˽cwmܣOSʽ 2011-2-15
?
1 like?542 views
The document discusses key performance indicators related to physical fitness and health over time. It shows graphs comparing metrics like average blood glucose and cholesterol levels between the United States and world from 2001-2010, with both seeing improvements. Other graphs show how measures like liver enzymes have decreased from 2003-2010, suggesting exercise may play a role. The document advocates for regular exercise, noting recommendations of 30 minutes daily at moderate intensity to maintain health and reduce disease risk factors.
˽cwmܣOSʽ 2011-2-15
- 6. <
- 7. <
- 14. ? ? ?
- 15. = ROE = t
- 16. = = area under curve >>
- 26. Fitness
- 27. Fitness -
- 30. > 30 min
- 31. ? ? ? ? 42 30 ? ?
- 32. ? ? ? ? 42 30 ? ?
- 33. KPI- (AC) (HbA1c) 140 8 130 7.5 120 7 World 110 6.5 USA 100 6 90 5.5 80 5 2001* 2002* 2003* 2004* 2005* 2006* 2007* 2008* 2009* 2010* Year
- 34. KPI- (AC) (HbA1c) 140 8 130 7.5 120 7 World 110 6.5 USA 100 6 90 5.5 80 5 2001* 2002* 2003* 2004* 2005* 2006* 2007* 2008* 2009* 2010* Year
- 35. KPI- (AC) (HbA1c) 140 8 ?# 1# 1# 130 MET MET MET 7.5 120 7 World 110 6.5 USA 100 6 90 5.5 80 5 2001* 2002* 2003* 2004* 2005* 2006* 2007* 2008* 2009* 2010* Year
- 36. KPI- (AC) (HbA1c) 140 8 ?# 1# 1# 130 MET MET MET 7.5 120 7 World 110 6.5 USA 100 6 90 5.5 80 5 2001* 2002* 2003* 2004* 2005* 2006* 2007* 2008* 2009* 2010* Year
- 37. KPI- (AC) (HbA1c) 140 8 ?# 1# 1# 130 MET MET MET 7.5 120 7 World 110 6.5 USA 100 6 90 5.5 80 5 2001* 2002* 2003* 2004* 2005* 2006* 2007* 2008* 2009* 2010* Year
- 38. KPI- (AC) (HbA1c) 140 8 ?# 1# 1# 130 MET MET MET 7.5 120 7 World 110 6.5 USA 100 6 90 5.5 80 5 2001* 2002* 2003* 2004* 2005* 2006* 2007* 2008* 2009* 2010* Year
- 39. KPI- GOT GPT 90 ?# 1# 1# 80 MET MET MET 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2003** 2004** 2005** 2006** 2007** 2008** 2009** 2010**
- 40. KPI- GOT GPT 90 ?# 1# 1# 80 MET MET MET 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2003** 2004** 2005** 2006** 2007** 2008** 2009** 2010**
- 41. 74 Kg 42 y/o
- 42. 74 Kg 42 y/o 67 Kg 52 y/o
- 44. ? ? ?
- 45. Fit, or die!
- 46. Fit, or retire! 30 60 90 120
- 47. 30 60 90 120
- 48. 30 60 90 120
- 49. 30 60 90 120
- 50. 30 60 90 120
- 51. Fit to aspire! 30 60 90 120 Fries J, New Engl J Med 1980;303:130-5
- 52. Fit to aspire! 30 60 90 120 Fries J, New Engl J Med 1980;303:130-5
- 53. Fit to aspire! 30 60 90 120 Fries J, New Engl J Med 1980;303:130-5
- 54. Fit to aspire! 30 60 90 120 Fries J, New Engl J Med 1980;303:130-5
- 55. Yesterday when Darling I am I was young growing older 20 40
- 56. Yesterday when Today while the I was young blossom is cling 20 50
- 58. ?
- 59. ?
- 61. 13 31
- 62. 13 31
- 63. 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33%
- 64. 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33%
- 65. ? (apoptosis) 33% 33% ? (aging process) ? (anti-aging) 33%
- 66. ? ? = ? ? ? (aging process)
- 67. ? ? = ? ? (apoptosis) ? (aging process)
- 68. ? ? = ? ? (apoptosis) ? (aging process) (anti-aging)
- 69. ? ? = ? ? ?
- 70. ? rapid sequence model! infusion model ? (start low, go slow!) (induction) (maintenance)
- 71. ? ? ?
- 72. :
- 73. F.I.T. Frequency Intensity Time
- 74. Total Volume of Work Sets Repetitions Resistance
- 75. KPI
- 80. Equity Premium
- 81. Equity Premium
- 82. (2007) (2008) >5 > 150 >3 > 30 (> 10 ) > 30 >3 > 75 130* > 20 (> 10 )
- 83. (2007) (2008) > > -- 8-10 -- > -- -- 8-12 8-12 --
- 84. 100 80 60 <90 <210 >210 40 % 20 60-70%
- 85. 100 80 60 <90 <210 >210 40 % 20 60-70%
- 86. 100 80 VO2 60 <90 <210 >210 40 % 20 60-70%
- 87. 100 80 VO2 60 <90 <210 >210 40 % 20 60-70%
- 88. ? ? ? ?
- 91. ?= (muscle strengthening ) ?= (resistance training ) ? ? Never sacri?ce form for weight
- 92. ? ? ? ? ? ?
- 93. ? ?
- 94. ? ? ?
- 95. ? ? ?
- 96. = No. 1=
- 97. = No. 1=
- 101. 363;8 August 19, 2010
- 102. Fibromylagia
- 103. Primary Endpoint Fibromylagia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) (0-100) Total Score = 0-100
- 105. 63