5. 犖犖犖о鹸犖犖迦牽犖犢犢犖 New York Time 犢犖犢犖犖劇犖犖犖犖朽犖犖迦牽犖犢犖迦検犖犖園犢犖犢犖迦検犖迦肩犖犢犖迦犢犖犖犖犖犢犖迦権犖犖犖犖犢犖犖犖犢犖犖迦犖犢 犖犖犖 犖÷元犖犖園犖犖園犖犖迦牽犢犖犢犖迦犖謹
犖犖犖犖犢犖犖犖犢犖犖∇弦犢犢犖犖犖園犖犖園犖犖朽 14 犖ム犖迦見犖ム険犖犖犖ム顕犖∇犖犖萎犖犖犢犖犖∇幻犢犖犖 犖犖о検犖犖園犖犖犖朽犖犖伍犖犢犖ム鍵犢犖犖迦見犖ム元犢犖犢
12. Preventing anticompetitive practices, unfair competition, and abuse of market position does not mean that the
Commission must impose conditions on every applicant which has some advantage not shared by every other applicant.
The Commission is required to treat all LEC's [Local Exchange Providers i.e. phone companies] equally, not make all
LEC's equal. BellSouth and the large cable companies certainly enjoy better capital costs than a typical small business
owner. Does this put the small company at a competitive disadvantage? Of course. Should the Commission determine
which LEC has the highest capital costs and require that all other companies impute that amount into their rates to level
the playing field"? Certainly not. If Marietta has to comply with expensive open records requirements or expensive
municipal bidding requirements, should those costs be imputed into the rates of all private companies? Again, no.
Similarly, if BellSouth has a large tax write-off one year, it would be ridiculous to require that they impute into their tax
rates the taxes they did not have to pay merely because some other company may not have had a tax write-off that year
犖犖迦牽犢犖犢犖犖犖園犖犖朽犢犖犖犖朽犖ム鍵犢犖犢犖犖犖犖犖?