�ݺ�ߣ

Editor's Notes

• #3: Har solgt skytjenester i 8 år, har 4 barn viss data jeg prøver å holde styr påEn potensiell kunde skulle plukke meg opp på Gardermoen og vi hadde ikke møtt hverandre før (dette var før Lync bilder) Endre Valdersnes plukket meg opp på gaten for ca ett år siden
• #8: Jeremy Rifkin (født 1945-) er opphavsmann til «The Third Industrial Revolution». Han er forfatter av over 20 bøker om teknologisk utvikling og påvirkning på næringsliv, samfunnet og miljøet. Rifkins visjon er en bærekraftig og karbonfri økonomisk æra hvor energy og internett har smeltet sammen. Han har vært rådgiver for EU og en rekke statsledere. Rifkin snakker om utviklingen av energimarkedet og hvordan ekspansjonen av internett beveger oss mot et samfunn med stadig billigere varer og tjenester.
• #15: A nuclear reactor at Kalkar was finished just before the 1986 explosion at Chernobyl, Ukraine—and never used. It’s now an amusement park with a ride in what would have been the cooling tower. Fear of nuclear power spurred Germany’s transition.
• #27: Michael Jackson "performed" at the 2014 Billboard Music Awards, in holographic form
• #28: William Gibson gav oss ordet Cyberspace
• #34: Innen 2018 skal alle kommuner i Norge ha digitale trygghetsalarmer. Bergen kommune har i høst forberedt en anskaffelsesprosess for slike alarmer. I løpet av januar vil kommunen ha kravspesifikasjon og konkurransegrunnlaget klart og utlyse konkurransen. Leverandøren som vinner konkurransen kan etter planen velges i april, og de nye alarmene kan dermed være i bruk før sommeren.
• #39: The��Fosbury Flop��is a style used in the athletics event of��high jump. It was popularized and perfected by American athlete��Dick Fosbury��first in 1965 and whose gold medal in the��1968 Summer Olympics��brought it to the world's attention.[1]��Over the next few years the flop became the dominant style of the event and remains so today. Before Fosbury, most elite jumpers used the��straddle technique,��Western Roll,��Eastern cut-off��or even��scissors jump��to clear the bar. Given that landing surfaces had previously been sandpits or low piles of matting, high jumpers of earlier years had to land on their feet or at least land carefully to prevent injury. With the advent of deep foam matting high jumpers were able to be more adventurous in their landing styles and hence experiment with styles of jumping.
• #40: Jan Mauritz Boklöv��(born 14 April 1966) is a Swedish former��ski jumper��who won the��1988–89 World Cup season. He also dominated the Swedish national championships during the late 1980s and early 1990s.[1] He is best known for popularising the now-ubiquitous��V-style��in the late 1980s and early 1990s.
• #42: Politikere Styrerommene
• #44: Nysgjerrig – Kurs, digitale nyheter, partnere, kunder, communities Kompetanse – Pass på egenutvikling. Atea kan tilrettelegge, men kompetanse er eget 100%ansvar Change – vær endringsvillig. Vi må passe på at vi ikke blir et Kodak eller et Nokia Innovation&Digi workshop med kunder, les Antibes, partnere eller lokal modell Velferd og skole
• #46: Utfordren er sulten, ydmyk, lærenem, med behov for å bevise noe, byr på seg selv og investerer tid og energi uten at belønning nødvendigvis er helt i sikte, prøver nye tilnærminger, URGENCY – jobber med en følelse av tidspress som om kunden trenger akutt hjelp, spiller for å vinne, utfordrer status quo Sine qua non��(latin, «uten hvilket ikke») er et uttrykk som brukes om noe en ikke kan klare seg foruten. «Bilen er blitt et sine qua non». Uttrykket kommer fra jussen, og heter egentlig��conditio sine qua non��– «betingelse uten hvilken ikke» – og betyr da at et forhold eller en handling har vært en ufravikelig betingelse for et bestemt utfall:��A��setter fra seg bilen med nøkkelen i mens barna leker i nærheten.��As sønn starter bilen og kjører på søsteren.��As uaktsomme handling er et��conditio sine qua non��for datterens skade. Å spise er et��conditio sine qua non��for å leve.
• #48: Brukeren forventer at tjenester er Enkelt å bytte ut tjenester Andre hensyn å ta / andre hensyn / mer komplekse applikasjoner i bedriftsmarkedet
• #49: Why "everyone" is wrong about the Industrial Internet The II, today, is at a similar stage to the first bridges made of steel: they copied the design of prior wooden bridges. It took architects many years to understand that steel had fundamentally different properties from wood, and thus very different designs were enabled.��I think the same thing is happening today in the II space - many are looking to standardize what they want for the "1% improvement", and ignoring the refactoring that will change the nature of industry (and human labor) itself.��II is not revolutionary if it is only analytics applied to machines to make them more efficient. Predictive analytics are nice, but they don't require new kinds of networks, and they aren't an 'industrial revolution' II alludes to. The idea of condition based maintenance has been around for decades - there's no revolution waiting in the wings. And I know I don't get out of bed in the morning to make something slightly more efficient.��The real revolution we can see, today, has already started to happen in the consumer/IoT space: the 'maker' movement and the construction of ad hoc systems to serve an end user's mission need, without having a design, an architecture, an engineering degree, or even anything more than the idea that they want device A to talk to device B to produce effect C under circumstances D. Today that's still hard to do--what II can do is make it a whole lot easier.��That's a very different kind of system than we build today - we (over) engineer things to ensure predictability, cost containment, safety, and security. We don't allow some customer to change our products; we don't allow someone doing field maintenance to change our part suppliers; we certainly don't allow the accountants to control the water flow into the nuclear power plant.��I think the real impact of the II will be when industries have those IoT abilities - when it is the end user that configures the product for their need, and that in turn changes what the manufacturer produces for the price point desired, and factories and plants themselves are constructed in an ad hoc fashion on demand--not by design. Mass customization at the next level - where much of the customization is done in the field, by the machine itself, based on need. And that's going to require a very different kind of network, a different kind of device and a different kind of business model than we have today.��It's going to require automating engineering, pushing autonomy downward (e.g., so devices can know if they are being employed safely, and reject requests that they do otherwise), and getting away from the kind of IP we have today. Everyone will be able to manufacture what they want on demand. Everyone will be able to sketch what they need, and have it built for them in minutes instead of months. Services will be distributed arising based on need (pull) not marketing (push). Scarcity will decrease (at least for commodity products). And people will take jobs they are actually interested and engaged in, rather than just need for money. Boring repetitive work, optimization work, engineering work will be automated away. What will be left is artistic design, new kinds of engagement, and most of the creative arts. Which implies work is going to have to compete more directly with other kinds of engagement, like sports and entertainment.��I think that's an "industrial revolution" worth having.��What do you think?
• #50: - Next level with the new Office, particularly on touch-enabled devices. ability to get stuff done online or offline, always have access to your inbox and documents Exchange have lead Gartner’s Unified Communications Magic Quadrant for years. leadership position in the Enterprise Content Management space, thanks to SharePoint 2010 Yammer, leading Enterprise social network, which will enhance our already strong offering with SharePoint. Excel, SharePoint, and SQL Server incredibly easy for you to visualize data and democratize data within your organization.