More Related Content
What's hot (20)
(CCGT - Final) Preliminary FS
- 1. www.kettha.gov.my Preliminary Feasibility Study on GAS-FIRED COMBINED CYCLE POWER PLANT in Malaysia
- 2. Presentation Road Map The significant of CCPP development towards sustainability of energy supply Project Background Project Necessity Comparison with Other Option. UNFCC Statistic Carbon footprint Technical Aspect Pollution Prevention Measures Natural Environment Social Environment Project Scope Power Output Scope of implementation Power Output Scope of implementation Environmental & Social Consideration Project Cost Kuantan Site Kapar Site Project Schedule 2015 2020 Commencement: 2021 1 2 3 4 5 6
- 3. Project Necessity Ensuring electricity supply security through better management of resources Focus area E: Encouraging sustainable energy use to support growth New generation capacity installed in Peninsular Malaysia by 2020 (RMK-11)
- 4. CO2 Emission by Industry (2000) In Malaysia 147,001.30 kt
- 5. Natural Gas enabling the energy transition High level of efficiency Up to 50% Cleaner than any Other fossil fuel Improve the air we breathe
- 6. Comparison with Other Options Alternative Contents Description Proposal 1 Construction of an ultra- supercritical coal-fired power plant Low generation Cost (Coal Price). Obligation to make effort in reduce GHG target value thru COP21. Efficiency only up to 42%. Initial Fund exceed 200B Yen. Proposal 2 Increase of power trading volume (no construction of a power plant) Increase power trading from neighbor countries. Constant imported power can cause significant economic damage. Proposal 3 Introduction of renewable energy Lower intensity of power generation compared to fossil fuel. Stable power supply cannot be expected, CCPP are operated as load adjusting power source. CCPP will play important role in big cities area. CCPP extremely reliable and proven latest technology of Gas Turbine (M701J) with high efficiency CCGT in 2015. improved up to 60%. Enhancement of use of natural Gas. Tremendous Reduction in CO2 Emission. Proven with more than 10, ooo operating hours in Tokyo.
- 7. Project Scope 500 700 MW x 2 units High Efficiency CCPP based on 1600 C class gas turbine (LHV up to 60%) Reduction of GHG emissions such CO2 Target Sites Kuantan and Kapar Power Output and Quantity 500 to 700 MW x 2 unit Scope of Implementation Complete set of Combined cycle power generation plant Civil Engineering and Construction Detail Design of CCPP Production, transportation and installation of a combined cycle power plant (gas turbine and its accessories, steam turbine & accs, HRSG & accs, electric facility, control facility, environment facility, pneumatic facility, cooling water facility, fire fighting facility, etc) Test operation of power plant Consulting service Outside scope of Implementation Implemented under TNB Power plant, transmission line, substation, gas construction site accommodation associated with this project
- 8. Technical Aspect Candidates sites Comparison and evaluation GT Selection Shaft Configuration Power System Analysis Site Layout PlanEnvironmental Financial and economics Technical approach
- 9. Selling your idea Candidate Sites? Kapar, Selangor Kuantan, Pahang Port Dickson, Negeri Sembilan Pasir Gudang, Johor Pulau Indah, Selangor
- 10. Difficulties in: - Land acquisition - Construct transmission line & gas pipeline - Technical diffculties point of view Designated site for separate project commonly known as Track 4A Project PIC Pengerang Co- generation Plant (PCP), 1,220 MW: 620 MW utilised by RAPID 600 MW exported to the grid
- 11. Conditions are favorable No particular problem Serious problems (cannot be solved) There are some problems (can be addressed) Location Comparison and Evaluation Ensuring electricity supply security through better management of resources Focus area E: Encouraging sustainable energy use to support growth Land Acquis ition Site Area Geo. Features Fresh water Supply Intake & dischar ge channel Gas Supply Power cable and substatio n Possible impacts on environme nt & Society Kapar Port Dickson Kuantan Notes :
- 12. Selection of Candidate Sites Type of Candidate GT GT26 Alstorm Power 9F.05 GE M701J Mitsubishi SGT5-8000H Siemens Gross Thermal Efficiency (%) 58.4 57.4 60.3 58.7 Plant Gross Power Output (MW) 448.9 405.2 629.4 536.4 GT Selection Criteria of candidates sites Sufficiently large area natural gas supply seawater & sea depth sufficiently deep Fresh water supply Transmission line and substation Road, port access & infrastructure facilities
- 13. Shaft Configuration Description Type of Shaft A : 1 on 1 Multi-shaft B : 2 on 1 Multi-shaft C : single-shaft Thermal Efficiency Base Base +0,3% Base + 0.1% Construction Cost Base Base + 10.2% Base + 5.1% Power Gen Cost Base Base + 2.3% Base + 1.2% Influence of Electrical Networks Base Double Same Maintenance Cost Base Slightly Less Slightly Less Power System Analysis **Conducted by TNB. Power system analysis not disclosed to 3rd party TNB confirmed there are no problem to grid in Malaysia when 1000MW 1400 MW CCPP put into operation
- 14. Technical Approach Item J Type GT base CCPP USC Coal Fired Thermal PP Gross Thermal Efficiency 19.7% increament (61.7%) Base (42%) CO2 Emission 17,556345 tCO / year decrease Base Type of Candidate GT GT26 Alstorm Power 9F.05 GE M701J Mitsubishi SGT5-8000H Siemens Gross Thermal Efficiency (%) 58.4 57.4 60.3 58.7 Plant Gross Power Output (MW) 448.9 405.2 629.4 536.4 GT Selection CCPP to achieve max. energy-saving effect and reduction on environmental impact
- 15. Site Layout Plan (Kapar Site)
- 16. Site Layout Plan (Kuantan Site)
- 17. Environmental & Social Consideration Social Environment Pollution Prevention Measures Natural Environment
- 18. Highly adequate; this item is no factor that been assessed on environmental impact Moderately adequate; this item is able to avoid environmental impact by implementation of mitigation measures based on investigation. Adequate with consideration; This item needs to take into consideration of environmental impact Screening for Environmental Aspect Item Kuantan Kapar Environmental & Social Consideration Pollution Prevention Measures Kuantan Air quality Water quality Waste Soil Contamination Noise & Vibration Subsidence Odor
- 19. Screening for Environmental Aspect (cont..) Item Kuantan Kapar Environmental & Social Consideration Natural Environment Protected Areas Ecosystem and biota Topography & Geology Social Environment Resettlement and land acquisition Living and livelihood Heritage Landscape Ethnic minorities & indigenous people Working Condition
- 20. Highly adequate; this item is no factor that been assessed on environmental impact Moderately adequate; this item is able to avoid environmental impact by implementation of mitigation measures based on investigation. Adequate with consideration; This item needs to take into consideration of environmental impact Item Kuantan Kapar Environmental & Social Consideration Others Impacts during construction Accident prevention Monitoring Screening for Environmental Aspect (cont..)
- 21. **1 land for construction site already owned by TNB, for financial analysis purposes. Estumated 15.6/ft族 (50 acre) & land reclamation RM130M **2; Contingency (Physical) estimated at 10% of total construction costs exclude land acquisition **3; Interest during construction estimated based funding by JICA Yen Loan Component Kuantan Site Kapar Site Total Cost (JP 促 Mill) Foreign Currency (JP 促 Mill) Total Cost (JP 促 Mill) Foreign Currency (JP 促 Mill) A . Construction Work : Sub-total 108,405.0 73,015.5 118,477.8 83,892.1 Power Plant 92,204.1 64,543.1 92,204.1 64,543.1 Civil Work 4,222.4 3,854.4 16,041..0 14,184.0 Gas Supply System 250.0 200.0 490.0 392.0 Substation 4,727.0 4,253.0 5,289.0 4,760.0 Transmission Line 1,630.0 165.0 123.0 13.0 Land acquisition 5,371.5 - 4,330.7 (**1) - B. Consulting services 1,970.3 1,577.2 1,970.3 1,577,2 C. Contingency (Physical) **2 10,840.5 7,301.,5 11,847.8 8,389.2 D. Interest during construction **3 737.9 737.9 874.6 874.6 E. Total 121,953.7 82,632.1 133,170.5 94,733.1 Total Project Cost (Before tax) Notes:
- 22. Items for Consideration Candidate Sites Kapar Pulau Indah Land Acquisition TNB ownership Owned by TadMax - Difficulty for land acquisition from states government Existing Infrastructure Consideration (Transmission Line) Existing Infrastructure Required to build more than 60 km transmission line, nearest in Olak Lempit (substation) Existing Infrastructure Consideration (Gas Pipeline) Existing Infrastructure Required to build the new gas pipeline Kapar as the Ideal candidate sites compare to Pulau Indah source: http://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2016/08/12/twist-in-power-deal/
- 23. Oct 15 Feb 16 March 16 Dec 16 Jan 18 Dec 20 Req for Yen Loan from EPU. Study in GoJ and confirmation with NGO. F/S by JICA. IEA. Selection of Consultant. Detailed Design. 2015 2016 2017 2018 - 2020 Pre- F/S Construction of Combined Cycle Power Plant Project Schedule EIA. Appraisal. Pledge. E/N and L/A. Detailed Design. Selection of Contractor. Jan 17 Dec 17
- 24. www.kettha.gov.my Conclusion Kapar site most favorable due to: - 45% of the countrys electricity demand from Klang Valley - Gas Pipeline availability in Kapar, only extension line required - Existing Infrastructure, KPAR substation (no obstacles exists on planned route - Air quality in Klang Valley is critical
- 25. Paris Aggreement 2016 Malaysia intends to reduce its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity of GDP by 45% by 2030 relative to the emissions intensity of GDP in 2005. This consist of 35% on an unconditional basis and a further 10% is condition upon receipt of climate finance, technology transfer and capacity building from developed countries www.kettha.gov.my
- 26. Energy Sector We can create a more sustainable, cleaner and safer world by making wiser energy choices Aiman Ali Perdana Felo Ministry of Energy, Green Tech and Water (Batch 4 2016) Email: aimanali2509@gmail.com Cell: +6016-7032509 www.kettha.gov.my follow us on