The document discusses the failure of the St. Francis Dam in 1928 near Los Angeles, California. It provides background on the dam's design and construction. On March 12, 1928, the dam catastrophically failed, releasing a flood wave that killed an estimated 450 people and destroyed over 1,000 homes and buildings. The failure was likely due to cracks and leaks that were dismissed by the dam's designer. The document recommends lessons for disaster management, including early warning systems and emergency preparedness.
Convert to study materialsBETA
Transform any presentation into ready-made study materialselect from outputs like summaries, definitions, and practice questions.
2. The cause of failure may be
classified as
hydraulic failures (for all types of dams)
failures due to seepage
1. through foundation (all except arch dams)
2. through body of dam (embankment dam)
failures due to stresses developed within structure
Arch dams fail instantaneously, whereas the gravity
dams take some multiples of 10minutes
3. The percentage distribution of
dam breaks and its attributes causes of
failure
Foundation problems 40 %
Inadequate spillway 23 %
Poor construction 12 %
Uneven settlement 10 %
High pore pressure 5 %
Acts of war 3 %
Embankment slips 2 %
Defective materials 2 %
Incorrect operations 2 %
Earthquakes 1 %
4. Dam failures effects
Dam failure results in a catastrophic break followed by
a flood wave often with considerable loss of life or
property
More than a dozen dams have failed in South
Carolina amid catastrophic flooding that has
destroyed homes and businesses and left more than
a dozen people dead
The structures that have failed in South Carolina are
like the vast majority of dams around the world: they
are made of earth
5. Dam failures are most likely to
happen for one of five reasons
Overtopping
Foundation Defects and Slope Instability
Cracking
Inadequate maintenance and upkeep
Piping
6. Overtopping
caused by water spilling over the top of a dam.
Overtopping of a dam is often a precursor of dam
failure. National statistics show that overtopping due
to inadequate spillway design, debris blockage of
spillways, or settlement of the dam crest account for
approximately 34% of all U.S. dam failures
7. Foundation Defects and Slope
Instability
Foundation defects, including settlement and slope
instability, cause about 30% of all dam failures
8. Piping
It happens when seepage through a dam is not
properly filtered and soil particles continue to
progress and form sink holes in the dam
20% of U.S. dam failures have been caused by piping
(internal erosion caused by seepage).
9. Failure Prevention
Failure could have been prevented if some of these
points had been observed
Failure is a complex process
Begins with some abnormality in behavior (not
detected)
Consequent deteriorations (not observed)
Further damage or disaster
Inspection and Monitoring of dams as well as data
analysis and interpretation has a critical role in the
field of dam safety
11. Geography
Located 40 miles NE of Los Angeles
In city of Santa Clarita
Developing city
Agriculture, electricity (Edison), mostly immigrants
Inside San Francisquito Canyon
12. Background
Designed by William Mulholland, Dept. of Power
and Water
1924 construction began
Originally
Capacity: 30,000 acre-feet
180 ft high, 600 ft long
1st change
10ft height increase
Capacity: 32,000 acre-feet
2nd change (July 1925)
10ft height increase
Capacity: 38,000 acre-feet
Wing dyke added (600ft long)
1926 construction complete
William Mulholland
14. 1926-1928
Cracks developing in dam and abutments
Mulholland investigates and dismisses
7 March 1928
Reservoir fills to capacity
More leaks develop
Mulholland investigates and dismisses
12 March 1928
East side of reservoir roadbed sagging 1 5 feet
More leaks and cracks
Mulholland and assistant inspect and dismiss
Evidence of leaks
http://www.scvhistory.com/scvhistory/scvhistory.htm
15. 12 March 1928 Dam fails 11:57 pm
12 bill gallons of water
18 mi/hr initially, 5 mi/hr into Pacific
Traveled 55 miles to the Pacific Ocean
Took 5 遜 hrs
Dam after failure
http://www.scvhistory.com/scvhistory/scvhistory.htm
16. Impacts
Deaths: 450 estimated
Many found downstream
Tent residents of unknown count
+900 homes destroyed
1,200 buildings damaged
10 bridges knocked out
Power lost in multiple cities
Crops, businesses and livestock affected
18. Disaster Management
Awareness and preparedness
No disaster plan
No one ever thought it would break
Mulholland was aware of cracks/leaks and maximum capacity
Dismissed them because said, This is typical for a concrete dam of
this size.
19. How was the community affected
Many people lost jobs
Edison electric power plants ruined
Agriculture crops devastated
Agriculture devastated
7,900 acres
Citrus, walnuts, apricots, grapes, alfalfa, pecans
Tent residents
Lost jobs and displaced
Rebuild homes and businesses
Took very long for people to get back on their feet
20. Recommendations
Warning system needed
You can never be too careful, the risk of failure will always be there no matter the
confidence
More response by police force
Efficiency needed with system of communication
Reservoir shouldnt have been built there
The geography is extremely dangerous
21. Sources
http://www.scvhistory.com/scvhistory/scvhistory.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisquito_Canyon
http://web.umr.edu/~rogersda/st_francis_dam/lessons_learned
_from_the_st_francis_dam_failure(geostrata_mar-apr_2006).pdf
http://web.umr.edu/~rogersda/st_francis_dam/reassessment_o
f_st_francis_dam_failure.pdf
http://web.umr.edu/~rogersda/st_francis_dam/Mapping%20th
e%20St%20Francis%20Dam%20Outburst%20Flood%20with%2
0GIS.pdf
Sharif University Presentation based on dam failure
Outland, Charles F. Man Made Disaster: the story of St.
Francis Dam. Glendale, California: The Arthur H. Clark
Company, 1963.