Conference presentation about how crises create unique stakeholders and the effect on crisis message processing. Uses ELM as a guide.
1 of 7
More Related Content
Crisis holder
1. A Crisis-holder Approach to Crisis Communication:
Implications for the
Central and Peripheral Routes for Processing Crisis
Response Strategies
Crisis-holder
Routes
Dynamics
2. Routes
Peripheral: Potential victims and voyeurs (non-
victims)
Accept non-apologies as apologies
Surface features, low involvement
Central: Victims
High involvement
More likely to seek apology characteristics
6. Comparison
Partial and full apologies similar performance
Protect reputations
Protect purchase intentions
Reduce anger
Reduce likelihood of negative WOM
7. Why?
When using the peripheral route, stakeholders
will accept any cue that approximates an
apology as an apology
Full or partial apologies provide narrative
finality for non-victims (including media)
Provides focus on stakeholders perspective