際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
CRESCENT PURE
Harvard Case Analysis
1
Introduction
Crescent Pure was a non-alcoholic
functional beverage
The drinks combination of energy-enhancing,
hydrating, and organic ingredients.
2
The CEO of Portland Dark
Beverages (PDB), Michael
Booth acquired it in 2013
3
The drink was first founded
by Peter Hoops in 2008
It was well received locally,
due its Organic nature and
unique taste
THATs
HOW IT
HAPPENED

 T
 T P ,
4
STRATEgies
BUT WHY Crescent Pure ?
 Comparatively 70% less
sugar.
 Minimal caffeine content.
 Natural, Healthy, Hydrating
5
Main Options
Available
 Energy Drink
 Sports Drink
6
PRODUCT
POSITIONING
7
ENERGY
DRINK
PROS:
 Market share was projected to reach
13.5 billions by 2018.
 Healthier and low levels os sugar
compared to competitors.
 The suggested price $2.75 was less
than the Average price $2.99
 Attracts more Male consumers 18-34.
8
ENERGY
DRINK
CONS:
 Negative Media publicity regarding
health risks
 32% people avoided energy drinks in
past years
 11% people reduced taking them being
health conscious.
 High competition among top 4 players,
combinedly occupying 85% Market
share.
9
COMPEtitiors In
ENERGY DRINKS
1. Fright
2. Razor
3. Torque
4. Stellar
PROs:
 42% of sports beverage drinkers considered
sports drinks anytime beverages
 Regular users consume sports drink more
often
 It is described more often as refreshing,
healthy, fun and hydrating than energy
drinks
10
SPORTS
DRINK
CONs:
 Market is $2.2 billion less than energy drink
market
 Crescents $2.75 price point for an 8 oz.can is
significantly higher than other competing
sports drinks.
 Recent govt. mandated guidelines to remove
sugary,high calorie drinks from school
vending machines.
11
SPORTS
DRINK
COMPETITORS
IN SPORTS
DRINKS
CATeGORY
12
13
Market INSIGHTS:
DEMOGRAPHICS A B C
Yellow 10 20 7
Blue 30 15 10
Orange 5 24 16
14
15
PERCEPTUAL
MAP
energy
DRINK
Highligthing its
Healthy & ORanic
Roots
PROS:
 Healthier and Organic
alternative.
 Organic beverages claimed a
price premium over
convenctional beverages.
 PDB will have a wider customer
presence in additional
segments.
16
ANAlysis
energy
DRINK
Highligthing its
Healthy & ORanic
Roots
CONS:
 Feasible budget $7,50,000
 SHORT OF TIME, SHOULD HURRY
UP.
 LIMITED DISTRUBuTERS.
 People may doubt the quality
with low price
17
ANAlysis
WIll IT
Break Even ?
18
Lets see
BREAK EVEN ANALYSIS
Advertising costs (Benchmark goal) $750,000
Price per each 8-ounce can $1.24
Variable costs $1.02
Profit per can $0.22
No.of cases produced per month 12000
Cans / each case 24
Profit per month $63,360
Profit per year $760,320
Net profit (Beyond Break Even) $10,320
SUMMARY
20
STRATEGIES
ANALYSIS and BREAK EVEN
PRODUCT POSITIONING
21
Thank you !
Created by A.S.R.Sai Teja.
NIT RAIPUR.
Submitted to Prof.Sameer
Mathur, IIM LUCKNOW as a
part of Marketing Internship.

More Related Content

Crescent pure - Case Study

  • 2. Introduction Crescent Pure was a non-alcoholic functional beverage The drinks combination of energy-enhancing, hydrating, and organic ingredients. 2
  • 3. The CEO of Portland Dark Beverages (PDB), Michael Booth acquired it in 2013 3 The drink was first founded by Peter Hoops in 2008 It was well received locally, due its Organic nature and unique taste THATs HOW IT HAPPENED
  • 4. T T P , 4 STRATEgies
  • 5. BUT WHY Crescent Pure ? Comparatively 70% less sugar. Minimal caffeine content. Natural, Healthy, Hydrating 5
  • 6. Main Options Available Energy Drink Sports Drink 6 PRODUCT POSITIONING
  • 7. 7 ENERGY DRINK PROS: Market share was projected to reach 13.5 billions by 2018. Healthier and low levels os sugar compared to competitors. The suggested price $2.75 was less than the Average price $2.99 Attracts more Male consumers 18-34.
  • 8. 8 ENERGY DRINK CONS: Negative Media publicity regarding health risks 32% people avoided energy drinks in past years 11% people reduced taking them being health conscious. High competition among top 4 players, combinedly occupying 85% Market share.
  • 9. 9 COMPEtitiors In ENERGY DRINKS 1. Fright 2. Razor 3. Torque 4. Stellar
  • 10. PROs: 42% of sports beverage drinkers considered sports drinks anytime beverages Regular users consume sports drink more often It is described more often as refreshing, healthy, fun and hydrating than energy drinks 10 SPORTS DRINK
  • 11. CONs: Market is $2.2 billion less than energy drink market Crescents $2.75 price point for an 8 oz.can is significantly higher than other competing sports drinks. Recent govt. mandated guidelines to remove sugary,high calorie drinks from school vending machines. 11 SPORTS DRINK
  • 14. DEMOGRAPHICS A B C Yellow 10 20 7 Blue 30 15 10 Orange 5 24 16 14
  • 16. energy DRINK Highligthing its Healthy & ORanic Roots PROS: Healthier and Organic alternative. Organic beverages claimed a price premium over convenctional beverages. PDB will have a wider customer presence in additional segments. 16 ANAlysis
  • 17. energy DRINK Highligthing its Healthy & ORanic Roots CONS: Feasible budget $7,50,000 SHORT OF TIME, SHOULD HURRY UP. LIMITED DISTRUBuTERS. People may doubt the quality with low price 17 ANAlysis
  • 18. WIll IT Break Even ? 18 Lets see
  • 19. BREAK EVEN ANALYSIS Advertising costs (Benchmark goal) $750,000 Price per each 8-ounce can $1.24 Variable costs $1.02 Profit per can $0.22 No.of cases produced per month 12000 Cans / each case 24 Profit per month $63,360 Profit per year $760,320 Net profit (Beyond Break Even) $10,320
  • 20. SUMMARY 20 STRATEGIES ANALYSIS and BREAK EVEN PRODUCT POSITIONING
  • 21. 21 Thank you ! Created by A.S.R.Sai Teja. NIT RAIPUR. Submitted to Prof.Sameer Mathur, IIM LUCKNOW as a part of Marketing Internship.