Mike Powell, Director of IKM Emergent, a research programme looking at the use of information and knowledge in the international development sector, shares his notes on his presentation about the use of the semantic web in diplomacy.
1 of 7
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Diplo 2010 output version
1. DIPLO 2010
To introduce myself,
Director of IKM Emergent, a research programme
looking at the use of information and knowledge in
the international development sector. Nothing
directly to do with diplomacy but many overlaps
and commonalities. Our programme puts a lot of
emphasis about information and relationships,
about barriers to communication so, like many of
you, we think about
the large and the small
the rich and the poor
specialists and generalists
and we think about whether and how new
information technologies help or hinder
communication across these gaps, which is why I
was interested in coming to have a conversation
with you today
So ' The use of the semantic web in diplomacy?'
Difficult as it does not yet exist BUT
Something of the sort is beginning to emerge
A semantic web may mark a more significant
difference with what came before than did the
world wide web
2. Will explain why some people think that in a
minute but
First however a bit of context/ history
We have been here before
Meetings discussing the potential implications of
text only citinets
The G8 Osaka meeting
The sudden prioritising of a new issue
The lack of critical analysis of whose interests
political, governmental and commercial might lie
behind it all
And the questions posed -
Is there value in getting involved with the first, in
trying to shape what happens?
Should we just stick with doing whatever it is
health, agriculture, water - we do best?
I don't know but I would suggest it is worth
thinking about:
And that is what we intend to do today to explore
and to think.
Not here to promote the semantic web
Not here as a technical expert but to explain
and discuss what there is to know so far and to
explore with you potential issues for
3. diplomacy in where it may be going
Will do this in outline now. Very happy to talk
about it more later within our sessions or outside.
So what is the semantic web about?
The semantic web is not a separate Web but an
extension of the current one, in which information
is given well-defined meaning, better enabling
computers and people to work in cooperation. The
first steps in weaving the semantic web into the
structure of the existing web are already under way.
In the near future, these developments will usher in
significant new functionality as machines become
much better able to process and understand the
data that they merely display at present' (The
Semantic Web by Berners-Lee, Hendler and
Lassila, May 2001).
Example of one dimensional nature of web pages
limitations of text e.g. 'there may be gender
implications in the introduction of this new
technology but I will not explore them today' This
statement would show up in any key word search
for gender.
By contrast example of resource identification,
specifying resources in more detail (person,
organisation, place etc.) and the relationships
4. between them
Knowledge Models | agropedia
2010 and the 'near future' is still with us. Also
there has been the massive growth of social media
in the mean time. But over the last 2-3 years there
has finally been some impetus to the Semantic Web
in the fields of
- A growing set of tools and of standards and
rules led by W3C consortium
- Search both as new search engines and as
new incorporations into existing ones
- Linked Data marking up data in a way that
one data set can incorporate and use data
originating from another
About the Linking Open Data dataset cloud
Still only a fraction of the information
available on the web but perhaps getting to a
tipping point where it becomes a norm
So what are the issues for diplomacy?
Opportunities
Open and shared information environment
5. Historic problem of finding stuff, of knowing who
has done what, especially from a range of sources
e.g. consultations in Sheffield, or DFID funded
research
Differences from Open data
Raise profile (internal and external) through
participation
New ways of analysing information
Potential for new perspectives
Visualisation
Gapminder World
Worldmapper: The world as you've never seen it before
Potential to link with social media e.g. simultaneous
'official' and 'unofficial', not either/or
Data & Research Offences Sudan VoteMonitor
Risks
Benefits larger/ richer organisations
Potential barriers to having your data accepted
Restrictive ontologies
Bad science
eg. Geneva least healthy place for UN staff
Unknowns
Unanticipated outcomes
Loss of control
MPs Expenses: Travel Expenses
Continuing process
Qualitative Information
e.g. Southampton work on Mountbatten archives
Finally one issue which I want to touch on now but go
6. into in more detail in the workshop is that of
visualisation. There is no direct link between the
semantic web and the visual presentation of information
but the former makes the latter easier. They seem to both
be strongly emerging and converging trends. Personally,
I am very interested in visualisation but as I said at the
beginning, I think we should take a critical stance to all
of this. So I will end with a cautionary story.....
When I was visiting Liberia towards the end of the civil
war, a young media liaison person working for a British
NGO handed out printed graphs about the disarmament
process which, from memory, looked something like
this
L ib e r ia Potential issue: Visualisation
E s ti i m a te d o v e r a l l s i z e o f a r m i e s
C h a rl e s T a y l o r
P ri n c e J o h n s o n
N a tio n a l A rm y
N o rth e rn A l li a n c e
O th e r
L ib e r ia
S iz e o f e ffe c tiv e a r m ie s a t c u r r e n t s ta g e o f d is a r m a m e n t
C h a rle s T a y l o r
P ri n c e J o h n s o n
N a tio n a l A rm y
N o rth e rn A l li a n c e
O th e r
The point was that the disarmament process, by
proceeding at different rates with different groups, was in
danger of undermining the military balance which had
led to the agreement to disarm in the first place.
7. The other point was that this liaison worker found that
when, previously he had presented this information in
verbal form, he was always bombarded with questions
about where it had come from, how reliable it was.
When he presented it in a nice 3D graphic, printed off a
spreadsheet all the hardened war correspondents just
accepted it at face value.
Which is the reason why it is necessary for us to
maintain a keen but critical interest in developments in
the capture, sharing, presentation and interpretation of
information.
Mike Powell
m.powell@pop3.poptel.org.uk
www.ikmemergent.net
Malta,
June 2010,