The document discusses the law of fixtures and how it determines whether objects attached to land, such as machinery, are considered real property or personal property. It provides examples of items nailed, bolted, or resting on land and how those attachment methods could influence whether they are considered fixtures or chattels. The document also references two legal cases, Geita Sebea v The Territory of Papua and Belgrave Nominees v Barlin Scott Air Conditioning, that relate to the purpose of annexation test in determining if a fixture is real or personal property.
1 of 14
More Related Content
Chattel or fixture?
1. When is a chattel
not a chattel?
LA2015 Monday, week 2, 2014
3. The law of fixtures changes the
character of some physical
objects placed on land from
personal property to real
property
4. Whatever is attached to the soil
becomes part of the soil
Image: http://stlbridge.com/category/projects/pile-driving-deep-foundations/
11. Geita Sebea v The Territory of
Papua (1941) 67 CLR 544
Image: http://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/asearch/asearch?
name=HESTON&gazetteer=heston&POPULATED_PLACE=HESTON&LONDON_BOROU
GH=HOUNSLOW&searchCountry=3
12. Purpose of Annexation Test Belgrave
Nominees v Barlin Scott Air Conditioning
(1984) VR 947
Image: http://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/687710-death-defying-
workman-climbs-out-of-window-to-fix-air-conditioner/
13. Image: Colin Cook http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-03-12/success-for-salt-
resistent-wheat-crop/3883398