際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
CIF -Improving your
chances of success..
and why Value for
Money is Key
COVERING TODAY
WHY CHANGE  RESPONDING TO NEW EFSA SCORING CRITERIA
WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR SCHOOLS AND CONSULTANTS?
HOW THIS CHANGES THE CLIENT/ CONSULTANT DYNAMIC
HOW I CAN HELP
WHY CHANGE?
ESFA GUIDANCE PAPER:
 VALUE FOR MONEY INCREASED
FROM 15-25%
 NEED REDUCED FROM 70-60%
 PROJECT PLANNING  15% (NO
CHANGE)
IMPACT
ON
SCORING
CRITERIA
ELEMENT OUTPUT NEED PROJECT
PLANNING
VALUE FOR
MONEY
THRESHOLD
Weight
60%
1 Mark
= 3%
Score
Weight
15%
1 Mark =
1%
Score
Weight
25%
1 Mark
=1.66%
Score
77%
Scenario 1 15 45 13 58 10 16.6 74.6%
Scenario 2 15 45 13 58 11 18.26 76.26%
Scenario 3 16 48 12 60 10 16.6 76.6%
Scenario 4 16 48 12 60 11 18.26 78.26%
Scenario 5 17 51 12 63 9 14.94 77.94%
EVIDENCE
ESFA Feedback (Quotes from 2018/19)
The lack of school contribution
reduced the score for this section.
Higher marks would have been
awarded had the school
contributed.
Maximum marks would have been
awarded had the school made a
greater financial contribution.
Need was clearly evident,
however there was no
contribution from the school
An inability to contribute
resulted in a lower mark.
WHAT DOES
THIS MEAN?
FOR CIF CONSULTANTS
 TARGET LIKELY WINS (HIGH NEED/
HIGH CONTRIBUTION)
 PRIORITISE BIDS WITH CONTRIBUTION
EVEN IF NEED IS GREATER
 MAY CHANGE NO WIN / NO FEE
MODEL
WHAT DOES
THIS MEAN?
FOR SCHOOLS
 EMPHASIS ON CONTRIBUTION
 NO CONTRIBUTION? - PLAN TO
GENERATE REVENUE/ ACCESS TO
FUNDING
 THEREFORE; A RENEWED FOCUS ON
ESTATE MANAGEMENT
CHANGES CLIENT / CONSULTANT
RELATIONSHIP?
CONSULTANTS TO PROVIDE HOLISTIC
SERVICE:
 ASSIST WITH ESTATE STRATEGY
 FUNDING AND INWARD REVENUE
 SEEK LONGER TERM PARTNERING
CHANGES
CONSULTANT /
SUPPLY CHAIN
RELATIONSHIP?
EXTENDING PARTNERING TO SUPPLY
CHAIN TO ADD VALUE:
 BACK TO BACK PARTNERNG
RELATIONSHIP WITH SUPPLY CHAIN
 BETTER VISIBILITY / WORK CERTAINTY =
BETTER PRICE.
 WILLING TO SPONSOR SCHOOL IF
WORK IS OVER MULTIPLE YEARS
 POTENTIAL FOR FRAMEWORK
ANY QUESTIONS?
Contact details

More Related Content

Condition Improvement Fund: Why Value for Money is the key

  • 1. CIF -Improving your chances of success.. and why Value for Money is Key
  • 2. COVERING TODAY WHY CHANGE RESPONDING TO NEW EFSA SCORING CRITERIA WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR SCHOOLS AND CONSULTANTS? HOW THIS CHANGES THE CLIENT/ CONSULTANT DYNAMIC HOW I CAN HELP
  • 3. WHY CHANGE? ESFA GUIDANCE PAPER: VALUE FOR MONEY INCREASED FROM 15-25% NEED REDUCED FROM 70-60% PROJECT PLANNING 15% (NO CHANGE)
  • 4. IMPACT ON SCORING CRITERIA ELEMENT OUTPUT NEED PROJECT PLANNING VALUE FOR MONEY THRESHOLD Weight 60% 1 Mark = 3% Score Weight 15% 1 Mark = 1% Score Weight 25% 1 Mark =1.66% Score 77% Scenario 1 15 45 13 58 10 16.6 74.6% Scenario 2 15 45 13 58 11 18.26 76.26% Scenario 3 16 48 12 60 10 16.6 76.6% Scenario 4 16 48 12 60 11 18.26 78.26% Scenario 5 17 51 12 63 9 14.94 77.94%
  • 5. EVIDENCE ESFA Feedback (Quotes from 2018/19) The lack of school contribution reduced the score for this section. Higher marks would have been awarded had the school contributed. Maximum marks would have been awarded had the school made a greater financial contribution. Need was clearly evident, however there was no contribution from the school An inability to contribute resulted in a lower mark.
  • 6. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? FOR CIF CONSULTANTS TARGET LIKELY WINS (HIGH NEED/ HIGH CONTRIBUTION) PRIORITISE BIDS WITH CONTRIBUTION EVEN IF NEED IS GREATER MAY CHANGE NO WIN / NO FEE MODEL
  • 7. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? FOR SCHOOLS EMPHASIS ON CONTRIBUTION NO CONTRIBUTION? - PLAN TO GENERATE REVENUE/ ACCESS TO FUNDING THEREFORE; A RENEWED FOCUS ON ESTATE MANAGEMENT
  • 8. CHANGES CLIENT / CONSULTANT RELATIONSHIP? CONSULTANTS TO PROVIDE HOLISTIC SERVICE: ASSIST WITH ESTATE STRATEGY FUNDING AND INWARD REVENUE SEEK LONGER TERM PARTNERING
  • 9. CHANGES CONSULTANT / SUPPLY CHAIN RELATIONSHIP? EXTENDING PARTNERING TO SUPPLY CHAIN TO ADD VALUE: BACK TO BACK PARTNERNG RELATIONSHIP WITH SUPPLY CHAIN BETTER VISIBILITY / WORK CERTAINTY = BETTER PRICE. WILLING TO SPONSOR SCHOOL IF WORK IS OVER MULTIPLE YEARS POTENTIAL FOR FRAMEWORK