More Related Content
Similar to Big Data projects.pdf (20)
Recently uploaded (20)
Big Data projects.pdf
- 2. Project 1 PDF Summary Tool: Students are tasked with creating a Streamlit app that can summarize PDF documents. They must choose between using nougat or pypdf libraries to process PDFs from the SEC. The app should allow users to select the library, test various PDFs, provide pros/cons for each tool, and recommend one. Additionally, students need to create and integrate architectural diagrams of the project within Streamlit. Data Quality Evaluation Tool: This part involves building a Streamlit tool using the Freddie Mac single- family dataset. The tool, designed for data quality evaluation, should allow users to upload CSV/XLS fi les and specify their type (Origination/Monthly Performance). The tool will use pandaspro fi ling to summarize data and greatexpectations to validate data schema, integrity, and completeness. Architecture Tools Used • Streamlit • Nougat or PyPDF libraries • pandas-profiling • greatexpectations • Diagrams tool for architecture Data Engineering and building tools to summarize SEC and Freddie Mac datasets
- 3. Project 2 A system using Large Language Models to summarize PDF documents from the SEC website. The project for the Big Data and Intelligent Analytics graduate course, as detailed in Assignment 2, involves developing a tool for analysts to load PDF documents and obtain summaries. The project includes evaluating nougat and pypdf libraries for processing PDFs from the SEC, replicating a demo from the Open AI cookbook, and creating Jupyter notebooks that can handle SEC PDF documents. Additionally, students are tasked with designing fast APIs for a Streamlit app, updating the app with new functionalities, and revising design documents and architectural diagrams to re fl ect the updates. Tools Used • Streamlit • Nougat or PyPDF libraries • FAST API • OPENAI APIs • greatexpectations • Diagrams tool for architecture visualization
- 4. This project focused on automating the creation of embeddings and populating a vector database. Key components include: Automating Embedding Creation and Database Population: Air fl ow Pipelines: Two distinct Air fl ow pipelines for data acquisition, embedding generation, and inserting records into Pinecone vector database using SEC PDF fi les. Data Processing and Validation: Implement data validation, generate embeddings, and save fi le extracts. Client-Facing Application Development: FastAPI and Streamlit: Develop a user registration and login system with JWT authentication. Utilize a SQL database for storing user credentials and application logs. Streamlit for User Interface: Create a secure login page, a question-answering interface, and implement a search mechanism using Pinecone vector database. Deployment: Containerize each microservice and deploy on a public cloud platform. Project 3 Using LLMs and RAG for document summarization of SEC documents Tools Used • Airflow • Pinecone • FastAPI • JWT (JSON Web Token) • SQL Database • Streamlit • Docker for containerization
- 5. Project 4 Using LLMs to interact with Snowflake using natural language Data Engineering with Snowpark Python: Students individually reproduce steps in creating data pipelines with Snowpark Python, showcasing their work in a forked repository. Dataset Analysis: Teams select datasets from Snow fl ake's marketplace, creating thematic stories and Proof of Concept (POC) to address speci fi c problems. They design architectural diagrams and implement SQL processes and User-De fi ned Functions, integrating Git actions for deployment. Streamlit and OpenAI Integration: The project involves connecting Snow fl ake with Streamlit for analytics, developing a text-based SQL query feature using natural language processing, and integrating OpenAI services for query generation and re fi nement. Tools Used • Snowpark Python • Snowflake Marketplace • Streamlit • OpenAI Services • SQL Database Management
- 6. The project involves a thorough review of the existing architecture (Assignment 3) and its redesign using two distinct approaches: Open Source Components: Utilizing primarily open-source tools like Huggingface, LLAMA from Meta, Amazon Bedrock, etc. The focus is on creating a fl exible and customizable stack that aligns with the dynamic needs of the enterprise. Enterprise Alternatives to OpenAI Stack: Incorporating enterprise solutions such as Google Bard, Anthropic, Cohere, Perplexity, etc. This approach is geared towards leveraging the robust and reliable frameworks o ff ered by leading tech organizations. Architecture Design: Both use cases will have detailed architecture diagrams showcasing preparation pipelines and inference aspects. A comparison of the technologies in terms of hosting and as-a-service capabilities. Technology Suitability Analysis: Justi fi cation of selected technologies based on application suitability. Evaluation of scalability, reliability, and performance metrics. Cost Analysis: Detailed breakdown of fi xed and variable costs for both architectures. Analysis includes hosting, annual licenses, maintenance, API access, and use-case speci fi c costs (e.g., PDF processing). Comparative study of cost structures between the original and new architectures. Project 5 Project redesign and rearchitecture Tools Used Huggingface: For machine learning and natural language processing tasks. LLAMA from Meta: A language model for various analytical tasks. Amazon Bedrock: For data management and analytics infrastructure. Enterprise Components: Google Bard: AI-driven data analysis and predictive modeling. Anthropic: Advanced AI solutions for complex data tasks. Cohere: Provides tools for natural language understanding.