ºÝºÝߣ

ºÝºÝߣShare a Scribd company logo

2012 Academic Achievement Report

?Download as PPTX, PDF?
?
J
Jay Marino

The data is used to guide continuous improvement efforts. Teachers and administrators carefully examine performance trends to identify strengths and needs at the student, classroom, school and district level. This informs targeted interventions, curriculum revisions, and instructional goal-setting to help all students succeed.

1 of 28
Download to read offline
October 2012 Annual District Progress Report 2012
Goal #1: To continually improve student growth and achievement
20 Year Historical Enrollment Data 4500 4080 4000 3701 3582 3500 3412 3270 3028 3000 2920 2753 2608 2451 2500 2365 22062270 20112089 2000 1904187618731940 18271860 1500 1000 500 0
Ethnicity Trend Data 100 90 86.7 86.6 85.4 84.1 81.8 81.2 80 78.5 76.9 76.4 74.2 74.1 70 60 50 40 30 20 14.5 10 4.6 5.8 5 2.8 2.2 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 White Black Hispanic Asian
Percent Free and Reduced Lunch 10 9 8.7 8.1 8 7 5.8 6 6 5.6 5.4 5.1 5.3 5.2 5.3 5 4 4 3 2 1 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Percent of IEP Students 15 14 13 12.3 12 11.9 11.9 12 12 12 11.5 11 10.7 10.7 10.8 10 10 9 8 7 6 5 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Number of ELL Students 200 173 179 180 154 160 140 123 120 103 100 88 80 60 47 40 31 20 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Trend Performance for All State Tests/All Grades/All Subjects 100 92 92 93 93 92.2 90 91 90 84 87 82 83 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
2012 Academic Achievement Report
2012 District Assessment Results ? ISAT: Criterion Referenced Exam based upon Illinois Learning Standards and indicators ? PSAE: Combined Work Keys and ACT Scores ? ACT: American College Testing ? AP Data: Advanced Placement
2012 ISAT Reading Performance 100 93 97 95 95 97 92 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 3rd grade 4th grade 5th grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade
Reading Trends for All Students 100 96 96 95 95 93 94 93 98 95 97 96 96 96 94 92 90 80 70 60 2008 50 2009 2010 40 2011 30 2012 20 10 0 3rd grade 4th grade 5th grade
Reading Trend Performance 100 92 93 95 96 95 91 91 96 95 95 97 96 9699 97 90 80 70 60 2008 50 2009 2010 40 2011 30 2012 20 10 0 6th grade 7th grade 8th grade
2012 ISAT Math Performance 100 96 98 95 96 95 98 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 3rd grade 4th grade 5th grade 6th grade 7th grade 8th grade
Math Trend Performance 100 99 97 99 96 96 98 98 99 98 98 95 96 94 9595 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 3rd grade 4th grade 5th grade 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Math Trend Performance 100 96 96 95 97 94 93 98 98 95 96 96 96 9798 96 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 6th grade 7th grade 8th grade 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Science Trend Data 100 97 96 98 97 96 94 97 97 96 90 87 80 70 60 2008 2009 50 2010 40 2011 30 2012 20 10 0 4th grade 7th grade
Class of 2012 ACT Performance 25 24.6 24.5 24.4 24.2 24.1 24.0 24 23.5 23 Composite 22.5 22 21.5 21 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Students Meeting College Readiness Benchmarks 100 90 90 80 75 74 70 65 60 57 50 47 44 Dunlap 40 State 30 30 20 10 0 English (18) Reading (21) Math (22) Science (24)
ACT Trend Scores (2008/2012) 25 24.8 24.6 24.6 24.5 24.5 24.5 24.2 24.2 24 24 23.9 23.5 23.5 23 2008 2012 22.5 22 21.5 21 English Reading Math Science Composite
2012 PSAE Performance 100 90 80 80 70 78 75 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Reading Math Science
PSAE Trend Performance 100 90 80 78 80 73 76 75 75 70 2007 60 2008 50 2009 2010 40 2011 30 2012 20 10 0 Reading Math Science
Advanced Placement Trend Scores 250 237 200 176 147 150 126 108 100 74 50 0 AP Students AP Exams Scores of 3+ 2008 2012 Number of Students
2012 Academic Achievement Report
No Child Left Behind (2001) requires: ?95% of all students in grades 3-8 and 11th grades be assessed (District 99.5%) ?Schools meet the 91% attendance rate for elementary and middle schools (District 95.7%) ?High Schools meet the minimum of 82% graduation rate (District 88.6%) ?All students meet the minimum AYP (85% ) ?All subgroups (45 students or more) meet AYP (85%) ?White, Black, Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander, Native America, Multi-Racial/Ethnic, Limited English Proficient, Students with Disabilities, and Economically Disadvantaged
NCLB Adequate Yearly Progress
2012 District Performance All White Asian African American IEP Low SES 100 92 93 92 94 95 97 90 82 87 80 80 AYP Minimum 71 74 70 67 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Reading Math
How is the data used? ? Continuous improvement! ? Data is reviewed by teachers/administrators to examine: ? Student performance by school/grade level ? Individual student performance ? Curricular strengths/needs ? Instructional strengths/needs ? The data is combined with other District assessments ? PLC teams identify students in need of additional support ? Curriculum Council examines curricular/instructional gaps ? Building Leadership Teams set instructional goals for the school ? Interventions are provided for students ? Curricular/Instructional changes are made as appropriate

More Related Content

2012 Academic Achievement Report

  • 2. Goal #1: To continually improve student growth and achievement
  • 3. 20 Year Historical Enrollment Data 4500 4080 4000 3701 3582 3500 3412 3270 3028 3000 2920 2753 2608 2451 2500 2365 22062270 20112089 2000 1904187618731940 18271860 1500 1000 500 0
  • 4. Ethnicity Trend Data 100 90 86.7 86.6 85.4 84.1 81.8 81.2 80 78.5 76.9 76.4 74.2 74.1 70 60 50 40 30 20 14.5 10 4.6 5.8 5 2.8 2.2 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 White Black Hispanic Asian
  • 5. Percent Free and Reduced Lunch 10 9 8.7 8.1 8 7 5.8 6 6 5.6 5.4 5.1 5.3 5.2 5.3 5 4 4 3 2 1 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
  • 6. Percent of IEP Students 15 14 13 12.3 12 11.9 11.9 12 12 12 11.5 11 10.7 10.7 10.8 10 10 9 8 7 6 5 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
  • 7. Number of ELL Students 200 173 179 180 154 160 140 123 120 103 100 88 80 60 47 40 31 20 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
  • 8. Trend Performance for All State Tests/All Grades/All Subjects 100 92 92 93 93 92.2 90 91 90 84 87 82 83 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
  • 10. 2012 District Assessment Results ? ISAT: Criterion Referenced Exam based upon Illinois Learning Standards and indicators ? PSAE: Combined Work Keys and ACT Scores ? ACT: American College Testing ? AP Data: Advanced Placement
  • 11. 2012 ISAT Reading Performance 100 93 97 95 95 97 92 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 3rd grade 4th grade 5th grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade
  • 12. Reading Trends for All Students 100 96 96 95 95 93 94 93 98 95 97 96 96 96 94 92 90 80 70 60 2008 50 2009 2010 40 2011 30 2012 20 10 0 3rd grade 4th grade 5th grade
  • 13. Reading Trend Performance 100 92 93 95 96 95 91 91 96 95 95 97 96 9699 97 90 80 70 60 2008 50 2009 2010 40 2011 30 2012 20 10 0 6th grade 7th grade 8th grade
  • 14. 2012 ISAT Math Performance 100 96 98 95 96 95 98 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 3rd grade 4th grade 5th grade 6th grade 7th grade 8th grade
  • 15. Math Trend Performance 100 99 97 99 96 96 98 98 99 98 98 95 96 94 9595 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 3rd grade 4th grade 5th grade 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
  • 16. Math Trend Performance 100 96 96 95 97 94 93 98 98 95 96 96 96 9798 96 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 6th grade 7th grade 8th grade 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
  • 17. Science Trend Data 100 97 96 98 97 96 94 97 97 96 90 87 80 70 60 2008 2009 50 2010 40 2011 30 2012 20 10 0 4th grade 7th grade
  • 18. Class of 2012 ACT Performance 25 24.6 24.5 24.4 24.2 24.1 24.0 24 23.5 23 Composite 22.5 22 21.5 21 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
  • 19. Students Meeting College Readiness Benchmarks 100 90 90 80 75 74 70 65 60 57 50 47 44 Dunlap 40 State 30 30 20 10 0 English (18) Reading (21) Math (22) Science (24)
  • 20. ACT Trend Scores (2008/2012) 25 24.8 24.6 24.6 24.5 24.5 24.5 24.2 24.2 24 24 23.9 23.5 23.5 23 2008 2012 22.5 22 21.5 21 English Reading Math Science Composite
  • 21. 2012 PSAE Performance 100 90 80 80 70 78 75 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Reading Math Science
  • 22. PSAE Trend Performance 100 90 80 78 80 73 76 75 75 70 2007 60 2008 50 2009 2010 40 2011 30 2012 20 10 0 Reading Math Science
  • 23. Advanced Placement Trend Scores 250 237 200 176 147 150 126 108 100 74 50 0 AP Students AP Exams Scores of 3+ 2008 2012 Number of Students
  • 25. No Child Left Behind (2001) requires: ?95% of all students in grades 3-8 and 11th grades be assessed (District 99.5%) ?Schools meet the 91% attendance rate for elementary and middle schools (District 95.7%) ?High Schools meet the minimum of 82% graduation rate (District 88.6%) ?All students meet the minimum AYP (85% ) ?All subgroups (45 students or more) meet AYP (85%) ?White, Black, Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander, Native America, Multi-Racial/Ethnic, Limited English Proficient, Students with Disabilities, and Economically Disadvantaged
  • 27. 2012 District Performance All White Asian African American IEP Low SES 100 92 93 92 94 95 97 90 82 87 80 80 AYP Minimum 71 74 70 67 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Reading Math
  • 28. How is the data used? ? Continuous improvement! ? Data is reviewed by teachers/administrators to examine: ? Student performance by school/grade level ? Individual student performance ? Curricular strengths/needs ? Instructional strengths/needs ? The data is combined with other District assessments ? PLC teams identify students in need of additional support ? Curriculum Council examines curricular/instructional gaps ? Building Leadership Teams set instructional goals for the school ? Interventions are provided for students ? Curricular/Instructional changes are made as appropriate

Editor's Notes

  • #4: As you know, we are constantly involved in facility enhancements to accommodate the increased enrollment. In the past few years we completed phase 1 renovations at the high school and completed over 5M in athletic and facility upgrades on the middle school campuses and high school.
  • #15: In general math performance in all groups are greater than reading.
  • #22: Reading Scores were the highest of the areas tested.
  • #28: State percentages needed