際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Classical Ethical
Theories
Note:
 Ethical Theories show us that
morality exists
 Distinguish Good from Evil
 These Theories are normative.
 Thus create moral
disagreements among people.
 Each classical ethical theory has
its view about the reality of
morality.
 Each theory gives important
truths a bout moral life.
 None of the theories can claim to
possess the whole truth
 Each theory checks the excesses of
the other,
 Thereby showing the limits of each
theory .
 Some theories are consequential in
Nature,
 While others are non-consequential.
Moral Absolutism
 Claims that there are absolute
standards against which
morality can be judged.
 We can strive to attain higher
norms that apply to all human
beings.
Moral absolutism contd
 Certain actions are right or
wrong irrespective of the
context of the act.
 Nothing is relative; a crime is a
crime regardless of the
circumstances.
Moral Absolutism Contd
 Therefore right and wrong are
universal truths ( ethical
standards are applicable to
every body everywhere.
Analysis:
 From an egoistic view, moral
absolutism condones
fundamentalism. This can break
down society.
 This would imply that all people
should have the same ethical
codes.
Contd
 positively:, it allows us to
judge the actions of others.
Moral Relativism
 There are no universal moral
standards; Nothing is good or bad
absolutely.
 Therefore the truth/ moral
principles vary from time to time,
group to group place to place
Moral Relativism Contd
 Every one should be contented
with the morality of their time
and place
Two Forms of Relativism
1.Subjectivism: Each individual
must act according to what
he/she considers appropriate
for each situation
Forms of Relativism Contd
2. Cultural Relativism: Good and
Bad depends on the ethical
values prevailing in the given
culture/community.
Analysis
 No responsibility, No blame
every body/groups have their
own moral standards.
 Can not Judge others
 Laws become impossible to
implement
Consequentialism
 Actions are judged according
to the end / completion /
effect.
 Sum total good in actions must
exceed the evil
Forms of Consequentialism
1.Ethical Egoism
2.Utilitarianism/altruism
3.Pragmatism
4. Feminist Consequentialism
Forms Contd
Ethical Egoism:
 What is ethical is that which
produces good consequences
to the actor.( hedonists/
Thomas Hobbes)
Analysis
 Is it possible to avoid pain?
 Foregoing sensual pleasure to
enjoy higher pleasure; postpone
the enjoyment of pleasure
 Pleasure generalized; sacrifice,
duty, generosity.. Etc
Utilitarianism; Jeremy
Bentham & Stuart Mill
 Using the principle of
utility,(Maximizing the Good)
Bentham found pain and
pleasure to be the only
intrinsic values in the world.
Classical ethical theories new
Utilitarianism Contd
 Man is governed naturally by pain
and pleasure.
 Actions and policies should be
evaluated on the basis of the
benefits and costs they have on
society.
Utilitarianism Contd
 Correct actions produce
greatest net benefits or
lowest net costs.
 Greatest happiness/good
for the greatest number.
Utilitarianism Contd
 People affected by actions are
stakeholders of the action;
therefore businesses should
consider all people affected by
their businesses as
stakeholders in the business.
Utilitarianism Contd
 Essentials of Utility
 Maximizing good
 Theory of value: standard of goodness:
intrinsic values- satisfaction of desires-
attainment of autonomy-achievement of deep
personal relationships
 Consequentialism; produce the best utilitarian
outcome
Utilitarianism Contd
 Impartiality/ Universalism
Analysis
 Is it possible to determine
pleasure for others?
 Is morality for the majority
always right?
Analysis contd
 Can lead to radical actions,
infanticide, exterminate
sufferers .. Assisted suicide(
euthanasia)
Pragmatism
 There is no room for
absolutism; ethical standards
change according to their
usefulness or practicability and
their ability to produce good
effect.
Pragmatism Contd
 Good actions are those that
work, profitable, or have
practical consequences, help
solve a problem, and produce
positive results.
Analysis
 No common Morality
 One can not be certain of the
consequences.
Feminist Consequentilism
Caro Gilligan/ Ethics of Care
 Men use logic and rules/ laws
to arrive at moral decisions.
They generalize morality while
Women see morality as being
entailed in communication and
relationships. Morality is
particular
Ethics of Care Contd
 Men see themselves as guilty
for doing something wrong
while women hold themselves
responsible for not doing
something to prevent the hurt.
Ethics of Care Contd
 Women change rules in order
to preserve relationships
while men abide by rules and
see relationships as
replaceable.
Ethics of Care Contd
 Therefore actions that are
right are those that do not
break up relationships, hurt
other peoples feelings; and
vise versa.
Non-Consequential Theories
 Kantian Ethics
 Deontology
 Virtue Ethics
Deontological Theories
 Greek word  Deon and logos meaning
duty or obligation.
 Acting in accordance to ones duty is right.
 What are duties?
 Hugo Grotius ( 1583-1635) and Samuel
Pufendorf ( 1632-1694)
 Duties towards God
 Towards ones self
Duties Contd
 Duty towards others. Family, friends, general
social obligations etc
 W.D ROSS DUTIES ( 1817-1971)
 Fidelity
 Gratitude
 Justice
 Beneficence
 Self improvement and Non- maleficence.
Kantian Ethics/Theory
 Immanuel Kant : 1724-1804
 He is a critique of the Utilitarian's, hedonists,
pragmatists, who never care a bout the motives
of actors/agents.
 Actions are duty based ( motive)
 Right actions are those that are done when the
agent possesses good will( a person recognizes
that they ought to do these actions)
 Categorical Imperative ( unconditional/
command- / essential)
Kant Contd
  Act only to that maxim by which you can at
the same time will that it should become a
universal law Universalism
 Key Issues:
 Duty and Good will
 Universalism
 Treating Human Beings as an  End not
Means
Virtue ethics
 Virtue is a habitual and firm disposition to do
the good.
 Virtues allow a person not only to perform
good acts to give the best of himself/herself in
every thing.
 A good person
directs his/herself towards the good with all
his/her sensory and spiritual powers.
Virtues contd
 A virtuous person stands firm in trying
moments
 The choice of good acts produces virtue and
virtues itself is the source of choosing to do
good acts.
 Good habits make virtues and bad habits
make the vices. ( Virtues= good; Vice= bad)
Virtues Contd
 Virtues are therefore necessary for a moral
life.
 Virtues govern actions, give one a firm and
good attitude, perfect the intellect, control
passions, and generally make it easy for one to
enjoy leading a morally good life.
 Virtues are acquired by human effort ( they
are the seed and fruit of morally good acts)
Virtues Contd
 Classifications of Virtues.
1. Cardinal Virtues/ moral virtues: Main/Major
all other virtues originate from them.
 Prudence: Right reason-ability to discern true
good from every circumstance.
 Justice: Fairness; promote equity.
 Fortitude: Firmness in difficulty-constant
pursuit of good
Virtues Contd
 Resistance to temptations
 Ability to overcome obstacles.
Temperance: Moderates attraction of pleasures.
2. Super natural : Charity, Hope and Faith
3. Intellectual: wisdom, science, art
Natural Law Tradition
 Laws of nature govern the activities of the
universe, instruct emotions common to man, like
love of offspring, self preservation etc ; Therefore
 All rational persons know what kind of actions
morality prohibits, requires, discourages and
encourages. It is reason which makes us act
morally.
 What is natural is right/good and vice versa.[
Divine Command Theory
 Good actions commanded by God
Communitarianism
 Common good
 Social Goals
 Co-operative Virtues
 Community Values
 Solidarity: community makes the individual
and Vice versa
 Society assigns roles. Therefore what is in line
with the common good is right and vice versa.
 Elements to evaluate an ethical act
 Object /act
 End/intention
 Circumstances
 Evaluation of acts with a double effect
 Responsibility for other peoples actions
 Responsibility for cooperating in other peoples
actions
 Restrictions to proper use of the intellect.
Ethics
Deontological Right Action Duty Rights
Teleological/conquentialism

More Related Content

Classical ethical theories new

  • 2. Note: Ethical Theories show us that morality exists Distinguish Good from Evil These Theories are normative. Thus create moral disagreements among people.
  • 3. Each classical ethical theory has its view about the reality of morality. Each theory gives important truths a bout moral life. None of the theories can claim to possess the whole truth
  • 4. Each theory checks the excesses of the other, Thereby showing the limits of each theory . Some theories are consequential in Nature, While others are non-consequential.
  • 5. Moral Absolutism Claims that there are absolute standards against which morality can be judged. We can strive to attain higher norms that apply to all human beings.
  • 6. Moral absolutism contd Certain actions are right or wrong irrespective of the context of the act. Nothing is relative; a crime is a crime regardless of the circumstances.
  • 7. Moral Absolutism Contd Therefore right and wrong are universal truths ( ethical standards are applicable to every body everywhere.
  • 8. Analysis: From an egoistic view, moral absolutism condones fundamentalism. This can break down society. This would imply that all people should have the same ethical codes.
  • 9. Contd positively:, it allows us to judge the actions of others.
  • 10. Moral Relativism There are no universal moral standards; Nothing is good or bad absolutely. Therefore the truth/ moral principles vary from time to time, group to group place to place
  • 11. Moral Relativism Contd Every one should be contented with the morality of their time and place
  • 12. Two Forms of Relativism 1.Subjectivism: Each individual must act according to what he/she considers appropriate for each situation
  • 13. Forms of Relativism Contd 2. Cultural Relativism: Good and Bad depends on the ethical values prevailing in the given culture/community.
  • 14. Analysis No responsibility, No blame every body/groups have their own moral standards. Can not Judge others Laws become impossible to implement
  • 15. Consequentialism Actions are judged according to the end / completion / effect. Sum total good in actions must exceed the evil
  • 16. Forms of Consequentialism 1.Ethical Egoism 2.Utilitarianism/altruism 3.Pragmatism 4. Feminist Consequentialism
  • 17. Forms Contd Ethical Egoism: What is ethical is that which produces good consequences to the actor.( hedonists/ Thomas Hobbes)
  • 18. Analysis Is it possible to avoid pain? Foregoing sensual pleasure to enjoy higher pleasure; postpone the enjoyment of pleasure Pleasure generalized; sacrifice, duty, generosity.. Etc
  • 19. Utilitarianism; Jeremy Bentham & Stuart Mill Using the principle of utility,(Maximizing the Good) Bentham found pain and pleasure to be the only intrinsic values in the world.
  • 21. Utilitarianism Contd Man is governed naturally by pain and pleasure. Actions and policies should be evaluated on the basis of the benefits and costs they have on society.
  • 22. Utilitarianism Contd Correct actions produce greatest net benefits or lowest net costs. Greatest happiness/good for the greatest number.
  • 23. Utilitarianism Contd People affected by actions are stakeholders of the action; therefore businesses should consider all people affected by their businesses as stakeholders in the business.
  • 24. Utilitarianism Contd Essentials of Utility Maximizing good Theory of value: standard of goodness: intrinsic values- satisfaction of desires- attainment of autonomy-achievement of deep personal relationships Consequentialism; produce the best utilitarian outcome
  • 26. Analysis Is it possible to determine pleasure for others? Is morality for the majority always right?
  • 27. Analysis contd Can lead to radical actions, infanticide, exterminate sufferers .. Assisted suicide( euthanasia)
  • 28. Pragmatism There is no room for absolutism; ethical standards change according to their usefulness or practicability and their ability to produce good effect.
  • 29. Pragmatism Contd Good actions are those that work, profitable, or have practical consequences, help solve a problem, and produce positive results.
  • 30. Analysis No common Morality One can not be certain of the consequences.
  • 31. Feminist Consequentilism Caro Gilligan/ Ethics of Care Men use logic and rules/ laws to arrive at moral decisions. They generalize morality while Women see morality as being entailed in communication and relationships. Morality is particular
  • 32. Ethics of Care Contd Men see themselves as guilty for doing something wrong while women hold themselves responsible for not doing something to prevent the hurt.
  • 33. Ethics of Care Contd Women change rules in order to preserve relationships while men abide by rules and see relationships as replaceable.
  • 34. Ethics of Care Contd Therefore actions that are right are those that do not break up relationships, hurt other peoples feelings; and vise versa.
  • 35. Non-Consequential Theories Kantian Ethics Deontology Virtue Ethics
  • 36. Deontological Theories Greek word Deon and logos meaning duty or obligation. Acting in accordance to ones duty is right. What are duties? Hugo Grotius ( 1583-1635) and Samuel Pufendorf ( 1632-1694) Duties towards God Towards ones self
  • 37. Duties Contd Duty towards others. Family, friends, general social obligations etc W.D ROSS DUTIES ( 1817-1971) Fidelity Gratitude Justice Beneficence Self improvement and Non- maleficence.
  • 38. Kantian Ethics/Theory Immanuel Kant : 1724-1804 He is a critique of the Utilitarian's, hedonists, pragmatists, who never care a bout the motives of actors/agents. Actions are duty based ( motive) Right actions are those that are done when the agent possesses good will( a person recognizes that they ought to do these actions) Categorical Imperative ( unconditional/ command- / essential)
  • 39. Kant Contd Act only to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law Universalism Key Issues: Duty and Good will Universalism Treating Human Beings as an End not Means
  • 40. Virtue ethics Virtue is a habitual and firm disposition to do the good. Virtues allow a person not only to perform good acts to give the best of himself/herself in every thing. A good person directs his/herself towards the good with all his/her sensory and spiritual powers.
  • 41. Virtues contd A virtuous person stands firm in trying moments The choice of good acts produces virtue and virtues itself is the source of choosing to do good acts. Good habits make virtues and bad habits make the vices. ( Virtues= good; Vice= bad)
  • 42. Virtues Contd Virtues are therefore necessary for a moral life. Virtues govern actions, give one a firm and good attitude, perfect the intellect, control passions, and generally make it easy for one to enjoy leading a morally good life. Virtues are acquired by human effort ( they are the seed and fruit of morally good acts)
  • 43. Virtues Contd Classifications of Virtues. 1. Cardinal Virtues/ moral virtues: Main/Major all other virtues originate from them. Prudence: Right reason-ability to discern true good from every circumstance. Justice: Fairness; promote equity. Fortitude: Firmness in difficulty-constant pursuit of good
  • 44. Virtues Contd Resistance to temptations Ability to overcome obstacles. Temperance: Moderates attraction of pleasures. 2. Super natural : Charity, Hope and Faith 3. Intellectual: wisdom, science, art
  • 45. Natural Law Tradition Laws of nature govern the activities of the universe, instruct emotions common to man, like love of offspring, self preservation etc ; Therefore All rational persons know what kind of actions morality prohibits, requires, discourages and encourages. It is reason which makes us act morally. What is natural is right/good and vice versa.[
  • 46. Divine Command Theory Good actions commanded by God
  • 47. Communitarianism Common good Social Goals Co-operative Virtues Community Values Solidarity: community makes the individual and Vice versa Society assigns roles. Therefore what is in line with the common good is right and vice versa.
  • 48. Elements to evaluate an ethical act Object /act End/intention Circumstances Evaluation of acts with a double effect Responsibility for other peoples actions Responsibility for cooperating in other peoples actions Restrictions to proper use of the intellect.
  • 49. Ethics Deontological Right Action Duty Rights Teleological/conquentialism