際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
FEA stress analysis
defect in a Molded Plastic part
Solidworks Simulation
8/25/2016
Don Blanchet
3B Associates
dwb3298@verizon.net
Model from
Grabcad
CAUTION
 Dont assume that a defect will always
result in a part failure at the location
of the defect.
 Engineering experience and
judgement can mislead.
 Complex parts often have complex
load paths.
PROBLEM
 A high volume molded plastic part
underwent post NC machining which
introduced a defect due to an error.
 What impact does this false cut have on
the strength and factor of safety in the
part.
 Worst case Static Loading was specified
by the customer.
Model
ABS plastic
1.55 inch dia
Model with defect
NC false cut
Manufacturing engineering part will be o.k.  ship 5,000 parts
Boundary Conditions
Fixed base
Worst case static
Loads
+ Fy = 25lbs
- Fz = 20lbs
FEA adaptive mesh
Stress results original design
Max VonMises stress = 3,000 psi
Elastic deformation
Stress results flawed part
VonMises stress = 2,000 psi
In flaw
Stress results flawed part
Max VonMises stress = 6,000 psi
Same location as original part
Permanent plastic deformation here
Results
Analysis
case
Maximum
Stress
psi
Factor of Safety
Tensile
strength =
4500 psi
Original 3,000 1.5
With NC
Manufacturing
flaw
6,000 0.75
failure
Conclusion
 There is a significant risk in shipment
of the defective parts.
 The potential failure location is not at
the defect. (surprise ! ??)
 FEA could save the company
embarrassment time and money.
Postscript
 I started structural analysis in 1967
right out of undergrad school with the
help of a slide rule and great mentors.
 I was lucky enough to be among the
earliest adopters of the finite element
method.
 It continues to please and amaze.

More Related Content

Defect analysis in molded plastic part