際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
COL Christopher Cross
Army Capabilities Integration Center
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command
The Challenge  Will Todays Investments Secure the Future?
2020

2025

Beyond 2025
BN CMD

CO CMD

BDE CMD

Today  2014

The current path is
UNLIKELY to sustain
our current
competitive
advantage

CURRENT PATH
WEIGHTING ADAPTATION

PL

AND EVOLUTION
80% of the
Army of
2020 is in the
force, or in
the budget,
now.
Todays
security
capability rests
on 1990-2000s
investment

National
investments
drive
fundamental
political and
social changes 
and ensure US
advantage

Are our investments
focused to meet the
needs of the Nation? 
must influence events at
the speed they unfold 
with less

Capability

ALTERNATIVE PATH
WEIGHTING INNOVATION

1

The Innovation path
is more LIKELY to
sustain / increase
our effectiveness

By 2025 we are at risk of
overmatch

Time

Mid-term must focus on providing leaner , more capable, expeditionary units to maintain overmatch
The far-term will deliver technologies that fundamentally change the nature of the force and how we fight
03 Feb 2014

2
Imperatives for Change: Emerging Threats and the
Need to be Expeditionary
We Need An Expeditionary, Scalable & Ready
Modern Army (From CSA Priorities, SEP 13)
- Train and equip the Total Army to rapidly deploy,

fight, sustain itself, and win against complex state
and non-state threats in austere environments and
rugged terrain (The expeditionary mindset).
- Support the Joint Force with critical enablers

such as aviation, intelligence, engineers, logistics,
medical, signal, and special operations, both while
enroute to, and operating within expeditionary
environments alongside Unified Action Partners.

- Rapidly deploy, fight, and win whenever and
wherever our national interests are threatened.

The Army will remain the most highly-trained and
professional All-Volunteer land force in the world;
uniquely organized with the capability and capacity to
provide expeditionary, decisive landpower to the Joint
Force (From CSA Priorities, SEP 13)

- Focus S&T investment to maximize the potential
of emerging game-changing landpower
technologies to counter emerging threats.

We must rebalance now to prevent overmatch and to provide new capabilities for the future force
3
Ready for the Future: Considerations for 2025 & Beyond
The Army is in transition and must balance investments in readiness with
increased capabilities for 2025 & beyond
Innovation , Investment
and Time to Mitigate
Risk from Force
Reductions

POTENTIAL
OVERMATCH ADVANTAGE
(with investment &
innovation)

Force 2025
ARMY 2020
A more globally
responsive force,
capable of decisive
action across the
ROMO

2014

Field Army 2020, while
focusing on Force 2025 and
rebalancing S&T

2040

Beyond Force
2025
A fundamentally
changed force,
uniquely enabled and
organized to conduct
expeditionary
maneuver

A leaner, more
lethal,
expeditionary, and
agile force than
today
POTENTIAL
OVERMATCH RISK
Achieve Force 2025,
Maintain Overmatch and set
conditions for fundamental change

Achieve Force 2030-2040,
Potential to Fundamentally the
Change Army

ADAPT .... EVOLVE ... INNOVATE
To maintain our advantages and meet the demands of the emerging security environment,
DoD and the Army must take the long view, establishing an enduring, joint effort thru the
far term  While remaining prepared for the near-certainty that an unanticipated crisis will
arise that will require Army forces at an unforeseen time, manner and place
4
Where the Army Should Focus ... Next?

Campaign Seasons - Fixed
Fortifications
Small Armies as Capital
Investments
Emergence of Levee en Masse

Industry of War
Large Armies- Tactical and
Operational Durability
Emergence of Combined Arms
Warfare

Precision Weapons-GPS Navigation
Network-Common Operating Picture
Integration of Information and Joint
Effects

The next
Global
Technical Era?

Soldier Performance?
Strategic through Tactical
Nuclear Weapons
Wars of Limited Objective
Emergence of Revolutionary
Warfare

Beyond Digital?
Mobility, Lethality,
Protection, Materials?

Absent breakthroughs .... The technologies and systems of Army of 2030 are in our S&T
base today ... Leading to little change in the physical characteristics of that Army ...
DOD must recognize landpower is the US asymmetric advantage and make it the number
one Defense investment
5
Integrated S&T Lines of Effort
Attributes of an Expeditionary Force
LOE
Outcomes

S&T Lines of Effort

Mobile, Protected Platforms

Robotics

Logistics Optimization

Human Performance Optimization

Information to Decision

Cyber, EW, and Interoperability

Improved Lethality and Effects

Deploy globally and
rapidly; seize &
maintain initiative

Aviation

Increased lethality;
directed energy
weapons; mobile
ground launch

Reduced reliance on
ISBs and
Sustainment Forces
Extended reach;
increased lethality;
heavy lift

End State
The rapid
deployment of
scalable, tailored,
operationally and
tactically
significant forces
on short notice to
usually austere
locations in order
to conduct any
type of operation
immediately upon
arrival, often in
persistent antiaccess / area
denial
environments.

Materials & Manufacturing
Power & Energy; Energetics
Fundamental Science
Relevant intelligence to
points-of-need delivered at
the speed of change

Maximized individual and team
performance  Army
professionals, holistic fitness

Robotics enable and
augment humans;
mitigate risk
6
Mobile Protected Platforms
Heavy, expensive, large support reqs.

Tomorrow
 Balance of Mobility, Firepower, and
Protection
 Lighter, scalable protection that maximizes
occupant survivability in every operating
environment
 Lightweight, agile platforms that increase
options for employment of Strategic
Landpower
 Restored strategic responsiveness that
deters conflict and enables other elements
of national power
 360 degree protection that identifies,
prevents, and mitigates CBRN and
explosive hazards at standoff range and
maneuver speeds

Strategically & Tactically Mobile

Force 2025
 Enhanced Mobility for Airborne Infantry (MAI)
Ground Mobility Vehicle Ranger (GMV-R)
Phantom Badger
 Mobile Protected Firepower (MPF)
LAV 25 Family of vehicles
Up gunned Stryker

Beyond Force 2025
 Unmanned Air / Ground Vehicle Integration
Robotic Wingman
 Army Ground Vehicle (AGV)
30-ton Tank

Expeditionary, mobile, and agile units with the ability to arrive in theater first, with the most

7
Lethality
Lethal formations constrained by time,
terrain, distance, and uncertainty .

Tomorrow
 Extended range precision surface-to-air
and surface-to-surface fires that overcome
anti-access and area denial threats and
enable assured access to global commons
 Discriminant, scalable, tailorable effects
that achieve combatant commanders'
objectives while preventing fratricide and
minimizing collateral damages

 Renewable directed energy resulting in
bottomless munitions stowage and order
of magnitude standoff increase

Lethality, Mobility, and Survivability-balanced
formations that overcome terrain, distance, and
uncertainty.

Force 2025
 Dismounted Lethality
Counter Defilade Target Engagement (CDTE)
Precision Sniper Rifle
Individual Assault Munitions
 Indirect Lethal Effects
120mm High Explosive Guided Mortar

Beyond Force 2025
 Extended Range Precision Surface Fires
Land based Rail Gun
High Energy Explosives and Advanced propellants
 Increased Survivability of Key Assets
Mobile High Energy Lasers for Counter Rocket and Mortar

Expeditionary maneuver with decisive responsiveness to prevent overmatch
8

More Related Content

2014 wausa science and technology

  • 1. COL Christopher Cross Army Capabilities Integration Center U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command
  • 2. The Challenge Will Todays Investments Secure the Future? 2020 2025 Beyond 2025 BN CMD CO CMD BDE CMD Today 2014 The current path is UNLIKELY to sustain our current competitive advantage CURRENT PATH WEIGHTING ADAPTATION PL AND EVOLUTION 80% of the Army of 2020 is in the force, or in the budget, now. Todays security capability rests on 1990-2000s investment National investments drive fundamental political and social changes and ensure US advantage Are our investments focused to meet the needs of the Nation? must influence events at the speed they unfold with less Capability ALTERNATIVE PATH WEIGHTING INNOVATION 1 The Innovation path is more LIKELY to sustain / increase our effectiveness By 2025 we are at risk of overmatch Time Mid-term must focus on providing leaner , more capable, expeditionary units to maintain overmatch The far-term will deliver technologies that fundamentally change the nature of the force and how we fight 03 Feb 2014 2
  • 3. Imperatives for Change: Emerging Threats and the Need to be Expeditionary We Need An Expeditionary, Scalable & Ready Modern Army (From CSA Priorities, SEP 13) - Train and equip the Total Army to rapidly deploy, fight, sustain itself, and win against complex state and non-state threats in austere environments and rugged terrain (The expeditionary mindset). - Support the Joint Force with critical enablers such as aviation, intelligence, engineers, logistics, medical, signal, and special operations, both while enroute to, and operating within expeditionary environments alongside Unified Action Partners. - Rapidly deploy, fight, and win whenever and wherever our national interests are threatened. The Army will remain the most highly-trained and professional All-Volunteer land force in the world; uniquely organized with the capability and capacity to provide expeditionary, decisive landpower to the Joint Force (From CSA Priorities, SEP 13) - Focus S&T investment to maximize the potential of emerging game-changing landpower technologies to counter emerging threats. We must rebalance now to prevent overmatch and to provide new capabilities for the future force 3
  • 4. Ready for the Future: Considerations for 2025 & Beyond The Army is in transition and must balance investments in readiness with increased capabilities for 2025 & beyond Innovation , Investment and Time to Mitigate Risk from Force Reductions POTENTIAL OVERMATCH ADVANTAGE (with investment & innovation) Force 2025 ARMY 2020 A more globally responsive force, capable of decisive action across the ROMO 2014 Field Army 2020, while focusing on Force 2025 and rebalancing S&T 2040 Beyond Force 2025 A fundamentally changed force, uniquely enabled and organized to conduct expeditionary maneuver A leaner, more lethal, expeditionary, and agile force than today POTENTIAL OVERMATCH RISK Achieve Force 2025, Maintain Overmatch and set conditions for fundamental change Achieve Force 2030-2040, Potential to Fundamentally the Change Army ADAPT .... EVOLVE ... INNOVATE To maintain our advantages and meet the demands of the emerging security environment, DoD and the Army must take the long view, establishing an enduring, joint effort thru the far term While remaining prepared for the near-certainty that an unanticipated crisis will arise that will require Army forces at an unforeseen time, manner and place 4
  • 5. Where the Army Should Focus ... Next? Campaign Seasons - Fixed Fortifications Small Armies as Capital Investments Emergence of Levee en Masse Industry of War Large Armies- Tactical and Operational Durability Emergence of Combined Arms Warfare Precision Weapons-GPS Navigation Network-Common Operating Picture Integration of Information and Joint Effects The next Global Technical Era? Soldier Performance? Strategic through Tactical Nuclear Weapons Wars of Limited Objective Emergence of Revolutionary Warfare Beyond Digital? Mobility, Lethality, Protection, Materials? Absent breakthroughs .... The technologies and systems of Army of 2030 are in our S&T base today ... Leading to little change in the physical characteristics of that Army ... DOD must recognize landpower is the US asymmetric advantage and make it the number one Defense investment 5
  • 6. Integrated S&T Lines of Effort Attributes of an Expeditionary Force LOE Outcomes S&T Lines of Effort Mobile, Protected Platforms Robotics Logistics Optimization Human Performance Optimization Information to Decision Cyber, EW, and Interoperability Improved Lethality and Effects Deploy globally and rapidly; seize & maintain initiative Aviation Increased lethality; directed energy weapons; mobile ground launch Reduced reliance on ISBs and Sustainment Forces Extended reach; increased lethality; heavy lift End State The rapid deployment of scalable, tailored, operationally and tactically significant forces on short notice to usually austere locations in order to conduct any type of operation immediately upon arrival, often in persistent antiaccess / area denial environments. Materials & Manufacturing Power & Energy; Energetics Fundamental Science Relevant intelligence to points-of-need delivered at the speed of change Maximized individual and team performance Army professionals, holistic fitness Robotics enable and augment humans; mitigate risk 6
  • 7. Mobile Protected Platforms Heavy, expensive, large support reqs. Tomorrow Balance of Mobility, Firepower, and Protection Lighter, scalable protection that maximizes occupant survivability in every operating environment Lightweight, agile platforms that increase options for employment of Strategic Landpower Restored strategic responsiveness that deters conflict and enables other elements of national power 360 degree protection that identifies, prevents, and mitigates CBRN and explosive hazards at standoff range and maneuver speeds Strategically & Tactically Mobile Force 2025 Enhanced Mobility for Airborne Infantry (MAI) Ground Mobility Vehicle Ranger (GMV-R) Phantom Badger Mobile Protected Firepower (MPF) LAV 25 Family of vehicles Up gunned Stryker Beyond Force 2025 Unmanned Air / Ground Vehicle Integration Robotic Wingman Army Ground Vehicle (AGV) 30-ton Tank Expeditionary, mobile, and agile units with the ability to arrive in theater first, with the most 7
  • 8. Lethality Lethal formations constrained by time, terrain, distance, and uncertainty . Tomorrow Extended range precision surface-to-air and surface-to-surface fires that overcome anti-access and area denial threats and enable assured access to global commons Discriminant, scalable, tailorable effects that achieve combatant commanders' objectives while preventing fratricide and minimizing collateral damages Renewable directed energy resulting in bottomless munitions stowage and order of magnitude standoff increase Lethality, Mobility, and Survivability-balanced formations that overcome terrain, distance, and uncertainty. Force 2025 Dismounted Lethality Counter Defilade Target Engagement (CDTE) Precision Sniper Rifle Individual Assault Munitions Indirect Lethal Effects 120mm High Explosive Guided Mortar Beyond Force 2025 Extended Range Precision Surface Fires Land based Rail Gun High Energy Explosives and Advanced propellants Increased Survivability of Key Assets Mobile High Energy Lasers for Counter Rocket and Mortar Expeditionary maneuver with decisive responsiveness to prevent overmatch 8