際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
NEW DRUG
CEFIDEROCOL
Dr. Ancy George
JR Pharmacology
Cefiderocol versus imipenem-cilastatin for the treatment of
complicated urinary tract infections caused by Gram-negative
uropathogens: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind,
non-inferiority trial
Simon Portsmouth, David van Veenhuyzen, Roger Echols, Mitsuaki
Machida, Juan Camilo Arjona Ferreira, Mari Ariyasu, Peter Tenke,
Tsutae Den Nagata
Lancet Infect Dis 2018
October 25, 2018
Objective
To assess the efficacy and safety of Cefiderocol vs Imipenem  Cilastatin for
treatment of complicated UTI in patients with risk of multidrug resistant
Gram negative infections
Methods
Phase 2, multicenter, double blind, parallel group, non- inferiority trailat 67
hospitals in 5 countries
Inclusion criteria
Adults admitted with clinical diagnosis of complicated UTI (cUTI) with or
without pyelonephritis or thoses with acute uncomplicated
pyelonephritis.
Randomly assigned as 2:1 into Cefiderocol (2g) and Imipenem- Cilastatin
( 1g each) Q8H for 7-14 days
Exclusion
 Baseline urine culture with more than 2 uropathogens
 Fungal UTI
 Carbepenem resistant uropathogen
Primary endpoint
Composite of clinical and microbiological outcomes at test of cure (7 days
after treatment cessation), which was used to establish non-inferiority
(15% and 20% margins) of cefiderocol versus imipenem-cilastatin.
Results
1 year study
Cefiderolcol
Assigned  303
Got treatment  300
GN uropathogen  252
Effective treatment  183 (73%)
(p value = 0.0004)
Adverse effects  122(41%)
Imipenem-cilastatin
Assigned  149
Got treatment  148
GN uropathogen  119
Effective treatment  65 (55%)
Adverse effects  76(51%)
Inference
Intravenous infusion of cefiderocol (2 g) three times daily was non-inferior
compared with imipenem-cilastatin (1 g each) for the treatment of
complicated urinary tract infection in people with multidrug-resistant
Gram negative infections.
The results of this study will provide the basis for submission of a New
Drug Application to the US Food and Drug Administration.
Cefiderocol - Dr. ANCY GEORGE
CEFIDEROCOL
Phase III drug
Cefiderocol is a novel catechol substituted siderophore cephalosporin
INDICATIONS
It is against Gram negative bacteria including
Carbapenem- resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae
Acinetobacter baumannii
 Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
USES
Cefiderocol is being developed as a therapeutic drug for the treatment of
carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections, including
nosocomial pneumonia,
bloodstream infections,
complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI).
Structural similarity with Cefepime
Bactericidal
Inhibition of bacterial cell wall synthesis by binding to penicillin binding
proteins
CEFEPIME CEFIDEROCOL
Cefiderocol - Dr. ANCY GEORGE
TROJAN HORSE
It form a chelating complex with
ferric iron and utilize the bacterial
iron transport system to penetrate
the outer membrane of GN
organisms.
Highly stable to various types of carbapenemase
KPC, OXA, IMP, VIM and NDM
Potent activity against Gram-negatives including CR strains
Acinetobacter baumannii
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Escherichia coli
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
Not active against Gram positives or anaerobes
APEKS
STABILITY OF CEFIDEROCOL TO CARBEPENEMASES
Pharmacokinetics
 Terminal elimination half-life -1.98 to 2.74 hr. in healthy subjects.
 Cefiderocol is excreted mainly via the kidneys, with 60 to 70% of the dose in
urine as the unchanged parent drug.
 The total clearance (CL) of cefiderocol was dependent on renal
 Dose adjustment required in renal failure
 No accumulation was observed at the 2 g every 8 hours dose intravenous
infusion, and this dose was well tolerated when administered over 10 days.
Dosage and administration
2-g q8h dosing with a 3-h intravenous infusion was selected as the
standard dose regimen
 Diarrhoea (4%)
 Hypertension (4%)
 Constipation (3%)
 Infusion site pain (3%)
 Headache (2%)
 Nausea (2%)
 Cough (2%)
 Vomiting (2%)
 Hypokalaemia (2%)
 Insomnia (1%)
 Renal cyst (1%)
 Infusion site erythema (1%)
 Abdominal pain upper (1%)
 Cardiac failure (1%)
 Clostridium difficile colitis (<1%)
 Vaginal infection
Adverse Effect
Single dose effects
Diarrhea
Contact dermatitis
Rash
Abdominal pain
Blood in urine
WBC in urine
Increased total counts
Multiple dose effect
Increased TSH
Elevated AST, ALT
THANK YOU

More Related Content

Cefiderocol - Dr. ANCY GEORGE

  • 1. NEW DRUG CEFIDEROCOL Dr. Ancy George JR Pharmacology
  • 2. Cefiderocol versus imipenem-cilastatin for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections caused by Gram-negative uropathogens: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial Simon Portsmouth, David van Veenhuyzen, Roger Echols, Mitsuaki Machida, Juan Camilo Arjona Ferreira, Mari Ariyasu, Peter Tenke, Tsutae Den Nagata Lancet Infect Dis 2018 October 25, 2018
  • 3. Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of Cefiderocol vs Imipenem Cilastatin for treatment of complicated UTI in patients with risk of multidrug resistant Gram negative infections Methods Phase 2, multicenter, double blind, parallel group, non- inferiority trailat 67 hospitals in 5 countries
  • 4. Inclusion criteria Adults admitted with clinical diagnosis of complicated UTI (cUTI) with or without pyelonephritis or thoses with acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis. Randomly assigned as 2:1 into Cefiderocol (2g) and Imipenem- Cilastatin ( 1g each) Q8H for 7-14 days Exclusion Baseline urine culture with more than 2 uropathogens Fungal UTI Carbepenem resistant uropathogen
  • 5. Primary endpoint Composite of clinical and microbiological outcomes at test of cure (7 days after treatment cessation), which was used to establish non-inferiority (15% and 20% margins) of cefiderocol versus imipenem-cilastatin.
  • 6. Results 1 year study Cefiderolcol Assigned 303 Got treatment 300 GN uropathogen 252 Effective treatment 183 (73%) (p value = 0.0004) Adverse effects 122(41%) Imipenem-cilastatin Assigned 149 Got treatment 148 GN uropathogen 119 Effective treatment 65 (55%) Adverse effects 76(51%)
  • 7. Inference Intravenous infusion of cefiderocol (2 g) three times daily was non-inferior compared with imipenem-cilastatin (1 g each) for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection in people with multidrug-resistant Gram negative infections. The results of this study will provide the basis for submission of a New Drug Application to the US Food and Drug Administration.
  • 9. CEFIDEROCOL Phase III drug Cefiderocol is a novel catechol substituted siderophore cephalosporin INDICATIONS It is against Gram negative bacteria including Carbapenem- resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae Acinetobacter baumannii Pseudomonas aeruginosa Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
  • 10. USES Cefiderocol is being developed as a therapeutic drug for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections, including nosocomial pneumonia, bloodstream infections, complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI).
  • 11. Structural similarity with Cefepime Bactericidal Inhibition of bacterial cell wall synthesis by binding to penicillin binding proteins CEFEPIME CEFIDEROCOL
  • 13. TROJAN HORSE It form a chelating complex with ferric iron and utilize the bacterial iron transport system to penetrate the outer membrane of GN organisms.
  • 14. Highly stable to various types of carbapenemase KPC, OXA, IMP, VIM and NDM Potent activity against Gram-negatives including CR strains Acinetobacter baumannii Pseudomonas aeruginosa Escherichia coli Klebsiella pneumoniae Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Not active against Gram positives or anaerobes APEKS
  • 15. STABILITY OF CEFIDEROCOL TO CARBEPENEMASES
  • 16. Pharmacokinetics Terminal elimination half-life -1.98 to 2.74 hr. in healthy subjects. Cefiderocol is excreted mainly via the kidneys, with 60 to 70% of the dose in urine as the unchanged parent drug. The total clearance (CL) of cefiderocol was dependent on renal Dose adjustment required in renal failure No accumulation was observed at the 2 g every 8 hours dose intravenous infusion, and this dose was well tolerated when administered over 10 days.
  • 17. Dosage and administration 2-g q8h dosing with a 3-h intravenous infusion was selected as the standard dose regimen
  • 18. Diarrhoea (4%) Hypertension (4%) Constipation (3%) Infusion site pain (3%) Headache (2%) Nausea (2%) Cough (2%) Vomiting (2%) Hypokalaemia (2%) Insomnia (1%) Renal cyst (1%) Infusion site erythema (1%) Abdominal pain upper (1%) Cardiac failure (1%) Clostridium difficile colitis (<1%) Vaginal infection
  • 19. Adverse Effect Single dose effects Diarrhea Contact dermatitis Rash Abdominal pain Blood in urine WBC in urine Increased total counts Multiple dose effect Increased TSH Elevated AST, ALT