

More Related Content

2010; Risk Mapping & Observations

  • 1. 2010; MEP TOUR OF DUTY & RISKS OBSERVATION PT. Berau Coal
  • 2. Background B k d UU N 1/1970 No.1/1970 KEPMEN 555/1995 BeGeMS Corporate Philosophy
  • 3. Risk Mapping pp g Measure the Hazard M h H d Exposure at every activity. Hazard Finding. Immediately Action Taken. Implementation p measurement the current system. Baseline Data. B li D Next Strategic Plan.
  • 4. Risk Mapping pp g Establish the context Com municate an consult Identify risks Monitor and review nd Analyse risks M Evaluate risks Assess risks Treat risks
  • 5. Consequences q CAUSE EFFECT
  • 6. Consequences q CAUSE EFFECT
  • 7. Significant Trends g Major/Fatal M j /F l 1 Year of 2008, Dec 09 Jan 10, Minor 10 1 0 Property Damaged P t D d 30 2 [3] 2 285 21 600 Near Miss 2145 728 2000 ??? At Risk 20.000 Behavior & At Risk Conditions Frank E. Bird ratio; 1982
  • 8. Preventive Actions At Risk Behavior Incident Basic Causes & At Risk Injury Losses Conditions Occurred
  • 9. Gap Analysis p y Findings Fi di PTBC St d d Standard Inspections Yes; no CARs Compliances How far ? Understandings Only 50% Risk Assessment ASDAM; too general Awareness Mostly lack MSDS Yes; b t Y but no evidence id Implementations Very low
  • 10. OBJECTIVES The effort to prevent any loss and fatalities fatalities.
  • 11. Objectives j Commitments Implementations Engineering Control Document Control Measurement Involvement
  • 12. How to do it ? Raising of Sense Daily Commitment Management Touch Document Review g Sustainable Monitoring Duty of Care
  • 13. HAZARD CONTROL STANDARD was th b t practice the best ti approached to achieved our pp objective and target: a Prevention of Fatalities
  • 15. Thank you and Have a Safe W f Work Walk the Talk; Trust the Worthy; and Living Example.