Dgl group debate
0 likes494 views
The document discusses the negative effects of texting on literacy. It summarizes research finding that heavy use of "textspeak" can inhibit a child's grammar skills and lead to weaker academic performance. The document also notes concerns that texting can result in misconstruction of language skills, laziness, and unprofessional communication if used in an academic or professional context. In conclusion, while texting enables fast communication, overreliance on adaptations may lessen language proficiency and promote an unprofessional manner.
Dgl group debate
- 1. The Negative Effects Of Texting On Literacy Team J-RAAD January 15th, 2014
- 2. A History In Text Global System for Mobile Communications! The concept was for one way message to alert user about incoming voice mail.! IDEG Implementation of data and telematics services experts group.! The 鍖rst SMS text 1980s! The 鍖rst person send text Neil Papworth.! 1993 鍖rst mobile engineering Nokia 01
- 3. What Weve Found Texting and textspeak, can inhibit a childs grammar skills. If not differentiated can lead to unprofessional and poor academic re鍖ection.!
- 4. Penn State University, 2012 Drew Cingel and S. Shyam Sundar! Believed a strong use of textspeak, to negatively affect proper grammar.! Tested 542 middle school students.! After the test a survey was handed out.! Found broad results that the heavier the texter the weaker the student.
- 5. Academic Affliction Texting as a language! Misconstruction of language skills! Invasive
- 7. In Conclusion Fast Communication! The more adaptations the lesser pro鍖ciency! Invasive manner! Unprofessional acclaim
- 9. Questions?