際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
CSA S250 Standard MAPPING OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE Bob Gaspirc, OLS, CLS, OAEM Manager, Mapping Services  City of Toronto Chair, CSA S250 Technical  Committee 2009 OGRA/ROMA Combined Conference  2009-02-24  Buried Treasure  Underground Utilities Workshop   Toronto, Ontario, Canada.  Fairmount Royal York Hotel, Tudor Room
Where is the treasure in underground utility mapping standards?  Business Intelligence  (noun) - a set of concepts and methods to improve business decision making by using fact-based support systems.  Today we will demonstrate how  CSA s250 will be used to support business intelligence Key Goal CSA s250 - Good records - better decisions
Key Goal  improve decision making You must: Be ready to produce utility record as evidence that an event, set of activities, or task occurred and was completed  Have record containing relevant, factual, and  timely  data Be able to access and retrieve utility record  Be able to to share, manipulate, analyze, distribute data Make and act on decisions using reliable and dependable utility map records
Evidence of an event, activity, task As-built drawings, plans Circulation drawings, mark ups Design drawing Permit drawings, sketches Approved design drawing used for purposes of construction Field notes, locator notes, inspector notes,  Digital representations of above  Supports and demonstrates the legal test phases to be met  the integrity of the recording system and  the reliability of the entry.
CSA s250  Mapping of underground infrastructure Needs to be: referenced and used within infrastructure design, construction, operation policies, practices, and procedures  these documents are needed to:  establish the integrity and authenticity of utility mapping records recorded in their document management systems, GIS, and other electronic records management system
CSA s250:  Mapping of underground infrastructure Provides technology-neutral language    as per CSA s250 Codifies selected  best practices, procedures, tables,  or figures that are normal to rely on  Applying the standard to an organizations business will not eliminate the possibility of litigation, but it will make the production of electronic records easier and their acceptance in a legal proceeding more certain.
Improved decision framework Acts, regulations, by-laws, codes  Results of court actions/decisions, other legal proceeding Enables  Framework for exchange, data sharing, data licensing; web-based distribution models, reseller model, value-added reseller model, no-fee and fee-based distribution models Business policies, best practice, procedures, and operational requirements STANDARDS ISO 15489 - records management CAN/CGSB-72.34, Electronic records as documentary evidence standards endorsed for the Canadian Geospatial Data Infrastructure (CGDI) (DRM, metadata, web services etc) CSA s250  Mapping of Underground Utility Infrastructure Technology neutral language Improves, enhances records management during design, construction, operation, retirement phase of plant
Why a Mapping Standard? Good records lead to informed  decisions Next logical step, building on best practices Better communication reduces infrastructure life-cycle challenges Promotes communication among utility infrastructure stakeholders
Why a CSA based standard? Provides management framework for administering technical committee Acts a facilitator; provides neutral third party forum, process, and structure for developing a  consensus standard   Part of the National Standards System; accredited by the Standards Council of Canada
CSAs Involvement in Civil Infrastructure More than 400 publications relate to civil infrastructure Homes & Buildings Transportation structures  Energy networks (electrical, petroleum, gas & alternative energy) Water, waste, & storm water management Industrial structures Communications structures Community, healthcare and recreational facilities
History and Background of Initiative No current mapping standard that addresses accuracy, process, and identification of underground plant Historically, high variability in the reliability, consistency & accuracy of mapping underground utilities The (Ontario and BC) Common Ground Alliance movement have introduced Mapping Best Practices for Damage Prevention Recent technological advancements allows for: Improved records capture Better records storage Enhanced access and sharing mechanisms Growing appetite to share utility mapping records
Standards are developed by stakeholders business  Cooperative work through common interest in particular subject area consumer groups industry labour  government  environmental groups
Build Up to Development of Standard 2005 to 2006 Q3  ORCGA Mapping Best Practices finalized and committee dissolved 2006 Q1 to Q3  RPWCO gathered support to develop a mapping standard  2006 Q3  RPWCO approached CSA to conduct a study on the viability of developing a new mapping standard 2006 Q4 to 2007 Q2  Feasibility Task Force 2007 Q2  Call for participation nationwide to become member of committee to develop new CSA standard 2007 Q3  New CSA S250 Technical Committee established and kick off
Creation of a New CSA Technical Committee Technical Committee established consisting of subject matter experts, that also represent regional and end user interests. Mandate:  The Committee shall be responsible for developing and maintaining standards related to mapping and recording of existing in-service underground utility infrastructure and related appurtenances below, at, or near grade and those that are either abandoned or that are reserved for future use.
What is a Consensus? All participants have equal voice, including minority interests. Chair Associate Members CSA Project Manager Public Review / Enquiry Utilities Design Consultants Regulators  End Users Voting Members:
Committee Matrix Interest categories Min  Max  UI  User Interest  4  7  GI  General Interest  4  7  CA  Carriers  4  7  RA  Regulatory Authority  4  7
Purpose of CSA 250 standard  is to specify the mapping requirements of records that provide the identification and location of underground utility infrastructure This standard is intended to promote the use, and drive the advancement of mapping records, during the planning, design, construction, and operation of an underground utility
1.1 Scope This standard specifies the mapping requirements for the recording and depiction of underground utility infrastructure, and related appurtenances at or near grade This standard applies to proposed existing, abandoned in-place, retired, or reserved for future use, underground utility infrastructure
Committee Meetings Held Thus Far October 2007 (Toronto) - Kick-off and member training session  December 2007 (Mississauga)  Lifecycle of plant February 2008 (Mississauga)  Content development April 2008 (Mississauga)  Content development June 2008 (Vancouver)  Content development September 2008 (Mississauga)  Rough outline review  November 2008 (Mississauga)  1 st  reading of draft January 2009 (Calgary)  2 nd  reading of draft Teleconferences as required
Content Development Started from a position of strength by building on best practices generally accepted by industry Referred to existing documents Common Ground Alliance:  Mapping Best Practices ASCE 38-02 SUE concepts ISO 15489  Policy, practise, process, procedures from various stakeholders Ensuring that requirements are realistic and can be practically achievable without significant demands/investments or changes to stakeholder group technology, practices or internal processes
Examples of Recent Committee Discussion Terminology characteristics of a record Authenticity  what it purports to be Reliabiity  trusted as full and accurate representation of the fact Integrity  complete and unaltered Useability  can be located, retrieved, presented, and interpretted Accuracy of mapping records Accurate content, completeness, extent of coverage, completeness, and  spatial accuracy   (Absolute & Relative) Accuracy levels being defined Developing a methodology to qualify the level of reliability of mapping records information that is collected and used to depict the location and attributes of utility infrastructure Quality levels envisioned to be as per ASCE 38-02, Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data
Map record accuracy Insert table 6.1
An Example of Sewer Attributes
Challenges & Observations   Need to remind ourselves of the benefits of having a standard Need to maintain interest in the standard by committee members and all stakeholders Need to assess how the standard will be embraced and then sustained Once CSA S250 is published, stakeholders may:   formally mandate implementation of all or part of CSA standard in regulatory/legislated framework modify internal processes and systems to meet or exceed the standard
Improved  reliability and accuracy  in the location of underground utility infrastructure mapping records & supporting data Improved  safety  of company & contractor employees and the general public by decreasing utility hits/strikes Lower cost  in the utility design life cycle by sharing accurate & complete utility records in a timely fashion amongst all users (municipalities, carriers, contractors, designers, consultants, locators) Expected Outcomes
Next Steps - Timeline for Publication Complete rough outline June 2009 Enquiry (public review) stage  Fall 2009 Approval by CSA Technical Committee  Winter 2009 / 2010 Ready for publication  Summer 2010 CSA S250  Mapping of underground utility infrastructure
Questions? Thank-you!

More Related Content

Csa 2009 Ogr Roma Combined Conference Workshop 20090224 95b

  • 1. CSA S250 Standard MAPPING OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE Bob Gaspirc, OLS, CLS, OAEM Manager, Mapping Services City of Toronto Chair, CSA S250 Technical Committee 2009 OGRA/ROMA Combined Conference 2009-02-24 Buried Treasure Underground Utilities Workshop Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Fairmount Royal York Hotel, Tudor Room
  • 2. Where is the treasure in underground utility mapping standards? Business Intelligence (noun) - a set of concepts and methods to improve business decision making by using fact-based support systems. Today we will demonstrate how CSA s250 will be used to support business intelligence Key Goal CSA s250 - Good records - better decisions
  • 3. Key Goal improve decision making You must: Be ready to produce utility record as evidence that an event, set of activities, or task occurred and was completed Have record containing relevant, factual, and timely data Be able to access and retrieve utility record Be able to to share, manipulate, analyze, distribute data Make and act on decisions using reliable and dependable utility map records
  • 4. Evidence of an event, activity, task As-built drawings, plans Circulation drawings, mark ups Design drawing Permit drawings, sketches Approved design drawing used for purposes of construction Field notes, locator notes, inspector notes, Digital representations of above Supports and demonstrates the legal test phases to be met the integrity of the recording system and the reliability of the entry.
  • 5. CSA s250 Mapping of underground infrastructure Needs to be: referenced and used within infrastructure design, construction, operation policies, practices, and procedures these documents are needed to: establish the integrity and authenticity of utility mapping records recorded in their document management systems, GIS, and other electronic records management system
  • 6. CSA s250: Mapping of underground infrastructure Provides technology-neutral language as per CSA s250 Codifies selected best practices, procedures, tables, or figures that are normal to rely on Applying the standard to an organizations business will not eliminate the possibility of litigation, but it will make the production of electronic records easier and their acceptance in a legal proceeding more certain.
  • 7. Improved decision framework Acts, regulations, by-laws, codes Results of court actions/decisions, other legal proceeding Enables Framework for exchange, data sharing, data licensing; web-based distribution models, reseller model, value-added reseller model, no-fee and fee-based distribution models Business policies, best practice, procedures, and operational requirements STANDARDS ISO 15489 - records management CAN/CGSB-72.34, Electronic records as documentary evidence standards endorsed for the Canadian Geospatial Data Infrastructure (CGDI) (DRM, metadata, web services etc) CSA s250 Mapping of Underground Utility Infrastructure Technology neutral language Improves, enhances records management during design, construction, operation, retirement phase of plant
  • 8. Why a Mapping Standard? Good records lead to informed decisions Next logical step, building on best practices Better communication reduces infrastructure life-cycle challenges Promotes communication among utility infrastructure stakeholders
  • 9. Why a CSA based standard? Provides management framework for administering technical committee Acts a facilitator; provides neutral third party forum, process, and structure for developing a consensus standard Part of the National Standards System; accredited by the Standards Council of Canada
  • 10. CSAs Involvement in Civil Infrastructure More than 400 publications relate to civil infrastructure Homes & Buildings Transportation structures Energy networks (electrical, petroleum, gas & alternative energy) Water, waste, & storm water management Industrial structures Communications structures Community, healthcare and recreational facilities
  • 11. History and Background of Initiative No current mapping standard that addresses accuracy, process, and identification of underground plant Historically, high variability in the reliability, consistency & accuracy of mapping underground utilities The (Ontario and BC) Common Ground Alliance movement have introduced Mapping Best Practices for Damage Prevention Recent technological advancements allows for: Improved records capture Better records storage Enhanced access and sharing mechanisms Growing appetite to share utility mapping records
  • 12. Standards are developed by stakeholders business Cooperative work through common interest in particular subject area consumer groups industry labour government environmental groups
  • 13. Build Up to Development of Standard 2005 to 2006 Q3 ORCGA Mapping Best Practices finalized and committee dissolved 2006 Q1 to Q3 RPWCO gathered support to develop a mapping standard 2006 Q3 RPWCO approached CSA to conduct a study on the viability of developing a new mapping standard 2006 Q4 to 2007 Q2 Feasibility Task Force 2007 Q2 Call for participation nationwide to become member of committee to develop new CSA standard 2007 Q3 New CSA S250 Technical Committee established and kick off
  • 14. Creation of a New CSA Technical Committee Technical Committee established consisting of subject matter experts, that also represent regional and end user interests. Mandate: The Committee shall be responsible for developing and maintaining standards related to mapping and recording of existing in-service underground utility infrastructure and related appurtenances below, at, or near grade and those that are either abandoned or that are reserved for future use.
  • 15. What is a Consensus? All participants have equal voice, including minority interests. Chair Associate Members CSA Project Manager Public Review / Enquiry Utilities Design Consultants Regulators End Users Voting Members:
  • 16. Committee Matrix Interest categories Min Max UI User Interest 4 7 GI General Interest 4 7 CA Carriers 4 7 RA Regulatory Authority 4 7
  • 17. Purpose of CSA 250 standard is to specify the mapping requirements of records that provide the identification and location of underground utility infrastructure This standard is intended to promote the use, and drive the advancement of mapping records, during the planning, design, construction, and operation of an underground utility
  • 18. 1.1 Scope This standard specifies the mapping requirements for the recording and depiction of underground utility infrastructure, and related appurtenances at or near grade This standard applies to proposed existing, abandoned in-place, retired, or reserved for future use, underground utility infrastructure
  • 19. Committee Meetings Held Thus Far October 2007 (Toronto) - Kick-off and member training session December 2007 (Mississauga) Lifecycle of plant February 2008 (Mississauga) Content development April 2008 (Mississauga) Content development June 2008 (Vancouver) Content development September 2008 (Mississauga) Rough outline review November 2008 (Mississauga) 1 st reading of draft January 2009 (Calgary) 2 nd reading of draft Teleconferences as required
  • 20. Content Development Started from a position of strength by building on best practices generally accepted by industry Referred to existing documents Common Ground Alliance: Mapping Best Practices ASCE 38-02 SUE concepts ISO 15489 Policy, practise, process, procedures from various stakeholders Ensuring that requirements are realistic and can be practically achievable without significant demands/investments or changes to stakeholder group technology, practices or internal processes
  • 21. Examples of Recent Committee Discussion Terminology characteristics of a record Authenticity what it purports to be Reliabiity trusted as full and accurate representation of the fact Integrity complete and unaltered Useability can be located, retrieved, presented, and interpretted Accuracy of mapping records Accurate content, completeness, extent of coverage, completeness, and spatial accuracy (Absolute & Relative) Accuracy levels being defined Developing a methodology to qualify the level of reliability of mapping records information that is collected and used to depict the location and attributes of utility infrastructure Quality levels envisioned to be as per ASCE 38-02, Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data
  • 22. Map record accuracy Insert table 6.1
  • 23. An Example of Sewer Attributes
  • 24. Challenges & Observations Need to remind ourselves of the benefits of having a standard Need to maintain interest in the standard by committee members and all stakeholders Need to assess how the standard will be embraced and then sustained Once CSA S250 is published, stakeholders may: formally mandate implementation of all or part of CSA standard in regulatory/legislated framework modify internal processes and systems to meet or exceed the standard
  • 25. Improved reliability and accuracy in the location of underground utility infrastructure mapping records & supporting data Improved safety of company & contractor employees and the general public by decreasing utility hits/strikes Lower cost in the utility design life cycle by sharing accurate & complete utility records in a timely fashion amongst all users (municipalities, carriers, contractors, designers, consultants, locators) Expected Outcomes
  • 26. Next Steps - Timeline for Publication Complete rough outline June 2009 Enquiry (public review) stage Fall 2009 Approval by CSA Technical Committee Winter 2009 / 2010 Ready for publication Summer 2010 CSA S250 Mapping of underground utility infrastructure

Editor's Notes

  1. Simply defined, standards are documents that describe the important features of a product, service or system. There are thousands of standards in use around the world that cover everything, from the simplest screw thread to the most complex information technology network.The National Standards System is the network of
  2. The basic process by which a standard is developed is consistent among all standard development organizations, national and international. The following is a simplified
  3. These key phrases are not defined by the law, but the Canada Evidence Act, as well as most provincial and territorial evidence acts, contains the following provision, encouraging the use of standards:31.5 For the purpose of determining under any rule of law whether an electronic document is admissible, evidence may be presented in respect of any standard, procedure, usage or practice concerning the manner in which electronic documents are to be recorded or stored, having regard to the type of business, enterprise or endeavour that used, recorded or stored the electronic document and the nature and purpose of the electronic document..
  4. This standard can be applied to the policies, procedures, practices and documentation that organizations need to establish the integrity and authenticity of recorded information on field notes, plans, sketches, as-builts, GIS systems, or other data/information management systemsIts technology-neutral language allows organizations to apply the procedures to various types and combinations of Information Technologyas per CSA s250 statements - will assist them in demonstrating compliance with legal requirements, without dictating the types of technology required. As a codification of best practices become more embedded into the evolution of this standard, organizations can and will be able to rely on this standard if they implement the appropriate procedures and follow them. Applying the standard to an organizations business will not eliminate the possibility of litigation, but it will make the production of electronic records easier and their acceptance in a legal proceeding more certain.
  5. Owners, operators and regulators nationwide want to better manage record the existence, identification, and depiction, and location of buried plant during the planning, design, construction and operation, retirement phases.The development of a standard for mapping of underground utility infrastructure is a logical next step, building on best practicesRefer back to Common Ground Alliance in Ontario and BCInfrastructure challenges:Defintions, terms, symbology, features, have known meaning and can be applied to :Cost management issues, business disruptions to revenue stream, disruption to other utilities, damage prevention, , Time cost, coordination, reduced right of way size, conjestion, no cut moritoriums, advancements of trench technology, -By improving communication between infrastructure stakeholders there is a better opportunity to cooperate and collaborate rather than work in isolotion co-builds, joint trenching,
  6. Leader in developing standards in Canada since founded in 1919.Originally known as the Canadian Engineering Standards Association215 Staff9,000 volunteer members worldwideOver 3,000 publications covering 54 technology areasOver 40% of its Standards are referenced in legislationOffers 600+ training events a year attended by 8,500+ students<number>
  7. So what is infrastructure? Is defined from two perspectives. First, the services that it provides to individuals, and communities. Also, its useful to establish a few different categories for infrastructure categories may differ from organization to organizationI wont discuss fleets, ships, aircraft, vehicles or rolling stock but will consider the transportation networks, ports and border crossings that they useThe first five categories of infrastructure are particularly sensitive to wind and water, and extreme climatic events as well see through some examples Climatic parameters: things like wind speed, intensity of precipitation, temperature not only in real time, but over very long time periods
  8. Standards are part science and part art. They can cover a number of areas including:stipulating requirements for use, safety levels and/or performance of products and servicesoutlining industry guidelines or best practices encompassing the design, maintenance, installation or operation of a product or service.CSA facilitates the standards development process by drawing together volunteers from government, industry, associations, business, health, and consumers who have diverse technical knowledge, perspectives, experiences and technical skill sets. Thus, CSA standards are the culmination of the diverse knowledge and expertise of the members who develop them. Many CSA standards are cited in legislation at federal, provincial, state and municipal levels across North America. Many are also internationally or regionally harmonized.
  9. Technical Committee On Mapping of Underground Utility Infrastructure Terms of Reference DECEMBER 17, 2007 Note: This document is supplementary to the CSA By-Laws, CSA Policy Governing Standardization Code of Good Practice for Standardization (CSA-SDP-1), and the CSA Directives and Guidelines Governing Standardization (CSA-SDP-2, Parts 1, 2 and 3), which are based on the principles of the consensus process. These Terms of Reference were approved by the Strategic Steering Committee (SSC) on December 17, 2007, SSC ballot number 5006. 1. Authorization 1.1 The Technical Committee on Mapping of Underground Utility Infrastructure (hereinafter called the Committee) operates under the authority of the Strategic Steering Committee on Structures (Design). 1.2 Amendments to these terms of reference shall be prepared by CSA staff, in consultation with the executive committee, chair, or chair designate, and referred to the SSC for approval. 2. Scope 2.1 The Committee shall be responsible for developing and maintaining standards related to mapping and recording of existing in-service underground utility infrastructure and related appurtenances below, at, or near grade and those that are either abandoned or that are reserved for future use. 2.2 The scope of the Committee does not include utility infrastructure that persist above grade such as overhead wires, pole-mounted transformers, antennas and dishes. <number>
  10. The standard applies to those who receive, create, capture, maintain, use, store or dispose of utility related mapping records. This standard applies to private and public sector activities of Persons irrespective of whether such activities are undertaken on a for-profit or not-for-profit basisThis standard is intended for use by those who want to improve the assurance that the reocrds they hold are trustworthy, reliable and recognized as authentic.Concensus Based Approach:
  11. 3. Committee Structure3.1 Categories Members shall represent the following categories on the basis of their predominant interest in the products or services detailed in Clause 2.1 of these terms of reference: (a) User Interest (UI) this category shall include those who are predominantly involved with the supply of services related to the mapping, locating, excavating, data capture and creating, and/or construction of the underground utility infrastructure; (b) General Interest (GI) this category shall include those who are predominantly involved in providing planning and design services, and those who are not associated in any way with the supply of services related to the mapping, locating, excavating, data capture and creating, construction, ownership, operation and/or regulation of the underground utility infrastructure. This category may include professionals employed by academic and scientific institutions; (c) Carriers (CA) - this category shall include those who are predominantly involved with the ownership and/or operation of an underground utility infrastructure; and (d) Regulatory Authority (RA) this category shall include those who are predominantly involved in regulating the use and operation of the underground utility infrastructure.
  12. life cycle of records stages in the life cycle of a record include but are not limited to its planning, creation and organization; the receipt and capture of data; the retrieval, processing, dissemination and distribution of data; its storage, maintenance and protection; its archival preservation or destruction or xpungement
  13. in general, apply on a go-forward basisbe easily implemented and adhered so that it can be adopted as regulatory requirement
  14. incorporate Standard for mapping into municipal access agreements, rfp contract documents
  15. <number>