際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
DIPLO 2010

To introduce myself,
Director of IKM Emergent, a research programme
looking at the use of information and knowledge in
the international development sector. Nothing
directly to do with diplomacy but many overlaps
and commonalities. Our programme puts a lot of
emphasis about information and relationships,
about barriers to communication so, like many of
you, we think about
   the large and the small
   the rich and the poor
   specialists and generalists
and we think about whether and how new
information technologies help or hinder
communication across these gaps, which is why I
was interested in coming to have a conversation
with you today

So ' The use of the semantic web in diplomacy?'

Difficult as it does not yet exist BUT

Something of the sort is beginning to emerge

A semantic web may mark a more significant
difference with what came before than did the
world wide web
Will explain why some people think that in a
minute but

First however a bit of context/ history
We have been here before
Meetings discussing the potential implications of
text only citinets
The G8 Osaka meeting

The sudden prioritising of a new issue
The lack of critical analysis of whose interests 
political, governmental and commercial  might lie
behind it all

And the questions posed -
Is there value in getting involved with the first, in
trying to shape what happens?

Should we just stick with doing whatever it is 
health, agriculture, water - we do best?

I don't know but I would suggest it is worth
thinking about:
And that is what we intend to do today  to explore
and to think.
    Not here to promote the semantic web
    Not here as a technical expert but to explain
     and discuss what there is to know so far and to
     explore with you potential issues for
diplomacy in where it may be going

Will do this in outline now. Very happy to talk
about it more later within our sessions or outside.

So what is the semantic web about?

The semantic web is not a separate Web but an
extension of the current one, in which information
is given well-defined meaning, better enabling
computers and people to work in cooperation. The
first steps in weaving the semantic web into the
structure of the existing web are already under way.
In the near future, these developments will usher in
significant new functionality as machines become
much better able to process and understand the
data that they merely display at present' (The
Semantic Web by Berners-Lee, Hendler and
Lassila, May 2001).

Example of one dimensional nature of web pages 
limitations of text e.g. 'there may be gender
implications in the introduction of this new
technology but I will not explore them today' This
statement would show up in any key word search
for gender.

By contrast example of resource identification,
specifying resources in more detail (person,
organisation, place etc.) and the relationships
between them
Knowledge Models | agropedia


2010 and the 'near future' is still with us. Also
there has been the massive growth of social media
in the mean time. But over the last 2-3 years there
has finally been some impetus to the Semantic Web
in the fields of
  - A growing set of tools and of standards and
     rules led by W3C consortium
  - Search  both as new search engines and as
     new incorporations into existing ones
  - Linked Data  marking up data in a way that
     one data set can incorporate and use data
     originating from another
      About the Linking Open Data dataset cloud
      Still only a fraction of the information
      available on the web but perhaps getting to a
      tipping point where it becomes a norm

So what are the issues for diplomacy?




Opportunities
Open and shared information environment
 Historic problem of finding stuff, of knowing who
     has done what, especially from a range of sources
     e.g. consultations in Sheffield, or DFID funded
     research
   Differences from Open data
Raise profile (internal and external) through
participation
New ways of analysing information
Potential for new perspectives
   Visualisation
  Gapminder World
  Worldmapper: The world as you've never seen it before
Potential to link with social media e.g. simultaneous
'official' and 'unofficial', not either/or
      Data & Research Offences Sudan VoteMonitor


Risks
Benefits larger/ richer organisations
Potential barriers to having your data accepted
Restrictive ontologies
Bad science
eg. Geneva least healthy place for UN staff

Unknowns
Unanticipated outcomes
Loss of control
MPs Expenses: Travel Expenses
Continuing process
Qualitative Information
   e.g. Southampton work on Mountbatten archives




Finally one issue which I want to touch on now but go
into in more detail in the workshop is that of
visualisation. There is no direct link between the
semantic web and the visual presentation of information
but the former makes the latter easier. They seem to both
be strongly emerging and converging trends. Personally,
I am very interested in visualisation but as I said at the
beginning, I think we should take a critical stance to all
of this. So I will end with a cautionary story.....

When I was visiting Liberia towards the end of the civil
war, a young media liaison person working for a British
NGO handed out printed graphs about the disarmament
process which, from memory, looked something like
this


                            L ib e r ia                                                                 Potential issue: Visualisation
        E s ti i m a te d o v e r a l l s i z e o f a r m i e s




                                                                  C h a rl e s T a y l o r
                                                                  P ri n c e J o h n s o n
                                                                  N a tio n a l A rm y
                                                                  N o rth e rn A l li a n c e
                                                                  O th e r




                                                                                                                                    L ib e r ia
                                                                                             S iz e o f e ffe c tiv e a r m ie s a t c u r r e n t s ta g e o f d is a r m a m e n t



                                                                                                                                                                       C h a rle s T a y l o r
                                                                                                                                                                       P ri n c e J o h n s o n
                                                                                                                                                                       N a tio n a l A rm y
                                                                                                                                                                       N o rth e rn A l li a n c e
                                                                                                                                                                       O th e r




The point was that the disarmament process, by
proceeding at different rates with different groups, was in
danger of undermining the military balance which had
led to the agreement to disarm in the first place.
The other point was that this liaison worker found that
when, previously he had presented this information in
verbal form, he was always bombarded with questions
about where it had come from, how reliable it was.
When he presented it in a nice 3D graphic, printed off a
spreadsheet all the hardened war correspondents just
accepted it at face value.

Which is the reason why it is necessary for us to
maintain a keen but critical interest in developments in
the capture, sharing, presentation and interpretation of
information.


                                                   Mike Powell
                                    m.powell@pop3.poptel.org.uk
                                          www.ikmemergent.net

                                                        Malta,
                                                     June 2010,

More Related Content

Diplo 2010 output version

  • 1. DIPLO 2010 To introduce myself, Director of IKM Emergent, a research programme looking at the use of information and knowledge in the international development sector. Nothing directly to do with diplomacy but many overlaps and commonalities. Our programme puts a lot of emphasis about information and relationships, about barriers to communication so, like many of you, we think about the large and the small the rich and the poor specialists and generalists and we think about whether and how new information technologies help or hinder communication across these gaps, which is why I was interested in coming to have a conversation with you today So ' The use of the semantic web in diplomacy?' Difficult as it does not yet exist BUT Something of the sort is beginning to emerge A semantic web may mark a more significant difference with what came before than did the world wide web
  • 2. Will explain why some people think that in a minute but First however a bit of context/ history We have been here before Meetings discussing the potential implications of text only citinets The G8 Osaka meeting The sudden prioritising of a new issue The lack of critical analysis of whose interests political, governmental and commercial might lie behind it all And the questions posed - Is there value in getting involved with the first, in trying to shape what happens? Should we just stick with doing whatever it is health, agriculture, water - we do best? I don't know but I would suggest it is worth thinking about: And that is what we intend to do today to explore and to think. Not here to promote the semantic web Not here as a technical expert but to explain and discuss what there is to know so far and to explore with you potential issues for
  • 3. diplomacy in where it may be going Will do this in outline now. Very happy to talk about it more later within our sessions or outside. So what is the semantic web about? The semantic web is not a separate Web but an extension of the current one, in which information is given well-defined meaning, better enabling computers and people to work in cooperation. The first steps in weaving the semantic web into the structure of the existing web are already under way. In the near future, these developments will usher in significant new functionality as machines become much better able to process and understand the data that they merely display at present' (The Semantic Web by Berners-Lee, Hendler and Lassila, May 2001). Example of one dimensional nature of web pages limitations of text e.g. 'there may be gender implications in the introduction of this new technology but I will not explore them today' This statement would show up in any key word search for gender. By contrast example of resource identification, specifying resources in more detail (person, organisation, place etc.) and the relationships
  • 4. between them Knowledge Models | agropedia 2010 and the 'near future' is still with us. Also there has been the massive growth of social media in the mean time. But over the last 2-3 years there has finally been some impetus to the Semantic Web in the fields of - A growing set of tools and of standards and rules led by W3C consortium - Search both as new search engines and as new incorporations into existing ones - Linked Data marking up data in a way that one data set can incorporate and use data originating from another About the Linking Open Data dataset cloud Still only a fraction of the information available on the web but perhaps getting to a tipping point where it becomes a norm So what are the issues for diplomacy? Opportunities Open and shared information environment
  • 5. Historic problem of finding stuff, of knowing who has done what, especially from a range of sources e.g. consultations in Sheffield, or DFID funded research Differences from Open data Raise profile (internal and external) through participation New ways of analysing information Potential for new perspectives Visualisation Gapminder World Worldmapper: The world as you've never seen it before Potential to link with social media e.g. simultaneous 'official' and 'unofficial', not either/or Data & Research Offences Sudan VoteMonitor Risks Benefits larger/ richer organisations Potential barriers to having your data accepted Restrictive ontologies Bad science eg. Geneva least healthy place for UN staff Unknowns Unanticipated outcomes Loss of control MPs Expenses: Travel Expenses Continuing process Qualitative Information e.g. Southampton work on Mountbatten archives Finally one issue which I want to touch on now but go
  • 6. into in more detail in the workshop is that of visualisation. There is no direct link between the semantic web and the visual presentation of information but the former makes the latter easier. They seem to both be strongly emerging and converging trends. Personally, I am very interested in visualisation but as I said at the beginning, I think we should take a critical stance to all of this. So I will end with a cautionary story..... When I was visiting Liberia towards the end of the civil war, a young media liaison person working for a British NGO handed out printed graphs about the disarmament process which, from memory, looked something like this L ib e r ia Potential issue: Visualisation E s ti i m a te d o v e r a l l s i z e o f a r m i e s C h a rl e s T a y l o r P ri n c e J o h n s o n N a tio n a l A rm y N o rth e rn A l li a n c e O th e r L ib e r ia S iz e o f e ffe c tiv e a r m ie s a t c u r r e n t s ta g e o f d is a r m a m e n t C h a rle s T a y l o r P ri n c e J o h n s o n N a tio n a l A rm y N o rth e rn A l li a n c e O th e r The point was that the disarmament process, by proceeding at different rates with different groups, was in danger of undermining the military balance which had led to the agreement to disarm in the first place.
  • 7. The other point was that this liaison worker found that when, previously he had presented this information in verbal form, he was always bombarded with questions about where it had come from, how reliable it was. When he presented it in a nice 3D graphic, printed off a spreadsheet all the hardened war correspondents just accepted it at face value. Which is the reason why it is necessary for us to maintain a keen but critical interest in developments in the capture, sharing, presentation and interpretation of information. Mike Powell m.powell@pop3.poptel.org.uk www.ikmemergent.net Malta, June 2010,