際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Comparative and non-comparative evaluation in educational technology

Comparative study:
Title: A COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE AND PERCEPTIONS
OF STUDENTS RECEIVING LIVE VERSUS WEB-BASED
HORTICULTURAL INSTRUCTION
Author: IGINO TEOLIS, B.Sc.(Agr.), M.Sc.
Purpose of the study: examine whether the level of student learning in
horticulture was equivalent in both web-based and traditional live instruction
and to compare perceptions of students towards different modes of
instruction.
Instrument:surveys, A pre-course survey was distributed within the first
week of the course.All students were asked to complete a similar survey
(post-course survey) during the last class of the semester or after completing
the final exam.
Evidence:Both web-based and traditional course students had greater
percentages of correct quiz answers in the post-course survey than in the
pre-course survey. The increase in quiz score was greater for the traditional
course students than for the web-based students.

Non-Comparative study:
Title:IMPACTS OF LEARNING STYLES AND COMPUTER SKILLS
ON ADULT STUDENTS LEARNING ONLINE
Author: Salih RAKAP
Purpose of the study:investigated the influences of learning
styles/preferences, prior computer skills and experience withonline courses
on adult learners knowledge acquisition in a web-based special education
course.
Instrument:The VARK learning preference questionnaire was selected to
evaluate learning
preference of adult students because it is very easy and quick to complete
and available online.
Evidence:The findings of current research further support the
necessity of identifying individual differences (e.g., learning styles and
computer skills) of online course
participants in order to optimize instructional design and strategies,
maximize learning opportunities for students
enrolling in online programs and courses, and address their diverse needs for
learning.

More Related Content

What's hot (19)

PDF
Steven Norfleet, Dissertation Abstract, Dr. Wm. A. Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
William Kritsonis
PPT
Ppt Comparitive1
u067157
PPTX
Mdd.second.monitoring
darinamitkova
DOCX
Comparison between two
Amira Squ
PPT
Post 7. comparative and non comparative evaluation in educational technology
mazin
PPT
FSE 3 (TECHNOLOGY IN THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT)
UNIVERSITY OF CEBU
PPT
FSE 3 (TECHNOLOGY IN THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT)
UNIVERSITY OF CEBU
DOCX
Dual enrollment students were 11
didionfan
DOCX
Thursday
elizabeth8214
PPTX
Compritive and non
mraa2
DOC
Jaclyn Weisz resume EDU
Jaclyn Weisz
PPTX
Understanding Students' Engagement with Personalised Feedback Messages
Hamideh Iraj
PPTX
The impact of integrating social media in language teaching a...
kdore
ODP
TEL and the student experience
Fred Riley
PPT
Assignment1
H S
PPT
Summary of two evaluation studies in edu.technology
alsalmi
PPT
Alice Research Plan
Fantastic1234
PPTX
Effects of Participation in a Post-Secondary Honors Program using Propensity ...
Scott R. Furtwengler, Ph.D.
Steven Norfleet, Dissertation Abstract, Dr. Wm. A. Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
William Kritsonis
Ppt Comparitive1
u067157
Mdd.second.monitoring
darinamitkova
Comparison between two
Amira Squ
Post 7. comparative and non comparative evaluation in educational technology
mazin
FSE 3 (TECHNOLOGY IN THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT)
UNIVERSITY OF CEBU
FSE 3 (TECHNOLOGY IN THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT)
UNIVERSITY OF CEBU
Dual enrollment students were 11
didionfan
Thursday
elizabeth8214
Compritive and non
mraa2
Jaclyn Weisz resume EDU
Jaclyn Weisz
Understanding Students' Engagement with Personalised Feedback Messages
Hamideh Iraj
The impact of integrating social media in language teaching a...
kdore
TEL and the student experience
Fred Riley
Assignment1
H S
Summary of two evaluation studies in edu.technology
alsalmi
Alice Research Plan
Fantastic1234
Effects of Participation in a Post-Secondary Honors Program using Propensity ...
Scott R. Furtwengler, Ph.D.

Similar to Comparative and non comparative evaluation in educational technology (20)

PPT
Comparative and non-comparative evaluation in Educational technology
Alaa Sadik
PPT
Compartive And Non
u066945
PPT
Comparartive and non-Comparative study
Khadeeja Al-Shidhani
PPTX
Comparative and non comparative study
u083133
PPT
Comparative and Non-Comparative
u068692
PPT
e-learning
alkaeicher
PPT
Comparative_study_in_an_online_course
Christos Karakirios
PDF
A Comparison Of E-Learning And Traditional Learning Experimental Approach
Kayla Jones
PPT
Comparative and Non-Comparative Evaluation Studies
u068717
PPT
Comparative And Non Comparative Study
u065932
PPT
e-Learning in Indian Education System
iicecollege
PDF
Peas in a pod
Louise Smyth
DOC
Report comparative & non-comparative studies
u068719
PDF
Course Evaluation Poster
Bridget Hanley
PPTX
Consultant
janetguerrini
PPT
Comparative And Non Comparative Evaluation In Educational Technology
Yousuf Salim
PDF
Recipe for success maninger sam houston -focus (done)
William Kritsonis
PPT
Comparative & Non-comparative Studies
u068719
PPT
comparative and non-comparative study
u067535
PPT
Comparative and non comparative
Younis M
Comparative and non-comparative evaluation in Educational technology
Alaa Sadik
Compartive And Non
u066945
Comparartive and non-Comparative study
Khadeeja Al-Shidhani
Comparative and non comparative study
u083133
Comparative and Non-Comparative
u068692
e-learning
alkaeicher
Comparative_study_in_an_online_course
Christos Karakirios
A Comparison Of E-Learning And Traditional Learning Experimental Approach
Kayla Jones
Comparative and Non-Comparative Evaluation Studies
u068717
Comparative And Non Comparative Study
u065932
e-Learning in Indian Education System
iicecollege
Peas in a pod
Louise Smyth
Report comparative & non-comparative studies
u068719
Course Evaluation Poster
Bridget Hanley
Consultant
janetguerrini
Comparative And Non Comparative Evaluation In Educational Technology
Yousuf Salim
Recipe for success maninger sam houston -focus (done)
William Kritsonis
Comparative & Non-comparative Studies
u068719
comparative and non-comparative study
u067535
Comparative and non comparative
Younis M
Ad

More from Mariya Albakri (8)

DOCX
Summary of two evaluation studies in educational technology
Mariya Albakri
PDF
Writing distance matirls
Mariya Albakri
DOCX
Analyzing the capabilities and features of a video
Mariya Albakri
DOCX
Analyzing the capabilities and features of a video
Mariya Albakri
PPTX
Video conferncing
Mariya Albakri
DOCX
Applying actions model de technologies (e.g., printed materials, c ds, tv, in...
Mariya Albakri
DOCX
Writing distance matirls
Mariya Albakri
DOCX
Review of a de technology.
Mariya Albakri
Summary of two evaluation studies in educational technology
Mariya Albakri
Writing distance matirls
Mariya Albakri
Analyzing the capabilities and features of a video
Mariya Albakri
Analyzing the capabilities and features of a video
Mariya Albakri
Video conferncing
Mariya Albakri
Applying actions model de technologies (e.g., printed materials, c ds, tv, in...
Mariya Albakri
Writing distance matirls
Mariya Albakri
Review of a de technology.
Mariya Albakri
Ad

Comparative and non comparative evaluation in educational technology

  • 1. Comparative and non-comparative evaluation in educational technology Comparative study: Title: A COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE AND PERCEPTIONS OF STUDENTS RECEIVING LIVE VERSUS WEB-BASED HORTICULTURAL INSTRUCTION Author: IGINO TEOLIS, B.Sc.(Agr.), M.Sc. Purpose of the study: examine whether the level of student learning in horticulture was equivalent in both web-based and traditional live instruction and to compare perceptions of students towards different modes of instruction. Instrument:surveys, A pre-course survey was distributed within the first week of the course.All students were asked to complete a similar survey (post-course survey) during the last class of the semester or after completing the final exam. Evidence:Both web-based and traditional course students had greater percentages of correct quiz answers in the post-course survey than in the pre-course survey. The increase in quiz score was greater for the traditional course students than for the web-based students. Non-Comparative study: Title:IMPACTS OF LEARNING STYLES AND COMPUTER SKILLS ON ADULT STUDENTS LEARNING ONLINE Author: Salih RAKAP Purpose of the study:investigated the influences of learning styles/preferences, prior computer skills and experience withonline courses on adult learners knowledge acquisition in a web-based special education course.
  • 2. Instrument:The VARK learning preference questionnaire was selected to evaluate learning preference of adult students because it is very easy and quick to complete and available online. Evidence:The findings of current research further support the necessity of identifying individual differences (e.g., learning styles and computer skills) of online course participants in order to optimize instructional design and strategies, maximize learning opportunities for students enrolling in online programs and courses, and address their diverse needs for learning.