際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Prentice Hall, Inc. 息 2006
PERFORMANCEPERFORMANCE
MANAGEMENTMANAGEMENT
Herman AguinisHerman Aguinis
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
PERFORMANCEPERFORMANCE
MANAGEMENTMANAGEMENT
Herman AguinisHerman Aguinis
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Performance Management in Context:Performance Management in Context:
OverviewOverview
 Definition of Performance Management (PM)
 The Performance Management Contribution
 Disadvantages/Dangers of Poorly-implemented PM
systems
 Definition of Reward Systems
 Aims and role of PM Systems
 Characteristics of an Ideal PM system
 Integration with Other Human Resources and
Development Activities
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Performance Management: DefinitionPerformance Management: Definition
Continuous Process of
Identifying performance of individuals and teams
Measuring performance of individuals and teams
Developing performance of individuals and teams
and
Aligning performance with the strategic goals of the
organization
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
PM is NOT performancePM is NOT performance appraisalappraisal
 PM
 Strategic business
considerations
 Ongoing feedback
 So employee can
improve performance
 Driven by line manager
 Performance appraisal
 Assesses employee
 Strengths &
 Weaknesses
 Once a year
 Lacks ongoing feedback
 Driven by HR
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Contributions of PMContributions of PM
For EmployeesFor Employees
The definitions of job and success are clarified
Motivation to perform is increased
Self-esteem is increased
Self-insight and development and enhanced
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Contributions of PMContributions of PM
For ManagersFor Managers
Supervisors views of performance are
communicated more clearly
Managers gain insight about subordinates
There is better and more timely differentiation
between good and poor performers
Employees become more competent
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Contributions of PMContributions of PM
For Organization/HR FunctionFor Organization/HR Function
Organizational goals are made clear
Organizational change is facilitated
Administrative actions are more fair and
appropriate
There is better protection from lawsuits
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Disadvantages/Dangers ofDisadvantages/Dangers of
Poorly-implemented PM SystemsPoorly-implemented PM Systems
for Employeesfor Employees
 Lowered self-esteem
 Employee burnout and job dissatisfaction
 Damaged relationships
 Use of false or misleading information
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Disadvantages/Dangers ofDisadvantages/Dangers of
Poorly-implemented PM SystemsPoorly-implemented PM Systems
for Managersfor Managers
 Increased turnover
 Decreased motivation to perform
 Unjustified demands on managers resources
 Varying and unfair standards and ratings
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
 Wasted time and money
 Unclear ratings system
 Emerging biases
 Increased risk of litigation
Disadvantages/Dangers ofDisadvantages/Dangers of
Poorly-implemented PM SystemsPoorly-implemented PM Systems
for Organizationfor Organization
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Reward Systems: DefinitionReward Systems: Definition
Set of mechanisms for distributing
Tangible returns
and
Intangible or relational returns
As part of an employment relationship
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Tangible returnsTangible returns
Cash compensation
Base pay
Cost-of-Living & Contingent Pay
Incentives (short- and long-term)
Benefits, such as
Income Protection
Allowances
Work/life focus
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Intangible returnsIntangible returns
 Relational returns, such as
Recognition and status
Employment security
Challenging work
Learning opportunities
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Returns and Their Degree of DependencyReturns and Their Degree of Dependency
on the Performance Management Systemon the Performance Management System
Return
 Cost of Living Adjustment
 Income Protection
 Work/life Focus
 Allowances
 Relational Returns
 Base Pay
 Contingent Pay
 Short-term Incentives
 Long-term Incentives
Degree of Dependency
 Low
 Low
 Moderate
 Moderate
 Moderate
 Moderate
 High
 High
 High
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Purposes of PM Systems:Purposes of PM Systems:
OverviewOverview
Strategic
Administrative
Informational
Developmental
Organizational maintenance
Documentation
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Strategic PurposeStrategic Purpose
Link employee behavior with organizations
goals
Communicate most crucial business strategic
initiatives
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Administrative PurposeAdministrative Purpose
Provide information for making decisions re:
Salary adjustments
Promotions
Retention or termination
Recognition of individual performance
Layoffs
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Informational PurposeInformational Purpose
Communicate to Employees:
Expectations
What is important
How they are doing
How to improve
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Developmental PurposeDevelopmental Purpose
Performance feedback/coaching
Identification of individual strengths and
weaknesses
Causes of performance deficiencies
Tailor development of individual career path
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Organizational Maintenance PurposeOrganizational Maintenance Purpose
Plan effective workforce
Assess future training needs
Evaluate performance at organizational level
Evaluate effectiveness of HR interventions
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Documentational PurposeDocumentational Purpose
Validate selection instruments
Document administrative decisions
Help meet legal requirements
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Characteristics of an Ideal PM SystemCharacteristics of an Ideal PM System
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Congruent with organizational strategyCongruent with organizational strategy
 Consistent with organizations strategy
 Aligned with unit and organizational goals
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
ThoroughThorough
 All employees are evaluated
 All major job responsibilities are evaluated
 Evaluations cover performance for entire
review period
 Feedback is given on both positive and
negative performance
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
PracticalPractical
 Available
 Easy to use
 Acceptable to decision makers
 Benefits outweigh costs
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
MeaningfulMeaningful
 Standards are important and relevant
 System measures ONLY what employee can
control
 Results have consequences Evaluations
occur regularly and at appropriate times
 System provides for continuing skill
development of evaluators
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
SpecificSpecific
Concrete and detailed guidance to
employees
 whats expected
 how to meet the expectations
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Identifies effective and ineffective performanceIdentifies effective and ineffective performance
 Distinguish between effective and ineffective
 Behaviors
 Results
 Provide ability to identify employees with
various levels of performance
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
ReliableReliable
 Consistent
 Free of error
 Inter-rater reliability
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
ValidValid
 Relevant (measures what is important)
 Not deficient (doesnt measure unimportant
facets of job)
 Not contaminated (only measures what the
employee can control)
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Acceptable and FairAcceptable and Fair
 Perception of Distributive Justice
 Work performed  evaluation received  reward
 Perception of Procedural Justice
 Fairness of procedures used to:
 Determine ratings
 Link ratings to rewards
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
InclusiveInclusive
 Represents concerns of all involved
 When system is created, employees should help
with deciding
 What should be measured
 How it should be measured
 Employee should provide input on performance
prior to evaluation meeting
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Open (Open (NoNo Secrets)Secrets)
 Frequent, ongoing evaluations and feedback
 2-way communications in appraisal meeting
 Clear standards, ongoing communication
 Communications are factual, open, honest
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
CorrectableCorrectable
 Recognizes that human judgment is fallible
 Appeals process provided
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
StandardizedStandardized
 Ongoing training of managers to provide
 Consistent evaluations across
 People
 Time
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
EthicalEthical
 Supervisor suppresses self-interest
 Supervisor rates only where she has sufficient
information about the performance dimension
 Supervisor respects employee privacy
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Integration with other Human ResourcesIntegration with other Human Resources
and Development activitiesand Development activities
PM provides information for:
Development of training to meet organizational
needs
Workforce planning
Recruitment and hiring decisions
Development of compensation systems

More Related Content

Ch1

  • 1. Prentice Hall, Inc. 息 2006 PERFORMANCEPERFORMANCE MANAGEMENTMANAGEMENT Herman AguinisHerman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCEPERFORMANCE MANAGEMENTMANAGEMENT Herman AguinisHerman Aguinis
  • 2. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Performance Management in Context:Performance Management in Context: OverviewOverview Definition of Performance Management (PM) The Performance Management Contribution Disadvantages/Dangers of Poorly-implemented PM systems Definition of Reward Systems Aims and role of PM Systems Characteristics of an Ideal PM system Integration with Other Human Resources and Development Activities
  • 3. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Performance Management: DefinitionPerformance Management: Definition Continuous Process of Identifying performance of individuals and teams Measuring performance of individuals and teams Developing performance of individuals and teams and Aligning performance with the strategic goals of the organization
  • 4. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PM is NOT performancePM is NOT performance appraisalappraisal PM Strategic business considerations Ongoing feedback So employee can improve performance Driven by line manager Performance appraisal Assesses employee Strengths & Weaknesses Once a year Lacks ongoing feedback Driven by HR
  • 5. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Contributions of PMContributions of PM For EmployeesFor Employees The definitions of job and success are clarified Motivation to perform is increased Self-esteem is increased Self-insight and development and enhanced
  • 6. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Contributions of PMContributions of PM For ManagersFor Managers Supervisors views of performance are communicated more clearly Managers gain insight about subordinates There is better and more timely differentiation between good and poor performers Employees become more competent
  • 7. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Contributions of PMContributions of PM For Organization/HR FunctionFor Organization/HR Function Organizational goals are made clear Organizational change is facilitated Administrative actions are more fair and appropriate There is better protection from lawsuits
  • 8. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Disadvantages/Dangers ofDisadvantages/Dangers of Poorly-implemented PM SystemsPoorly-implemented PM Systems for Employeesfor Employees Lowered self-esteem Employee burnout and job dissatisfaction Damaged relationships Use of false or misleading information
  • 9. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Disadvantages/Dangers ofDisadvantages/Dangers of Poorly-implemented PM SystemsPoorly-implemented PM Systems for Managersfor Managers Increased turnover Decreased motivation to perform Unjustified demands on managers resources Varying and unfair standards and ratings
  • 10. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Wasted time and money Unclear ratings system Emerging biases Increased risk of litigation Disadvantages/Dangers ofDisadvantages/Dangers of Poorly-implemented PM SystemsPoorly-implemented PM Systems for Organizationfor Organization
  • 11. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Reward Systems: DefinitionReward Systems: Definition Set of mechanisms for distributing Tangible returns and Intangible or relational returns As part of an employment relationship
  • 12. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Tangible returnsTangible returns Cash compensation Base pay Cost-of-Living & Contingent Pay Incentives (short- and long-term) Benefits, such as Income Protection Allowances Work/life focus
  • 13. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Intangible returnsIntangible returns Relational returns, such as Recognition and status Employment security Challenging work Learning opportunities
  • 14. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Returns and Their Degree of DependencyReturns and Their Degree of Dependency on the Performance Management Systemon the Performance Management System Return Cost of Living Adjustment Income Protection Work/life Focus Allowances Relational Returns Base Pay Contingent Pay Short-term Incentives Long-term Incentives Degree of Dependency Low Low Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate High High High
  • 15. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Purposes of PM Systems:Purposes of PM Systems: OverviewOverview Strategic Administrative Informational Developmental Organizational maintenance Documentation
  • 16. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Strategic PurposeStrategic Purpose Link employee behavior with organizations goals Communicate most crucial business strategic initiatives
  • 17. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Administrative PurposeAdministrative Purpose Provide information for making decisions re: Salary adjustments Promotions Retention or termination Recognition of individual performance Layoffs
  • 18. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Informational PurposeInformational Purpose Communicate to Employees: Expectations What is important How they are doing How to improve
  • 19. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Developmental PurposeDevelopmental Purpose Performance feedback/coaching Identification of individual strengths and weaknesses Causes of performance deficiencies Tailor development of individual career path
  • 20. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Organizational Maintenance PurposeOrganizational Maintenance Purpose Plan effective workforce Assess future training needs Evaluate performance at organizational level Evaluate effectiveness of HR interventions
  • 21. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Documentational PurposeDocumentational Purpose Validate selection instruments Document administrative decisions Help meet legal requirements
  • 22. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Characteristics of an Ideal PM SystemCharacteristics of an Ideal PM System
  • 23. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Congruent with organizational strategyCongruent with organizational strategy Consistent with organizations strategy Aligned with unit and organizational goals
  • 24. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver ThoroughThorough All employees are evaluated All major job responsibilities are evaluated Evaluations cover performance for entire review period Feedback is given on both positive and negative performance
  • 25. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PracticalPractical Available Easy to use Acceptable to decision makers Benefits outweigh costs
  • 26. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver MeaningfulMeaningful Standards are important and relevant System measures ONLY what employee can control Results have consequences Evaluations occur regularly and at appropriate times System provides for continuing skill development of evaluators
  • 27. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver SpecificSpecific Concrete and detailed guidance to employees whats expected how to meet the expectations
  • 28. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Identifies effective and ineffective performanceIdentifies effective and ineffective performance Distinguish between effective and ineffective Behaviors Results Provide ability to identify employees with various levels of performance
  • 29. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver ReliableReliable Consistent Free of error Inter-rater reliability
  • 30. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver ValidValid Relevant (measures what is important) Not deficient (doesnt measure unimportant facets of job) Not contaminated (only measures what the employee can control)
  • 31. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Acceptable and FairAcceptable and Fair Perception of Distributive Justice Work performed evaluation received reward Perception of Procedural Justice Fairness of procedures used to: Determine ratings Link ratings to rewards
  • 32. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver InclusiveInclusive Represents concerns of all involved When system is created, employees should help with deciding What should be measured How it should be measured Employee should provide input on performance prior to evaluation meeting
  • 33. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Open (Open (NoNo Secrets)Secrets) Frequent, ongoing evaluations and feedback 2-way communications in appraisal meeting Clear standards, ongoing communication Communications are factual, open, honest
  • 34. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver CorrectableCorrectable Recognizes that human judgment is fallible Appeals process provided
  • 35. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver StandardizedStandardized Ongoing training of managers to provide Consistent evaluations across People Time
  • 36. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver EthicalEthical Supervisor suppresses self-interest Supervisor rates only where she has sufficient information about the performance dimension Supervisor respects employee privacy
  • 37. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Integration with other Human ResourcesIntegration with other Human Resources and Development activitiesand Development activities PM provides information for: Development of training to meet organizational needs Workforce planning Recruitment and hiring decisions Development of compensation systems

Editor's Notes

  • #13: Base pay Hourly wages Salary Cost-of-Living & Contingent Pay Usually permanent increases in pay based on either cost of living or performance Covered in more detail in Module 11 Incentives (short- and long-term) Used to increase performance E.g., bonuses (short term) or stock options/ownership (long term) Income Protection Sometimes required under law, such as Social Security (what about unemployment insurance in the USA?) Disability pay, medical insurance, pension plans, savings plans Allowances E.g., housing transportation (e.g., company provides car)
  • #14: Work/life focus (to help employee balance work/home life) Such as vacation time, flextime and telecommuting, services (e.g., counseling, financial planning, fitness activities) Relational Returns Such as recognition, status, employment security, challenging work, opportunities to learn, opportunities to form personal relationships
  • #17: Note: the following is slide used before (some of this is not in Module 1) Links employee activities with organizations mission and goals Identifies results and behaviors needed to carry out strategy Maximizes extent employees exhibit those behaviors and results Only 13% of organizations use PM to communicate organizational purpose and goals