3 Types of Argument.pdf for effective comunication
0 likes6 views
The document explains three types of arguments: classical, Rogerian, and Toulmin, detailing their structures and when to use them. Classical arguments follow a specific format including an introduction, background, proposition, proof, refutation, and conclusion, while Rogerian arguments emphasize understanding opposing views and finding common ground. Toulmin's argument model consists of data, claim, warrants, qualifiers, rebuttals, and backing, focusing on logical reasoning and evidence in argumentation.
1 of 16
Download to read offline
Ad
Recommended
How to use this template To use this template, replace the inst.docx
How to use this template To use this template, replace the inst.docxwellesleyterresa
油
This document provides a guide for writing academic arguments, outlining the essential elements such as claim, evidence, counterargument, and rebuttal. It describes two main types of argument stylesclassic (Aristotelian) and consensual (Rogerian)along with their structures and features. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of understanding rhetorical situations and appeals to effectively engage an audience.13-Ling-21---Lecture-6---Logical-Fallacies-I.ppt
13-Ling-21---Lecture-6---Logical-Fallacies-I.pptMShah32
油
This document covers logical fallacies and their classifications, emphasizing the distinction between fallacies of relevance and insufficient evidence. It details examples of common fallacies, such as ad hominem attacks, straw man arguments, and bandwagon appeals, along with explanations of their mechanisms. The text serves as a guide to understanding flawed reasoning in arguments and the importance of recognizing these fallacies in discourse.Write an exposition or discussion on a familiar issue
Write an exposition or discussion on a familiar issueRjhayCastillo2
油
The document discusses the classification of statements as claims of fact, value, or policy, with examples provided for each type. It also outlines the objectives and structural elements of expository texts, including how to write an expository essay and various types of exposition. Additionally, it describes patterns of idea development such as cause and effect, comparison and contrast, and problem and solution.Argumentative Essay Structureeee(5).pptx
Argumentative Essay Structureeee(5).pptxsemihcaglar28
油
The document provides an overview of argumentative essays, detailing their structure, including the necessity for a clear thesis and logical transitions. It explores the types of claims that can be made, methods for organizing arguments using the Toulmin method, and the importance of employing rhetorical strategies such as logos, ethos, and pathos. Additionally, it addresses common logical fallacies to avoid in persuasive writing.Rhetoric, rhetoric, rhetoric
Rhetoric, rhetoric, rhetoricJameson Hogan
油
This video discusses argumentation and rhetorical analysis. It introduces key concepts for constructing arguments, including premises, conclusions, and logical reasoning. Syllogisms are presented as a way to structure arguments logically. The Toulmin model is also introduced as a framework for developing claims, grounds, warrants, backing, rebuttals, and qualifiers. Partners are asked to choose a topic and construct both a syllogism and a full argument using the Toulmin model to analyze different perspectives on the issue. The video also covers the rhetorical situation, explaining how to analyze a text based on its elements of text, reader, author, constraints, and exigence.Inventing arguments chap 1 2
Inventing arguments chap 1 2palderman
油
The document discusses the key elements of an argument, including a claim supported by evidence. It defines argument, rhetoric, and the rhetorical situation. It also outlines the common structures and logical fallacies seen in arguments. The main components are a claim, grounds or evidence to support the claim, and consideration of alternative positions or rebuttals to the claim.Argumentation 111312
Argumentation 111312professorreyes
油
The document provides an overview of argumentation and persuasion techniques for academic papers. It discusses developing a thesis, addressing opposing viewpoints, using logical reasoning and credible evidence to support claims, and avoiding logical fallacies. The document outlines plans for upcoming class meetings and assignments, and strategies for crafting persuasive arguments tailored to different audience types.Writing Assignment 3 Prompt Description In this writ.docx
Writing Assignment 3 Prompt Description In this writ.docxambersalomon88660
油
The document outlines a writing assignment focused on detecting rhetoric, bad definitions, and fallacies in arguments, providing specific tasks for students. It includes guidelines for identifying rhetorical devices, assessing definitions for clarity, and recognizing various informal fallacies. The assignment aims to enhance students' critical thinking skills by helping them recognize and reject irrational arguments.Rhetorical situation power point
Rhetorical situation power pointsblarge
油
The document discusses the rhetorical situation, which includes the author, audience, context, purpose, topic, and genre of a communication. It explains that the author considers their beliefs and credibility, while the audience's values and viewpoints are important to understand. Context includes the situation prompting a need for change or argument. Purpose can be to persuade, inform, analyze, entertain, describe, or request. Rhetorical strategies like appeals to ethos, pathos, and logos are examined, along with logical techniques and considerations for organization, structure, and language choice.Argument vocab
Argument vocabBrianna Orr
油
The document defines key terms related to argumentation and rhetoric. It discusses Aristotle's rhetorical triangle of pathos, ethos, and logos. It then defines additional terms such as argument, evidence, warrant, rhetoric, fallacies, and components of the Toulmin method of argumentation. Videos are provided as examples for some of the terms.The argument paragraph 091
The argument paragraph 091Karen Wright
油
The document provides guidance on writing an effective argument paper. It should begin with an introductory paragraph that sets up a debatable topic and thesis. The body should provide background information, reasons supporting the thesis with examples, and anticipate and rebut opposing positions. The conclusion should call the reader to action without an abrupt ending. Tone should be fair, credible, and avoid exaggeration.LING 281Template Sentences for Paper 1Templates for the au.docx
LING 281Template Sentences for Paper 1Templates for the au.docxmanningchassidy
油
The document discusses the reasons behind people's susceptibility to fake news, attributing it to either cognitive rationalization driven by political biases or a lack of critical thinking skills. Researchers argue for a dual approach, acknowledging that both rationalization and mental laziness contribute to the issue, and emphasize the importance of improving people's reasoning abilities to combat misinformation. Successful essays on this topic should analyze the author's argument structure, audience, and supporting evidence while incorporating insights from recent psychological studies.introduction to critical thinking.ppt
introduction to critical thinking.pptEmilyn Marinas
油
Critical thinking involves systematically evaluating beliefs and statements using rational standards. It examines life through examining one's beliefs, as Socrates said an unexamined life is not worth living. Critical thinking uses distinct procedures like identifying claims, premises, conclusions, and arguments to rationally assess existing beliefs and form new ones. Common impediments include self-interested, group, and subjective thinking. Deductive arguments aim to conclusively support conclusions while inductive arguments probably support conclusions. Fallacies involve irrelevant or unacceptable premises while various reasoning patterns help strengthen arguments.Writing Arguments
Writing ArgumentsGayla Keesee
油
This document provides a comprehensive guide to writing argumentative essays, outlining essential components such as claims, supports, organization patterns, and common logical fallacies. It includes specific types of claims (fact, value, policy), types of evidence, and a checklist for evaluating arguments and counterarguments. The tutorial emphasizes effective structuring while recognizing that alternative approaches may also be valid.Crafting an argument
Crafting an argumentpernak
油
The document discusses strategies for crafting an effective argument. It outlines the key rhetorical strategies of logos, ethos, and pathos and how to establish each within an argument. Logos relies on logic and reasoning through inductive or deductive techniques. Ethos establishes the author's credibility, and pathos makes an emotional appeal. The document also reviews elements of an argument like claims, evidence, assumptions, counterclaims, and rebuttals. It provides guidance on choosing a topic, considering the audience, and organizing the argument.Fallacies
FallaciesCharlotte Howe
油
This document discusses common logical fallacies that weaken arguments. It defines several types of fallacies such as hasty generalization, oversimplification, slippery slope, false analogy, begging the question, post hoc, and ad hominem. Examples are provided for each fallacy type. The document also prompts readers to identify the fallacy in several example arguments.Argumentative Writing
Argumentative Writinglisamulka
油
This document provides an overview of argumentative writing elements and structures for students in a WRIT 122 college course. It defines key elements like claims, reasons, evidence and addressing opposition. It also explains the structures of Toulmin, classical and Rogerian arguments, highlighting their different components and approaches. The document aims to help students learn and apply these concepts in their own argumentative writing.academic writing class notes.docx
academic writing class notes.docxmaryanneGatumbi
油
This document discusses how to write a classical argument. It will cover identifying classical arguments, using Toulmin's model of argument to plan essays, checking reliability of sources, and using rhetorical appeals. Learners will be able to write a 500-word argumentative essay using these techniques after reviewing counterarguments and concessions. The document also explains classical argument structure, the Toulmin model, and responding to alternative views.Constructing Reasonable Academic Arguments
Constructing Reasonable Academic Argumentsvlequire
油
This document provides guidance on constructing reasonable academic arguments. It discusses what constitutes a reasonable argument, establishes the four pillars of argument as thesis, evidence, refutation, and concluding statement. It then examines each pillar in detail, providing examples and guidelines. For thesis statements, it suggests establishing credibility and taking a debatable but not too aggressive stance. For evidence, it emphasizes using facts, statistics, and expert opinions. For refutation, it advises anticipating and counter opposing arguments. The document also identifies common logical fallacies to avoid and concludes by reminding readers that persuasive arguments require intelligence and decency.Making an argument presentation by duke university writing center
Making an argument presentation by duke university writing centerChristina McCleanhan
油
Orwell argues that modern English, especially in writing, contains bad linguistic habits that impair clear thought. He claims these habits have spread through imitation and can be avoided through conscious effort. Orwell reasons that removing these habits allows one to think more clearly, and clear thought is necessary for political progress. He uses examples from his own writing and the works of others to support this claim and acknowledge potential counterarguments.揃 NOTE Essay # 2 should combine the strategies you have learned i.docx
揃 NOTE Essay # 2 should combine the strategies you have learned i.docxLynellBull52
油
The document outlines the requirements for essay #2, which focuses on convincing and persuading, utilizing strategies from chapters 9 and 10 of the textbook. It emphasizes proper MLA formatting, including in-text citations, a works cited page, and the necessity to use material from both textbook readings and library sources. The essay should be argumentative, structured with an introduction, history of the issue, detailed evidence, and a conclusion, while appealing to the audience's ethos, logos, and pathos.Rhetoric and logic and argumentation
Rhetoric and logic and argumentationpvenglishteach
油
This document provides an overview of rhetoric, logic, and argumentation. It discusses key concepts like the rhetorical triangle of ethos, pathos, and logos. It also examines rhetorical devices, cognitive biases, deductive and inductive arguments, logical fallacies, and the differences between valid, sound, and fallacious reasoning.Judging the Validity of the Evidence Listened to L2.pptx
Judging the Validity of the Evidence Listened to L2.pptxJoshuaLanderSoquitaC
油
Judging the Validity of the Evidence Listened to L2.pptxArgument+rhetoric+ppt
Argument+rhetoric+pptandrewoleary1993
油
This document provides information on argumentation and the structure of argument essays. It defines argumentation as appealing to reason by connecting evidence in a logical chain to lead readers to an intended conclusion. There are four main types of arguments: definition, evaluation, cause-effect, and proposal. A good argument topic must be specific, controversial, researchable, rational, and relatable. An argument essay follows a basic structure with a claim, support/evidence, refutation of counter-arguments, and a conclusion that reinforces the claim. The introduction should grab the reader, provide background, and state the thesis. The body should present logical evidence and refute opposing views. The conclusion restates the key points and supports the thesis.Module 7 Discussion Board Algebra1. What does it mean when s.docx
Module 7 Discussion Board Algebra1. What does it mean when s.docxmoirarandell
油
This document provides instructions for students to write a classical argument paper on an approved topic. It outlines the key elements of a classical argument, including: introducing the issue and opposing positions, presenting reasons and evidence to support the student's position, anticipating and refuting counterarguments, and concluding by emphasizing the importance of the issue. Students must write a minimum 1,200-1,500 word paper using at least 5 credible sources to both support their argument and refute opposing positions. The paper should follow standard argumentative structure and formatting guidelines provided.13 03 pers_logos_15ed_notes
13 03 pers_logos_15ed_notesturnercom
油
The document discusses the concept of logos, or logical appeals, in persuasive speaking. It defines logos as using reasoning and argument to persuade an audience. It explains Aristotle's three artistic proofs of persuasion - logos, ethos, and pathos. The document goes on to describe the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion, inductive vs deductive reasoning, the elements of an argument, different types of arguments including sign, example, analogy, and causation, and common fallacies in reasoning.Logical Fallacies and Arguments and Factual Evidences to Defend a Stand.pptx
Logical Fallacies and Arguments and Factual Evidences to Defend a Stand.pptxejamesmdavid
油
The document discusses logical fallacies and how to defend a position with strong arguments and evidence. It defines logical fallacies as errors in reasoning that weaken an argument. Some common fallacies explained are slippery slope, complex question, appeal to authority, bandwagon, attacking the person, hasty generalization, post hoc, straw man, inconsistency, and appeal to force. Guidelines are provided for developing a clear and well-supported position using claims, assessing opposing views, taking a firm stand, organizing arguments, and considering the audience.Fallacies notes
Fallacies notesLi Jing
油
This document defines and provides examples of logical fallacies, which are flawed arguments that contain mistakes in reasoning. It divides fallacies into two types - fallacies of relevance, where the premises are irrelevant to the conclusion, and fallacies of insufficient evidence, where the premises do not provide enough support for the conclusion. Specific fallacies of relevance discussed include personal attacks, appealing to motives, and straw man arguments. Fallacies of insufficient evidence covered include appeals to authority, hasty generalizations, slippery slopes, and weak analogies.More Related Content
Similar to 3 Types of Argument.pdf for effective comunication (20)
Rhetorical situation power point
Rhetorical situation power pointsblarge
油
The document discusses the rhetorical situation, which includes the author, audience, context, purpose, topic, and genre of a communication. It explains that the author considers their beliefs and credibility, while the audience's values and viewpoints are important to understand. Context includes the situation prompting a need for change or argument. Purpose can be to persuade, inform, analyze, entertain, describe, or request. Rhetorical strategies like appeals to ethos, pathos, and logos are examined, along with logical techniques and considerations for organization, structure, and language choice.Argument vocab
Argument vocabBrianna Orr
油
The document defines key terms related to argumentation and rhetoric. It discusses Aristotle's rhetorical triangle of pathos, ethos, and logos. It then defines additional terms such as argument, evidence, warrant, rhetoric, fallacies, and components of the Toulmin method of argumentation. Videos are provided as examples for some of the terms.The argument paragraph 091
The argument paragraph 091Karen Wright
油
The document provides guidance on writing an effective argument paper. It should begin with an introductory paragraph that sets up a debatable topic and thesis. The body should provide background information, reasons supporting the thesis with examples, and anticipate and rebut opposing positions. The conclusion should call the reader to action without an abrupt ending. Tone should be fair, credible, and avoid exaggeration.LING 281Template Sentences for Paper 1Templates for the au.docx
LING 281Template Sentences for Paper 1Templates for the au.docxmanningchassidy
油
The document discusses the reasons behind people's susceptibility to fake news, attributing it to either cognitive rationalization driven by political biases or a lack of critical thinking skills. Researchers argue for a dual approach, acknowledging that both rationalization and mental laziness contribute to the issue, and emphasize the importance of improving people's reasoning abilities to combat misinformation. Successful essays on this topic should analyze the author's argument structure, audience, and supporting evidence while incorporating insights from recent psychological studies.introduction to critical thinking.ppt
introduction to critical thinking.pptEmilyn Marinas
油
Critical thinking involves systematically evaluating beliefs and statements using rational standards. It examines life through examining one's beliefs, as Socrates said an unexamined life is not worth living. Critical thinking uses distinct procedures like identifying claims, premises, conclusions, and arguments to rationally assess existing beliefs and form new ones. Common impediments include self-interested, group, and subjective thinking. Deductive arguments aim to conclusively support conclusions while inductive arguments probably support conclusions. Fallacies involve irrelevant or unacceptable premises while various reasoning patterns help strengthen arguments.Writing Arguments
Writing ArgumentsGayla Keesee
油
This document provides a comprehensive guide to writing argumentative essays, outlining essential components such as claims, supports, organization patterns, and common logical fallacies. It includes specific types of claims (fact, value, policy), types of evidence, and a checklist for evaluating arguments and counterarguments. The tutorial emphasizes effective structuring while recognizing that alternative approaches may also be valid.Crafting an argument
Crafting an argumentpernak
油
The document discusses strategies for crafting an effective argument. It outlines the key rhetorical strategies of logos, ethos, and pathos and how to establish each within an argument. Logos relies on logic and reasoning through inductive or deductive techniques. Ethos establishes the author's credibility, and pathos makes an emotional appeal. The document also reviews elements of an argument like claims, evidence, assumptions, counterclaims, and rebuttals. It provides guidance on choosing a topic, considering the audience, and organizing the argument.Fallacies
FallaciesCharlotte Howe
油
This document discusses common logical fallacies that weaken arguments. It defines several types of fallacies such as hasty generalization, oversimplification, slippery slope, false analogy, begging the question, post hoc, and ad hominem. Examples are provided for each fallacy type. The document also prompts readers to identify the fallacy in several example arguments.Argumentative Writing
Argumentative Writinglisamulka
油
This document provides an overview of argumentative writing elements and structures for students in a WRIT 122 college course. It defines key elements like claims, reasons, evidence and addressing opposition. It also explains the structures of Toulmin, classical and Rogerian arguments, highlighting their different components and approaches. The document aims to help students learn and apply these concepts in their own argumentative writing.academic writing class notes.docx
academic writing class notes.docxmaryanneGatumbi
油
This document discusses how to write a classical argument. It will cover identifying classical arguments, using Toulmin's model of argument to plan essays, checking reliability of sources, and using rhetorical appeals. Learners will be able to write a 500-word argumentative essay using these techniques after reviewing counterarguments and concessions. The document also explains classical argument structure, the Toulmin model, and responding to alternative views.Constructing Reasonable Academic Arguments
Constructing Reasonable Academic Argumentsvlequire
油
This document provides guidance on constructing reasonable academic arguments. It discusses what constitutes a reasonable argument, establishes the four pillars of argument as thesis, evidence, refutation, and concluding statement. It then examines each pillar in detail, providing examples and guidelines. For thesis statements, it suggests establishing credibility and taking a debatable but not too aggressive stance. For evidence, it emphasizes using facts, statistics, and expert opinions. For refutation, it advises anticipating and counter opposing arguments. The document also identifies common logical fallacies to avoid and concludes by reminding readers that persuasive arguments require intelligence and decency.Making an argument presentation by duke university writing center
Making an argument presentation by duke university writing centerChristina McCleanhan
油
Orwell argues that modern English, especially in writing, contains bad linguistic habits that impair clear thought. He claims these habits have spread through imitation and can be avoided through conscious effort. Orwell reasons that removing these habits allows one to think more clearly, and clear thought is necessary for political progress. He uses examples from his own writing and the works of others to support this claim and acknowledge potential counterarguments.揃 NOTE Essay # 2 should combine the strategies you have learned i.docx
揃 NOTE Essay # 2 should combine the strategies you have learned i.docxLynellBull52
油
The document outlines the requirements for essay #2, which focuses on convincing and persuading, utilizing strategies from chapters 9 and 10 of the textbook. It emphasizes proper MLA formatting, including in-text citations, a works cited page, and the necessity to use material from both textbook readings and library sources. The essay should be argumentative, structured with an introduction, history of the issue, detailed evidence, and a conclusion, while appealing to the audience's ethos, logos, and pathos.Rhetoric and logic and argumentation
Rhetoric and logic and argumentationpvenglishteach
油
This document provides an overview of rhetoric, logic, and argumentation. It discusses key concepts like the rhetorical triangle of ethos, pathos, and logos. It also examines rhetorical devices, cognitive biases, deductive and inductive arguments, logical fallacies, and the differences between valid, sound, and fallacious reasoning.Judging the Validity of the Evidence Listened to L2.pptx
Judging the Validity of the Evidence Listened to L2.pptxJoshuaLanderSoquitaC
油
Judging the Validity of the Evidence Listened to L2.pptxArgument+rhetoric+ppt
Argument+rhetoric+pptandrewoleary1993
油
This document provides information on argumentation and the structure of argument essays. It defines argumentation as appealing to reason by connecting evidence in a logical chain to lead readers to an intended conclusion. There are four main types of arguments: definition, evaluation, cause-effect, and proposal. A good argument topic must be specific, controversial, researchable, rational, and relatable. An argument essay follows a basic structure with a claim, support/evidence, refutation of counter-arguments, and a conclusion that reinforces the claim. The introduction should grab the reader, provide background, and state the thesis. The body should present logical evidence and refute opposing views. The conclusion restates the key points and supports the thesis.Module 7 Discussion Board Algebra1. What does it mean when s.docx
Module 7 Discussion Board Algebra1. What does it mean when s.docxmoirarandell
油
This document provides instructions for students to write a classical argument paper on an approved topic. It outlines the key elements of a classical argument, including: introducing the issue and opposing positions, presenting reasons and evidence to support the student's position, anticipating and refuting counterarguments, and concluding by emphasizing the importance of the issue. Students must write a minimum 1,200-1,500 word paper using at least 5 credible sources to both support their argument and refute opposing positions. The paper should follow standard argumentative structure and formatting guidelines provided.13 03 pers_logos_15ed_notes
13 03 pers_logos_15ed_notesturnercom
油
The document discusses the concept of logos, or logical appeals, in persuasive speaking. It defines logos as using reasoning and argument to persuade an audience. It explains Aristotle's three artistic proofs of persuasion - logos, ethos, and pathos. The document goes on to describe the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion, inductive vs deductive reasoning, the elements of an argument, different types of arguments including sign, example, analogy, and causation, and common fallacies in reasoning.Logical Fallacies and Arguments and Factual Evidences to Defend a Stand.pptx
Logical Fallacies and Arguments and Factual Evidences to Defend a Stand.pptxejamesmdavid
油
The document discusses logical fallacies and how to defend a position with strong arguments and evidence. It defines logical fallacies as errors in reasoning that weaken an argument. Some common fallacies explained are slippery slope, complex question, appeal to authority, bandwagon, attacking the person, hasty generalization, post hoc, straw man, inconsistency, and appeal to force. Guidelines are provided for developing a clear and well-supported position using claims, assessing opposing views, taking a firm stand, organizing arguments, and considering the audience.Fallacies notes
Fallacies notesLi Jing
油
This document defines and provides examples of logical fallacies, which are flawed arguments that contain mistakes in reasoning. It divides fallacies into two types - fallacies of relevance, where the premises are irrelevant to the conclusion, and fallacies of insufficient evidence, where the premises do not provide enough support for the conclusion. Specific fallacies of relevance discussed include personal attacks, appealing to motives, and straw man arguments. Fallacies of insufficient evidence covered include appeals to authority, hasty generalizations, slippery slopes, and weak analogies.More from SergioFelixCuratacan (7)
speaking skills 1.pptx. speak fluently and correctly
speaking skills 1.pptx. speak fluently and correctlySergioFelixCuratacan
油
The document outlines the components of speaking skills essential for effective communication, including linguistic, discourse, pragmatic competencies, and fluency. It emphasizes the importance of oral presentations and participation in discussions, detailing stages of presentation preparation and strategies for engaging effectively in conversations. Additionally, it covers methods for expressing points of view, strategies for agreement and constructive disagreement, as well as the role of a chair in managing discussions.Inclusao na sala de aula de aula como pSergioFelixCuratacan
油
O documento aborda a inclus達o na sala de aula em Mo巽ambique, destacando a import但ncia de garantir que todas as crian巽as se sintam bem-vindas e suas necessidades atendidas. ele enfatiza a necessidade de criar um ambiente seguro e favor叩vel, onde intera巽探es positivas entre alunos e professores s達o essenciais. Tamb辿m delineia comportamentos adequados e inadequados por parte do professor para promover a auto-estima e o envolvimento dos alunos.MORPHOLOGY (Morphs ,Allomorph, Grammatical and Phonological Conditioning).pptx
MORPHOLOGY (Morphs ,Allomorph, Grammatical and Phonological Conditioning).pptxSergioFelixCuratacan
油
The document discusses the concepts of morphology, morphs, and allomorphs, that are crucial in linguistics for understanding word formation and phonological variations. It covers types of allomorphs, such as additive, zero, replacive, and suppletive, along with examples illustrating their occurrence in English morphology. The text also explains phonological and grammatical conditioning affecting the pronunciation and formation of different morphemes.study skills presentation. about English
study skills presentation. about EnglishSergioFelixCuratacan
油
The document outlines the components of effective speaking skills, including linguistic, discourse, and pragmatic competencies, emphasizing the importance of pronunciation, grammar, and fluency. It also discusses the process of preparing and delivering oral presentations, participating in discussions, expressing viewpoints, and the etiquette of communication. Key aspects include understanding audience needs, structuring discourse, and managing interactions to achieve successful communication outcomes.Ad
Recently uploaded (20)
How to Customize Quotation Layouts in Odoo 18
How to Customize Quotation Layouts in Odoo 18Celine George
油
Customizing quotation layouts in Odoo 18 allows businesses to personalize their quotations to match branding or specific requirements. This can include adding logos, custom fields, or modifying headers and footers. THE PSYCHOANALYTIC OF THE BLACK CAT BY EDGAR ALLAN POE (1).pdf
THE PSYCHOANALYTIC OF THE BLACK CAT BY EDGAR ALLAN POE (1).pdfnabilahk908
油
Psychoanalytic Analysis of The Black Cat by Edgar Allan Poe explores the deep psychological dimensions of the narrators disturbed mind through the lens of Sigmund Freuds psychoanalytic theory. According to Freud (1923), the human psyche is structured into three components: the Id, which contains primitive and unconscious desires; the Ego, which operates on the reality principle and mediates between the Id and the external world; and the Superego, which reflects internalized moral standards.
In this story, Poe presents a narrator who experiences a psychological breakdown triggered by repressed guilt, aggression, and internal conflict. This analysis focuses not only on the gothic horror elements of the narrative but also on the narrators mental instability and emotional repression, demonstrating how the imbalance of these three psychic forces contributes to his downfall.How to use search fetch method in Odoo 18
How to use search fetch method in Odoo 18Celine George
油
The search_fetch is a powerful ORM method used in Odoo for some specific addons to combine the functionality of search and read for more efficient data fetching. It might be used to search for records and fetch specific fields in a single call. It stores the result in the cache memory.IIT KGP Quiz Week 2024 Sports Quiz (Prelims + Finals)
IIT KGP Quiz Week 2024 Sports Quiz (Prelims + Finals)IIT Kharagpur Quiz Club
油
The document outlines the format for the Sports Quiz at Quiz Week 2024, covering various sports & games and requiring participants to Answer without external sources. It includes specific details about question types, scoring, and examples of quiz questions. The document emphasizes fair play and enjoyment of the quiz experience.INDUCTIVE EFFECT slide for first prof pharamacy students
INDUCTIVE EFFECT slide for first prof pharamacy studentsSHABNAM FAIZ
油
The inductive effect is the electron-withdrawing or electron-donating effect transmitted through sigma () bonds in a molecule due to differences in electronegativity between atoms.
---
Definition:
The inductive effect is the permanent shifting of electrons in a sigma bond caused by the electronegativity difference of atoms, resulting in partial charges within the molecule.2025 June Year 9 Presentation: Subject selection.pptx
2025 June Year 9 Presentation: Subject selection.pptxmansk2
油
2025 June Year 9 Presentation: Subject selectionA Visual Introduction to the Prophet Jeremiah
A Visual Introduction to the Prophet JeremiahSteve Thomason
油
These images will give you a visual guide to both the context and the flow of the story of the prophet Jeremiah. Feel free to use these in your study, preaching, and teaching.Code Profiling in Odoo 18 - Odoo 18 際際滷s
Code Profiling in Odoo 18 - Odoo 18 際際滷sCeline George
油
Profiling in Odoo identifies slow code and resource-heavy processes, ensuring better system performance. Odoo code profiling detects bottlenecks in custom modules, making it easier to improve speed and scalability.June 2025 Progress Update With Board Call_In process.pptx
June 2025 Progress Update With Board Call_In process.pptxInternational Society of Service Innovation Professionals
油
---
June 25 ISSIP Event - slides in process
20250618 PPre-Event Presentation Summary - Progress Update with Board Series June 25
ISSIP Website Upcoming Events Description: https://issip.org/event/semi-annual-issip-progress-call/
Register here (even if you cannot attend live online, all who register will get link to recording and slides post-event): https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdThrop1rafOCo4PQkYiS2XApclJuMjYONEHRMGBsceRdcQqg/viewform
This pre-event presentation: /slideshow/june-2025-progress-update-with-board-call_in-process-pptx/280718770
This pre-event recording: https://youtu.be/Shjgd5o488o
---University of Ghana Cracks Down on Misconduct: Over 100 Students Sanctioned
University of Ghana Cracks Down on Misconduct: Over 100 Students SanctionedKweku Zurek
油
University of Ghana Cracks Down on Misconduct: Over 100 Students Sanctioned
This is why students from these 44 institutions have not received National Se...
This is why students from these 44 institutions have not received National Se...Kweku Zurek
油
This is why students from these 44 institutions have not received National Service PIN codes (LIST)Gladiolous Cultivation practices by AKL.pdf
Gladiolous Cultivation practices by AKL.pdfkushallamichhame
油
This includes the overall cultivation practices of Rose prepared by:
Kushal Lamichhane (AKL)
Instructor
Shree Gandhi Adarsha Secondary School
Kageshowri Manohara-09, Kathmandu, Nepal
Pests of Maize: An comprehensive overview.pptx
Pests of Maize: An comprehensive overview.pptxArshad Shaikh
油
Maize is susceptible to various pests that can significantly impact yields. Key pests include the fall armyworm, stem borers, cob earworms, shoot fly. These pests can cause extensive damage, from leaf feeding and stalk tunneling to grain destruction. Effective management strategies, such as integrated pest management (IPM), resistant varieties, biological control, and judicious use of chemicals, are essential to mitigate losses and ensure sustainable maize production.Filipino 9 Maikling Kwento Ang Ama Panitikang Asiyano
Filipino 9 Maikling Kwento Ang Ama Panitikang Asiyanosumadsadjelly121997
油
Filipino 9 Maikling Kwento Ang Ama Panitikang AsiyanoPeer Teaching Observations During School Internship
Peer Teaching Observations During School InternshipAjayaMohanty7
油
FOR B.ED,M.ED,M.A.EDUCATION AND ANY STUDENT OF TEACHER EDUCATIONSCHIZOPHRENIA OTHER PSYCHOTIC DISORDER LIKE Persistent delusion/Capgras syndr...
SCHIZOPHRENIA OTHER PSYCHOTIC DISORDER LIKE Persistent delusion/Capgras syndr...parmarjuli1412
油
SCHIZOPHRENIA INCLUDED TOPIC IS INTRODUCTION, DEFINITION OF GENERAL TERM IN PSYCHIATRIC, THEN DIFINITION OF SCHIZOPHRENIA, EPIDERMIOLOGY, ETIOLOGICAL FACTORS, CLINICAL FEATURE(SIGN AND SYMPTOMS OF SCHIZOPHRENIA), CLINICAL TYPES OF SCHIZOPHRENIA, DIAGNOSIS, INVESTIGATION, TREATMENT MODALITIES(PHARMACOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT, PSYCHOTHERAPY, ECT, PSYCHO-SOCIO-REHABILITATION), NURSING MANAGEMENT(ASSESSMENT,DIAGNOSIS,NURSING INTERVENTION,AND EVALUATION), OTHER PSYCHOTIC DISORDER LIKE Persistent delusion/Capgras syndrome(The Delusion of Doubles)/Acute and Transient Psychotic Disorders/Induced Delusional Disorders/Schizoaffective Disorder /CAPGRAS SYNDROME(DELUSION OF DOUBLE), GERIATRIC CONSIDERATION, FOLLOW UP, HOMECARE AND REHABILITATION OF THE PATIENT, M&A5 Q1 1 differentiate evolving early Philippine conventional and contempora...
M&A5 Q1 1 differentiate evolving early Philippine conventional and contempora...ErlizaRosete
油
MAPEH 6 QI WEEK IYSPH VMOC Special Report - Measles Outbreak Southwest US 6-14-2025.pptx
YSPH VMOC Special Report - Measles Outbreak Southwest US 6-14-2025.pptxYale School of Public Health - The Virtual Medical Operations Center (VMOC)
油
BLUF:
The Texas outbreak has slowed down, but sporadic cases continue to emerge in Kansas, Oklahoma, and New Mexico.
Elsewhere in the US, we continue to see signs of acceleration due to outbreaks outside the Southwest (North Dakota, Montana, and Colorado) and travel-related cases. Measles exposures due to travel are expected to pose a significant challenge throughout the summer.
The U.S. is on track to exceed its 30-year high for measles cases (1,274) within the next two weeks.
Here is the latest update:
CURRENT CASE COUNT: 919
Texas: 744 (+2) (55% of cases are in Gaines County).
New Mexico: 81 (83% of cases are from Lea County).
Oklahoma: 20 (+2)
Kansas: 74 (+5) (38.89% of the cases are from Gray County).
HOSPITALIZATIONS: 104
Texas: 96 (+2) This accounts for 13% of all cases in Texas.
New Mexico: 7 This accounts for 9.47% of all cases in New Mexico.
Kansas: 3 This accounts for 5.08% of all cases in the state of Kansas.
DEATHS: 3
Texas: 2 This is 0.27% of all cases in Texas.
New Mexico: 1 This is 1.23% of all cases in New Mexico.
US NATIONAL CASE COUNT: 1,197
INTERNATIONAL SPREAD
Mexico: 2337 (+257), 5 fatalities
Chihuahua, Mexico: 2,179 (+239) cases, 4 fatalities, 7 currently hospitalized.
Canada: 3,207 (+208), 1 fatality
Ontario Outbreak, Canada: 2,115 (+74) cases, 158 hospitalizations, 1 fatality.
Alberta, Canada: 879(+118) cases, 5 currently hospitalized.June 2025 Progress Update With Board Call_In process.pptx
June 2025 Progress Update With Board Call_In process.pptxInternational Society of Service Innovation Professionals
油
YSPH VMOC Special Report - Measles Outbreak Southwest US 6-14-2025.pptx
YSPH VMOC Special Report - Measles Outbreak Southwest US 6-14-2025.pptxYale School of Public Health - The Virtual Medical Operations Center (VMOC)
油
Ad
3 Types of Argument.pdf for effective comunication
- 1. 3 Types of Argument: Classical, Rogerian, Toulmin Get ready to take notes
- 2. Aristotles Rhetorical Triangle Speaker/Writer Audience/Reader Subject/Topic Intention/Purpose Pathos Logos/Logic connects your reasoning and thoughts to the subject Pathos connects the audiences to the subject through emotion Ethos/credibility is how you establish that you are someone worth the audiences attention
- 4. Classical 1. Introduction(Exordium):Capture the audiences attention. Introduce the issue and create exigence for your claim. Why is this an issue? Why do we need to pay attention? 2. Statement of Background (Narratio) Supply the context needed to understand the case you present. What circumstances, occurrences, or conditions do we need to be made aware of? 3. Proposition (Partitio) State your position (claim/thesis), based on the information you have presented, and outline the major points that will follow. The partitio divides the background information from the reasoning. 4. Proof (Confirmatio)Present your reasons, subclaims, and evidence. Establish inferences between claim and support. Provide additional evidence for subclaims and evidence, where necessary. Explain and justify assumptions. 5. Refutation (Refutatio) Anticipate and refute opposing arguments. In this section you demonstrate that you have already considered the issue thoroughly and have reached the only reasonable conclusion. 6. Conclusion (Peroratio) Summarize the most important points. Make a final appeal to values, motivations, and feelings that are likely to encourage the audience to identify with your argument
- 5. Classical Example: I have a dream speech. When to use: More direct More aggressive To establish power When the audience already respects you or When the audience needs to get something from you.
- 7. 1. Zeke! (yelling) (Introductioncapture attention) 2. Stop antagonizing your brother. He had a tough day at school. (Background context) 3. The next time you gloat about beating Luigis Mansion you are going to be sitting in time out. Proposition (claim/thesis) 4. This is the third time that you have brought this up in the past 15 minutes. He is crying on the floor. He knows that you have beat the game; you are just being mean. Proof 5. I know that he is a little pipsqueak sometimes, and he gets on your nerves by talking about Wee-gees Mansion, but you have to set a good example for him. Refutation (concession and counterargument) 6. If you say one more thing about beating Luigis mansion you will be in time out. I dont care if we are in a grocery store and your friends are watching. Conclusion (Peroratio) Classical Example
- 8. Rogerian 1. Introduction of Problem: State the problem you hope to resolve. By presenting your issue as a problem you raise the possibility of positive change. Often opponents will want to solve the same problem. 2. Summary of Opposing Views: As accurately and neutrally as possible, state the views of the people with whom you disagree. By doing this you show that you are capable of listening without judging and have given a fair hearing to people who think differently from you. 3. Statement of Understanding: Also called the statement of validity. Show that you understand that there are situations in which these views are valid. Which parts of the opposing argument s do you concede? Under which conditions might you share these views? 4. Statement of Your Position: Now that readers have seen that youve given full consideration to views other than your own, they should be prepared to listen fairly to your views. State your position. 5. Statement of Contexts: Describe situations in which you hope your views will be honored. By showing that your position has merit in specific contexts, you recognize that people wont agree with you all of the time. However, opponents are allowed to agree in part and share common ground. 6. Statement of Benefits: Appeal to the self-interest of your opponents by showing how they would benefit from accepting your position; this concludes your essay on a hopeful, positive note.
- 9. Rogerian Example: Queen Elizabeths speech at Tilbury When to use: With an audience who you dont relate to With an audience who doesnt share your views With an audience who has authority over you With an audience who is overly sensitive
- 11. Rogerian Example 1. Peanut, you have all of this homework that has to get done. (Problem) 2. I know that you really want to beat Luigis Mansion, and that you are hungry. (Summary of Opposing Views) 3. If you had all of your home work done, you could play as much Luigis Mansion as you want. (Statement of Understanding) 4. Right now, I need for you to finish your homework. When your homework is finished, you can have a snack. (Statement of Your Position) 5. I am going to put the package of fruit snacks over your place at the table so that you can eat it as soon as you finish. (Statement of Contexts) 6. When you finish your homework, you can play Luigis Mansion until bedtime, and you will have good grades in school. (Statement of Benefits)
- 12. Toulmin The twentieth-century British philosopher Stephen Toulmin noticed that good, realistic arguments typically will consist of six parts. He used these terms to describe the items. 1. Data: The facts or evidence used to prove the argument 2. Claim: The statement being argued (a thesis) 3. Warrants: The general, hypothetical (and often implicit) logical statements that serve as bridges between the claim and the data. 4. Qualifiers: Statements that limit the strength of the argument or statements that propose the conditions under which the argument is true. 5. Rebuttals: Counter-arguments or statements indicating circumstances when the general argument does not hold true. 6. Backing: Statements that serve to support the warrants (i.e., arguments that don't necessarily prove the main point being argued, but which do prove the warrants are true.)
- 13. Toulmin Example John Gages The Shape of Reason When to use: When speaking to the scientific community When you are trying to put the facts at the forefront of your argument When your audience is very logical and rational
- 14. from John Gage's The Shape of Reason Congress should ban animal research (Claim #1) because animals are tortured in experiments that have no necessary benefit for humans such as the testing of cosmetics (Data). The well being of animals is more important than the profits of the cosmetics industry (Warrant). Only congress has the authority to make such a law (Warrant)because the corporations can simply move from state to state to avoid legal penalties (Backing). Of course, this ban should not apply to medical research (Qualifier). A law to ban all research would go too far (Rebuttal).So, the law would probably (qualifier) have to be carefully written to define the kinds of research intended (claim #2). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZJFDSEBORw
- 16. 1. Reagan, when was the last time you took a shower? Reagan: I dont remember. Me: So it has been a while then. (Data) 2. You need to take a shower. (Claim) 3. You are starting to get stinky. Your hair is looking a little crazy. (Warrants) 4. Birds will build a nest in your hair if it isnt clean and brushed. You dont want to be the stinky girl at school. (Qualifiers) 5. My Husband yelling from the other room: She always smells like cinnamon and sugar. Me: Usually she does, but she is getting a little ripe. (Rebuttals) 6. You are a precious girl, but you still have to take a shower. (Backing) Toulmin Example