The document discusses the "Browser Wars" between Microsoft and Netscape in the late 1990s and early 2000s. It analyzes why Microsoft's Internet Explorer web browser became the dominant standard, monopolizing the market. While unlikely to change in the short term, the monopoly may not continue indefinitely. New competitors like Google Chrome and an increasingly tech-savvy user base supporting browsers like Mozilla Firefox could undermine Internet Explorer's dominance over the next decade. However, Microsoft remains entrenched as the dominant player in both operating systems and web browsers for now.
1 of 12
Downloaded 61 times
More Related Content
Browser Wars: Internet Explorer versus Netscape
1. Browser Wars : Battles of Standards
Ronan CHARDONNEAU
Innovation and Knowledge Management
European Master in Business Studies
25/04/2009
2. Browser Wars
Battles of Standards, Microsoft versus
Netscape
Topic :
One standard that appears to have been effectively monopolized by a
single company is the Microsoft PC system software. The class could discuss
why this is the case and wether it is likely to continue in the future. It
could also ask wether such a monopoly is a good thing (for society as a
whole, not just Microsoft) for what it considers, as unfair competition against
Netscape. An excellent analysis of the various sides of the debate can be
found in The Economist ('At war with Microsoft' and 'Play nicely, or not at all',
May 23, 1998; 'Bill Gates replies: compete, don't delete', June 13, 1998;
Microsoft - letters, p.10, June 27, 1998).
Context :
The following case study has been submitted for the course of Innovation and
Knowledge Management at the university of L¨¦on within the European Master
in Business Studies.
Ronan
Ronan CHARDONNEAU - European Master in Business Studies Page 2
3. Index
Pages
Topic : ................................................................................................................ 2
Context : ............................................................................................................ 2
Introduction : ...................................................................................................... 4
Personal experience about the study case :...................................................... 4
Why the web browser standard has been monopolized by Microsoft PC
system software ? .............................................................................................. 5
Is it likely to continue in the future ? .................................................................. 6
Raising up of a new competitor: Google......................................................... 6
A computer population who is more and more educated ............................... 7
A new sanction for Microsoft ? ....................................................................... 8
Is such a monopoly a good thing ? .................................................................... 9
Good point : .................................................................................................... 9
Bad point :....................................................................................................... 9
Conclusion : ..................................................................................................... 11
Ronan
Ronan CHARDONNEAU - European Master in Business Studies Page 3
4. Introduction :
Internet explorer versus Netscape Navigator is a classic of case study and this
is not the information which are lacking on the subject.
As an example the two books I chose to study within the course of Innovation
and Knowledge Management untitled quot;Winners Losers & Microsoftquot; and
quot;Information rules: a strategic guide to network economyquot; are both refering to
the battle between Internet Explorer and Netscape web browsers.
This story and analysis has then already been written more than once and it
can then be very easy for me to make a good copy of those works based on
the analysis of analysis.
I am personnaly more interested in writing something new and original. I
suggest then to take into account new elements such as the current web
browser market (2009), the fact that we are analyzing the situation 10 years
after the battle and trying to predict the future of the web browser market.
Those changes will brought an original work to the teacher and an exclusive
paper to its readers.
I hope you will appreciate it.
Ronan CHARDONNEAU
Personal experience about the study case :
I have been introduced to Netscape Navigator in 1999, my elder brother
studying computer sciences he came back one day with a pc including Internet
Explorer and Netscape. I personnaly grew up and be trained with Internet
Explorer ( as it was by default installed on all computers of my junior High
School).
I never used Netscape Navigator to go on Internet and I am an experienced
user of Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome. I also use sometimes the textual
web browser Lynx.
Ronan
Ronan CHARDONNEAU - European Master in Business Studies Page 4
5. Why the web browser standard has been monopolized by Microsoft PC
system software ?
First of all let¡¯s define what is a standard :
? A technology is recognized as a standard when it gets more than 50% of
the market shares?
Let¡¯s now define a web browser :
? A browser is a software application that is used to locate and display Web
pages. ?
www.asu.edu/copp/resources/glossary.html
Here is a definition of Microsoft :
? Microsoft Corporation is an American multinational computer technology
corporation, which rose to dominate the home computer operating
system ?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft
And to finish a definition of an operating system :
? The most important program run on a computer because it manages all
the other programs. ?
www.iscfr21.it/21cfr_glossary.html
So Microsoft owns the Operating System market which is managing web
browsers and Microsoft is producing its own web browser : Internet Explorer.
Here we can then understand the problematic.
On Microsoft side we can understand the following question ? Why should I
include a competitor web browser within my own Operating System ? ? and
obviously understand why they are still not doing it.
In 1999 in order to install Netscape on your PC you needed to take it from
the outside (Download on Internet, take it from a CD etc¡) and here is the
heart of the winning battle.
In order to win and be recognized as a better product people have to know that
you exist. We can then understand why at that time computer users did not
Ronan
Ronan CHARDONNEAU - European Master in Business Studies Page 5
6. have Netscape on their computer (today the world Internet penetration rate is
at 23,8% in 2000 only 7% of the world population had Internet connection,
http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm). Netscape was then for elites or
computer educated people, for example my brother had it and I never heard
about it.
So to sum up this first part :
- The web browser market has been monopolized by Microsoft because
MS owns the software which manage web browsers ;
- Microsoft has no interest of letting entering competitors into his own
market ;
- Users cannot know that other web browsers exist if they are not
informed about their existence and of course cannot install them if they
do not know how to ;
Is it likely to continue in the future ?
Actually a good question one should ask is ? Is the situation of web
browsers has changed during the last ten years ? ?
As a standard user I can say no but the next decade is going to be very
interesting for the web browsers market and this for many reasons.
Raising up of a new competitor: Google
The first good reason for changes is the raising up of Google
on the market of operating systems. Google already started
on cell phones with a software called ? Android ?. Google is
the most famous brand in the world and has a better
reputation than Microsoft which is a good reason for
Ronan
Ronan CHARDONNEAU - European Master in Business Studies Page 6
7. customers to switch or at least give a try to a new operating system. Moreover
Google already owns its proper web browser : Google Chrome.
It is not that popular but has however the fourth position in the market of web
browser, taking in account that the third one is more or less targeting another
kind of computers (Mac) one can say that Google Chrome has an interesting
outsider position (cf.page 11).
I would amphisize as well that Google may have the solution for the operating
system of tomorrow which could bring a tremendous revolution in the world of
operating system.
It is going to be the first time that Microsoft will face a competitor which is as
famous and successful as him.
A computer population who is more and more educated
The case of Mozilla Firefox web browser is also a very interesting part of this
case study . Mozilla Firefox is a free, open-source, web browser for Windows,
Linux and Mac OS X. Firefox is knowing exactly the same story as Netscape
(in fact the those two products are more or less the same
At the time of the acquisition, the
http://browser.netscape.com/history). ?
Netscape team had begun working on converting their flagship product -
the Netscape Communicator web suite - into open source software,
under a new name: Mozilla. ?
Netscape as Mozilla Firefox both have the reputation to best
http://www.consumersearch.com/web-browser-reviews . It is so called better than Internet
Explorer but is not yet recognized as the standard. The success of Mozilla is
due to the fact that it is a product which is according to me more convenient
Ronan
Ronan CHARDONNEAU - European Master in Business Studies Page 7
8. than Internet Explorer. It is not first in the market because in order to have it on
your computer you need to download it and of course to know its existence.
The best example I can find about the recognition of its strengths is its
presence at the university.
It is nowadays very hard to find in European universities a computer which
does not have Mozilla Firefox on the desktop.
I guess that the presence of Mozilla is due to the fact that higher education
recognize its quality.
Let's know think about the future when the current students which are studying
right now at the university will be on the market place.
Well good chances that it will install a wave of Mozilla Firefox within
businesses and that it will be a trend which will not be reversed until
universities recognize the value of another web browser.
So I would attribute the success of Mozilla Firefox and in a certain way
Netscape to the fact that people get more and more computer educated.
However this education is not sufficient enough in order to jeopardize
Microsoft Internet Explorer on the short term.
A new sanction for Microsoft ?
Microsoft has been at the center of many polemics since the story of Netscape
versus Microsoft, however justice never sanctionned firmely Microsoft for
obvious reasons (if Microsoft is seriously condamned what will happen to
Microsoft users ?).
Microsoft trial is still a day to day topic in the
news : http://www.zdnet.fr/actualites/informatique/0,39040745,39393157,00.ht
m. Microsoft is under a condamnation by the european commission
http://rcpmag.com/news/article.aspx?editorialsid=10780 to let an option on its operating
system allowing to remove Internet Explorer and include competitors web
browsers.
The answer of the verdict is fixed at April the 28th 2009 : http://www.generation-
Ronan
Ronan CHARDONNEAU - European Master in Business Studies Page 8
9. nt.com/internet-explorer-vente-liee-windows-europe-actualite-264581.html
Is such a monopoly a good thing ?
As in all monopoly you have pros and cons :
Good point :
I worked for almost one year in computer companies or at least worked in the
field of computers and here are some benefits I have seen.
If everybody use the same web browsers then it is less work for website
computer programmers because you are sure that all the information you will
display will be displayed properly. Exactly like a language if everybody speaks
the same language then everybody understand and understand each other
Bad point :
On the other hand when people are using different web browsers some
information are sometimes missing, computer programmers have to test the
applications on different web browsers and then tasks come to be more and
more complicated.
Here are some mere explanations. Some web browsers recognized some
parts of codes whereas other don't. One of the most famous one is the HTML
tag called <blink></blink> which means that a word included between those
two tags will blink automatically. Some web browsers are not reading those
codes and of course will not display this information properly whereas other
will.
So here was for the main basic idea.
Ronan
Ronan CHARDONNEAU - European Master in Business Studies Page 9
10. Another idea we can developped is the different use of web browser for
different tasks.
For example Mozilla Firefox is very popular because of all the functions you
can add to this browser : applications which will allow you to download videos
from the website you are looking at or even thousands of others functionalities
to customize your web browser.
Google Chrome is is very convenient because it is quickly launched.
Lynx is very popular to protect your data and your confidentiality.
So to each web browser correspond a certain list of characteristics but of
course you have to know that they exist and what are there characteristics.
According to the book quot;Winners, losers and Microsoftquot; the products which win
the battle are always the best. I strongly disagree with this statement. The
product which win is the best advertised and at this game Microsoft is leading
the game.
A quick look at the recent figures of the web browsers market shares show us
that Internet Explorer is still the leader and the standard in terms of web
browser.
Ronan
Ronan CHARDONNEAU - European Master in Business Studies Page 10
11. Conclusion :
From this analysis we can then understand why Netscape did not win (if your
success is in the end of your competitor¡well it is hard to win) but also why it
is still living under the name of Firefox (when you have strenght that
competitors do not have you are still on the race).
We can also see that people are not entirely benefiting from this monopoly
because Internet Explorer is not the best product.
For consumers they can take the best part of web browsers only by using each
of them for specific purposes but should at least know that they exist.
Microsoft could lose its monopolistic position on the short term but only if a
strong event happened such as the presence of Google on the desktop
operating system market or a severe condamnation from the European
Commission.
Ronan
Ronan CHARDONNEAU - European Master in Business Studies Page 11
12. What is really strange to see is that the Web Browser market clearly show how
computer education is moving and market imperfection, how is it still possible
that Microsoft is taking the monopole of web browser since such a long time ?
Ronan
Ronan CHARDONNEAU - European Master in Business Studies Page 12