狠狠撸

狠狠撸Share a Scribd company logo
Dear NLRB, WTF?!!?
No Seriously – WTF???
The Mission – to boldly go where no
NLRB has gone before!
HR
The Original Avengers NLRB
The New NLRB Avengers
NLRB - “The law we
enforce gives
employees the right
to act together to try
to improve their pay
and working
conditions, with or
without a union. If
employees are fired,
suspended, or
otherwise penalized
for taking part in
protected group
activity, the National
Labor Relations
Board will fight to
restore what was
unlawfully taken
away.”
The NLRB & General Counsel
NLRB.GOV
Triple Play
? "Maybe someone should do the owners of
Triple Play a favor and buy it from them. They
can’t even do the tax paperwork correctly!!!
Now I OWE money...Wtf!!!!“
? "Hahahaha he’s such a shady little man. He
prolly [sic] pocketed it all from all our
paychecks.“
? “I owe too. Such an a**hole.”
Three D, LLC (Triple Play), 361 NLRB No. 31 (2014)
Triple Play
The Board said:
? “The employees engaged in protected concerted
activity by taking part in a social media discussion
among offsite, off-duty employees, as well as two
non-employees…. Although we do not condone
her conduct, we find that Sanzone’s use of a
single expletive to describe a manager, in the
course of a protected discussion on a social
media website, does not sufficiently implicate the
Respondent’s legitimate interest in maintaining
discipline and order in the workplace…”
Three D, LLC (Triple Play), 361 NLRB No. 31 (2014)
The Picket Line
An employee was caught on video making racist
remarks:
“Hey, did you bring enough KFC for everyone?”
? “Hey, anybody smell that? I smell fried
chicken and watermelon.”
http://www.scribd.com/doc/268209701/Cooper-Tire-Rubber-Company
The Picket Line
? The NLRB said:
? “[The] “KFC” and “fried chicken and watermelon”
statements most certainly were racist, offensive, and
reprehensible, but they were not violent in character,
and they did not contain any overt or implied threats
to replacement workers or their property….The record
evidence in this case does not establish that Runion’s
statements were coercive or intimidating to the
exercise of employees’ Section 7 rights, and it does not
establish that the statements raised the likelihood of
imminent physical confrontation.”
http://www.scribd.com/doc/268209701/Cooper-Tire-Rubber-Company
More WTF?
? Employees at ATT&T show
up at work wearing buttons
that read:
? “WTF Where’s the
Fairness?”
? “FTW Fight to Win”
? “Cut the Crap! Not My
Healthcare.”
? AT&T sends employees
home after refusing to
remove the buttons before
leaving the office to work in
and around customer
homes and businesses.
More WTF?
The Board disagreed with AT&T:
? “We agree with the judge that
the content of the “WTF,”
“FTW,” and “Cut the Crap!”
buttons and stickers was not
so vulgar and offensive as to
cause employees wearing
them to lose the protection of
the [National Labor Relations
Act]. In particular, we
emphasize that the “WTF” and
“FTW” buttons and stickers
provided a nonprofane,
nonoffensive interpretation on
their face.”
Common sense sometimes matters
? During contract negotiations in
2009 Communications
Workers in Connecticut wore
T-shirts with “Inmate # ____”
on the front and “Prisoner of
AT$T” on the back. The boss
said they could not wear them
if they were going into
customer homes or were
working in public. Many did
anyhow, and 183 got
suspended.
? Board said it was okay!!!
? DC Circuit overturned in July
http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/80AD773E2F0DF13385257E7E0052C14A/$file/11-1099-1561845.pdf
Perez Pier Sixty
? While on break at work, employee uses his
iPhone to post about his boss on his personal
Facebook page:
? “Bob is such a NASTY MFer don’t know how to
talk to people!!!!!!! F*** his mother and his
entire f***ing family!!!!
? What a LOSER!!!! Vote YES for the
UNION!!!!!!!”
http://www.scribd.com/doc/260742549/Perez-Pier-Sixty
Perez Pier Sixty
? “The overwhelming evidence establishes that,
while distasteful, the Respondent tolerated
the widespread use of profanity in the
workplace, including the words “f**k” and
“mf***er.” Considered in this setting,
Perez’ use of those words in his Facebook post
would not cause him to lose the protection of
the Act.”
? They ordered reinstatement!!!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/260742549/Perez-Pier-Sixty
Protected Tweets
In January 2015, after a
customer tweeted out
thanks for a freebie at
Chipotle's, Kennedy
tweeted back,
“@ChipotleTweets, nothing
is free, only cheap #labor.
Crew members only make
$8.50hr how much is that
steak bowl really?"
Lone Wolf PCA
? The NLRB determined
that an individual who
filed a collective
action FLSA claim in
federal court was
engaged in protected
concerted activity –
even if no other
employees asked him
to do it.
Dear nlrb, wtf?  #disrupthr
What to do?
? Have a drink
? Review handbook and
policies regularly
? NLRB guidance memos
from General Counsel
? Hire competent legal
counsel
? Treasure your
employees
? Get started now!

More Related Content

Dear nlrb, wtf? #disrupthr

  • 1. Dear NLRB, WTF?!!? No Seriously – WTF???
  • 2. The Mission – to boldly go where no NLRB has gone before! HR
  • 4. The New NLRB Avengers
  • 5. NLRB - “The law we enforce gives employees the right to act together to try to improve their pay and working conditions, with or without a union. If employees are fired, suspended, or otherwise penalized for taking part in protected group activity, the National Labor Relations Board will fight to restore what was unlawfully taken away.”
  • 6. The NLRB & General Counsel
  • 8. Triple Play ? "Maybe someone should do the owners of Triple Play a favor and buy it from them. They can’t even do the tax paperwork correctly!!! Now I OWE money...Wtf!!!!“ ? "Hahahaha he’s such a shady little man. He prolly [sic] pocketed it all from all our paychecks.“ ? “I owe too. Such an a**hole.” Three D, LLC (Triple Play), 361 NLRB No. 31 (2014)
  • 9. Triple Play The Board said: ? “The employees engaged in protected concerted activity by taking part in a social media discussion among offsite, off-duty employees, as well as two non-employees…. Although we do not condone her conduct, we find that Sanzone’s use of a single expletive to describe a manager, in the course of a protected discussion on a social media website, does not sufficiently implicate the Respondent’s legitimate interest in maintaining discipline and order in the workplace…” Three D, LLC (Triple Play), 361 NLRB No. 31 (2014)
  • 10. The Picket Line An employee was caught on video making racist remarks: “Hey, did you bring enough KFC for everyone?” ? “Hey, anybody smell that? I smell fried chicken and watermelon.” http://www.scribd.com/doc/268209701/Cooper-Tire-Rubber-Company
  • 11. The Picket Line ? The NLRB said: ? “[The] “KFC” and “fried chicken and watermelon” statements most certainly were racist, offensive, and reprehensible, but they were not violent in character, and they did not contain any overt or implied threats to replacement workers or their property….The record evidence in this case does not establish that Runion’s statements were coercive or intimidating to the exercise of employees’ Section 7 rights, and it does not establish that the statements raised the likelihood of imminent physical confrontation.” http://www.scribd.com/doc/268209701/Cooper-Tire-Rubber-Company
  • 12. More WTF? ? Employees at ATT&T show up at work wearing buttons that read: ? “WTF Where’s the Fairness?” ? “FTW Fight to Win” ? “Cut the Crap! Not My Healthcare.” ? AT&T sends employees home after refusing to remove the buttons before leaving the office to work in and around customer homes and businesses.
  • 13. More WTF? The Board disagreed with AT&T: ? “We agree with the judge that the content of the “WTF,” “FTW,” and “Cut the Crap!” buttons and stickers was not so vulgar and offensive as to cause employees wearing them to lose the protection of the [National Labor Relations Act]. In particular, we emphasize that the “WTF” and “FTW” buttons and stickers provided a nonprofane, nonoffensive interpretation on their face.”
  • 14. Common sense sometimes matters ? During contract negotiations in 2009 Communications Workers in Connecticut wore T-shirts with “Inmate # ____” on the front and “Prisoner of AT$T” on the back. The boss said they could not wear them if they were going into customer homes or were working in public. Many did anyhow, and 183 got suspended. ? Board said it was okay!!! ? DC Circuit overturned in July http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/80AD773E2F0DF13385257E7E0052C14A/$file/11-1099-1561845.pdf
  • 15. Perez Pier Sixty ? While on break at work, employee uses his iPhone to post about his boss on his personal Facebook page: ? “Bob is such a NASTY MFer don’t know how to talk to people!!!!!!! F*** his mother and his entire f***ing family!!!! ? What a LOSER!!!! Vote YES for the UNION!!!!!!!” http://www.scribd.com/doc/260742549/Perez-Pier-Sixty
  • 16. Perez Pier Sixty ? “The overwhelming evidence establishes that, while distasteful, the Respondent tolerated the widespread use of profanity in the workplace, including the words “f**k” and “mf***er.” Considered in this setting, Perez’ use of those words in his Facebook post would not cause him to lose the protection of the Act.” ? They ordered reinstatement!!! http://www.scribd.com/doc/260742549/Perez-Pier-Sixty
  • 17. Protected Tweets In January 2015, after a customer tweeted out thanks for a freebie at Chipotle's, Kennedy tweeted back, “@ChipotleTweets, nothing is free, only cheap #labor. Crew members only make $8.50hr how much is that steak bowl really?"
  • 18. Lone Wolf PCA ? The NLRB determined that an individual who filed a collective action FLSA claim in federal court was engaged in protected concerted activity – even if no other employees asked him to do it.
  • 20. What to do? ? Have a drink ? Review handbook and policies regularly ? NLRB guidance memos from General Counsel ? Hire competent legal counsel ? Treasure your employees ? Get started now!