At present laboratory reagent companies are suspending supply of specialised agar products due to low availability of raw material. These bacteriological/technical agars used in laboratories around the world are predominantly obtained from species of a single red algal genus, Gelidium. Harvesting of natural populations is the only source of feedstock as cultivation has never been feasible. Here we analyse historical landings data since the 1920s in all countries where natural Gelidium resources have been harvested. Up to WWII Japan was the only source of agar but then other countries like Spain, Portugal, Morocco, Mexico, and South Africa began to survey and exploit local Gelidium resources. Gelidium landings peaked in the 1960s, while Japan lost market dominance. A sustained decrease in landings to less than 50% of peak annual values has occurred since. This trend was accompanied by concentration of feedstock production in just one country, Morocco, which contributed over 70% of world supply in the last two decades. A sudden decline in this countrys landings will have a disproportionate effect on world availability of Gelidium. This is actually the present situation when landing and export quotas were recently implemented in Morocco in order to safeguard the natural resources. Thus Gelidium agar is now undersupplied and priced itself out of the food industry but the increasing demand of bacteriological and technical agars will probably create an opportunity for historical producers, where production has declined, to get back into the market. If an interest in Gelidium resource exploitation is renewed adequate scientific management practices should be implemented. For this, simple harvest statistics such as daily harvest yields and harvest effort need to be collected by harvest area. Estimates of both the standing stock and the exploitation rate of the resource can then be calculated, without the need for time and space extensive, high cost sampling assessments.
1 of 19
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Back to basics: Global shortage of bacteriological agar
2. Back to basics
Global shortage of bacteriological
and technical agars
Ricardo Melo + Rui Santos
3. Nature 528: 171172
(December 10th, 2015)
Microbiologys most important
reagent is in short supply, with
potential consequences for research,
public health and clinical labs around
the world.
already pushed wholesale prices of
agar to an all-time high of around
US$3545 per kilogram nearly
triple the price before scarcities
began.
by Ewen Callaway
21/06/16 Melo + Santos 2
doi: 10.1038/528171a
5. Our we told you so moment!
ISS XIX 2007, Japan Global Gelidium resource
21/06/16 Melo + Santos 4
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
1980s 1990s 2000s
Decades
Landings(tdw)
South Africa
Chile
Mexico
Indonesia
Portugal
Japan
South Korea
Morocco
Spain
6. ISS XIX 2007, Japan (cont.)
Global Gelidium production in 3 preceding decades
16 000 t (dw)
Stable in South Africa, Chile, Mexico, South Korea
Collapsed in Indonesia, Portugal, Japan, Spain
But, how sustainable this level of production?
Maintained by Moroccos very increased landings
Representing 73% of world landings
21/06/16 Melo + Santos 5
7. Our present objective is to:
Compile available disseminated information
More and better data communication
Identify bottlenecks and sustainability problems
Boost renewed attention to Gelidium resources
Historical producer countries & others
Disseminate a low cost stock assessment method
Based on harvest effort statistics
Effective use of harvest logbooks
Coaching of harvesters for sustainability
21/06/16 Melo + Santos 6
9. Global Gelidium resource
21/06/16 Melo + Santos 8
Has been in decline since 1960s peak
Dramatic drop in the 2010s
Production less than 50% of peak value
Business as usual?
2010s mean harvest
pre-WW II situation *
* 1940
10. Other take-home ideas
Steady increase of Moroccos global share
From 20% in the 60s up to 70% in the new century
Global market virtually depends on sole
supplier
Fluctuations should have DISPROPORTIONATE effect
21/06/16 Melo + Santos 9
13. Morocco: updated management
Gelidium harvest
Interdiction: October 1st June 30th
Only beach cast harvest, no plucking, no night harvest
In 2010 limit was 5440 t in 2010, 6040 t in 2014
Traceability system for Gelidium and agar commerce
Export licence regime for Gelidium and agar
Restrictive export quotas enforced
Only 20% of Gelidium production
80% must be processed in-country (Setexam, K辿nitra)
21/06/16 Melo + Santos 12
14. Santos, Cristo & Jesus 2003
Describe stock assessment of Gelidium resource
based on harvest effort information
Low cost compared with common standing stock
evaluations involving scientific diving
Analysis of harvest effort data is highly informative
But:
Information on sea conditions for each harvest day must
be included to improve logbook data
21/06/16 Melo + Santos 13
15. Gelidium corneum harvest in Portugal: yearly
variation of harvest yield, total harvest effort, and
seasonal CPUE (Santos et al. 2003)
21/06/16 Melo + Santos 14
16. Training and coaching is a must
Harvesters need to understand:
How logbook data will be used
The importance of providing accurate records
Managers and scientists have to:
Better communicate with harvesters
Illustrate how the information obtained from harvest
effort data is to be used
21/06/16 Melo + Santos 15
17. Gelidium corneum harvest in Portugal: yearly
variation of standing stock, harvest yield, exploitation
rate, and catchability (Santos et al. 2003)
21/06/16 Melo + Santos 16
18. Data harvesting
A difficult task finding statistical data on agarophyte harvest!
Also complicated assessing the quality of those data!
On-line fisheries data from governmental and research
institutions, trade associations, international experts
Many individual researchers and friends were of great help
Previous reports by Santelices (1988), Santos and Duarte (1991), Melo et al.
(1991), Melo (1998, 2002), McHugh (2003), and Santos et al. (2003) review harvest
methods, fisheries statistics, cultivation attempts, and stock assessment of
Gelidium species
21/06/16 Melo + Santos 17
#12: Comparaison des densit辿s de biomasses de G.sesquipedale durant les ann辿es 1999-2010-2011-2012 et 2013
Les r辿sultats obtenus montrent synth辿tiquement: (i) Une diminution de la biomasse moyenne du Gelidium de 57% par rapport 1999 et de 36% par rapport 2012; (ii) Un braconnage intensif (collecte avant louverture de la campagne) et une d辿gradation de lhabitat du Gelidium (destruction du substrat rocheux dont elle est particuli竪rement tributaire); (iii) Une biomasse moyenne de H. incurvus qui d辿passe celle du G辿lidium.
Ainsi, lINRH souligne, une fois encore, limportance du respect de la p辿riode du repos biologique de lagarophyte G. sesquipedale, et de la sensibilisation des exploitants sur la n辿cessit辿 vitale de la protection de son habitat. Leffet conjugu辿 de ces deux facteurs (non-respect de la r辿glementation et la d辿gradation de lhabitat) est lorigine de la chute de la biomasse de Gelidium et en parall竪le, une conqu棚te de son espace par lesp竪ce comp辿titive Halopithys incurvus commence prendre de lampleur.
#16: The most important limiting factors for Gelidium sesquipedale harvest effort, and thus for harvest yield, which was highly correlated with effort, were bad sea conditions and low standing stocks.