ºÝºÝߣ

ºÝºÝߣShare a Scribd company logo
Accessibility to
mobile interfaces
for older people
Jose-Manuel D¨ªaz-Bossini, Lourdes Moreno
Labda Group,
Computer Science and Engineering Department
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Vigo, 13 November 2013
Contents
? Introduction and Motivation
? Background
? Proposal
? Conclusions and Future Work
2
Introduction and Motivation
? Exponential growth of the elderly population
that suffers from age-related disabilities
? This problem will be even bigger when
middle-age population becomes the new
elderly population.
? New technologies and devices evolves faster
than accessibility issues are addressed
3
Background
? Accessibility and older people
? There is a lack of accessibility guidelines in
the mobile applications context: literature,
best practices and guidelines.
? W3C is working on providing guidance to
apply its Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG) via the Mobile Web Application Best
Practices (MWABP) and Mobile Web Best
Practices (MWBP) 4
Proposal
? A set of guidelines to keep in mind in order
to achieve accessibility in mobile interfaces
for older people.
? An accessibility study of three mobile native
Apps on android that modify the default
interface for another more accessible one.
5
Proposal
Accessibility guidelines
? Accessibility guidelines of mobile Apps for the
elderly
? We propose an Accesibility Checklist for mobile
Apps for the elderly : set of 17 checkpoints
collected from 3 source research works:
¢Ù World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) guidelines.
¢Ú Android Accessibility Practices.
¢Û Age-centered Research-Based Design Guidelines
(2005, Panayiotis, Z. et al.)
6
Proposal
Accessibility guidelines
¢Ù W3C criteria (7 criteria):
? Providing a text equivalent for every non-text
element
? Use clear and simple language
? Do not create periodically auto-refreshing
pages, unless you have informed the user and
provided a means of stopping it
7
Proposal
Accessibility guidelines
¢Ú Android Accessibility Practices (4 criteria)
? Add descriptive text to user interface controls
? Audio prompts accompanied by another visual
prompt or notification
¢Û Age-centered Research-Based Design
Guidelines (6 categories)
? Provide larger targets
? Provide ample time to read information
? Highlight important information
8
Proposal
An accessibility study of mobile Apps
? EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
1. Object of study:
? An accessibility evaluation of 3 mobile native Apps
that modify the default interface, turning it into a
more accessible and friendly one for elderly
people
2. Experiment Context
? Nexus 4 Smartphone with Android 4.2.2.
? TalkBack services
? Explore by Touch system feature
9
Fontrillo Mobile
Proposal
An accessibility study of mobile Apps
Big Launcher
10
Accessibility for
Android
3. Sample Apps:
Proposal
An accessibility study of mobile Apps
4. Study parameters
? Accessibility Checklist
5. Evaluation method
? Each checkpoint was manually tested and
pointed between 1 and 5.
? The final result is the average between them.
11
Analysis and Results
CHECKPOINT BIG LAUNCHER FONTRILLO THE MOBILE ACCESSIBILITY FOR
ANDROID
W3CP001 5 5 5
W3CP002 5 2 4
W3CO001 2 2 5
W3CO002 3 4 4
W3CU001 5 5 4
W3CU002 4 3 4
W3CO003 4 5 4
Android001 5 2 5
Android002 3 3 3
Android003 4 3 4
Android004 5 3 3
WDG-TD 5 5 2
WDG-UG 5 4 2
WDG-BWF 2 2 2
WDG-CLD 4 4 2
WDG-UCD 5 4 3
WDG-UCB 4 5 3
Final Score 4,11 3,58 3,47 12
Proposal
An accessibility study of mobile Apps
13
Proposal
An accessibility study of mobile Apps
? Summary and Interpretation of Findings
? The results of study indicate Big Launcher is the
most accessible for older people of the three
applications.
? In the medium term, we¡¯ve got Frontillo. It
accomplish with many of the criteria established.
? The accessibility for Android App is a good
application but it focuses mainly on blind people,
so it¡¯s not the best option for older people.
Conclusions
? From this study, we provide:
? A checklist of accessibility guidelines to evaluate mobile
Apps for elderly people
? Evaluation of three mobile native Apps that modify the
default interface, turning it into a more accessible for
elderly people
? Apps should be accessible in order to prevent social
exclusion and to encourage the access of elderly and
disabled people to the technologies
? Accessibility requirements should be addressed early
on the design phase in the development process.
? Future work
14
15
Jose-Manuel D¨ªaz-Bossini, Lourdes Moreno
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

More Related Content

Accessibility to mobile interfaces for older people

  • 1. Accessibility to mobile interfaces for older people Jose-Manuel D¨ªaz-Bossini, Lourdes Moreno Labda Group, Computer Science and Engineering Department Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Vigo, 13 November 2013
  • 2. Contents ? Introduction and Motivation ? Background ? Proposal ? Conclusions and Future Work 2
  • 3. Introduction and Motivation ? Exponential growth of the elderly population that suffers from age-related disabilities ? This problem will be even bigger when middle-age population becomes the new elderly population. ? New technologies and devices evolves faster than accessibility issues are addressed 3
  • 4. Background ? Accessibility and older people ? There is a lack of accessibility guidelines in the mobile applications context: literature, best practices and guidelines. ? W3C is working on providing guidance to apply its Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) via the Mobile Web Application Best Practices (MWABP) and Mobile Web Best Practices (MWBP) 4
  • 5. Proposal ? A set of guidelines to keep in mind in order to achieve accessibility in mobile interfaces for older people. ? An accessibility study of three mobile native Apps on android that modify the default interface for another more accessible one. 5
  • 6. Proposal Accessibility guidelines ? Accessibility guidelines of mobile Apps for the elderly ? We propose an Accesibility Checklist for mobile Apps for the elderly : set of 17 checkpoints collected from 3 source research works: ¢Ù World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) guidelines. ¢Ú Android Accessibility Practices. ¢Û Age-centered Research-Based Design Guidelines (2005, Panayiotis, Z. et al.) 6
  • 7. Proposal Accessibility guidelines ¢Ù W3C criteria (7 criteria): ? Providing a text equivalent for every non-text element ? Use clear and simple language ? Do not create periodically auto-refreshing pages, unless you have informed the user and provided a means of stopping it 7
  • 8. Proposal Accessibility guidelines ¢Ú Android Accessibility Practices (4 criteria) ? Add descriptive text to user interface controls ? Audio prompts accompanied by another visual prompt or notification ¢Û Age-centered Research-Based Design Guidelines (6 categories) ? Provide larger targets ? Provide ample time to read information ? Highlight important information 8
  • 9. Proposal An accessibility study of mobile Apps ? EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN 1. Object of study: ? An accessibility evaluation of 3 mobile native Apps that modify the default interface, turning it into a more accessible and friendly one for elderly people 2. Experiment Context ? Nexus 4 Smartphone with Android 4.2.2. ? TalkBack services ? Explore by Touch system feature 9
  • 10. Fontrillo Mobile Proposal An accessibility study of mobile Apps Big Launcher 10 Accessibility for Android 3. Sample Apps:
  • 11. Proposal An accessibility study of mobile Apps 4. Study parameters ? Accessibility Checklist 5. Evaluation method ? Each checkpoint was manually tested and pointed between 1 and 5. ? The final result is the average between them. 11
  • 12. Analysis and Results CHECKPOINT BIG LAUNCHER FONTRILLO THE MOBILE ACCESSIBILITY FOR ANDROID W3CP001 5 5 5 W3CP002 5 2 4 W3CO001 2 2 5 W3CO002 3 4 4 W3CU001 5 5 4 W3CU002 4 3 4 W3CO003 4 5 4 Android001 5 2 5 Android002 3 3 3 Android003 4 3 4 Android004 5 3 3 WDG-TD 5 5 2 WDG-UG 5 4 2 WDG-BWF 2 2 2 WDG-CLD 4 4 2 WDG-UCD 5 4 3 WDG-UCB 4 5 3 Final Score 4,11 3,58 3,47 12 Proposal An accessibility study of mobile Apps
  • 13. 13 Proposal An accessibility study of mobile Apps ? Summary and Interpretation of Findings ? The results of study indicate Big Launcher is the most accessible for older people of the three applications. ? In the medium term, we¡¯ve got Frontillo. It accomplish with many of the criteria established. ? The accessibility for Android App is a good application but it focuses mainly on blind people, so it¡¯s not the best option for older people.
  • 14. Conclusions ? From this study, we provide: ? A checklist of accessibility guidelines to evaluate mobile Apps for elderly people ? Evaluation of three mobile native Apps that modify the default interface, turning it into a more accessible for elderly people ? Apps should be accessible in order to prevent social exclusion and to encourage the access of elderly and disabled people to the technologies ? Accessibility requirements should be addressed early on the design phase in the development process. ? Future work 14
  • 15. 15 Jose-Manuel D¨ªaz-Bossini, Lourdes Moreno Universidad Carlos III de Madrid THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

Editor's Notes

  • #4: completar
  • #5: Mas en plan items, en incluye algo m¨¢s, revisa el art¨ªculo
  • #14: completar