際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
CJ 304 Pitch Presentation: Tonjanique Swanigan
By the end of 2005, Michigan population consisted of
49,377 inmates. In the year 2010, Michigans prison
population consisted of 44,113 inmates. Meaning that
Michigans inmate population decreased by 5,264 within
5 years. (Heyns, 2010)
CJ 304 Pitch Presentation: Tonjanique Swanigan
But even though it has decreased, incapacitation is still costing Americans
tons of dollars. Having to house a significant number of inmates who are
rapidly committing crimes is quite expensive. This is exactly why Michigans
correctional facilities budget is steadily increasing.

According to the Michigan Department of Corrections 2010 annual budget
for Michigan correctional facilities, Michigans budget in 2000 was
approximately $1.2 billion. The average annual cost for one prisoner from
any security levels in 2010 was 33, 822. Within a decade Michigans budget
CJ 304 Pitch Presentation: Tonjanique Swanigan
 Alternative incapacitation is a way to
  decrease budget that is steadily rising, and
  help our country save millions of dollars.
 House arrest is an effective alternative to
  incapacitation.
 In this paper I defined and examined in
  depth the benefits and problems of house
  arrest, and explained the impacts house
  arrest had on recidivism and crime rates.
≒House arrest is a sentence
    imposed by the court in
  which offenders are legally
 ordered to remain confined
   in their own residences.
 House arrest is an effective alternative to
  incapacitation.
 Its now Starting to get more widely used!
 By the end of 2010, Michigan itself had
  approximately 3,500 inmates on active GPS
  monitoring, and about 2,500 inmates on other
  electronic monitoring (Heyns, 2010).
 The recidivism rates and escapes rate are fairly low
 The average percentage of offenders who fails to
  complete the program is about twenty-five percent, if
  not less.
CJ 304 Pitch Presentation: Tonjanique Swanigan
 House arrest can be cost-effective in the sense of
  not looking at the technological start-up.
 House arrest will cut a good number of expenses
  such as; the cost of housing per year per
  inmate, and also reduce the need for expenses to
  build new correctional facilities.
 Many of the house arrest programs order for the
  offender to work. Which means that the offender
  will continue to pay taxes, and sometimes may
  even have to pay restitution, probation, and/or
  supervision fees.
 Manufacturers also believe this will decrease
  welfare expenses, because the offender will be
 Low percentage rate of recidivism.
 Helps with overcrowding; Many jurisdictions are
  ordering correctional facilities to decrease their
  inmate population to fix the problem of overcrowding.
 Not only that, but house arrest programs will allow the
  offender to still be able to work, and cover any
  expenses they have on their on instead of at the
  expense of the government.
 Questions the safety of
  society, and rather it is
  safe for an convicted
  felon to interact with the
  public.
 But one thing that
  society have to realize is
  one day most of the

More Related Content

CJ 304 Pitch Presentation: Tonjanique Swanigan

  • 2. By the end of 2005, Michigan population consisted of 49,377 inmates. In the year 2010, Michigans prison population consisted of 44,113 inmates. Meaning that Michigans inmate population decreased by 5,264 within 5 years. (Heyns, 2010)
  • 4. But even though it has decreased, incapacitation is still costing Americans tons of dollars. Having to house a significant number of inmates who are rapidly committing crimes is quite expensive. This is exactly why Michigans correctional facilities budget is steadily increasing. According to the Michigan Department of Corrections 2010 annual budget for Michigan correctional facilities, Michigans budget in 2000 was approximately $1.2 billion. The average annual cost for one prisoner from any security levels in 2010 was 33, 822. Within a decade Michigans budget
  • 6. Alternative incapacitation is a way to decrease budget that is steadily rising, and help our country save millions of dollars. House arrest is an effective alternative to incapacitation. In this paper I defined and examined in depth the benefits and problems of house arrest, and explained the impacts house arrest had on recidivism and crime rates.
  • 7. ≒House arrest is a sentence imposed by the court in which offenders are legally ordered to remain confined in their own residences.
  • 8. House arrest is an effective alternative to incapacitation. Its now Starting to get more widely used! By the end of 2010, Michigan itself had approximately 3,500 inmates on active GPS monitoring, and about 2,500 inmates on other electronic monitoring (Heyns, 2010). The recidivism rates and escapes rate are fairly low The average percentage of offenders who fails to complete the program is about twenty-five percent, if not less.
  • 10. House arrest can be cost-effective in the sense of not looking at the technological start-up. House arrest will cut a good number of expenses such as; the cost of housing per year per inmate, and also reduce the need for expenses to build new correctional facilities. Many of the house arrest programs order for the offender to work. Which means that the offender will continue to pay taxes, and sometimes may even have to pay restitution, probation, and/or supervision fees. Manufacturers also believe this will decrease welfare expenses, because the offender will be
  • 11. Low percentage rate of recidivism. Helps with overcrowding; Many jurisdictions are ordering correctional facilities to decrease their inmate population to fix the problem of overcrowding. Not only that, but house arrest programs will allow the offender to still be able to work, and cover any expenses they have on their on instead of at the expense of the government.
  • 12. Questions the safety of society, and rather it is safe for an convicted felon to interact with the public. But one thing that society have to realize is one day most of the