際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo

Code of ethics final

Download as PPSX, PDF
Joselito Loquinario
Joselito Loquinario

The document discusses several cases related to teachers and the teaching profession. It includes summaries of cases related to teachers being dismissed for misconduct, disputes over termination of employment, and the duties and code of ethics for teachers. It also discusses legal documents like the Code of Ethics for Professional Teachers and the Continuing Professional Development Act that govern teachers.

1 of 12
Download to read offline
Legal Dimensions in School Administration EDD 603 Bolton Main Campus Bolton Street Corner Bonifacio Street Davao City 8000 The Code of Ethics for Professional Teachers ARTICLE IV A TEACHER AND THE PROFESSION JOSELITO G. LOQUINARIO, EDD Student
ARTICLE IV A TEACHER AND THE PROFESSION Section 4 Section 5 Section 3 Section 2 Section 1 Case Example Case Example Case Example Case Example Case Example
ARTICLE IV A TEACHER AND THE PROFESSION Section 1. Every teacher shall actively insure that teaching is the noblest profession, and shall manifest genuine enthusiasm and pride in teaching as a noble calling.
ARTICLE IV A TEACHER AND THE PROFESSION Section 2. Every teacher shall uphold the highest possible standards of quality education, shall make the best preparations for the career of teaching, and shall be at his best at all times and in the practice of his profession.
ARTICLE IV A TEACHER AND THE PROFESSION Section 3. Every teacher shall participate in the Continuing Professional Education (CPE) program of the Professional Regulation Commission, and shall pursue such other studies as will improve his efficiency, enhance the prestige of the profession, and strengthen his competence, virtues, and productivity in order to be nationally and internationally competitive.
ARTICLE IV A TEACHER AND THE PROFESSION Section 4. Every teacher shall help, if duly authorized, to seek support from the school, but shall not make improper misrepresentations through personal advertisements and other questionable means.
ARTICLE IV A TEACHER AND THE PROFESSION Section 5. Every teacher shall use the teaching profession in a manner that makes it dignified means for earning a decent living.
ARTICLE IV A TEACHER AND THE PROFESSION SECOND DIVISION [G.R. NO. 146053 : April 30, 2008] DIOSCORO F. BACSIN, Petitioner, v. EDUARDO O. WAHIMAN, Respondent. D E C I S I O N VELASCO, JR., J.: In this Petition for Review on Certiorari, petitioner Dioscoro F. Bacsin questions the Decision1 dated August 23, 2000 of the First Division of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 51900, which affirmed Resolution No. 98-0521 dated March 11, 1998 and Resolution No. 99-0273 dated January 28, 1999, both issued by the Civil Service Commission (CSC), dismissing petitioner from the service for Grave Misconduct. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A teacher who perverts his position by sexually harassing a student should not be allowed, under any circumstance, to practice this noble profession. So it must be here. WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, this petition is hereby DISMISSED, and the decision of the CA in CA-G.R. SP No. 51900 is hereby AFFIRMED. Costs against petitioner. SO ORDERED. Endnotes:
ARTICLE IV A TEACHER AND THE PROFESSION FIRST DIVISION G.R. No. 164913 : September 8, 2010 St. MARY'S ACADEMY of Dipolog City, Petitioner, v. TERESITA PALACIO, MARIGEN CALIBOD, LEVIE LAQUIO, ELAINE MARIE SANTANDER, ELIZA SAILE, AND MA. DOLORES MONTEDERAMOS, Respondents. D E C I S I O N DEL CASTILLO, J.: The Court will not hesitate to defend the workers' constitutional right to security of tenure. After all, the interest of the workers is paramount as they are regarded with compassion under the policy of social justice. By this Petition for Review on Certiorari,1 cralaw petitioner St. Mary's Academy of Dipolog City (petitioner) assails the Decision2 cralaw dated September 24, 2003 and Resolution3 cralaw dated August 16, 2004 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 67691, which affirmed with modification the Resolution4 cralaw of the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC), dated April 30, 2001 holding the dismissal of respondents Teresita Palacio (Palacio), Marigen Calibod (Calibod), Levie Laquio (Laquio), Elaine Marie Santander (Santander), Eliza Saile (Saile), and Ma. Dolores Montederamos (Montederamos) as illegal, as well as the Resolution5 cralaw dated August 31, 2001 denying the motion for reconsideration. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WHEREFORE, the petition is partially GRANTED. The Decision of the Court of Appeals dated September 24, 2003 in CA-G.R. SP No. 67691 finding respondents Teresita Palacio, Marigen Calibod, Levie Laquio, Elaine Marie Santander and Ma. Dolores Montederamos to have been illegally dismissed and awarding them separation pay and limited backwages is AFFIRMED. As regards respondent Eliza Saile, we find her termination valid and legal. Consequently, the awards of separation pay and limited backwages in her favor are DELETED. SO ORDERED.
ARTICLE IV A TEACHER AND THE PROFESSION REPUBLIC ACT NO. 10912, July 21, 2016 AN ACT MANDATING AND STRENGTHENING THE CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR ALL REGULATED PROFESSIONS, CREATING THE CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL, AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR, AND FOR OTHER RELATED PURPOSES
ARTICLE IV A TEACHER AND THE PROFESSION ALLIANCE OF CONCERNED TEACHERS (ACT), ENRIQUE D. TORRES, RODRIGO G. NATIVIDAD, FRANCISCO A. NECERINA, EVA V. FERIS, LUCIA R. CARRASCO, LEO R. RAMBOYONG, ZENEIDA PEREZ, MARIA ACEJO, AND OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS TOO NUMEROUS TO BE IMPLEADED, Petitioners, v. HON. ISIDRO CARIO, in his capacity as Secretary of Education, Culture and Sports; and HON. GUILLERMO CARAGUE, in his capacity as Secretary of Budget and Management, Respondents. Free Legal Assistance Group, Movement of Attorneys for Brotherhood Integrity & Nationalism and Union of Lawyers and Advocates for petitioners in G.R. No. 95590. Gregorio Fabros for petitioner in G.R. No. 95445. D E C I S I O N - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - As the majority avers, these cases are not all about whether the petitioners could have validly gone on a strike that question has long been settled by this Court but rather, whether or not they have been given due process as a result of investigations arising from the strike. I submit that due process is a perfectly legitimate issue to debate in Court an issue involving the mentors of the nations children no less. I also submit that it is to trivialize the noblest profession, if it is not to trivialize the serious crisis confronting the state of Philippine education, to dismiss these complaints as if it involved simple personalities demanding money. If Cari単o acted as if it were that, and as if it were a matter alone of "they struck so I fired them," I submit that we ought to know better. The State assures education for all. 4 It also gives priority to education, as an indispensable process in nation-building. 5 There is no harm in listening to our educators. I therefore vote to grant both petitions.Endnotes:
ARTICLE IV A TEACHER AND THE PROFESSION SUPREME COURT Manila FIRST DIVISION. MELECIO ALCALA, PERLA ALCALA, ROQUE BORINAGA, DIOSDADA BORINAGA, HELEN LENDIO, AND MARY BABETH MAGNO, Petitioners,G.R. No. 156063November 18, 2003-versus-JOVENCIO VILLAR, Respondent. D E C I S I O N YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.: This is a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure assailing the July 31, 2002 Decision[1] of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 57391 which nullified and set aside the June 22, 1999 Resolution of the Office of the Ombudsman in OMB-VIS-ADM-98-0103, as well as the Resolution[2] dated October 25, 2002 denying petitioner's motion for reconsideration. chan robles virtual law library Respondent Jovencio D. Villar is the School Principal of Lanao National High School, Pilar, Cebu City. In February 1998, Rolando Torceno and petitioners, Melecio Alcala, Perla Alcala, Roque Borinaga, Helen Lendio, Emma Labaniego and Mary Babeth Mano, all teachers of Lanao National High School, as well as Asterio Villarante and petitioner Diosdada Borinaga, teachers of Dapdap National High School, Pilar, Dapdap, Cebu City (herein collectively referred to as complainants), filed with the Office of the Ombudsman an administrative complaint against respondent for dishonesty. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - In the same vein, respondent in the case should be barred under the principle of estoppel by laches from assailing the jurisdiction of the Ombudsman. Therefore, the Court of Appeals should have resolved the appeal on its merits, considering that respondent's right to procedural due process was properly observed. WHEREFORE, in view of all the foregoing, the July 31, 2002 Decision of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 57391 which nullified the Resolution dated June 22, 1999 and Order dated October 13, 1999 of the Office of the Ombudsman, is REVERSED and SET ASIDE. Let this case be REMANDED to the Court of Appeals for the determination of the appeal on its merits. SO ORDERED. Davide, Jr., C.J., Panganiban, Carpio and Azcuna, JJ., concur.

More Related Content

Code of ethics final

  • 1. Legal Dimensions in School Administration EDD 603 Bolton Main Campus Bolton Street Corner Bonifacio Street Davao City 8000 The Code of Ethics for Professional Teachers ARTICLE IV A TEACHER AND THE PROFESSION JOSELITO G. LOQUINARIO, EDD Student
  • 2. ARTICLE IV A TEACHER AND THE PROFESSION Section 4 Section 5 Section 3 Section 2 Section 1 Case Example Case Example Case Example Case Example Case Example
  • 3. ARTICLE IV A TEACHER AND THE PROFESSION Section 1. Every teacher shall actively insure that teaching is the noblest profession, and shall manifest genuine enthusiasm and pride in teaching as a noble calling.
  • 4. ARTICLE IV A TEACHER AND THE PROFESSION Section 2. Every teacher shall uphold the highest possible standards of quality education, shall make the best preparations for the career of teaching, and shall be at his best at all times and in the practice of his profession.
  • 5. ARTICLE IV A TEACHER AND THE PROFESSION Section 3. Every teacher shall participate in the Continuing Professional Education (CPE) program of the Professional Regulation Commission, and shall pursue such other studies as will improve his efficiency, enhance the prestige of the profession, and strengthen his competence, virtues, and productivity in order to be nationally and internationally competitive.
  • 6. ARTICLE IV A TEACHER AND THE PROFESSION Section 4. Every teacher shall help, if duly authorized, to seek support from the school, but shall not make improper misrepresentations through personal advertisements and other questionable means.
  • 7. ARTICLE IV A TEACHER AND THE PROFESSION Section 5. Every teacher shall use the teaching profession in a manner that makes it dignified means for earning a decent living.
  • 8. ARTICLE IV A TEACHER AND THE PROFESSION SECOND DIVISION [G.R. NO. 146053 : April 30, 2008] DIOSCORO F. BACSIN, Petitioner, v. EDUARDO O. WAHIMAN, Respondent. D E C I S I O N VELASCO, JR., J.: In this Petition for Review on Certiorari, petitioner Dioscoro F. Bacsin questions the Decision1 dated August 23, 2000 of the First Division of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 51900, which affirmed Resolution No. 98-0521 dated March 11, 1998 and Resolution No. 99-0273 dated January 28, 1999, both issued by the Civil Service Commission (CSC), dismissing petitioner from the service for Grave Misconduct. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A teacher who perverts his position by sexually harassing a student should not be allowed, under any circumstance, to practice this noble profession. So it must be here. WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, this petition is hereby DISMISSED, and the decision of the CA in CA-G.R. SP No. 51900 is hereby AFFIRMED. Costs against petitioner. SO ORDERED. Endnotes:
  • 9. ARTICLE IV A TEACHER AND THE PROFESSION FIRST DIVISION G.R. No. 164913 : September 8, 2010 St. MARY'S ACADEMY of Dipolog City, Petitioner, v. TERESITA PALACIO, MARIGEN CALIBOD, LEVIE LAQUIO, ELAINE MARIE SANTANDER, ELIZA SAILE, AND MA. DOLORES MONTEDERAMOS, Respondents. D E C I S I O N DEL CASTILLO, J.: The Court will not hesitate to defend the workers' constitutional right to security of tenure. After all, the interest of the workers is paramount as they are regarded with compassion under the policy of social justice. By this Petition for Review on Certiorari,1 cralaw petitioner St. Mary's Academy of Dipolog City (petitioner) assails the Decision2 cralaw dated September 24, 2003 and Resolution3 cralaw dated August 16, 2004 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 67691, which affirmed with modification the Resolution4 cralaw of the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC), dated April 30, 2001 holding the dismissal of respondents Teresita Palacio (Palacio), Marigen Calibod (Calibod), Levie Laquio (Laquio), Elaine Marie Santander (Santander), Eliza Saile (Saile), and Ma. Dolores Montederamos (Montederamos) as illegal, as well as the Resolution5 cralaw dated August 31, 2001 denying the motion for reconsideration. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WHEREFORE, the petition is partially GRANTED. The Decision of the Court of Appeals dated September 24, 2003 in CA-G.R. SP No. 67691 finding respondents Teresita Palacio, Marigen Calibod, Levie Laquio, Elaine Marie Santander and Ma. Dolores Montederamos to have been illegally dismissed and awarding them separation pay and limited backwages is AFFIRMED. As regards respondent Eliza Saile, we find her termination valid and legal. Consequently, the awards of separation pay and limited backwages in her favor are DELETED. SO ORDERED.
  • 10. ARTICLE IV A TEACHER AND THE PROFESSION REPUBLIC ACT NO. 10912, July 21, 2016 AN ACT MANDATING AND STRENGTHENING THE CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR ALL REGULATED PROFESSIONS, CREATING THE CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL, AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR, AND FOR OTHER RELATED PURPOSES
  • 11. ARTICLE IV A TEACHER AND THE PROFESSION ALLIANCE OF CONCERNED TEACHERS (ACT), ENRIQUE D. TORRES, RODRIGO G. NATIVIDAD, FRANCISCO A. NECERINA, EVA V. FERIS, LUCIA R. CARRASCO, LEO R. RAMBOYONG, ZENEIDA PEREZ, MARIA ACEJO, AND OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS TOO NUMEROUS TO BE IMPLEADED, Petitioners, v. HON. ISIDRO CARIO, in his capacity as Secretary of Education, Culture and Sports; and HON. GUILLERMO CARAGUE, in his capacity as Secretary of Budget and Management, Respondents. Free Legal Assistance Group, Movement of Attorneys for Brotherhood Integrity & Nationalism and Union of Lawyers and Advocates for petitioners in G.R. No. 95590. Gregorio Fabros for petitioner in G.R. No. 95445. D E C I S I O N - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - As the majority avers, these cases are not all about whether the petitioners could have validly gone on a strike that question has long been settled by this Court but rather, whether or not they have been given due process as a result of investigations arising from the strike. I submit that due process is a perfectly legitimate issue to debate in Court an issue involving the mentors of the nations children no less. I also submit that it is to trivialize the noblest profession, if it is not to trivialize the serious crisis confronting the state of Philippine education, to dismiss these complaints as if it involved simple personalities demanding money. If Cari単o acted as if it were that, and as if it were a matter alone of "they struck so I fired them," I submit that we ought to know better. The State assures education for all. 4 It also gives priority to education, as an indispensable process in nation-building. 5 There is no harm in listening to our educators. I therefore vote to grant both petitions.Endnotes:
  • 12. ARTICLE IV A TEACHER AND THE PROFESSION SUPREME COURT Manila FIRST DIVISION. MELECIO ALCALA, PERLA ALCALA, ROQUE BORINAGA, DIOSDADA BORINAGA, HELEN LENDIO, AND MARY BABETH MAGNO, Petitioners,G.R. No. 156063November 18, 2003-versus-JOVENCIO VILLAR, Respondent. D E C I S I O N YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.: This is a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure assailing the July 31, 2002 Decision[1] of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 57391 which nullified and set aside the June 22, 1999 Resolution of the Office of the Ombudsman in OMB-VIS-ADM-98-0103, as well as the Resolution[2] dated October 25, 2002 denying petitioner's motion for reconsideration. chan robles virtual law library Respondent Jovencio D. Villar is the School Principal of Lanao National High School, Pilar, Cebu City. In February 1998, Rolando Torceno and petitioners, Melecio Alcala, Perla Alcala, Roque Borinaga, Helen Lendio, Emma Labaniego and Mary Babeth Mano, all teachers of Lanao National High School, as well as Asterio Villarante and petitioner Diosdada Borinaga, teachers of Dapdap National High School, Pilar, Dapdap, Cebu City (herein collectively referred to as complainants), filed with the Office of the Ombudsman an administrative complaint against respondent for dishonesty. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - In the same vein, respondent in the case should be barred under the principle of estoppel by laches from assailing the jurisdiction of the Ombudsman. Therefore, the Court of Appeals should have resolved the appeal on its merits, considering that respondent's right to procedural due process was properly observed. WHEREFORE, in view of all the foregoing, the July 31, 2002 Decision of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 57391 which nullified the Resolution dated June 22, 1999 and Order dated October 13, 1999 of the Office of the Ombudsman, is REVERSED and SET ASIDE. Let this case be REMANDED to the Court of Appeals for the determination of the appeal on its merits. SO ORDERED. Davide, Jr., C.J., Panganiban, Carpio and Azcuna, JJ., concur.