The document summarizes research on the structural properties and biocompatibility of alumina/zirconia bioceramics. X-ray diffraction and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy showed that titanium dioxide addition modified the structure of alumina/zirconia composites while retaining the tetragonal phase of zirconia. Animal studies found that both 90% alumina-10% zirconia and 90% alumina-10% zirconia with 5% titanium dioxide composites integrated well with bone over 6 weeks without inflammatory responses. Calcium/phosphorus ratios from scanning electron microscopy indicated improved osseointegration with titanium dioxide addition.
1 of 21
Downloaded 92 times
More Related Content
SIMONA CAVALU_Correlation between structural properties and in vivo biocompatibility of alumina/zirconia bioceramics
1. Correlation between structural
properties and in vivo
biocompatibility of
alumina/zirconia bioceramics
Simona Cavalu
Professor
Preclinical Sciences Department
Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutics
University of Oradea
ROMANIA
2. Motivation
There is a continuous input from bioengineering for
reaching a high level of comfort, improving reliability,
finding new applications.
This development is also a response to the growing
number of patients afflicted with traumatic or non-
traumatic conditions: the number of implants is
continuously growing, due to the increase in persons
suffering of arthritis and joint problems.
As the average age of population grows, the need for
medical devices to replace damaged or worn tissues
increases.
As patients have become more and more demanding
regarding esthetic and biocompatibility aspects of
their dental restorations
3. Motivation
Al2O3 ZrO2
Excellent hardness and Was introduced to overcome
wear properties. the limitations of alumina.
Fracture toughness values When properly manufactured,
are lower than those of zirconia has a higher strength,
the metals used in but only 50% of aluminas
orthopedic surgery. hardness.
Chemical and Unstable material. The
hydrothermal stability. tetragonal phase tends to
It is a brittle material, transform into the monoclinic
phase. The addition of
with low resistance to the stabilizing materials
propagation of cracks. (Y2O3)during manufacture, can
control the phase
transformation of zirconia.
Al2O3, ZrO2, TiO2 have been considered as bioinert ceramics
since they cannot induce apatite formation in SBF. They do
however support bone cell attachment, proliferation and
differentiation.
4. The ideal ceramic is a high performance biocomposite that combines
the excellent material properties of alumina in terms of chemical
stability and low wear and of zirconia with its superior mechanical
strength and fracture toughness.
Alumina/zirconia ceramics were successfully used in total
hip/knee arthroplasty in the last decades.
For dental application: root canal posts, orthodontic
brackets, implant abutments and all- ceramic
restaurations.
5. Goal
An evaluation of the structural and
biocompatibility properties of a new
zirconia toughened alumina ceramics.
The composition of proposed materials
for this study:
90%Al2O3-10%ZrO2 and
90%Al2O3-10%ZrO2+5%TiO2
prepared by using modern processing
technologies spark plasma sintering.
6. Methods
Investigation of the structural changes induced by TiO2
addition to Al2O3/ ZrO2 are made by FTIR spectroscopy and X-
ray diffraction (XRD) analysis .
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and EDX are used for
microstructure and morphology investigation of the samples.
In order to perform in vivo tests, the rat model has been applied
for biocompatibility evaluation. The rat model has been accepted
as a model for the effects of systemic disease on osseointegration.
SEM micrographs are recorded on the rats femur along with the
elemental composition of the sheared implant surfaces at
different time intervals after the surgery.
Histological examination of the connective tissue is performed
to detect any immunological or inflammatory responses.
7. Results: XRD Spectroscopy
XRD patterns of (a) 90Al2O310ZrO2 and
(b) 90Al2O310ZrO2 + 5%TiO2 samples.
1200
Z
A
The TiO2 addition slightly
A Z modifies the relative intensities
1000 of XRD peaks. Both samples
A A show similar peak positions,
800 A Z
A
A
the slight change of relative
Z
A A intensities of XRD peaks could
be attributed
T
to weak
Intensity (a.u.)
Z A
600
Z A A Z
(a) differences in size and shape of
the crystals in these samples
400
A A
A
A
A
This result suggest that
200 Z A zirconia present in the
T
Z
A
composite is, therefore,
0
A
(b) retained in the tetragonal form
as alumina particles prevent
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
the tetragonal to monoclinic
2 theta (degrees)
transformation by matrix
constraint.
8. FTIR Spectroscopy: (a) 90Al2O310ZrO2 and
(b) 90Al2O310ZrO2 + 5%TiO2 samples.
The large bands around 1088
cm-1 are assigned to stretching
vibration of AlOAl bonds.
The Al-O stretching vibrations of
465
0.6
1088
tetrahedral AlO4 groups are
614
660
related with the bands in the
780
1168
region 900 750 cm-1 and
564
518
797
0.5
bands in 650 460 cm-1 region
Intensity (a.u.)
(a)
are associated with stretching
modes of AlO6 octahedra.
0.4
The absorption bands at 518 to
564 cm-1 correspond to Zr-O
vibrations in tetragonal ZrO2
0.3
phase.
(b) Upon TiO2 addition to alumina-
zirconia matrix, the relative
0.2 intensity of 660/614 cm-1 band
1200 1000 800
Wavenumber (cm )
-1
600 400
is considerably modified, as a
superposition of the
characteristics absorption bands
occurs in this region.
9. SEM: Irregular shape of 90%Al2O3-10%ZrO2(a)
and 90%Al2O3-10%ZrO2+5%TiO2 (b) granules and
their corresponding microstructure (c, d)
a) c)
b) d)
16. SEM Analysis reveals:
Fibrinous and collagenous matrix extensively interdigitated
with the three-dimensional interconnected porous structure
after first 3 weeks.
Distinct gaps between the implant and the bone were
observed in a few locations.
After 6 weeks, the matrix around the surface implanted
area appeared more densely, well covered and extensively
integrated into a mixture of mineralized tissue, osteoid and
dense matrix.
As revealed from the EDAX spectra, calcium/phosphate
ratio is an indicative of the surface implant coverage for a
successful osseointegration, varying from 1.5 (after 3
weeks) to 1.9 (after 6 weeks).
The results suggest that TiO2 presence in the samples favor
the osseointegration process.
17. XRD spectrum of the femoral bone
900
800 Z AlZr Biocomposite
700 A
A Z Z A
A A A A
A
T Z
600
500 Z Bone/AlZr
I (a.u.)
B Z Z
A A A
400 A B A AZ
300 *
200
* Bone
100
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
2 (deg)
18. Histological images: The connective tissue
was also examined to detect any
immunological or inflammatory responses
osteoblasts
A network of woven bony trabecular architecture with cellular infiltration
was observed
19. Conclusions
Structural investigations of the proposed composites
using XRD and FTIR spectroscopy confirms the
stability of the microstructure upon TiO 2 addition to
alumina/zirconia matrix.
In vivo: both implanted materials in critical size
defect of the femur were well integrated in the
original bone defects and covered with a layer of soft
tissue at 6 weeks after implantation, as demonstrated
by SEM images.
As revealed from the EDAX spectra, Ca/P ratio is an
indicative of the surface implant coverage for a
successful osseointegration, varying from 1.5 (after 3
weeks) to 1.9 (after 6 weeks).
No signs of inflammatory reactions, such as necrosis
or reddening suggesting implant rejection, were found
upon histological examination.
20. The team:
Prof. dr. Gultekin Goller and dr. Ipek Akin, Istanbul
Technical University, Materials Science Department.
Prof. dr. Viorica Simon and dr. Oana Ponta Babes-Bolyai
University, Faculty of Physics & Institute of Interdisciplinary
Research in Bio-Nano-Sciences, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Assoc. prof. Cristian Ratiu and dr. Ioan Oswald
University of Oradea, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutics,
Oradea, Romania.
Romania-Turkey Bilateral Cooperation project 385/2010.
#2: The research of upgraded or new bioceramics is related to the crucial topic of the enhancement of life conditions.
#4: The two ceramic materials in clinical use today as bearing surfaces are aluminium oxide and zirconium oxide.
#5: So everybody is searching for the ideal bioceramic that combines the properties of both. Because of the extensively reported long term success in the orthopedic field (more than 20 years), it has been used in dentistry .
#6: In this context, we propose an evaluation of the structural properties and biocompatibility of new zirconia toughened alumina ceramics. The composition.. Materials were prepared in Biomaterials Research Center ITU by using spark plasma sintering.
#7: FTIR and XRD SEM and EDAX for microstructure and morphology. Grain size and densification degree as a result of TiO2 adition to alumina zirconia matrix. The rat model has been accepted as a model for the effects of systemic disease on osseointegration. -SEM Histo
#8: XRD spectra shows reflection lines occurring from crystallographic planes related to alpha alumina and tetragonal zirconia. The addition of TiO2 slightly modifies the relative intensities of the peaks.
#9: -The FTIR spectrum is dominated by the absorption lines arising from alumina phase. The stretching vibration of Al-O bonds are related to the tetrahedral or octahedral groups. Stretching vibration of Zr- O bonds in tetragonal phase. -TiO2 addition to alumina/zirconia matrix is reflected in relative intensity of the 660/614 as a superposition of the characteristics bands in this range.
#10: In order to perform in vivo tests, both materials were used as granular, irregular shaped, filling the defects created in in the femur of Wistar rats. The microstructure of the granules is presented, along with the EDAX spectrum for each sample.
#11: As a surgical procedure, a critical size defect was made in the femur, using a dental drill, under constant irrigation of cold saline to avoid thermal necrosis and to remove the debris.
#12: Upon filling the defects, a collagen thin film was placed on the top, and then muscle and skin were sutured in layers.
#13: In order to monitor the osseointegration process in vivo, radiographic images were recorded at different time intervals after the surgical procedure.
#14: The femur was harvested for SEM. The defects were microscopically evaluated with respect to filling of the defect with new bone. We can notice the contour/ the edge line of the implanted area and the details with different magnification. After 3 weeks, distinct gaps between the implanted area and the original bone were observed in a few locations. The defects are covered with a layer of soft tissue. A fibrinous and collagenous matrix extensively interdigitated in a three dimensional structure is observed. The details reveal that our material (grain) seems to be swallowed by the natural bone. Notice the Ca/P ratio in the EDAX spectrum=1.57
#15: After 6 weeks, the matrix around the implant area appeared more densely, well covered and extensively integrated into a mixture of mineralized tissue , osteoids and dense matrix. It seems that TiO2 addition to alumina/zirconia matrix is favorable to the oseointegration process, as the aspect of the implanted area is more uniform. Notice the Ca/P ratio = 1.9
#16: Up- image was taken from the original bone, unaffected by the surgical procedure. Below- image taken from the surface of the new bone covering the implanted area.
#17: SEM images reveals that the materials are well integrated in the original bone
#18: The XRD pattern of the harvested femur shows characteristic lines of the Al Zr and hydroxyapatite compared with the pattern of pure biocomposite and those of original bone unaffected by surgery.
#19: No signs of inflammatory reaction such as necrosis or reddening suggesting implant rejection were found upon histological examination. The periosteal regions were completely closed with new blood capillaries around the implant site. Osteoblast- like cells are the evidence of new bone formation.