際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Design of High Capacity Energy
                Efficient Wells
                              Jay Lazarus, Jim Riesterer, P.G.
                                   Glorieta Geoscience, Inc.
                                         PO Box 5727
                                     Santa Fe NM 87502
                                   www.glorietageo.com

                           Waste to Worth Conference April 2-4, 2013




GLORIE A GE
      T    OSCIENCE INC.
                   ,
Efficient Water Use At Dairies
   Agriculture is the largest user of groundwater in the
    United States
   Ground water at dairies used for cow drinking, milking
    parlor clean-up and crop irrigation is produced from wells
    that often are often improperly designed and completed.
   Inefficient well design results in increased pumping costs
    and increases the frequency that wells and/or pumps
    have to be replaced.
   Inefficient wells require significantly more energy to
    pump lesser amounts of water than properly designed
    wells.
Well Drilling




                GLORIE A GE
                      T    OSCIENCE INC.
                                   ,
Types of Wells

 Domestic
 Municipal
 Commercial
 Irrigation




                                GLORIE A GE
                                      T    OSCIENCE INC.
                                                   ,
Types of screen
 Torch cut
 Plasma cut
 Saw cut (PVC)
 Mill slot
 Wire wrapped
 Louvered


                  Photo from
                  johnsonscreens.com




                                       GLORIE A GE
                                             T    OSCIENCE INC.
                                                          ,
Well Efficiency
Inefficient well:                       Efficient well:
Limited open area                      Maximize open area
Incorrect/no filter pack               Proper filter pack
Screens get dewatered                  Screens are not dewatered
Pumps sand and/or air                  Does not pump sand and/or air
Oversized pump motor                   Properly sized pump motor
Artificially high total dynamic head   Minimizes total dynamic head
Why is Well Efficiency Important?
 Energy cost savings
 An efficient, sand-free well will save a
  farmer significant money on energy costs
  to produce the water and the well and
  pump lifetime will be extended
  significantly.




                                     GLORIE A GE
                                           T    OSCIENCE INC.
                                                        ,
When Does a Pump Fail?

 When you need it the most..


 During the hottest time of the irrigation
  season..

 When the pump contractor is servicing a
  municipal well for a bigger client..


                                      GLORIE A GE
                                            T    OSCIENCE INC.
                                                         ,
Why Does a Pump Fail?
 Old Age
 Excessive sand production
 Excessive drawdown
     Water not cooling the pump effectively
     Air entrainment  Cavitation
 Other




                                      GLORIE A GE
                                            T    OSCIENCE INC.
                                                         ,
What Causes Sand Production?
                       Improper
                        screen/filter
                        pack sand
                        sizes
                       Casing failure
                        (bad welds,
                        corrosion)




                          GLORIE A GE
                                T    OSCIENCE INC.
                                             ,
Screen Placement

    Best production intervals
    Allow sufficient water column above
       screen to prevent dewatering screens
           Include margin for long-term drawdown




GLORIE A GE
      T    OSCIENCE INC.
                   ,
Well Screen Design

    Slot size
    Slot geometry
                             Total open area
    Filter pack
           Sized in conjunction with sieve analysis of
            formation material and screen slot size
        
            Increases hydraulic conductivity, reduces
            (eliminates) sand production



GLORIE A GE
      T    OSCIENCE INC.
                   ,
Well Development
  Removes drilling fluid from filter pack and
   formation (increases production)
  Removes fines from filter pack, properly
   grades filter pack and formation for long
   term sand-free production




GLORIE A GE
      T    OSCIENCE INC.
                   ,        Photo from Driscoll, 1986
Specific Capacity
 Defined as production rate per unit of
 drawdown (Q/s)
     Typically expressed as gpm/ft
     The bigger the number the better the well
 Allows well to be designed in a manner
 that will avoid dewatering screens
     Often must estimate Q/s in design phase
      based on nearby wells or lithologic
      analogues
  
      Confirm actual Q/s with test pump
       prior to selecting permanent pump    GL IE A GE
                                              OR T    OSCIENCE INC.
                                                              ,
Specific Capacity
 Directly impacts pumping costs
Maximizing Specific Capacity
 Proper screen and filter pack selection
 Proper screen locations
 Proper well development
 Up front costs associated with these items
 can easily be recouped in power savings
 and pump longevity




                                GLORIE A GE
                                      T    OSCIENCE INC.
                                                   ,
Maximizing Pump Efficiency
 Must have good specific capacity (step
  drawdown) test at a minimum to select
  best pump for the job
 Select permanent pump AFTER step test
  is conducted
 Oversizing the pump requires choking
  back flow, creating artificial and
  unnecessary head (and increased
  pumping costs)

                               GLORIE A GE
                                     T    OSCIENCE INC.
                                                  ,
Step Drawdown Test
Using the Step Test Results
7 Day Drawdown Test
Maximizing Pump Efficiency
     800                                                                              80
                                                                   ~71 % eff.
     700                                                                              70
               50 hp                                                  ~62 % eff.
     600                                                                              60

               40 hp
     500                                                                              50
                                                          Assumed
     400       30 hp                                                                  40




                                                                                             %
                                                                                             n
                                                                                             e
                                                                                             y
                                                                                             c
                                                                                             )
                                                                                             (
                                                                                           Eff
                                                                                             i
     300                                                                              30
               20 hp                                                    Step test
 m




                                                                        Result
 H
 D
To
 d
 e
 n
 a
 c
 y
 )
 (
 f
 t
 i
 l




     200                                                                              20
                   10 hp
     100                                                                              10

      0                                                                               0
           0           100   200       300         400       500        600
                                        Capacity (gpm)

       If pump is selected based on the assumed flow and head, the pump will be
       oversized and actual operation will be ~9% less efficient and discharge will
       have to be choked back creating an additional ~80 ft of artificial head.
Maximizing Pump Efficiency
 In our example*, a 9% reduction in pump
 efficiency and an extra 80 ft of head
 translates to a cost increase of
 approximately $9200/year for one pivot.




  *Q = 500 gpm, Q/s = 15 gpm/ft, Pipe diameter = 6, pipe length = 1000 ft,
  power cost = $0.10/KWH



                                                        GLORIE A GE
                                                              T    OSCIENCE INC.
                                                                           ,
Other Considerations
 Well location
     Geohydrology
     Distance from pivot (pipeline friction loss)
  
      Elevation change to pivot


                                Note: All other factors held
                                Constant: Q = 500 gpm, Q/s
                                = 15 gpm/ft, pipe diameter =
                                6, elevation change = 0, energy
                                Cost = $0.10/KWH




                                           GLORIE A GE
                                                 T    OSCIENCE INC.
                                                              ,
Other Considerations
 Pipeline sizes
     Properly sized pipes can significantly reduce
      friction loss/pumping costs


                                 Note: All other factors held
                                 Constant: Q = 500 gpm, Q/s
                                 = 15 gpm/ft, pipe length =
                                 1000, elevation change = 0,
                                 Energy cost = $0.10/KWH




                                         GLORIE A GE
                                               T    OSCIENCE INC.
                                                            ,
Summary and Conclusions
   Significant operational cost savings (power, pump
    replacement) can be realized through properly:
      Selecting screen size/geometry
      Locating screened intervals
      Selecting filter pack size
      Developing the well
      Testing the well
      Maximizing pump efficiency
      Sizing pipelines
      Minimizing pipe runs where possible

                                         GLORIE A GE
                                               T    OSCIENCE INC.
                                                            ,
Questions?

   www.glorietageo.com
 lazarus@glorietageo.com
riesterer@glorietageo.com




                      GLORIE A GE
                            T    OSCIENCE INC.
                                         ,

More Related Content

Design of High Capacity Energy Efficient Wells

  • 1. Design of High Capacity Energy Efficient Wells Jay Lazarus, Jim Riesterer, P.G. Glorieta Geoscience, Inc. PO Box 5727 Santa Fe NM 87502 www.glorietageo.com Waste to Worth Conference April 2-4, 2013 GLORIE A GE T OSCIENCE INC. ,
  • 2. Efficient Water Use At Dairies Agriculture is the largest user of groundwater in the United States Ground water at dairies used for cow drinking, milking parlor clean-up and crop irrigation is produced from wells that often are often improperly designed and completed. Inefficient well design results in increased pumping costs and increases the frequency that wells and/or pumps have to be replaced. Inefficient wells require significantly more energy to pump lesser amounts of water than properly designed wells.
  • 3. Well Drilling GLORIE A GE T OSCIENCE INC. ,
  • 4. Types of Wells Domestic Municipal Commercial Irrigation GLORIE A GE T OSCIENCE INC. ,
  • 5. Types of screen Torch cut Plasma cut Saw cut (PVC) Mill slot Wire wrapped Louvered Photo from johnsonscreens.com GLORIE A GE T OSCIENCE INC. ,
  • 6. Well Efficiency Inefficient well: Efficient well: Limited open area Maximize open area Incorrect/no filter pack Proper filter pack Screens get dewatered Screens are not dewatered Pumps sand and/or air Does not pump sand and/or air Oversized pump motor Properly sized pump motor Artificially high total dynamic head Minimizes total dynamic head
  • 7. Why is Well Efficiency Important? Energy cost savings An efficient, sand-free well will save a farmer significant money on energy costs to produce the water and the well and pump lifetime will be extended significantly. GLORIE A GE T OSCIENCE INC. ,
  • 8. When Does a Pump Fail? When you need it the most.. During the hottest time of the irrigation season.. When the pump contractor is servicing a municipal well for a bigger client.. GLORIE A GE T OSCIENCE INC. ,
  • 9. Why Does a Pump Fail? Old Age Excessive sand production Excessive drawdown Water not cooling the pump effectively Air entrainment Cavitation Other GLORIE A GE T OSCIENCE INC. ,
  • 10. What Causes Sand Production? Improper screen/filter pack sand sizes Casing failure (bad welds, corrosion) GLORIE A GE T OSCIENCE INC. ,
  • 11. Screen Placement Best production intervals Allow sufficient water column above screen to prevent dewatering screens Include margin for long-term drawdown GLORIE A GE T OSCIENCE INC. ,
  • 12. Well Screen Design Slot size Slot geometry Total open area Filter pack Sized in conjunction with sieve analysis of formation material and screen slot size Increases hydraulic conductivity, reduces (eliminates) sand production GLORIE A GE T OSCIENCE INC. ,
  • 13. Well Development Removes drilling fluid from filter pack and formation (increases production) Removes fines from filter pack, properly grades filter pack and formation for long term sand-free production GLORIE A GE T OSCIENCE INC. , Photo from Driscoll, 1986
  • 14. Specific Capacity Defined as production rate per unit of drawdown (Q/s) Typically expressed as gpm/ft The bigger the number the better the well Allows well to be designed in a manner that will avoid dewatering screens Often must estimate Q/s in design phase based on nearby wells or lithologic analogues Confirm actual Q/s with test pump prior to selecting permanent pump GL IE A GE OR T OSCIENCE INC. ,
  • 15. Specific Capacity Directly impacts pumping costs
  • 16. Maximizing Specific Capacity Proper screen and filter pack selection Proper screen locations Proper well development Up front costs associated with these items can easily be recouped in power savings and pump longevity GLORIE A GE T OSCIENCE INC. ,
  • 17. Maximizing Pump Efficiency Must have good specific capacity (step drawdown) test at a minimum to select best pump for the job Select permanent pump AFTER step test is conducted Oversizing the pump requires choking back flow, creating artificial and unnecessary head (and increased pumping costs) GLORIE A GE T OSCIENCE INC. ,
  • 19. Using the Step Test Results
  • 21. Maximizing Pump Efficiency 800 80 ~71 % eff. 700 70 50 hp ~62 % eff. 600 60 40 hp 500 50 Assumed 400 30 hp 40 % n e y c ) ( Eff i 300 30 20 hp Step test m Result H D To d e n a c y ) ( f t i l 200 20 10 hp 100 10 0 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Capacity (gpm) If pump is selected based on the assumed flow and head, the pump will be oversized and actual operation will be ~9% less efficient and discharge will have to be choked back creating an additional ~80 ft of artificial head.
  • 22. Maximizing Pump Efficiency In our example*, a 9% reduction in pump efficiency and an extra 80 ft of head translates to a cost increase of approximately $9200/year for one pivot. *Q = 500 gpm, Q/s = 15 gpm/ft, Pipe diameter = 6, pipe length = 1000 ft, power cost = $0.10/KWH GLORIE A GE T OSCIENCE INC. ,
  • 23. Other Considerations Well location Geohydrology Distance from pivot (pipeline friction loss) Elevation change to pivot Note: All other factors held Constant: Q = 500 gpm, Q/s = 15 gpm/ft, pipe diameter = 6, elevation change = 0, energy Cost = $0.10/KWH GLORIE A GE T OSCIENCE INC. ,
  • 24. Other Considerations Pipeline sizes Properly sized pipes can significantly reduce friction loss/pumping costs Note: All other factors held Constant: Q = 500 gpm, Q/s = 15 gpm/ft, pipe length = 1000, elevation change = 0, Energy cost = $0.10/KWH GLORIE A GE T OSCIENCE INC. ,
  • 25. Summary and Conclusions Significant operational cost savings (power, pump replacement) can be realized through properly: Selecting screen size/geometry Locating screened intervals Selecting filter pack size Developing the well Testing the well Maximizing pump efficiency Sizing pipelines Minimizing pipe runs where possible GLORIE A GE T OSCIENCE INC. ,
  • 26. Questions? www.glorietageo.com lazarus@glorietageo.com riesterer@glorietageo.com GLORIE A GE T OSCIENCE INC. ,