際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Advancing the Online Monitoring
  of Variable Speed Machinery
        Jordan McBain, P.Eng.
        mcbainjj@gmail.com
          Sudbury, Ontario
Condition Monitoring of Variable Speed Machinery
Introduction
 Monitoring of machinery
  largely limited to constant
  conditions
 Changes in speed and load
  termed nuisance
  parameters
 Variable speed/load
  machinery ubiquitous          Ref: Stack

 Resonances/vibration
  power
Novelty Detection
 Limited data
  characterizing normal
  state
    Little or no data for
     abnormal states
 Compute feature
  vectors of vibration
  (e.g. AR model)
 Methods
    SVDD and Statistical
     Boundaries
Statistical Parameterization
 Vibration strongly tied to temp (speed)
 Advanced by Keith Worden (Structural health
  monitoring)
    Segment feature vectors into small groups of modal value
    Compute statistics for each group (bin)
    Trend with regression or interpolation
 Suffers from
    Double curse of dimensionality
       Describe healthy state for all
        segments of modal parameter
    Gaussian distribution
       Good heuristic
Multi-Modal Novelty Detection
 Employ intuition from Statistical Parameterization
     Dont flatten data into bins
     Add modal parameter (speed) to feature vector
     Use any novelty detection technique
     One parameter only
 Gaussian Distribution
   eliminated
 Curse of dimensionality
   Dependent on underlying
    novelty detection technique
Experimental Methodology
Experimental Methodology
   Sensors
        2500 ppr Tach
        4 accel (10 kHz)
        AE
        Hall effect sensors
        Inline torque meter
   Variable Speed/Fixed Load (10 Nm)
   DAQ and Control
      NI FPGA and Accel Card


   Vibration data
      Segmentation: 30 shaft rotations, 70% overlap, Gaussian window
      Feature vectors: Auto-Regressive (AR) Models and Statistics
      Training: 20% of data for training, 80% for validation
   Faults
      Gears (96:32 and 80:48): missing tooth, root crack, chipped pinion
      Bearings: rough ball, outer race, inner race, chopped ball
Classification Results
 No speed adaptation (SVDD)
Classification Results
 Statistical Parameterization
Classification Results
Conclusions
 No speed adaptation = poor results
 Statistical Parameterization
   Good results
   Double Curse of Dimensionality
   Gaussian Distribution
 Multi-Modal Novelty Detection
   Comparable Results
   More to come
Future Work
 Novelty Detection Augmented for Fault
  Detection with Variable Speed Machinery
  (MSSP)
 Multi-Modal Novelty Detection for Variable
  Load and Speed Machinery
 Other multi-modal novelty detection
  techniques
   No modal sensors
References
 [1] J McBain, M Timusk. Fault detection in variable
  speed machinery: Statistical parameterization, Journal
  of Sound and Vibration 327 (2009) 623-646.
 [2] K Worden, H Sohn, CR Farrar. Novelty detection in a
  changing environment: Regression and interpolation
  approaches, J.Sound Vibrat. 258 (2002) 741-761.
 [3] JR Stack, TG Habetler, RG Harley. Effects of machine
  speed on the development and detection of rolling
  element bearing faults, IEEE Power Electronics Letters.
  1 (2003) 19-21.

More Related Content

Condition Monitoring of Variable Speed Machinery

  • 1. Advancing the Online Monitoring of Variable Speed Machinery Jordan McBain, P.Eng. mcbainjj@gmail.com Sudbury, Ontario
  • 3. Introduction Monitoring of machinery largely limited to constant conditions Changes in speed and load termed nuisance parameters Variable speed/load machinery ubiquitous Ref: Stack Resonances/vibration power
  • 4. Novelty Detection Limited data characterizing normal state Little or no data for abnormal states Compute feature vectors of vibration (e.g. AR model) Methods SVDD and Statistical Boundaries
  • 5. Statistical Parameterization Vibration strongly tied to temp (speed) Advanced by Keith Worden (Structural health monitoring) Segment feature vectors into small groups of modal value Compute statistics for each group (bin) Trend with regression or interpolation Suffers from Double curse of dimensionality Describe healthy state for all segments of modal parameter Gaussian distribution Good heuristic
  • 6. Multi-Modal Novelty Detection Employ intuition from Statistical Parameterization Dont flatten data into bins Add modal parameter (speed) to feature vector Use any novelty detection technique One parameter only Gaussian Distribution eliminated Curse of dimensionality Dependent on underlying novelty detection technique
  • 8. Experimental Methodology Sensors 2500 ppr Tach 4 accel (10 kHz) AE Hall effect sensors Inline torque meter Variable Speed/Fixed Load (10 Nm) DAQ and Control NI FPGA and Accel Card Vibration data Segmentation: 30 shaft rotations, 70% overlap, Gaussian window Feature vectors: Auto-Regressive (AR) Models and Statistics Training: 20% of data for training, 80% for validation Faults Gears (96:32 and 80:48): missing tooth, root crack, chipped pinion Bearings: rough ball, outer race, inner race, chopped ball
  • 9. Classification Results No speed adaptation (SVDD)
  • 12. Conclusions No speed adaptation = poor results Statistical Parameterization Good results Double Curse of Dimensionality Gaussian Distribution Multi-Modal Novelty Detection Comparable Results More to come
  • 13. Future Work Novelty Detection Augmented for Fault Detection with Variable Speed Machinery (MSSP) Multi-Modal Novelty Detection for Variable Load and Speed Machinery Other multi-modal novelty detection techniques No modal sensors
  • 14. References [1] J McBain, M Timusk. Fault detection in variable speed machinery: Statistical parameterization, Journal of Sound and Vibration 327 (2009) 623-646. [2] K Worden, H Sohn, CR Farrar. Novelty detection in a changing environment: Regression and interpolation approaches, J.Sound Vibrat. 258 (2002) 741-761. [3] JR Stack, TG Habetler, RG Harley. Effects of machine speed on the development and detection of rolling element bearing faults, IEEE Power Electronics Letters. 1 (2003) 19-21.