狠狠撸

狠狠撸Share a Scribd company logo
Analysis of Decisions of Superior
Courts on Will & Inheritance
Dr Shahbaz Ahmad Cheema
Professor of Law
University of the Punjab, Lahore
‘Law’ in Pakistani Legal System
? Written law (Statutes & Ordinances)
? Muslim Family Laws Ordinance 1961 (MFLO)
? Judgments of Supreme Court and High Courts
on question and principle of law (Articles 189
& 201)
? Federal Shariat Court (Article 203D)
? Islamic law as residuary law and interpretative
law
Decisions on ‘Will’
? Khairan Bibi V Ghulam Hassan [2007 CLC 167
(Lahore)] Distinction between will and
gift/hiba. Entire transaction should be
construed and ascertained and isolated
expressions are not be given overrated weight
? Zakirullah Khan V Faizullah Khan (1999 SCMR
971) Mere silence on the part of legal heirs
would not be equated with their consent for
making effective 1/3rd of an estate as will
Section 4 of MFLO 1961
? Inheritance of children of predeceased son/daughter
? Literal application or re-adjusted application under
Islamic law
? Mandatory wasiyat [Allah Rakha V Federation of
Pakistan (PLD 2000 FSC 01)]
? Council of Islamic Ideology for making uncles/aunts as
financially responsible for orphaned grandchildren
? Dr Muhammad Munir = section 4 as a legal maneuver
by state for shifting its responsibility to others
? Mandatory will is bound to take away the element of
voluntariness and free consent from will
? “An Analysis of the Application of Traditional Islamic
Law of Inheritance in Pakistani Courts”
Inheritance Rights of Women
? Section 498A of Pakistan Penal Code makes
disinheritance of women as an offence
punishable with imprisonment up to 10 years
under Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 2011
? Ghulam Ali V Ghulam Sarwar Naqvi (PLD 1990 SC
01) Brothers are obliged to protect their sisters’
right of inheritance; no space for the arguments
of estoppel, waiver and adverse possession;
disinheritance of women is against public policy.
? Khalida Shamim Akhtar V Ghulam Jaffar (PLD
2016 Lahore 865) Inheritance of childless widow
under Shia law
Shia Sunni Debate
? All Pakistanis are presumed to be Muslims unless
proved otherwise (Latifan Bibi V Rehmat Ali 2012 SCMR
1251) [Ahmadi v Muslim/Sunni/Hanafi]
? All Muslims are presumed to be Sunni unless proved
otherwise
? All Suunis are presumed to be Hanafi unless proved
otherwise
? All Shias are presumed to be the Ithna Ashari unless
proved otherwise
? Ghulam Shabbir V Bakhat Khatoon 2009 SCMR 644
? “Socially Abhorrent but Legally Acceptable: A Study of
Alleged Conversions of Sunnis and Shias in Cases of
Inheritance in Pakistan”
Estate of Missing Person
? M Sohail Kiyani V Raja M Anwar (PLD 2017
Islamabad 162)
? Mr A went missing in 1973 and the case was
initiated in 2013 for distribution of his estate
? Person missing for seven years without any
contact with his relatives/family is presumed to
be dead unless otherwise shown by evidence
(Article 124 of QSO)
? Due to non-availability of such evidence, his
estate was distributed among those who were
alive in 1980
Bad Precedent 1
? Saadullah V Gulbanda (2014 SCMR 1205)
? Mother, 3 full sisters & consanguine brother
? SC awarded the entire estate to mother and full
sisters under misconceived principle of radd
? Exclusion of consanguine brother is incorrect
? Solution under Islamic law: mother = 1/6; full
sisters = 2/3 & consanguine brother = 1/6
? Radd is not attracted in presence of any residuary
? “Inheritance of Full Sister/s with Consanguine
Brother/s in Pakistan: A Critical Analysis of
Saadullah v Gulbanda”
Bad Precedent 2
? Muhammad Khalid V Noor Bibi (2005 SCMR 1717)
? Deceased died issueless
? Sons and daughters of paternal uncle and an aunt as
petitioners
? Maternal uncles as respondents
? SC erroneously treated all as distant kindred and
granted the entire estate to maternal uncles excluding
all others
? Sons of paternal were residuaries and entitled to have
the entire estate to the exclusion of all others
Bad Precedent 3
? Khalida Begum V M Rashid Khan [PLD 2012 High
Court (AJ&K) 34]
? Widow = ? (10/40)
? Full sister = ? (20/40)
? 4 Consanguine brothers = (8/40)
? 2 Consanguine sisters = (2/40)
? Incorrect decision: Consanguine brothers are
residuaries alone and their presence deprives
consanguine sisters to get any share

More Related Content

Analysis of decisions of Pakistan's Superior Courts on Will & Inheritance

  • 1. Analysis of Decisions of Superior Courts on Will & Inheritance Dr Shahbaz Ahmad Cheema Professor of Law University of the Punjab, Lahore
  • 2. ‘Law’ in Pakistani Legal System ? Written law (Statutes & Ordinances) ? Muslim Family Laws Ordinance 1961 (MFLO) ? Judgments of Supreme Court and High Courts on question and principle of law (Articles 189 & 201) ? Federal Shariat Court (Article 203D) ? Islamic law as residuary law and interpretative law
  • 3. Decisions on ‘Will’ ? Khairan Bibi V Ghulam Hassan [2007 CLC 167 (Lahore)] Distinction between will and gift/hiba. Entire transaction should be construed and ascertained and isolated expressions are not be given overrated weight ? Zakirullah Khan V Faizullah Khan (1999 SCMR 971) Mere silence on the part of legal heirs would not be equated with their consent for making effective 1/3rd of an estate as will
  • 4. Section 4 of MFLO 1961 ? Inheritance of children of predeceased son/daughter ? Literal application or re-adjusted application under Islamic law ? Mandatory wasiyat [Allah Rakha V Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2000 FSC 01)] ? Council of Islamic Ideology for making uncles/aunts as financially responsible for orphaned grandchildren ? Dr Muhammad Munir = section 4 as a legal maneuver by state for shifting its responsibility to others ? Mandatory will is bound to take away the element of voluntariness and free consent from will ? “An Analysis of the Application of Traditional Islamic Law of Inheritance in Pakistani Courts”
  • 5. Inheritance Rights of Women ? Section 498A of Pakistan Penal Code makes disinheritance of women as an offence punishable with imprisonment up to 10 years under Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 2011 ? Ghulam Ali V Ghulam Sarwar Naqvi (PLD 1990 SC 01) Brothers are obliged to protect their sisters’ right of inheritance; no space for the arguments of estoppel, waiver and adverse possession; disinheritance of women is against public policy. ? Khalida Shamim Akhtar V Ghulam Jaffar (PLD 2016 Lahore 865) Inheritance of childless widow under Shia law
  • 6. Shia Sunni Debate ? All Pakistanis are presumed to be Muslims unless proved otherwise (Latifan Bibi V Rehmat Ali 2012 SCMR 1251) [Ahmadi v Muslim/Sunni/Hanafi] ? All Muslims are presumed to be Sunni unless proved otherwise ? All Suunis are presumed to be Hanafi unless proved otherwise ? All Shias are presumed to be the Ithna Ashari unless proved otherwise ? Ghulam Shabbir V Bakhat Khatoon 2009 SCMR 644 ? “Socially Abhorrent but Legally Acceptable: A Study of Alleged Conversions of Sunnis and Shias in Cases of Inheritance in Pakistan”
  • 7. Estate of Missing Person ? M Sohail Kiyani V Raja M Anwar (PLD 2017 Islamabad 162) ? Mr A went missing in 1973 and the case was initiated in 2013 for distribution of his estate ? Person missing for seven years without any contact with his relatives/family is presumed to be dead unless otherwise shown by evidence (Article 124 of QSO) ? Due to non-availability of such evidence, his estate was distributed among those who were alive in 1980
  • 8. Bad Precedent 1 ? Saadullah V Gulbanda (2014 SCMR 1205) ? Mother, 3 full sisters & consanguine brother ? SC awarded the entire estate to mother and full sisters under misconceived principle of radd ? Exclusion of consanguine brother is incorrect ? Solution under Islamic law: mother = 1/6; full sisters = 2/3 & consanguine brother = 1/6 ? Radd is not attracted in presence of any residuary ? “Inheritance of Full Sister/s with Consanguine Brother/s in Pakistan: A Critical Analysis of Saadullah v Gulbanda”
  • 9. Bad Precedent 2 ? Muhammad Khalid V Noor Bibi (2005 SCMR 1717) ? Deceased died issueless ? Sons and daughters of paternal uncle and an aunt as petitioners ? Maternal uncles as respondents ? SC erroneously treated all as distant kindred and granted the entire estate to maternal uncles excluding all others ? Sons of paternal were residuaries and entitled to have the entire estate to the exclusion of all others
  • 10. Bad Precedent 3 ? Khalida Begum V M Rashid Khan [PLD 2012 High Court (AJ&K) 34] ? Widow = ? (10/40) ? Full sister = ? (20/40) ? 4 Consanguine brothers = (8/40) ? 2 Consanguine sisters = (2/40) ? Incorrect decision: Consanguine brothers are residuaries alone and their presence deprives consanguine sisters to get any share