�ݺ�ߣ

Global Wind Organisation

CRITERIA’S FOR THE CERTIFICATION BODY

GWO – Criteria’s for the Certification Body

CONTENTS PAGE

Foreword 3

1. Introduction 4

2. Criteria for approval of Certification Body 4

3. Selection of audit team members certifying a Training Provider 4

4. The Certification Process 4

5. Man-day allocation 7

©Copyright: This document must not be copied without our written permission, and the contents thereof must not be imparted to a
third party nor be used for unauthorised purposes
Page 2/8


FORWORD

This standard has been approved by Global Wind Organisation’s (GWO) Steering
Committee on the 2nd of February 2012.

The GWO is an association of Wind Turbines owners and manufacturers with
the aim of supporting an injury free work environment in the wind industry.

This standard has been developed in response to the demand for
recognizable Basic Safety Training (BST) in the industry. The development of
this standard has been done in cooperation between the members of GWO.

The objective with the standard is to develop common industry training and
best practice standards on health and safety, as a vital and necessary way
forward to reduce risks for personnel in the wind industry working on site and
to reduce environmental risks across Europe and Global.

This standard describes the requirements for the certification bodies.

Editorial and Approval
The final editorial and approval of this standard has been made by GWO
steering committee.

Control Log

Amendments & Version Changes Approved by &
Dates Dates
02.02.2012 0 - Steering
Committee
02.02.2012

Page 3/8


1. Introduction:

The purpose of this document is to describe the criteria’s for being a
Certification Body certifying Training Providers offering GWO’s Basic Safety
Training.

2. Criteria for a Certification Body:

The Certification Body must be accredited to ISO 9000 and OHSAS 18000
and must follow the general rules for accreditation when offering the service of
certifying Training Providers (ISO/IEC 17021:2006. Conformity assessment --
Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management
systems).

3. Selection of audit team members certifying a Training Provider:

The qualifications of team members shall follow the general rules for
accreditation regarding auditor qualifications and sector codes.
An ISO 9000 Lead Auditor can cover the audit of the QMS in the
administration of a Training Provider.
An OHSAS 18000 Lead Auditor can cover the audit of a training session on-
site.

4. The Certification Process:

4.1 Introduction

This section describes the whole 3-year certification process, from
request of proposal to obtaining a certificate and continuing with
recertification:

Page 4/8


4.2 Request for certification:

The Training Provider supplies information about the size
and scope (training modules) of their operations to the
Certification Body. A certification offer is issued by then upon
receipt of this information.
Multi-site offers are issued according to the multisite criteria
of the accreditation rules according to IAF.

4.3 Pre-audit

The pre-audit is an optional chargeable audit, which is
designed to preview the Training Providers management
system for areas of the specifications against which the
Training Provider asks for certification. The Certification
Body will issue a Report to the Training Provider detailing
the findings of this audit in due time including any
appropriate actions.

4.4 Certification Audit

Stage 1 Audit
The Certification Body will undertake a readiness review to
determine the preparedness of the Training Provider for Stage
2, what is the „real” audit phase. Stage 1 processes include:
o understanding the requirements,
o collecting information of the scope of the management
o system, processes and location of the Training
Provider,
o reviewing the allocation of resources for Stage 2;
o planning for Stage 2,
o evaluating the internal audit systems.
o Stage 1 can be repeated until it produces satisfactory
o result to proceed with Stage 2.

Stage 2 Audit
The Audit Team will provide an audit programme to the Training
Provider prior to the audit.
During the on-site audit, our audit team will meet with the
Training Provider’s management and staff to discuss the
details of the process and consider possible issues relating to
the performance of the audit. The audit team will discuss any
non-conformities, observations and opportunities for
improvement if and when they are identified during the audit.
Furthermore a member of the audit team will follow a training

Page 5/8


session on-site to see if it applies to the Training Provider’s own procedure
and follow the guidance from GWO.

After the audit, the audit team will prepare and present to the Training
Provider’s management a report of the audit, which will include the audit
findings.

Certificate:

When all corrective actions agreed have been completed,
the Certification Body will issue a Certificate of Approval and
Reports. The Certificate of Approval will detail the
specification to which the training Provider has been found to
be in compliant at the time of the audit and the scope of the
management system.
The Certification Body will publish the name of the training
provider on their homepage.

4.5 Certification Maintenance:

Surveillance

The purpose of the surveillance visit is to record whether the Training
Providers certification is found to be maintained. The process is
as for the stage 2 audit. It means that both the management
system and a training session will be audit on a sample basis.
The date of the first surveillance audit following initial
certification shall not be more than 12 months from the last day
of the stage 2 audit.

Re-certification

Every three years the Certification Body will automatically review the Training
Providers certification. If the surveillance audits and/or the re-certification audit
results are satisfactory, the Certification Body will re-issue the Training
Providers certification and the Certificate of Approval. This needs to be
completed before the expiry of the current Certificate of Approval to preserve
the continuity of the certification.

4.6 Extension of the Certification

If an already certified training provider wants to be approved for additional
training modules this can be done in two ways:

o a witnessed audit of the new training module (samples if more than
one) on an extra ordinary visit, or

Page 6/8


o during the ordinary surveillance visit where extra time is allocated.

4.7 Certification of new Training Providers

Training providers that are new into this area can have a provisional certificate
based on audit of their administrative procedures. Once a training session is
planned this will be witnessed by the certification body. If the training session
applies to the requirements a normal certificate is issued.

5. Man-day allocation:

The table gives a guidance to determine auditor time for the certification
process including surveillance and re-certification. Initial Audit is a
combination of Stage 1 and Stage 2. Normally 0,5-1,0 man-day is expected
for stage 1.

# Employees Initial Audit (md’s) Yearly Surveillance Re-certification (md’s)
(md’s)
QMS On—site QMS On—site QMS On—site
Training Training Training
1 – 25 1,5 1 1 0,5 1 1
26 – 65 2,5 1 1 0,5 2 1
66 – 125 3,5 2 1,5 1 2,5 1
126 – 275 4,5 2 2 1 3 1

Page 7/8


Page 8/8

�ݺ�ߣ

Criteria For Certification Body Version 0, February 2012

More Related Content

Criteria For Certification Body Version 0, February 2012