This document compares layered and unstructured tetrahedral meshing approaches for groundwater modeling at a geometrically complex mine site. It finds that fully unstructured tetrahedral meshing can substantially reduce mesh size while maintaining geologic detail. This allows direct solvers to be applied, improving simulation performance. Specifically, a tetrahedral mesh reduced nodes from over 2.8 million to under 200,000, decreasing solution times from over 1000 seconds to under 22 seconds compared to the legacy layered meshing approach.
1 of 30
Downloaded 18 times
More Related Content
Clausnitzer at al comparing meshing approaches
1. Comparing meshing approaches for
groundwater modeling at a geometrically
challenging mine site
Volker Clausnitzer, Fabien Cornaton, Peter Sch辰tzl
DHI-WASY
Robin Dufour
DHI Peru
3. Legacy layered meshing
息 DHI #3
18 geological formations
85 numerical layers
10 million elements
5 million nodes
18 geological formations
85 numerical layers
continuous, following the
faults
10 million elements
5 million nodes
4. Mesh Flexibility in 3D
息 DHI
Layered prism-based FE meshes
Excellent flexibility in 2D
Extruded to 3D
Vertical join faces restrict flexibility but simplify interactive model set-up once
mesh has been created
Unstructured tetrahedral FE meshes
Excellent flexibility in 3D
Difficult to handle in interactive work
5. 3D element types
息 DHI
Layered meshes
Penta- or hexahedrons with vertical quadrilateral join faces
7. 3D element types
息 DHI
Combined meshes
Pyramids connect layered and unstructured mesh portions
8. TetGen
息 DHI
Mesh generator for tetrahedral meshing of any 3D polyhedral domain
Author: Hang Si (Weierstrass Institute for Applied Analysis and Stochastics,
WIAS Berlin)
tetgen.org
17. Fully unstructured (tetrahedral) meshing
息 DHI
Takes spatial distribution of geologic units, 3D geometric description
of unit interfaces from dedicated geologic modelers
3D GeoModeller, GOCAD, (Leapfrog, MineSight, )
Geometric constraints passed to TetGen
GUI-supported parameter assignment based on geologic spatial
information
27. Performance Comparison
息 DHI
Layered Mesh Tetrahedral Mesh
Number of nodes
(Size of equation system)
2,816,304 195,628
SAMG Algebraic Multigrid Solver
Simulation time (seconds) 654.67 18.95
PARDISO Parallel Direct Solver
Simulation time (seconds) 1104.62 21.73
28. Performance Comparison
息 DHI
Layered Mesh Tetrahedral Mesh
Number of nodes
(Size of equation system)
2,816,304 195,628
SAMG Algebraic Multigrid Solver
Simulation time (seconds) 654.67 18.95
Relative mass-balance error 2.0e-6 2.8e-8
PARDISO Parallel Direct Solver
Simulation time (seconds) 1104.62 21.73
Relative mass-balance error 1.6e-13 4.2e-14
29. Summary
息 DHI
Unstructured tetrahedral meshing can be
combined with layered meshes or
used for the entire domain
Substantial reduction in mesh size for the same level of geologic
detail
Direct solvers become applicable to new class of problems
30. Thank you
and perhaps see you at FEFLOW 2015, September 2125 in Berlin, Germany!
息 DHI