際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo

Business Law tutorial

Download as DOCX, PDF
Syaff Hk
Syaff Hk

Farhanah would not be able to purchase the motorcycle at the stated price of $1000 after JJ's death. JJ's initial request to Farhanah was an invitation to treat, not an offer, so no contract was formed. When Farhanah expressed interest via email, that constituted her offer. However, before JJ could accept, he died. His wife is entitled to make a counteroffer as the new owner, increasing the price since she felt the original $1000 price was too low. Even if JJ had accepted Farhanah's offer verbally before dying, his wife could still invalidate the agreement, as the contract was not fully formed in writing. Therefore, the wife increasing the price means Farhanah cannot purchase

1 of 4
Download to read offline
1 N. Syafiqah Husin 1. a) Explain whether Farhanah can be successful in claiming her job from Kayangan Sdn Bhd? b) What happens if she had posted a letter on 17th May 2015 about 8am? Farhanah was offered a job at Kayangan Sdn Bhd after she attended the interview. She also indicated that she will accept the offer. However for her to accept the offer she must reply Kayangans letter dated 12th May 2015 but she received on 14th May 2015. In order for her to bind a contract with Kayangan Sdn Bhd and be successful in claiming her job is to follow Kayangans requirement. The requirement stats that she must send a letter of reply indicated that she accept Kayangans offer and also it must be via postal services. Not only that she must also send the reply letter in writing and it should reach the office on Friday or within five days from the date of offer. This is because Kayangan Sdn Bhd business hour are from Monday to Friday starting 8.30 am till 4.30 pm and Saturday 8.30 am till 12.30pm. When Kayangan asked Farhanah for the job is an indication of an offer. The intention that it will become binding upon acceptance by Farhanah. Theoretically, a contract is already binding because it already has an offer and acceptance. However Kayangan also indicates that in order for Farhanah to accept their offer they will send a formal offer letter to her on the outcome of the interview. So in order for Farhanah to accept the offer she must send an acceptance letter. However upon reply she was ill and ask her friend to notify Kayangan. To her knowledge, her friend telephoned Kayangan to tell them that Farhanah accept the offer. Unfortunately Kayangan was closed and the call was sent to voicemail. Farhanah was not satisfied when she heard that the job was not given to her because she felt so unfair. The formal offer letter only reach to her on 14th May 2015 and she was told that she was given 5 days to reply the offer letter. So the duration of offer should be from 14th 19th May 2015. Kayangan should accept her acceptance because her friend already called Kayangan via telephone on 17th May 2015. Kayangan Personel should check the voicemail first thing in the morning that Monday. If Kayangan doesnt accept the method of communication as it was already stated in Kayanagan requirement, Kayangan should also state the only method of communication was through postal only. This is because Farhanah felt cheated when Kayangan Personnel checked all the mail and immediately telephoned another interviewee. It is not fair for Farhanah because she can be crossed by the person who is using faster method of communication. Not only that, other interviewee could bypass Farhanah in term of sending the letter. Meaning to say, if the other interviewee send out the letter before Farhanah, he/she will be the one for the job. Another reason in which Farhanah felt so unfair is because she was instructed to send the letter and it should reach Kayangan office on Friday. With the limited time, the letter should reach on Friday assuming that she send the letter right after she received it which is on Wednesday, 14th May 2015. This is because it took 2 days for the letter to be processed and send out respectively, so Farhanahs letter will be delivered and should reach the Kayangan office by Friday and maybe in the afternoon assuming that there is nothing happened in the postal services.
2 N. Syafiqah Husin Kayangan have the rights to revoke the offer. This is because during the interview they clearly indicates that the offer are made as soon as they sent out the letter and Farhanah safely receive the letter. Postal rule states that the letter must be correctly addressed stamped and posted and therefore as soon as the letter are sent out, an offer will be formed on 12th May 2015. In that offer letter, Farhanah was clearly instructed to reply the offer within 5 days in writing. But Farhanah did not follow the instructions because she was ill and instruct her friend to tell Kayangan Personnel Department. It was Farhanahs fault not to tell her friend that she should reply Farhanahs acceptance in writing not through phone. This is because the postal rule only applies to telegrams but no other method i.e. telephone, fax or telex [Entores V Miles Far East Corp (1995)] In Farhanahs defend, she was so ill to write a letter and she immediately ask her friend to telephone Kayangan Personnel. Even though Kayangan clearly states the method of acceptance but she can reply by return post which means that phone call should be acceptable since she has a valid reason [Yates Building Co Ltd v RJ Pulleyen & Sons (York) Ltd (1975)]. If Farhanah had posted a letter on 17th May 2015 at 8am, the job should be hers. In her defend, she meet the requirement of postal rule. Assuming that she clearly addressed, stamp and posted correctly she still have the rights for the job due to the offer is still valid. In Farhanahs point of view the duration of offer was made on 14th May up till 17th May. Kayangan should receive Farhanahs letter in 2 days after she posted it which will be on Monday, 19th May 2015 and again assuming there is no delay in the postal services. So the job should be hers as she meet all the requirement. But Kayangan has different view. Kayangan made an offer to Farhanah stating 12th May 2015 till 16th May 2015. So even though Farhanah sent out her letter on 17th May 2015, her acceptance will no longer valid. Meaning to say that the offer lapses. [Ramsgate Victoria Hotel Co V Montefiore (1866)]. So, the personnel can choose other interviewee instead of Farhanah. In conclusion, Farhanah only be successful in claiming her job at Kayangan Sdn Bhd if she send out the letter right after she receive the offer letter. In addition to that, if she had send out the letter on 17th May, the offer lapses already and she will not get the job.
3 N. Syafiqah Husin 2. Would it be possible for farhanah to purchase the motocyle at the stated price as per initial request even after JJ's death? Farhanah receive a request from JJ whether she would buy his motorcycle for $1000. JJs act was an invitation to treat for Farhanah [Fisher v Bell (1960)]. This is because his request considered an advertisement due to he specifically asked Farhanah whether she would his motorcycle. Farhanah could easily makes the offer, which may be accepted or rejected. [Partridge v Crittenden 1968)]. So, Farhanah immediately send an email expressing her interest to purchase the motorcycle because the market price for that motorcycle is very expensive. In other words Farhanah was offering JJ and indicate that she would purchase the motorcycle. However, she still not received a reply from JJ after a week had passed. So she went to see JJ and she found out that JJ had died shortly after talking to her in Bukit Shahbandar. Moreover JJs wife change the price of the motorcycle as the quoted price was too cheap. Farhanah felt so unfair because she already send an email to JJ expressing her interest to purchase the motorcycle for $1000. The acceptance is valid if it is implied, expressed or written. So the contract between JJ and Farhanah considered a valid contract. Assuming that she had talk to JJ about Farhanahs offer during his hike at Bukit Shahbandar, the contract will be bind already because not only Farhanah send an email of offer, she also talk about it on the phone with JJ. She was using an instantaneous method of acceptance for the offer and JJ receives the acceptance. So there will be no case for his wife to counter offer after JJs death. And therefore, she could purchase the motorcycle at $1000 as per initial request. Another assumption will be when Farhanah didnt talk about the sale of JJs motorcycle but only casual talk before he died. This indicates that Farhanah was not notified about the death of JJ. The offer still standing and acceptance can be carried out by JJs next of kin which this case will be his wife. But JJs wife made counter offer by increasing the price due to the quoted price was too cheap. So the Farhanahs offer is no longer valid [Hyde V Wrench (1840)]. Moreover JJs wife has the right to make a counter offer because she is also quite aware of the sale of her late husbands motorcycle. Not only that, JJs request was only an invitation to treat and Lilly has the right to refuse to sell at the advertised price. In Farhanahs defend, Lilly act to increase the price of the motorcycle was wrong because if she felt that price was too cheap why not discuss to her husband before make the request? Farhanah felt cheated as she was already made the offer even though she knew that the offer may be rejected. In other situation when JJs request was not considered as an invitation to treat but an offer. If JJs request was an offer so Farhanahs email expressing her interest to purchase the motorcycle will be an acceptance thus the contract was made between them. One week passed and she did not receive anything from JJ and she went to his address showed in the notice. Then she found out that JJ had died after they had small talk during his hike at Bukit Shahbandar.
4 N. Syafiqah Husin Assuming that the talk was about the sale of JJs motorcycle like when and where to make the payment. The contract was already sealed tight and his wife, Lilly cannot make a counter offer by increasing the price of the motorcycle because the contract was valid unless JJ indicate otherwise. Another assumption will be when Farhanah didnt talk about her interest to purchase JJs motorcycle but only casual talk before he died. This indicates that Farhanah was not notified about the death of JJ. Still, the acceptance was valid. However, the offer also survive and can be carried out by JJs next of kin in this case will be his wife. But JJs wife made counter offer by increasing the price due to the quoted price was too cheap. So the initial offer is no longer valid and Farhanahs acceptance will also be terminated [Hyde V Wrench (1840)]. Moreover JJs wife has the right to make a counter offer because she is also quite aware of the sale of her late husbands motorcycle. In Farhanahs defend, Lilly act to increase the price of the motorcycle was wrong because if she felt that price was too cheap why not discuss to her husband before make the request? Farhanah felt cheated as she was already accept the offer made by JJ before he died. But in Lillys defend, she has the right to change the price because the offer are no longer valid. Moreover, Lilly also has the right not to sell the motorcycle. This is because JJ does not state the condition of the agreement. In conclusion, it is not possible for Farhanah to purchase the motorcycle as per initial request because it was an invitation to treat only and it definitely not considered as an offer. Not only that, Lilly has the right to accept or reject Farhanahs offer as she acted as the next of kin. But it the request was an offer and therefore Farhanah can purchase the motorcycle as per initial request.

More Related Content

Business Law tutorial

  • 1. 1 N. Syafiqah Husin 1. a) Explain whether Farhanah can be successful in claiming her job from Kayangan Sdn Bhd? b) What happens if she had posted a letter on 17th May 2015 about 8am? Farhanah was offered a job at Kayangan Sdn Bhd after she attended the interview. She also indicated that she will accept the offer. However for her to accept the offer she must reply Kayangans letter dated 12th May 2015 but she received on 14th May 2015. In order for her to bind a contract with Kayangan Sdn Bhd and be successful in claiming her job is to follow Kayangans requirement. The requirement stats that she must send a letter of reply indicated that she accept Kayangans offer and also it must be via postal services. Not only that she must also send the reply letter in writing and it should reach the office on Friday or within five days from the date of offer. This is because Kayangan Sdn Bhd business hour are from Monday to Friday starting 8.30 am till 4.30 pm and Saturday 8.30 am till 12.30pm. When Kayangan asked Farhanah for the job is an indication of an offer. The intention that it will become binding upon acceptance by Farhanah. Theoretically, a contract is already binding because it already has an offer and acceptance. However Kayangan also indicates that in order for Farhanah to accept their offer they will send a formal offer letter to her on the outcome of the interview. So in order for Farhanah to accept the offer she must send an acceptance letter. However upon reply she was ill and ask her friend to notify Kayangan. To her knowledge, her friend telephoned Kayangan to tell them that Farhanah accept the offer. Unfortunately Kayangan was closed and the call was sent to voicemail. Farhanah was not satisfied when she heard that the job was not given to her because she felt so unfair. The formal offer letter only reach to her on 14th May 2015 and she was told that she was given 5 days to reply the offer letter. So the duration of offer should be from 14th 19th May 2015. Kayangan should accept her acceptance because her friend already called Kayangan via telephone on 17th May 2015. Kayangan Personel should check the voicemail first thing in the morning that Monday. If Kayangan doesnt accept the method of communication as it was already stated in Kayanagan requirement, Kayangan should also state the only method of communication was through postal only. This is because Farhanah felt cheated when Kayangan Personnel checked all the mail and immediately telephoned another interviewee. It is not fair for Farhanah because she can be crossed by the person who is using faster method of communication. Not only that, other interviewee could bypass Farhanah in term of sending the letter. Meaning to say, if the other interviewee send out the letter before Farhanah, he/she will be the one for the job. Another reason in which Farhanah felt so unfair is because she was instructed to send the letter and it should reach Kayangan office on Friday. With the limited time, the letter should reach on Friday assuming that she send the letter right after she received it which is on Wednesday, 14th May 2015. This is because it took 2 days for the letter to be processed and send out respectively, so Farhanahs letter will be delivered and should reach the Kayangan office by Friday and maybe in the afternoon assuming that there is nothing happened in the postal services.
  • 2. 2 N. Syafiqah Husin Kayangan have the rights to revoke the offer. This is because during the interview they clearly indicates that the offer are made as soon as they sent out the letter and Farhanah safely receive the letter. Postal rule states that the letter must be correctly addressed stamped and posted and therefore as soon as the letter are sent out, an offer will be formed on 12th May 2015. In that offer letter, Farhanah was clearly instructed to reply the offer within 5 days in writing. But Farhanah did not follow the instructions because she was ill and instruct her friend to tell Kayangan Personnel Department. It was Farhanahs fault not to tell her friend that she should reply Farhanahs acceptance in writing not through phone. This is because the postal rule only applies to telegrams but no other method i.e. telephone, fax or telex [Entores V Miles Far East Corp (1995)] In Farhanahs defend, she was so ill to write a letter and she immediately ask her friend to telephone Kayangan Personnel. Even though Kayangan clearly states the method of acceptance but she can reply by return post which means that phone call should be acceptable since she has a valid reason [Yates Building Co Ltd v RJ Pulleyen & Sons (York) Ltd (1975)]. If Farhanah had posted a letter on 17th May 2015 at 8am, the job should be hers. In her defend, she meet the requirement of postal rule. Assuming that she clearly addressed, stamp and posted correctly she still have the rights for the job due to the offer is still valid. In Farhanahs point of view the duration of offer was made on 14th May up till 17th May. Kayangan should receive Farhanahs letter in 2 days after she posted it which will be on Monday, 19th May 2015 and again assuming there is no delay in the postal services. So the job should be hers as she meet all the requirement. But Kayangan has different view. Kayangan made an offer to Farhanah stating 12th May 2015 till 16th May 2015. So even though Farhanah sent out her letter on 17th May 2015, her acceptance will no longer valid. Meaning to say that the offer lapses. [Ramsgate Victoria Hotel Co V Montefiore (1866)]. So, the personnel can choose other interviewee instead of Farhanah. In conclusion, Farhanah only be successful in claiming her job at Kayangan Sdn Bhd if she send out the letter right after she receive the offer letter. In addition to that, if she had send out the letter on 17th May, the offer lapses already and she will not get the job.
  • 3. 3 N. Syafiqah Husin 2. Would it be possible for farhanah to purchase the motocyle at the stated price as per initial request even after JJ's death? Farhanah receive a request from JJ whether she would buy his motorcycle for $1000. JJs act was an invitation to treat for Farhanah [Fisher v Bell (1960)]. This is because his request considered an advertisement due to he specifically asked Farhanah whether she would his motorcycle. Farhanah could easily makes the offer, which may be accepted or rejected. [Partridge v Crittenden 1968)]. So, Farhanah immediately send an email expressing her interest to purchase the motorcycle because the market price for that motorcycle is very expensive. In other words Farhanah was offering JJ and indicate that she would purchase the motorcycle. However, she still not received a reply from JJ after a week had passed. So she went to see JJ and she found out that JJ had died shortly after talking to her in Bukit Shahbandar. Moreover JJs wife change the price of the motorcycle as the quoted price was too cheap. Farhanah felt so unfair because she already send an email to JJ expressing her interest to purchase the motorcycle for $1000. The acceptance is valid if it is implied, expressed or written. So the contract between JJ and Farhanah considered a valid contract. Assuming that she had talk to JJ about Farhanahs offer during his hike at Bukit Shahbandar, the contract will be bind already because not only Farhanah send an email of offer, she also talk about it on the phone with JJ. She was using an instantaneous method of acceptance for the offer and JJ receives the acceptance. So there will be no case for his wife to counter offer after JJs death. And therefore, she could purchase the motorcycle at $1000 as per initial request. Another assumption will be when Farhanah didnt talk about the sale of JJs motorcycle but only casual talk before he died. This indicates that Farhanah was not notified about the death of JJ. The offer still standing and acceptance can be carried out by JJs next of kin which this case will be his wife. But JJs wife made counter offer by increasing the price due to the quoted price was too cheap. So the Farhanahs offer is no longer valid [Hyde V Wrench (1840)]. Moreover JJs wife has the right to make a counter offer because she is also quite aware of the sale of her late husbands motorcycle. Not only that, JJs request was only an invitation to treat and Lilly has the right to refuse to sell at the advertised price. In Farhanahs defend, Lilly act to increase the price of the motorcycle was wrong because if she felt that price was too cheap why not discuss to her husband before make the request? Farhanah felt cheated as she was already made the offer even though she knew that the offer may be rejected. In other situation when JJs request was not considered as an invitation to treat but an offer. If JJs request was an offer so Farhanahs email expressing her interest to purchase the motorcycle will be an acceptance thus the contract was made between them. One week passed and she did not receive anything from JJ and she went to his address showed in the notice. Then she found out that JJ had died after they had small talk during his hike at Bukit Shahbandar.
  • 4. 4 N. Syafiqah Husin Assuming that the talk was about the sale of JJs motorcycle like when and where to make the payment. The contract was already sealed tight and his wife, Lilly cannot make a counter offer by increasing the price of the motorcycle because the contract was valid unless JJ indicate otherwise. Another assumption will be when Farhanah didnt talk about her interest to purchase JJs motorcycle but only casual talk before he died. This indicates that Farhanah was not notified about the death of JJ. Still, the acceptance was valid. However, the offer also survive and can be carried out by JJs next of kin in this case will be his wife. But JJs wife made counter offer by increasing the price due to the quoted price was too cheap. So the initial offer is no longer valid and Farhanahs acceptance will also be terminated [Hyde V Wrench (1840)]. Moreover JJs wife has the right to make a counter offer because she is also quite aware of the sale of her late husbands motorcycle. In Farhanahs defend, Lilly act to increase the price of the motorcycle was wrong because if she felt that price was too cheap why not discuss to her husband before make the request? Farhanah felt cheated as she was already accept the offer made by JJ before he died. But in Lillys defend, she has the right to change the price because the offer are no longer valid. Moreover, Lilly also has the right not to sell the motorcycle. This is because JJ does not state the condition of the agreement. In conclusion, it is not possible for Farhanah to purchase the motorcycle as per initial request because it was an invitation to treat only and it definitely not considered as an offer. Not only that, Lilly has the right to accept or reject Farhanahs offer as she acted as the next of kin. But it the request was an offer and therefore Farhanah can purchase the motorcycle as per initial request.