Alliance presentation
Download as PPTX, PDF1 like213 views
This document discusses NATO's response to the September 11th terrorist attacks. It covers NATO's history as a political and military alliance formed after World War II. On September 11th, 2001 the United States invoked NATO's Article 5 for the first and only time, treating the terrorist attacks as an action against all NATO members. NATO supported the US-led war on terrorism and expanded its mission beyond territorial defense of member states. The document examines the key decision makers, outcomes, and implications of NATO's response to 9/11 both in the short and long term.
More Related Content
What's hot (17)
Viewers also liked (9)
Recently uploaded (20)
Alliance presentation
- 1. An event from which we still feel the ripples today
- 2. PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION Alliance Dilemma of Global Significance Key Components Key Concepts and Topics Key Decision-Makers Positive/Negative Outcomes What if
- 3. North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) The North Atlantic Treaty -1949 A Political and Military Alliance Collective Defense NATO Faced with a Decision THE DILEMMA
- 4. (Five) Dysfunctions of a Team Commitment Conflict Trust Trans-Organizational Systems: Alliance NATO: Political and Military Team Building Context Composition Change KEY COMPONENTS OF DILEMMA
- 5. NATO Creation of the Alliance 1999 Complex new risks Aftermath of 9/11 Broader commitment to security Terrorism poses a real and serious threat to the security and safety of the Alliance and its members The Day Before What was happening on September 10th (and before) in the United States KEY CONCEPTS & TOPICS
- 6. NATO Motivation Short-Term Plan Of Action Long-Term Plan Of Action Current Objectives KEY DECISION MAKERS - NATO
- 7. George Bush Response to The People Response to NATO Mayor Giuliani Response to New York Response to Country Congress Response to President Response to Government KEY DECISION MAKERS USA
- 8. Positive Outcomes Unity of People War on Terrorism Grassroots Efforts Negative Outcomes Loss of Life War on Terrorism Political Division RESULTING OUTCOMES
- 9. What if 9/11 never happened? US Globally What if NATO hadnt invoked Article 5? US Globally WHAT IF
- 10. Alliance Dilemma of Global Significance Key Components Key Concepts and Topics Key Decision-Makers Positive/Negative Outcomes What if CONCLUSION
- 11. http://www.nato.int/nato-welcome/index.html http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/76706.htm http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/sept11/2002-09-09-last-day_x.htm http://www.nato.int/history/nato-history.html http://www.newsweek.com/what-if-911-had-never-happened-67373 http://youtu.be/79h4HIJIkm4 http://youtu.be/num7UD4oAME https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=913520725344496&set=t.1021743511&type=3 &theater http://www.nato.int/docu/Review/2011/11-september/NATO-US-Perspective-9- 11/EN/index.htm http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dennis-j-kucinich/isis-libya-nato_b_5764988.html http://nato.usmission.gov/natos-finest-hour-9-12-2011.html SOURCES
Editor's Notes
- #5: Jaime - Identify the key components associated with the dilemma that are recognized in the course material. Dysfunctions/functions of a team/alliance Trust dilemmas NATO had faced in the past; how they responded and how that generated trust among the members Commitment all of the members had to buy in to the idea of reacting to 9/11 Accountability 4 Cs Preparedness to react to change: NATO had to be formed knowing that they could not predict all of the events that it would need to respond to Context NATO had to react to a completely different context/situation than it had been utilized for in the past; Washingtons Treaty Capability specific action plans, Bushs speech about fighting back/War on Terror had to be translated to action Trans-Organizational systems NATO in general First responders working together Organizing volunteers, missing persons working with hospitals and volunteers, public forums