Class5 - The Mind-brain Problem
0 likes283 views
The document discusses the history of understanding the relationship between language and the brain. It describes early theories such as dualism which viewed the mind and body as separate. It then outlines key figures like Broca and Wernicke who through studying brain damage cases established that language production and comprehension are handled by distinct brain regions. More recent neuroscientists like Poeppel and Friederici study these language areas and how they interact using modern techniques like analyzing neuronal oscillations. The document traces the progression of the field from early philosophies to current models integrating linguistics and neuroscience.
![ByMagnolia87(Ownwork)[CCBY-SA3.0(https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)],viaWikimedia
Commons
Norman Geschwind
Integrating all we know
Language/ Speech anatomy and
physiology by integrating Brocas area,
Wernickes area and the cortexes.
Many medical schools still use this model.](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/class5themindbrainproblem-180611183433/85/Class5-The-Mind-brain-Problem-37-320.jpg)
Class5 - The Mind-brain Problem
- 1. The talking Brain LCD 105 - Class 5 - Professor Nathacia
- 2. Ok.. we now have a (partial) de鍖nition for Language Abstract reality that is socially-based, individually-based AND speci鍖cally-based; It is a Faculty of the mind; It is a cognition.
- 3. Cognition? Oxford: the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses Psychological Glossary: All the mental activities associated with thinking, knowing, and remembering. As you can tell, any of your ideas, thoughts, memories, etc., are all types of cognitive processes. What you are doing (reading and learning this explanation) is a type of cognition.
- 4. Houston, we have a problem
- 5. Dualism Mind and Body are to completely independent things. Descartes: Mind is non-physical - and therefore, non-spacial - substance. The mental can exist outside the body.
- 6. Dualism Mind and Body are to completely independent things. Descartes: Mind is non-physical - and therefore, non-spacial - substance. The mental can exist outside the body. Problem: How to explain non-physical substance causing physical events?
- 7. Materialism There is no mind actually. Everything is physical. What we call mind is actually an epiphenomenon of physical interactions. Radical Behaviorism: mind is an epiphenomenon of stimuli- response relations. Problem: It doesn't explain mental causes as knowledge, expectation and beliefs. Logical Behaviorism: mind is an epiphenomenon of logical relations between a stimulus and a response. Problem: it just explain mental causes in a event-event relation. What happens if theres no reason for a change of mind? Central-State Identity: mind is an epiphenomenon of neurons arrangement / circuits.
- 9. By Rama, CC BY-SA 3.0 fr, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=58036467 The interest for what is inside the head goes back many thousands years BC Trepanning or Trepanation Surgical intervention (alive people) in which a hole was drilled or scraped into a skull
- 10. Hippocrates Actually the brain is the organ of the mind (major controlling center)
- 11. Hippocrates and Galenus Actually the brain is the organ of the mind (major controlling center) Mental activity occurs in the brain.
- 12. Franz Joseph Gall Organology: the isolation of mental faculties. Cranioscopy: reading the skull's shape. Phrenology
- 17. Phineas Gage and the Localization Hypothesis
- 23. Back to relating anatomy and cognition Pierre Paul Broca 1860
- 24. Back to relating anatomy and cognition Pierre Paul Broca 1860
- 25. Back to relating anatomy and cognition Pierre Paul Broca 1860
- 28. Brocas aphasia Pierre Paul Broca Problems with production of closed class words No problems of comprehension Prosody not a鍖ected (or most part of it) Principal conclusion: Language Production and Language Comprehension are (anatomically and physiologically) distinct.
- 29. A different type of disorder Karl Wernicke
- 32. Wernickes aphasia Karl Wernicke Problems with comprehension Problems in making sense (semantics) No problems of articulation or speech production (in the matter of Phonetics, phonology, morphology or syntax - in certain extent) Principal conclusion (con鍖rmed): Language Production and Language Comprehension are (anatomically and physiologically) distinct.
- 33. Production x Articulation Wilder Graves Pen鍖eld Cortical Homunculus
- 37. ByMagnolia87(Ownwork)[CCBY-SA3.0(https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)],viaWikimedia Commons Norman Geschwind Integrating all we know Language/ Speech anatomy and physiology by integrating Brocas area, Wernickes area and the cortexes. Many medical schools still use this model.
- 39. When linguistics and Neuroscience meet David Poeppel The functional anatomic model of language developed with Greg Hickok Lateralization in auditory processing Experimental work on the role of neuronal oscillations in audition and speech perception
- 41. When linguistics and Neuroscience meet Angela Friederici Neurocognitive Model of Auditory Language Comprehension how the processing of syntax and semantics interacts with other linguistic (phonology, prosody) and non-linguistic domains (e.g. memory, emotion, gesture) Experimental work on the role of neuronal oscillations in audition and speech perception
- 42. Friederici (2012): The cortical language circuit: from auditory perception to sentence comprehension http://www.cell.com/trends/cognitive-sciences/fulltext/S1364-6613(12)00079-4