This document provides information about debating, including the benefits of debating, qualities of good debaters, different debate formats, how debates are judged, and the roles and responsibilities of speakers in various debate styles. Specifically, it outlines the elements that make up the matter, manner, and method components of a debate. It also describes the roles of government and opposition speakers in Asian and Australian parliamentary debates. The document aims to educate readers on the structure and components of effective debating.
4. DIFFERENT FORMATS OF DEBATES
PPaarrlliiaammeennttaarryy && NNoonn--ppaarrlliiaammeennttaarryy
Parliamentary debates allow Points of Information
(POI) while Non-Parliamentary debates do not.
MMaallaayyssiiaann CCoonnvveennttiioonnaall
3 members to a team
Topics given in advance
POIs not allowed
AAmmeerriiccaann PPaarrlliiaammeennttaarryy
2 members to a team
POIs are allowed
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
5. DIFFERENT FORMATS OF DEBATES
RRooyyaall MMaallaayyssiiaann// AAssiiaann
3 members to a team
POIS are allowed.
BBrriittiisshh PPaarrlliiaammeennttaarryy ((WWoorrlldd DDeebbaatteess))
2 member to team and 4 teams in a debate
POIs are allowed Opening Gov.
Closing Opp. Opening Opp.
Speaker/
Chairperson
Audience
Set up in a
British
Parliamentary
Format of
Debate
Closing Gov.
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
6. A DEBATE IS JUDGED ON THE
BASIS OF:
1. Matter:
What you present (i.e. the
content)
2. Manner:
How you present (i.e. the style)
3. Method:
Organisation/ structure of your
presentation
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
7. ELEMENTS OF MATTER
1. Definitions:
4. Rebuttals:
- Set up of the debate
2. Arguments:
- Must be logical
- Must be relevant
3. Evidences:
- Must be logical
- Must be relevant
- Must be prompt
- Must be relevant
- Evidential value (strength)
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
9. RULES OF DEFINITION
Characteristics of a Proper Definition:
It must bear a close relation to the motion.
It must not be truistic.
It must not employ time or place setting.
It must not be based on overly specific knowledge
Kinds of Definitions:
Literal with key-words definition.
Metaphorical definition.
Issue based &/or specified definition (different
from time-place setting).
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
10. CHALLENGE OF DEFINITION
Grounds for Challenge:
You can only challenge a definition if it
violates any of the criteria stated earlier.
Frequently used terms in challenging
definitions are: wholly unreasonable,
squirrel, time-place set, truistic.
You cannot challenge a definition simply
because you have a more reasonable or
better definition.
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
11. CHALLENGE OF DEFINITION
Challenge must come from the leader of the opposition, not
later.
Leader of the opposition must provide an alternative
definition.
In most of the cases, the teams must introduce an 'even if
argument.
An `Even if' argument is not possible in some cases. (e.g.
truistic definition & definition running counter to the
resolution i.e. where govt. has taken the oppositions case).
In a definition debate, all the speakers except the PM argue
the following:
Why challenge?
Validity/ invalidity of the two definitions.
Even if we are to accept the other side's definition, these are the
weaknesses of their case.
Positive case under their own definition.
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
12. GETTING THE RIGHT
ARGUMENTS
First, identify what you have to prove under the topic.
Then, identify what helps you to prove it. Put them in
the format of an argument or a set of arguments.
Not everything that you know on the subject is relevant.
Anticipate the questions that may be raised against
your arguments and see if you have good answers to
them.
Block the opportunity for those questions to be raised
by addressing them briefly as you explain the
argument.
Present the arguments in order of their strength.
Avoid empty rhetoric and emotionalism - be rational.
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
13. ESTABLISHING AN ARGUMENT
Basic statement
Logical explanations of why and how
the basic statement stands
Proofs/ evidences/ examples that factually
establish your basic statement
Conclusion/ how it proves
your teams theme
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
14. EFFECTIVE REBUTTALS
A t t a c k s
R e b u t t a l s
( R e b u t t h e A r g u m e n t s )
D e f e n c e
( R e b u t t h e R e b u t t a l s )
Do not rebut the example, attack the very premise of
the argument of the other side. Only then contrary
examples can be supplemented.
It is advisable to provide multiple rebuttals to each
argument of the other side.
Rebuttals should also be in conformity with your
case.
Rebut the rebuttals of your case by the other side in
order to defend your case.
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
15. ELEMENTS OF MANNER/STYLE
Respectable attitude towards the judges
and the other team.
Vocal style: volume, clarity, pace,
intonation etc.
Use of notes: not to read a written text.
Eye contact.
Body language: hand gestures, pacing,
standing etc.
Impression of sincerity.
Humour, wit, appropriate and healthy
sarcasm.
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
16. ELEMENTS OF METHOD
- TTeeaamm ssttrruuccttuurree
- Continuity of teams theme in all the speeches.
- Consistency among all the speakers (no
contradictions)
- Reinforcement of team members' arguments
- Clear & logical separation between arguments.
- IInnddiivviidduuaall SSttrruuccttuurree
- Attractive opening/ outline of the speech.
- Proper organisation & priority of the arguments.
- Organisation of rebuttals.
- Appropriate timing of the speech
- Summary of the speech.
- RReessppoonnsseess ttoo tthhee ddyynnaammiiccss ooff tthhee ddeebbaattee
- Right thing at the right time.
- Ability to follow the progression of and changes in the
Spedeechb a&te I,n taenrpde rtsoo nreal- aCcotm amccuonircdaitniognly E. nhancement Unit, IIUM
17. MODEL INDIVIDUAL SPEECH
Definitions/ theme of the
team
Rebuttals (attacks and defence)
Reiteration and defence of your own teams case
Presentation of your own arguments
Conclusion (why your teams case
stands and other teams case does not)
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
18. TEAMS ROLES: ASIAN/ AUSTRALS
PPRROOPPOOSSIITTIIOONN//
GGOOVVEERRNNMMEENNTT::
TToo ssuuppppoorrtt tthhee mmoottiioonn
wwhhiicchh iinnvvoollvveess::
Defining the motion,
Constructing a
positive case in
favour of the motion,
Providing substantive
materials and
arguments in support
of the case,
Responding to any
challenges made to
that case by the
Opposition.
OOPPPPOOSSIITTIIOONN::
TToo nneeggaattee tthhee mmoottiioonn wwhhiicchh
iinnvvoollvveess::
Responding to the
Government's definition,
Constructing a case in
opposition to the motion,
Providing substantive
material and arguments in
support of the (opposition)
case,
Responding to the arguments
delivered by the
Government.
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
19. TEAM ROLES: BRITISH PARLIAMENTARY
- Defines
- Builds a positive case to
support the motion
- Responds to the Opp.s case.
OPENING OPP.
- Responds to the
governments case
- Builds a case to oppose the
motion
- Supports the Opening Gov.s
case,
- Adds new dimensions,
arguments to further
substantiate the
governments case.
- Responds to the Opp.s case
- Supports the Opening Opp.s
case
- Adds new dimension,
arguments in Opp.s case
- Responds to governments
case
OPENING GOV.
CLOSING GOV. CLOSING OPP.
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
20. SPEAKERS' ROLES: ASIAN/ AUSTRALS
1st SSppeeaakkeerr //PPrriimmee MMiinniisstteerr
PPRROOPPOOSSIITTIIOONN//
GGOOVVEERRNNMMEENNTT::
Defines the topic.
Gives the case structure and theme.
Presents own arguments.
Provides a summary of his speech. (What I've given u so far..).
22nndd SSppeeaakkeerr
Rebuts.
Reiterates and defends his first speakers arguments.
Presents own argument.
Provides a summary of his speech.
33rrdd SSppeeaakkeerr
Rebuts substantially.
Reiterates and defends his own team's case.
Provides a summary of his speech.
RReeppllyy SSppeeaakkeerr
PPrreesseennttss aa ccoommppaarraattiivvee oovveerrvviieeww ooff tthhee ccllaasshh ppooiinnttss iinn tthhee ddeebbaattee
pprroovviinngg wwhhyy hhiiss tteeaammss ccaassee ssttaannddss
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM