This document summarizes a presentation on how to evaluate whether to bid on a government contract opportunity or not. It discusses the costs associated with bidding and having a low win rate. It provides questions to consider around the opportunity, competition, and likelihood of winning. A case study of a communications company that bid and lost is presented, along with lessons learned. Finally, it recommends creating a customized bid/no bid checklist to help systematically evaluate opportunities.
1 of 29
More Related Content
20160519 Wired -- How to tell, Bid or NoBid, What Next -- by Judy Bradt of Summit Insight --703 627 1074
6. RFPs Require
PerfecLon on every page
≒ Exact page count, the right font
≒ Correct desLnaLon
≒ On Lme, precise format as instructed
For exactly what they request no more, no less:
≒ The Forms, Past Performance, Technical, Management Plan
≒ The soluLon exactly as they told you they wanted
≒ In the format they need
to jusLfy choosing you.
PAINFUL
7. Why do Bid-NoBid decisions matter?
FBO.gov RFPs average 269 days to award.
Your response could take...
≒ 30 - 90 days, 4 people
≒ $101.56 / hour x 40 hours/week
≒ x 4 weeks x 4 people = $65,000!
Plus opportunity cost!
13. Wired For A CompeLtor? Symptoms
To Watch Symptom What to think about
Incumbent How happy is agency with their vendor?
Set Aside Favor the incumbent? Changed at the last minute?
Proprietary Technology Advantage to those who have the technology
Poorly wri]en RFP Favors incumbent that knows what the buyer wants
Key Personnel Emphasis Can you re-hire incumbent sta鍖 if you win?
Speci鍖c Past Performance
Emphasis
Does it favor incumbent?
Under 30 days to bid Big project? Strong compeLtors have already started.
RPF out on a Friday Advantage to those who know its coming
No pre-solicitaLon Advantage to incumbent if the contract is large
RFP/SOW wri]en by
incumbent
Check the properLes of the document you download
Odd or changed NAICS
code
Selected to allow a larger-sized small business?
Non-germane
requirements
Are they relevant to contract performance?
15. Case Study: Bid- NoBid?
Kim Plyler, Founder & CEO
The Story
≒ The buyer: Department of Defense
≒ The project: Military voLng
≒ The history:
≒ Cyclic contract
≒ Previous incumbent
≒ Previous award amount unknown
16. Case Study: Bid-NoBid?
The Opportunity
≒ New project
≒ Sources sought
≒ Firm 鍖xed-price RFP; base plus 2 years opLon
≒ Ideal awardee must have prime past performance
≒ The strategy
≒ Buying o鍖ce relaLonships 9-10 months ahead
≒ Related past performance as subcontractor
≒ QUERIED MAJOR CONCERN:
Prime past performance
≒ Therefore Researched potenLal teaming partners
≒ The proposal
≒ O鍖er as prime, with another known contractor
18. Case Study:
From Losing Bid To Winning Effort
Elements to consider
≒ New primes known
weaknesses
≒ Gap & surge capacity
opportuniLes
≒ Other projects
≒ RelaLonship culLvaLon
≒ OpLon years might not
happen
What else?
23. Thank You For Joining Us!
Judy Bradt, CEO
≒ 28 years U.S. federal contracts expert
≒ Author, Advisor, Educator
≒ Instructor for PTACs, SBDCs & SBA
≒ 2011 SBA Women in Business Champion
≒ Corporate Professional Services
≒ Federal compeLLve analysis
≒ U.S. federal sales training
≒ Custom data-driven federal sales contact plans
≒ Strategy implementaLon support
NaLonal Partner
28. Thank You To Our
Special Guest
Kim Plyler, Founder & CEO
Navy Veteran
Former Contrac>ng O鍖cer
Full Service Communica>ons
≒ Integrated CommunicaLons Planning
≒ Social Media Management
≒ Web Design & SEO
≒ Public & Media RelaLons
≒ Government RelaLons
≒ Crisis CommunicaLons
≒ Event Management
Kim@SahlComm.com
(484) 353-9859