The document summarizes the consultation process to establish a Guild for the Learning and Skills Sector. It discusses key milestones such as producing the consultation document, the formal consultation period, and developing an implementation plan. It also summarizes feedback received through an online survey and focus groups that generally supported the idea. The proposed Guild would focus on professional standards and development. It would have a small executive team and rely on partnerships. It would be established as a company limited by guarantee with strong sector governance. Initial funding would come from direct grants, moving to a levy-based system over time.
1 of 15
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Consultation presentation (key points)
1. Consultation to establish a Guild
for the Learning and Skills Sector
CLOSING DATE: 22 FEBRUARY 2013
Join in on Twitter @team_FEGuild
www.fe-guild.blogspot.co.uk
www.feguild.info
2. Key milestones
Production of Consultation document by end of
January - Done!
Formal consultation period 1st 22nd February
Implementation plan to BIS by end of March
FE Guild to start operations August 2013
3. Informing the Consultation Document
Online survey 404 responses.
Generally good level of support (50%) - 8% against.
69% felt could enhance sector.
Steering group meetings to discuss critical issues
Four initial focus groups
Production of 7 discussion papers
Meetings with organisations of interest, including HE Academy
More information on website and blog
4. Consultation Document- covers:
The landscape
Top level aims
What is professionalism
Remit
Who Guild is for
Governance and operational structure
Funding
The name!
5. 1
Focus on aspects associated with
professionalism, including defining
workforce qualifications and standards,
continuous professional development,
research into teaching and learning,
sharing best practice and leadership and
management.
6. 2
Have a relatively small executive team
and rely much more on partnership,
commissioning and other forms of cross
sector work to fulfil its mission.
7. 3
Be set up as a Company Limited by
Guarantee, but with very strong sector
involvement in governance and the work
of the Guild, via robust sector direction,
engagement and consultation processes.
8. Possible structure
Legal Members AoC, AELP +
Advisory/
Consultative Guild Board
Group
Standing
Practitioner Engagement
Committees 3 or 4
9. 4
Have a guiding principle of covering
everyone working in the sector, although
resource constraints and other factors
might result in there needing to be an
initial focus on teaching and learning
staff and those directly supporting
learner outcomes.
10. 5
Be based on providers in the sector being
part of the Guild, but keep open the
possibility of developing an individual
practitioner recognition scheme in the
future, should the sector decide it would
be valuable.
11. Guild who is it for?
Guild should only cover those Guild should cover
who directly deliver and
support teaching and learning
OR all staff .
and assessment.
Overarching principle - should aim to encompass all staff
Caveats:
May initially have to concentrate on the teaching, learning, assessing and
direct support staff.
Not duplicating standards of the other specialist professional bodies - could
signpost and or contextualise them.
Equally: areas such as equality and diversity, new technologies
and customer service relevant to all staff.
12. 6
Adopt a phased approach to funding,
initially based on a direct grant to ensure
a successful initiation and initial
operation of the Guild, but progressively
moving to a levy-based approach.
Further self-funding opportunities could
be considered for later years.
13. Interim arrangements
Interim Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
recruited by open competition; end-
dated December 2013.
Initial shadow Board with phased
migration plan to the permanent Board
by April 2014.
Interim CEO and shadow Board start to
build the proposed operational
structures.
14. Name should it be changed?
Should we change both parts?
Seems to be consensus that at least change
the FE tag.
If so what
collegeacademy.allianceinstitute.or
non specific?
Learning and Skills instead of FE?