際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Bonab University
Civil Engineering Department
Bonab-Iran
Dam failure
Sajad Behnajad
The cause of failure may be
classified as
 hydraulic failures (for all types of dams)
 failures due to seepage
1. through foundation (all except arch dams)
2. through body of dam (embankment dam)
 failures due to stresses developed within structure
Arch dams fail instantaneously, whereas the gravity
dams take some multiples of 10minutes
The percentage distribution of
dam breaks and its attributes causes of
failure
Foundation problems 40 %
Inadequate spillway 23 %
Poor construction 12 %
Uneven settlement 10 %
High pore pressure 5 %
Acts of war 3 %
Embankment slips 2 %
Defective materials 2 %
Incorrect operations 2 %
Earthquakes 1 %
Dam failures effects
 Dam failure results in a catastrophic break followed by
a flood wave often with considerable loss of life or
property
 More than a dozen dams have failed in South
Carolina amid catastrophic flooding that has
destroyed homes and businesses and left more than
a dozen people dead
 The structures that have failed in South Carolina are
like the vast majority of dams around the world: they
are made of earth
Dam failures are most likely to
happen for one of five reasons
 Overtopping
 Foundation Defects and Slope Instability
 Cracking
 Inadequate maintenance and upkeep
 Piping
Overtopping
 caused by water spilling over the top of a dam.
Overtopping of a dam is often a precursor of dam
failure. National statistics show that overtopping due
to inadequate spillway design, debris blockage of
spillways, or settlement of the dam crest account for
approximately 34% of all U.S. dam failures
Foundation Defects and Slope
Instability
 Foundation defects, including settlement and slope
instability, cause about 30% of all dam failures
Piping
 It happens when seepage through a dam is not
properly filtered and soil particles continue to
progress and form sink holes in the dam
 20% of U.S. dam failures have been caused by piping
(internal erosion caused by seepage).
Failure Prevention
 Failure could have been prevented if some of these
points had been observed
 Failure is a complex process
 Begins with some abnormality in behavior (not
detected)
 Consequent deteriorations (not observed)
 Further damage or disaster
 Inspection and Monitoring of dams as well as data
analysis and interpretation has a critical role in the
field of dam safety
St. Francis Dam Disaster
Geography
 Located 40 miles NE of Los Angeles
 In city of Santa Clarita
 Developing city
 Agriculture, electricity (Edison), mostly immigrants
 Inside San Francisquito Canyon
Background
 Designed by William Mulholland, Dept. of Power
and Water
 1924  construction began
 Originally
 Capacity: 30,000 acre-feet
 180 ft high, 600 ft long
 1st change
 10ft height increase
 Capacity: 32,000 acre-feet
 2nd change (July 1925)
 10ft height increase
 Capacity: 38,000 acre-feet
 Wing dyke added (600ft long)
 1926  construction complete
William Mulholland
Completed and filled
reservoir
St. Francis Dam
construction
http://www.scvhistory.com/scvhistory/scvhistory.htm
 1926-1928
 Cracks developing in dam and abutments
 Mulholland investigates and dismisses
 7 March 1928
 Reservoir fills to capacity
 More leaks develop
 Mulholland investigates and dismisses
 12 March 1928
 East side of reservoir roadbed sagging 1  5 feet
 More leaks and cracks
 Mulholland and assistant inspect and dismiss
Evidence of leaks
http://www.scvhistory.com/scvhistory/scvhistory.htm
 12 March 1928  Dam fails 11:57 pm
 12 bill gallons of water
 18 mi/hr initially, 5 mi/hr into Pacific
 Traveled 55 miles to the Pacific Ocean
 Took 5 遜 hrs
Dam after failure
http://www.scvhistory.com/scvhistory/scvhistory.htm
Impacts
 Deaths: 450 estimated
 Many found downstream
 Tent residents of unknown count
 +900 homes destroyed
 1,200 buildings damaged
 10 bridges knocked out
 Power lost in multiple cities
 Crops, businesses and livestock affected
Overturned railroad tracks
Debris and overturned cars
http://www.scvhistory.com/scvhistory/scvhistory.htm
Disaster Management
 Awareness and preparedness
 No disaster plan
 No one ever thought it would break
 Mulholland was aware of cracks/leaks and maximum capacity
 Dismissed them because said, This is typical for a concrete dam of
this size.
How was the community affected
 Many people lost jobs
 Edison electric power plants ruined
 Agriculture crops devastated
 Agriculture devastated
 7,900 acres
 Citrus, walnuts, apricots, grapes, alfalfa, pecans
 Tent residents
 Lost jobs and displaced
 Rebuild homes and businesses
 Took very long for people to get back on their feet
Recommendations
 Warning system needed
 You can never be too careful, the risk of failure will always be there no matter the
confidence
 More response by police force
 Efficiency needed with system of communication
 Reservoir shouldnt have been built there
 The geography is extremely dangerous
Sources
 http://www.scvhistory.com/scvhistory/scvhistory.htm
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisquito_Canyon
 http://web.umr.edu/~rogersda/st_francis_dam/lessons_learned
_from_the_st_francis_dam_failure(geostrata_mar-apr_2006).pdf
 http://web.umr.edu/~rogersda/st_francis_dam/reassessment_o
f_st_francis_dam_failure.pdf
 http://web.umr.edu/~rogersda/st_francis_dam/Mapping%20th
e%20St%20Francis%20Dam%20Outburst%20Flood%20with%2
0GIS.pdf
 Sharif University Presentation based on dam failure
 Outland, Charles F. Man  Made Disaster: the story of St.
Francis Dam. Glendale, California: The Arthur H. Clark
Company, 1963.
Thank You

More Related Content

Dam failure

  • 1. Bonab University Civil Engineering Department Bonab-Iran Dam failure Sajad Behnajad
  • 2. The cause of failure may be classified as hydraulic failures (for all types of dams) failures due to seepage 1. through foundation (all except arch dams) 2. through body of dam (embankment dam) failures due to stresses developed within structure Arch dams fail instantaneously, whereas the gravity dams take some multiples of 10minutes
  • 3. The percentage distribution of dam breaks and its attributes causes of failure Foundation problems 40 % Inadequate spillway 23 % Poor construction 12 % Uneven settlement 10 % High pore pressure 5 % Acts of war 3 % Embankment slips 2 % Defective materials 2 % Incorrect operations 2 % Earthquakes 1 %
  • 4. Dam failures effects Dam failure results in a catastrophic break followed by a flood wave often with considerable loss of life or property More than a dozen dams have failed in South Carolina amid catastrophic flooding that has destroyed homes and businesses and left more than a dozen people dead The structures that have failed in South Carolina are like the vast majority of dams around the world: they are made of earth
  • 5. Dam failures are most likely to happen for one of five reasons Overtopping Foundation Defects and Slope Instability Cracking Inadequate maintenance and upkeep Piping
  • 6. Overtopping caused by water spilling over the top of a dam. Overtopping of a dam is often a precursor of dam failure. National statistics show that overtopping due to inadequate spillway design, debris blockage of spillways, or settlement of the dam crest account for approximately 34% of all U.S. dam failures
  • 7. Foundation Defects and Slope Instability Foundation defects, including settlement and slope instability, cause about 30% of all dam failures
  • 8. Piping It happens when seepage through a dam is not properly filtered and soil particles continue to progress and form sink holes in the dam 20% of U.S. dam failures have been caused by piping (internal erosion caused by seepage).
  • 9. Failure Prevention Failure could have been prevented if some of these points had been observed Failure is a complex process Begins with some abnormality in behavior (not detected) Consequent deteriorations (not observed) Further damage or disaster Inspection and Monitoring of dams as well as data analysis and interpretation has a critical role in the field of dam safety
  • 10. St. Francis Dam Disaster
  • 11. Geography Located 40 miles NE of Los Angeles In city of Santa Clarita Developing city Agriculture, electricity (Edison), mostly immigrants Inside San Francisquito Canyon
  • 12. Background Designed by William Mulholland, Dept. of Power and Water 1924 construction began Originally Capacity: 30,000 acre-feet 180 ft high, 600 ft long 1st change 10ft height increase Capacity: 32,000 acre-feet 2nd change (July 1925) 10ft height increase Capacity: 38,000 acre-feet Wing dyke added (600ft long) 1926 construction complete William Mulholland
  • 13. Completed and filled reservoir St. Francis Dam construction http://www.scvhistory.com/scvhistory/scvhistory.htm
  • 14. 1926-1928 Cracks developing in dam and abutments Mulholland investigates and dismisses 7 March 1928 Reservoir fills to capacity More leaks develop Mulholland investigates and dismisses 12 March 1928 East side of reservoir roadbed sagging 1 5 feet More leaks and cracks Mulholland and assistant inspect and dismiss Evidence of leaks http://www.scvhistory.com/scvhistory/scvhistory.htm
  • 15. 12 March 1928 Dam fails 11:57 pm 12 bill gallons of water 18 mi/hr initially, 5 mi/hr into Pacific Traveled 55 miles to the Pacific Ocean Took 5 遜 hrs Dam after failure http://www.scvhistory.com/scvhistory/scvhistory.htm
  • 16. Impacts Deaths: 450 estimated Many found downstream Tent residents of unknown count +900 homes destroyed 1,200 buildings damaged 10 bridges knocked out Power lost in multiple cities Crops, businesses and livestock affected
  • 17. Overturned railroad tracks Debris and overturned cars http://www.scvhistory.com/scvhistory/scvhistory.htm
  • 18. Disaster Management Awareness and preparedness No disaster plan No one ever thought it would break Mulholland was aware of cracks/leaks and maximum capacity Dismissed them because said, This is typical for a concrete dam of this size.
  • 19. How was the community affected Many people lost jobs Edison electric power plants ruined Agriculture crops devastated Agriculture devastated 7,900 acres Citrus, walnuts, apricots, grapes, alfalfa, pecans Tent residents Lost jobs and displaced Rebuild homes and businesses Took very long for people to get back on their feet
  • 20. Recommendations Warning system needed You can never be too careful, the risk of failure will always be there no matter the confidence More response by police force Efficiency needed with system of communication Reservoir shouldnt have been built there The geography is extremely dangerous
  • 21. Sources http://www.scvhistory.com/scvhistory/scvhistory.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisquito_Canyon http://web.umr.edu/~rogersda/st_francis_dam/lessons_learned _from_the_st_francis_dam_failure(geostrata_mar-apr_2006).pdf http://web.umr.edu/~rogersda/st_francis_dam/reassessment_o f_st_francis_dam_failure.pdf http://web.umr.edu/~rogersda/st_francis_dam/Mapping%20th e%20St%20Francis%20Dam%20Outburst%20Flood%20with%2 0GIS.pdf Sharif University Presentation based on dam failure Outland, Charles F. Man Made Disaster: the story of St. Francis Dam. Glendale, California: The Arthur H. Clark Company, 1963.