This document summarizes the key aspects of distributing company assets during liquidation proceedings under Nigerian law. It discusses:
1. The roles and duties of a liquidator to gather company assets, realize their value, pay debts, and distribute any surplus to shareholders.
2. The types of assets available for distribution, including realized assets, assets from continuing business operations, and discovered assets.
3. Methods for increasing the asset pool, such as legal claims, demands on shareholders, calling unpaid capital, and summoning those possessing assets.
4. The process for creditors to prove debts, including deadlines, affidavit requirements, and the liquidator's examination and certification.
5. The ranking of
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) promotes global economic growth and financial stability. It provides loans to countries experiencing balance of payments problems to replenish international reserves and stabilize currencies. The IMF is governed by the Board of Governors consisting of all member states and has an Executive Board and Managing Director that handle daily operations. It offers several types of loans including Stand-By Arrangements for short-term assistance and Extended Fund Facility loans for medium-term support.
Differentiation between HIBA, HIBA BIL IWAZ and HIBA BA SHARTUL IWAZYash Keshari
油
This document differentiates between two types of gifts under Islamic law: Hiba and Shartul-iwaz. Hiba is an unconditional gift where ownership is transferred without consideration or agreement for return. Shartul-iwaz is a conditional gift where there is an express agreement for the recipient to return a gift. Some key differences are that delivery of possession is essential for Shartul-iwaz but not for Hiba, and that Shartul-iwaz is irrevocable only after the performance of the promised condition while Hiba is generally revocable.
The secretarial audit report provides an opinion on the compliance of applicable statutory provisions by the company. It verifies records related to key laws and regulations. The report may note any non-compliances observed and qualifications. It also evaluates the board processes, compliance management systems, and significant events of the company. The report is intended to assess adherence to good corporate practices and statutory compliance.
This document provides information on the roles and responsibilities of a merchant bank. A merchant bank provides capital to companies through equity ownership rather than loans, and provides corporate advisory services. It engages in a variety of financial activities including corporate finance advice, money market operations, lending, trade finance, investment holdings and fund management. Key services of a merchant bank include corporate counseling, project financing, working capital finance, portfolio management, restructuring strategies, and credit syndication. The document also outlines the differences between commercial and merchant banks and regulatory requirements for merchant banks related to public issues such as due diligence, underwriting obligations, and post-issue monitoring.
Investor state arbitration exploring conteporary issues and remedyAlexander Decker
油
This document discusses investor-state arbitration (ISA) and some of the issues that have arisen with its use. ISA allows foreign investors to pursue arbitration claims against host states for disputes related to investments. While traditionally seen as an optimal way to resolve such disputes, ISA has increasingly faced criticism in recent years over delays, high costs, and unsatisfactory outcomes. The document explores ways to strengthen ISA and examines alternative dispute resolution methods that may help prevent disputes and improve management of conflicts between investors and states.
The document outlines the key elements that must be included in an auditor's report according to the Companies Ordinance 1984. It discusses the required sections of the report including the title, addressee, opening paragraph, scope paragraph, opinion paragraph, date of report, auditor's address and signature. It also describes the types of opinions that can be issued - unqualified, qualified, disclaimer of opinion, and adverse opinion - and the circumstances under which each would be appropriate.
The document discusses negotiable instruments under Pakistani law. It defines a negotiable instrument as a promissory note, bill of exchange, or cheque according to Section 13(1) of the negotiable instrument Act, 1881. A negotiable instrument is a written document that creates a right to payment for the holder and can be freely transferred between parties. Key characteristics include free transferability, the holder having title free of defects, and the ability of the transferee to sue in their own name. The document also discusses the definitions, essentials, and parties involved in promissory notes, bills of exchange, and cheques.
The document discusses different types of mistakes in business law. There are two main types of mistakes: mistakes of law and mistakes of fact. Mistakes of law can occur regarding the laws of one's own country or the laws of a foreign nation. Mistakes of fact can be either bilateral, involving misunderstandings between both parties, or unilateral, involving a mistake by only one party. Bilateral mistakes of fact regarding essential elements of a contract, such as the subject matter or possibility of performance, will void the contract due to lack of consent.
The document discusses key aspects of negotiable instruments under the Negotiable Instruments Act of 1881 in India. It covers:
1) The main types of negotiable instruments like promissory notes, bills of exchange, and cheques. It explains their essential elements and differences.
2) Key parties to negotiable instruments like drawers, drawees, makers, payees, holders, and endorsers. It also discusses capacities of different parties.
3) Important concepts like crossing of cheques, classification of instruments, presumption of consideration, and distinction between payment in due course vs other payments.
4) The characteristics and requirements to qualify as a holder in due course, who has additional rights
This document provides an overview of negotiable instruments under the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 in India. It defines a negotiable instrument and discusses how they are easily transferable through delivery and endorsement. A holder in due course takes the instrument in good faith, for value, without defects in the transferor's title. The document also discusses key concepts like holders, endorsement, crossing of cheques, material alterations, and payment of negotiable instruments in 3 sentences or less.
The document discusses the Negotiable Instruments Act of 1881 in India. It defines key terms like negotiable instruments, promissory notes, bills of exchange, and cheques. It outlines the essential characteristics of negotiable instruments like property, title, rights, and presumptions. It also summarizes the key elements and differences between promissory notes, bills of exchange, inland/foreign bills, time/demand bills, trade/accommodation bills, and cheques as defined by the Act.
This document summarizes the key aspects of negotiable instruments under Indian law. It defines negotiable instruments as documents transferable by delivery that create rights, including promissory notes, bills of exchange, and cheques. It outlines the essential elements and parties involved in promissory notes, bills of exchange, and cheques. It also discusses negotiation, endorsement, liability of parties, and other important concepts regarding negotiable instruments.
The document discusses negotiation and discharge of negotiable instruments. It defines negotiation as the transfer of an instrument like a promissory note, bill of exchange, or cheque to another person, making them the holder. Negotiation can occur through delivery or endorsement and delivery. Endorsement involves the maker or holder signing on the back or face of the instrument to negotiate it. The endorsee is the person the instrument is endorsed to. Endorsement transfers property in the instrument to the endorsee. The document outlines various types of endorsements and effects, who can endorse, discharge from liability, and material alterations.
All about insolvency and bankruptcy board of indiaAnuj Pandey
油
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) is established to regulate insolvency professionals, insolvency professional agencies and information utilities. IBBI consists of a chairperson and other members appointed by the central government. IBBI registers and regulates insolvency professionals, agencies and utilities, specifies standards for their functioning, monitors their performance, issues regulations related to insolvency and bankruptcy matters. IBBI has powers of a civil court and can constitute committees to efficiently perform its functions. Delay by IBBI in performing any act can be condoned by the adjudicating authority by recording reasons in writing.
The document discusses audit reports and companies. It covers 5 units:
1. Incorporation of company including definitions, formation, types of companies
2. More on incorporation including types of companies
3. Share capital, winding up, and corporate social responsibility
4. Tax planning and management
5. Introduction to TDS, corporate returns, and GST
It then discusses audit reports, auditors' duties, and types of audit opinions including unmodified, modified, qualified, adverse and disclaimer opinions. The document provides details on these various opinion types.
Origin of cost audit&financial statement of auditRajpal Saipogu
油
Cost audit verifies cost accounts and adherence to cost accounting plans, examining whether the cost of products were arrived at according to cost accounting principles. It is conducted by independent cost and management accountants. Financial audits examine financial statements to determine if they fairly represent the financial position in accordance with standards, increasing credibility. Both cost and financial audits originated in India in the 1920s to monitor pricing and costs.
1. The document discusses audit documentation, which provides evidence of the auditor's basis for conclusions and that the audit was performed according to standards. It assists auditors in planning, performing, and reviewing the audit.
2. The purposes of audit documentation include assisting the audit team, demonstrating the work was done properly, and providing records for future audits. It guides auditors in providing reasonable assurance that documentation supports the audit evidence and conclusions in the report.
3. The document outlines the specific requirements for audit documentation content, organization, and typical elements. It also discusses ownership, confidentiality of working papers, and defines an audit program as a detailed listing of audit procedures to implement the audit plan.
Share capital refers to the total monetary value of shares issued by a company. It includes the authorized share capital, which is the maximum amount allowed, as well as the issued, subscribed, called up, paid up, and uncalled share capital, which refer to portions of the authorized capital that have been offered, applied for, demanded as payment, paid, and not yet demanded as payment by the company. Shares represent ownership units in a company and provide rights to profits, while stock refers to consolidated fully paid up shares. Companies can issue different types of shares such as equity shares, preference shares, cumulative/non-cumulative preference shares, and more. Allotment of shares must follow certain legal procedures and restrictions.
This document defines key terms related to goods under the Sales of Goods Act in India. It discusses that goods refer to all movable property except actionable claims and money. Goods can be existing, future, or contingent. Existing goods are specific, ascertained, or unascertained depending on whether they are identified and agreed upon. Future goods will be manufactured or acquired later, while contingent goods depend on an uncertain event for the seller to acquire them. The document provides examples and differences between future and contingent goods.
This document summarizes a case analysis of Mason vs. Burningham from 1945. It discusses the implied warranty of quiet possession in sales contracts. The plaintiff purchased a typewriter from the defendant but later discovered it was stolen. She was entitled to damages from the seller for breaching the implied warranty of quiet possession, which guarantees the buyer's right to quietly possess and enjoy the goods without interference from superior claims. This case established that damages for breaching this warranty include the purchase price and any repair costs incurred by the buyer. In conclusion, the implied warranty of quiet possession protects buyers if their possession is disturbed by a third party with a stronger legal claim to the goods.
This document discusses different types of jurisdiction in legal cases. It explains that pecuniary jurisdiction is determined by the valuation of the subject matter involved in the case. Territorial jurisdiction for cases involving immovable property is discussed in sections 16-18, while section 19 covers territorial jurisdiction for movable property and compensation cases. The key factors determining territorial jurisdiction are where the wrong was committed, where the defendant resides or works, and the plaintiff's option to choose the court. Lack of proper jurisdiction would result in the case being nullified.
The document discusses terms and standard form contracts. Key points include:
- Terms are obligations that parties must fulfill under a contract. Terms against regulations or that are unfair may render the contract void or unenforceable.
- When terms are broken, the non-breaching party can seek legal remedies. This can lead to lawsuits and damaged relationships between parties.
- Standard form contracts are standard documents used by one party to contract with customers. Customers often have no choice but to accept the terms. Exclusion clauses aim to limit liability but may be void if unreasonable or against consumer protection laws.
This document discusses the legal concepts of bailment and pledge. Bailment involves the delivery of property into temporary custody of another for a specific purpose, with ownership remaining with the bailor. Essential elements of bailment include a contract, physical delivery of goods, a specific purpose, and a change in possession but not ownership. Pledge differs in that goods are delivered as security for payment of a debt, with the pledgee able to sell the goods to recover the debt value if needed.
The adjudication of a civil court ends either in form of
(i) Decree; or
(ii) Order
Decree means
According to section 2(2) "Decree" means the formal expression of an adjudication which conclusively determines the rights of the parties with regard to all or any of the matters in controversy in the suit.
This document introduces a training course on construction contract laws. The first module defines what makes an agreement a legally binding contract. An agreement is only a contract when it is enforceable by law. To be enforceable, an agreement must comply with all relevant laws of the country, including acts, statutes, judicial precedents, and principles of equity and natural justice. Understanding how agreements become enforceable contracts through law is the first step to grasping construction contract laws. Future modules will cover topics like stare decisis, case law, and how to interpret and challenge arbitration awards.
This document provides an overview of the process for distributing company assets during liquidation under Nigerian law. It discusses what assets are available for distribution, including realized assets and potential future assets. It also covers how to increase the asset pool, such as through legal claims or calls on unpaid share capital. The document outlines the process for creditors to prove debts and rankings of claims, with costs and preferential debts in Classes A and B, followed by secured and unsecured creditors in Class C. Exceptions to the pari passu principle of equal treatment are noted, and the conclusion emphasizes proper compliance with laws to satisfy obligations in the liquidation process.
This document provides an overview and definitions for key terms in the Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act of 2010 in the Philippines. It defines terms like debtor, claim, commencement date, rehabilitation, and liquidation. It also outlines exclusions from the Act, such as banks and insurance companies. The Act aims to encourage rehabilitation of financially distressed enterprises when possible, and orderly liquidation when rehabilitation is not feasible, to protect creditor rights and maximize asset value.
The document discusses different types of mistakes in business law. There are two main types of mistakes: mistakes of law and mistakes of fact. Mistakes of law can occur regarding the laws of one's own country or the laws of a foreign nation. Mistakes of fact can be either bilateral, involving misunderstandings between both parties, or unilateral, involving a mistake by only one party. Bilateral mistakes of fact regarding essential elements of a contract, such as the subject matter or possibility of performance, will void the contract due to lack of consent.
The document discusses key aspects of negotiable instruments under the Negotiable Instruments Act of 1881 in India. It covers:
1) The main types of negotiable instruments like promissory notes, bills of exchange, and cheques. It explains their essential elements and differences.
2) Key parties to negotiable instruments like drawers, drawees, makers, payees, holders, and endorsers. It also discusses capacities of different parties.
3) Important concepts like crossing of cheques, classification of instruments, presumption of consideration, and distinction between payment in due course vs other payments.
4) The characteristics and requirements to qualify as a holder in due course, who has additional rights
This document provides an overview of negotiable instruments under the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 in India. It defines a negotiable instrument and discusses how they are easily transferable through delivery and endorsement. A holder in due course takes the instrument in good faith, for value, without defects in the transferor's title. The document also discusses key concepts like holders, endorsement, crossing of cheques, material alterations, and payment of negotiable instruments in 3 sentences or less.
The document discusses the Negotiable Instruments Act of 1881 in India. It defines key terms like negotiable instruments, promissory notes, bills of exchange, and cheques. It outlines the essential characteristics of negotiable instruments like property, title, rights, and presumptions. It also summarizes the key elements and differences between promissory notes, bills of exchange, inland/foreign bills, time/demand bills, trade/accommodation bills, and cheques as defined by the Act.
This document summarizes the key aspects of negotiable instruments under Indian law. It defines negotiable instruments as documents transferable by delivery that create rights, including promissory notes, bills of exchange, and cheques. It outlines the essential elements and parties involved in promissory notes, bills of exchange, and cheques. It also discusses negotiation, endorsement, liability of parties, and other important concepts regarding negotiable instruments.
The document discusses negotiation and discharge of negotiable instruments. It defines negotiation as the transfer of an instrument like a promissory note, bill of exchange, or cheque to another person, making them the holder. Negotiation can occur through delivery or endorsement and delivery. Endorsement involves the maker or holder signing on the back or face of the instrument to negotiate it. The endorsee is the person the instrument is endorsed to. Endorsement transfers property in the instrument to the endorsee. The document outlines various types of endorsements and effects, who can endorse, discharge from liability, and material alterations.
All about insolvency and bankruptcy board of indiaAnuj Pandey
油
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) is established to regulate insolvency professionals, insolvency professional agencies and information utilities. IBBI consists of a chairperson and other members appointed by the central government. IBBI registers and regulates insolvency professionals, agencies and utilities, specifies standards for their functioning, monitors their performance, issues regulations related to insolvency and bankruptcy matters. IBBI has powers of a civil court and can constitute committees to efficiently perform its functions. Delay by IBBI in performing any act can be condoned by the adjudicating authority by recording reasons in writing.
The document discusses audit reports and companies. It covers 5 units:
1. Incorporation of company including definitions, formation, types of companies
2. More on incorporation including types of companies
3. Share capital, winding up, and corporate social responsibility
4. Tax planning and management
5. Introduction to TDS, corporate returns, and GST
It then discusses audit reports, auditors' duties, and types of audit opinions including unmodified, modified, qualified, adverse and disclaimer opinions. The document provides details on these various opinion types.
Origin of cost audit&financial statement of auditRajpal Saipogu
油
Cost audit verifies cost accounts and adherence to cost accounting plans, examining whether the cost of products were arrived at according to cost accounting principles. It is conducted by independent cost and management accountants. Financial audits examine financial statements to determine if they fairly represent the financial position in accordance with standards, increasing credibility. Both cost and financial audits originated in India in the 1920s to monitor pricing and costs.
1. The document discusses audit documentation, which provides evidence of the auditor's basis for conclusions and that the audit was performed according to standards. It assists auditors in planning, performing, and reviewing the audit.
2. The purposes of audit documentation include assisting the audit team, demonstrating the work was done properly, and providing records for future audits. It guides auditors in providing reasonable assurance that documentation supports the audit evidence and conclusions in the report.
3. The document outlines the specific requirements for audit documentation content, organization, and typical elements. It also discusses ownership, confidentiality of working papers, and defines an audit program as a detailed listing of audit procedures to implement the audit plan.
Share capital refers to the total monetary value of shares issued by a company. It includes the authorized share capital, which is the maximum amount allowed, as well as the issued, subscribed, called up, paid up, and uncalled share capital, which refer to portions of the authorized capital that have been offered, applied for, demanded as payment, paid, and not yet demanded as payment by the company. Shares represent ownership units in a company and provide rights to profits, while stock refers to consolidated fully paid up shares. Companies can issue different types of shares such as equity shares, preference shares, cumulative/non-cumulative preference shares, and more. Allotment of shares must follow certain legal procedures and restrictions.
This document defines key terms related to goods under the Sales of Goods Act in India. It discusses that goods refer to all movable property except actionable claims and money. Goods can be existing, future, or contingent. Existing goods are specific, ascertained, or unascertained depending on whether they are identified and agreed upon. Future goods will be manufactured or acquired later, while contingent goods depend on an uncertain event for the seller to acquire them. The document provides examples and differences between future and contingent goods.
This document summarizes a case analysis of Mason vs. Burningham from 1945. It discusses the implied warranty of quiet possession in sales contracts. The plaintiff purchased a typewriter from the defendant but later discovered it was stolen. She was entitled to damages from the seller for breaching the implied warranty of quiet possession, which guarantees the buyer's right to quietly possess and enjoy the goods without interference from superior claims. This case established that damages for breaching this warranty include the purchase price and any repair costs incurred by the buyer. In conclusion, the implied warranty of quiet possession protects buyers if their possession is disturbed by a third party with a stronger legal claim to the goods.
This document discusses different types of jurisdiction in legal cases. It explains that pecuniary jurisdiction is determined by the valuation of the subject matter involved in the case. Territorial jurisdiction for cases involving immovable property is discussed in sections 16-18, while section 19 covers territorial jurisdiction for movable property and compensation cases. The key factors determining territorial jurisdiction are where the wrong was committed, where the defendant resides or works, and the plaintiff's option to choose the court. Lack of proper jurisdiction would result in the case being nullified.
The document discusses terms and standard form contracts. Key points include:
- Terms are obligations that parties must fulfill under a contract. Terms against regulations or that are unfair may render the contract void or unenforceable.
- When terms are broken, the non-breaching party can seek legal remedies. This can lead to lawsuits and damaged relationships between parties.
- Standard form contracts are standard documents used by one party to contract with customers. Customers often have no choice but to accept the terms. Exclusion clauses aim to limit liability but may be void if unreasonable or against consumer protection laws.
This document discusses the legal concepts of bailment and pledge. Bailment involves the delivery of property into temporary custody of another for a specific purpose, with ownership remaining with the bailor. Essential elements of bailment include a contract, physical delivery of goods, a specific purpose, and a change in possession but not ownership. Pledge differs in that goods are delivered as security for payment of a debt, with the pledgee able to sell the goods to recover the debt value if needed.
The adjudication of a civil court ends either in form of
(i) Decree; or
(ii) Order
Decree means
According to section 2(2) "Decree" means the formal expression of an adjudication which conclusively determines the rights of the parties with regard to all or any of the matters in controversy in the suit.
This document introduces a training course on construction contract laws. The first module defines what makes an agreement a legally binding contract. An agreement is only a contract when it is enforceable by law. To be enforceable, an agreement must comply with all relevant laws of the country, including acts, statutes, judicial precedents, and principles of equity and natural justice. Understanding how agreements become enforceable contracts through law is the first step to grasping construction contract laws. Future modules will cover topics like stare decisis, case law, and how to interpret and challenge arbitration awards.
This document provides an overview of the process for distributing company assets during liquidation under Nigerian law. It discusses what assets are available for distribution, including realized assets and potential future assets. It also covers how to increase the asset pool, such as through legal claims or calls on unpaid share capital. The document outlines the process for creditors to prove debts and rankings of claims, with costs and preferential debts in Classes A and B, followed by secured and unsecured creditors in Class C. Exceptions to the pari passu principle of equal treatment are noted, and the conclusion emphasizes proper compliance with laws to satisfy obligations in the liquidation process.
This document provides an overview and definitions for key terms in the Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act of 2010 in the Philippines. It defines terms like debtor, claim, commencement date, rehabilitation, and liquidation. It also outlines exclusions from the Act, such as banks and insurance companies. The Act aims to encourage rehabilitation of financially distressed enterprises when possible, and orderly liquidation when rehabilitation is not feasible, to protect creditor rights and maximize asset value.
This document discusses types of winding up, the differences between compulsory and voluntary winding up, procedures for members' voluntary liquidation and creditors' voluntary liquidation, powers and duties of a liquidator, and priorities for distributing funds in winding up. It provides details on:
- Grounds and processes for compulsory (court-ordered) winding up versus voluntary winding up initiated by shareholders or creditors.
- Requirements and steps for members' voluntary liquidation when a company is solvent, and creditors' voluntary liquidation when insolvent.
- Acceptance of a liquidator's authority, their main functions of taking control of assets and distributing proceeds, and who can be appointed.
- Evidence and priorities for
This document provides an overview of corporate finance topics including debentures, charges, capital maintenance, and reduction of capital under company law. It begins by defining debt financing methods companies use to raise capital, such as debentures. It distinguishes between fixed and floating charges on company assets and examines rules regarding priority among charges. The document also discusses the principle of capital maintenance and permissible methods for reducing share capital, including court approval and protecting creditors. Key concepts covered include the definitions and characteristics of debentures, debenture holders, fixed charges, floating charges, and capital reduction.
CORPORATE INSOLVENCY:
COMPANIES ACT 2016
Business is a combination of war and sport!!
- Andre Maurois
2
2
INSOLVENCY
Insolvency what does it mean?
Cessation of companies
New Corporate rescue mechanisms
Insolvent companies what options are available?
1
2
3
4
Insolvency is inability to pay debts.
When a company is unable to pay its debts, it may be subject to various insolvency proceedings.
The aim of insolvency approaches is for the insolvency administrator to take over the affairs of the debtor company in order to settle the debts of the creditors and distribute the insolvency proceeds to the rightful persons in accordance with law and equity.
Receivership
Compromise & Arrangement
Reconstruction and amalgamation of companies
Insolvency : Alternative Mechanisms
Corporate recovery plans
Cessation of business
Additional measures introduced in CA2016
The aim is to help financially distressed companies to allow them to restructure their debts, to remain as a going concern and to avoid winding up.
Corporate Voluntary Arrangement (CVA)
Judicial Management (JM)
Winding up
Members voluntary winding up
Creditors voluntary winding up
Winding up by Court (compulsory)
Striking off
RECEIVERSHIP
Lets start by briefly discussing on how lenders interests are protected
6
1
Receivership
A company going into receivership would mean that its affairs are being managed by a receiver or a receiver and manager. The company is not in liquidation except that the directors will have to surrender their rights to run the companys business to the receiver or receiver and manager as a going concern.
7
INTRODUCTION TO RECEIVERSHIP
When a financial institution / debenture holders provides a financial loan or facility (or other creditors provide credits) to a company, the financial institution would want to have some form of security to recover the debt.
One form of security is through a charge on the immovable property of the company. The charge can take a form of fixed charge or floating charge.
The fixed and floating charge will commonly be set out in the debenture. The terms of the debenture will commonly allow for the appointment of a receiver or receiver and manager and has duty to realise the charged assets and utilise the proceeds to repay the financial institution.
8
RECEIVERSHIP
A company goes into receivership when receiver is appointed by the debenture holder (or trustee) under a power contained in debenture or trust deed, or Court upon application.
The appointment by debenture holder is normally made in the event of a breach by the co of the conditions attached to the debentures.
The powers of the receiver under this form of insolvency administration are usually specified in a contractual agreement between the secured creditor and the company.
9
RECEIVERSHIP
A receivers task is to take possession of assets cover ...
Insolvency and bankruptcy code analysis of a selected few ordersShruti Jadhav
油
The document provides an introduction and overview of key provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code of India relating to corporate insolvency resolution processes. It discusses who can initiate insolvency proceedings under the Code, including financial creditors owed financial debt, operational creditors owed operational debt, and corporate debtors themselves. It also summarizes relevant definitions from the Code, such as what constitutes a debt and default. The document aims to analyze select orders from National Company Law Tribunals and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal to understand how provisions of the Code have been interpreted in practice.
The document discusses the process of liquidating a company. It provides details on:
- The definition of liquidation and winding up of a company.
- The three modes of liquidation: compulsory, voluntary, and under court supervision.
- The roles and powers of the liquidator in taking control of company assets/affairs.
- The consequences of winding up like discharge of employees and end of company existence.
- Preparation of statements of affairs and deficiency accounts.
- Order of payment of creditors, shareholders and distribution of surplus.
The document summarizes key aspects of initiating a corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) by a financial creditor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). It discusses how a financial creditor can file an application for CIRP with the Adjudicating Authority when a default occurs. It outlines the information and documents that must be provided along with the application. It also describes how the Authority will ascertain if a default has occurred and either admit or reject the application within 14 days, and the implications of each decision. Finally, it briefly mentions Rule 4 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016 regarding the required form and accompanying
This document provides an overview of key concepts related to bankruptcy, including types of bankruptcies, common shocks experienced during bankruptcy, out-of-court settlement options, steps to file UCC documents, issues related to distressed debtors, actions creditors can take after a bankruptcy filing is made, and definitions of key terms like reclamation and bankruptcy priorities. The document covers corporate and individual bankruptcy filings and considerations, as well as non-bankruptcy liquidation and restructuring alternatives.
The document discusses various topics related to company law in India, including the meaning of winding up, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, modes of winding up a company, and voluntary liquidation. It also covers topics like corporate insolvency resolution process, advisory committees, dissolution of companies under compulsory winding up, and the salient features and benefits of participation in a depository system for securities.
Characteristics of Insolvency Act 2063 - Nepal by Prajwal BhattaraiPrajwal Bhattarai
油
The court can order to appoint a qualified person to fill vacant position if the office of the restructuring manager or liquidator falls vacant due to suspension or cancellation of license by court. (s 67)
The court fixes the remuneration of inquiry official, restructuring manager or liquidator if it cant be fixed by the meeting of creditors from time to time. (s 68)
The court has the power to remove a restructuring manager or liquidator if they fail to execute duties prescribed or if their conduct is found to be contrary to the Act. However, the latter is given the chance to defend himself. (s 70)
The court can inquire a restructuring manager or liquidator for any action done or taken by him or her and in such an event, the latter has to reply promptly. (s 71)
The document discusses various provisions related to the issue of capital by companies under Indian law. It covers topics like the memorandum of association, capital clause, alteration of capital clause, reduction of share capital, variation in rights of shareholders, prospectus, and allotment of shares. Key points include that the memorandum defines and limits a company's powers, a capital clause states the share capital amount and structure, and special provisions under law regulate the initial and subsequent allotment of shares offered to the public.
This document discusses company liquidation accounts and the liquidation process. It explains that liquidation is the process by which a company is dissolved and its assets distributed, with an administrator called a liquidator appointed to oversee this. The document outlines the different modes of winding up a company, including compulsory, voluntary, and supervised voluntary winding up. It also discusses the roles and powers of the liquidator during liquidation, the order of distributing company assets to creditors and shareholders, and the requirement for directors to submit a statement of company affairs.
Commercial Litigation and Dispute Resolution partner, Julie Murphy O'Connor and senior associate, Kevin Gahan co-author the Ireland chapter of the Insolvency Review, 7th Edition.
Llb ii cl u 4 winding up and corporate liabilityRai University
油
The document summarizes key aspects of winding up and corporate liability under Indian company law. It discusses the three methods of winding up a company: compulsory by court order, voluntary by members/creditors, and voluntary with court supervision. Compulsory winding up can be initiated for reasons like insolvency or shareholder complaint. Voluntary winding up is initiated by shareholder or creditor resolution. The roles of liquidators and official liquidators in managing the process are also outlined, along with distribution of assets according to priority of claims. Consequences of winding up include transfer restrictions and notice of discharge for officers.
The document discusses the borrowing powers and restrictions on borrowing for companies under Indian law. It provides details on:
- Companies have implied power to borrow, while non-trading companies must include this power in their memorandum.
- The key restrictions on borrowing include limits based on paid-up capital and reserves, and requirements for shareholder authorization for amounts over these limits.
- Borrowings must be registered within 30 days for charges over specific assets like property or within 300 days with a late fee. Lenders can also register in some cases. The registrar issues certificates of registration and satisfaction.
The document discusses the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code of India. It provides definitions for key terms like insolvency, bankruptcy, and liquidation. It explains that the code establishes a time-bound resolution process for both corporate and individual entities that are unable to pay debts. The code aims to help creditors recover debts more effectively and replace the existing framework that had led to high amounts of pending bankruptcy cases. It overhauls the existing insolvency laws and consolidates them into a single code to provide a uniform and comprehensive law for insolvency and bankruptcy.
1. DISTRIBUTION OF COMPANY
ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION.
BY
CHIMEZIE VICTOR C. IHEKWEAZU
JULY 31, 2010
BEING A PAPER PRESENTED AT THE SECOND
PREPARATORY TRAINING FOR BRIPAN MEMBERS
TITLED :
2. STRIKING A BALANCE BETWEEN MERE PAYMENT
DEFAULT AND INSOLVENCY GUIDING
COINSIDERATION
JULY 31, 2010
1.
CONTENTS.
1. INTRODUCTION
2. WHAT ASSETS ARE AVAILABLE FOR
DISTRIBUTION
3. HOW DO YOU SWELL THE POOL OF ASSETS
3. 4. PROOF OF DEBTS
5. RANKING OF CLAIMS IN LIQUIDATION
6. PARI PASSU PRINCIPLE
7. EXCEPTIONS TO THE PARI PASSU PRINCIPLE
8. CONCLUSION
4. 2.
INTRODUCTION
Liquidation is the process of winding up of a Limited Liability Company or other
incorporated Association. In the case of a Limited Liability Company, the
liquidation or winding up may be voluntary, by the Court or under the
supervision of the Court. The applicable provisions are provided under the
Companies and Allied Matters Act. See part XV of the Act.
A Liquidator is a person appointed to wind up the Business affairs of a
Company in liquidation. He may be appointed by the Court, the Creditors, or the
Company as the case may be and with relation to the nature and stage of the
winding up of a Company. He retains the duty to gather the assets of the
Company and manage same with a view to realizing the best value of the
assets to pay the Companys debts and for distribution among the Companys
creditors, and the surplus to shareholders subject to other statutory obligations.
These obligations include among others, payment of recognized Taxes,
charges, cost and fees under the Law and managing the Affairs of the
Company with due statutory compliance until final dissolution of the Company
under the Companies and Allied Matter Act. See Part XV of the Act.
According to the Osborns Concise Law Dictionary 8
th
Edition by Leslie
Rutherford and Sheila Bone, (Sweet & Maxwell) 1993.
A Liquidator is an individual appointed to carry out the
winding up of a company. The duties of a liquidator are to get
5. in and realize the property of the Company to pay its debts,
and to distribute the surplus (if any) among the members.
The powers and the manner in which the Liquidator is to exercise its duties are
as stated under the Companies and Allied Matters Act and the Companies
Winding up Rules.
3.
WHAT ASSETS ARE AVAILABLE FOR DISTRIBUTION
The assets of the Company in Liquidation may be present or future. These
assets include properties, choses-in-action to which the Company is or appears
to be entitled. These can be ascertained from Statement of affairs of the
Company and other available records of the Company. Other assets may also
be located at the Company premises and locations where the Company carries
on business or businesses.
In Liquidation the following assets are available for distribution :
6. a. All assets that are realized by the Liquidator (after discharge of due debts
of the Company as may be sufficient to meet them.)
b. All such assets that may be further realized from the management of the
business of the Company as elected by the Liquidators.
c. All assets that may be recovered in the course of winding up through
discoveries made from the companies records or other information.
See generally Sections: 420, 423, 424, 425 and sections
494(5) of CAMA.
(Example- ADC experience as regards discoveries and
claims.)
7. 4.
HOW DO YOU SWELL THE POOL OF ASSETS
1. Claims through any Legal Process against debts owed to the Company.
See Section 425(1) (a)
2. Placing a demand on contributories on any money due from them or their
estate to the Company. See Section 441 of CAMA and Rule 62.
3. Making calls on any part of unpaid Share Capital. This may be enforced
by order of Court. Rule 73 Winding up Rules. See also Section 442 of
CAMA.
4. Exercising the Power to summon persons suspected to be in possession
of Company Assets. See Section 449 of CAMA
5. Carrying on the business of the Company as may be necessary for its
beneficial Winding up. See Section 425 of CAMA.
6. By making compromises or arrangements with Creditors. See Section
425 of CAMA.
8. 5.
PROOF OF DEBTS
All unsecured creditors and secured creditors (that have surrendered their
rights) are entitled to prove their claims for debts.
NOTICE TO CREDITORS TO PROVE DEBT.
The Liquidator shall fix the date for proof of debts by Creditors and he shall do
so by advertisement in any convenient Newspaper. See Rule 89.
In addition the Liquidator may also notify all the creditors in writing through any
means of communication which will be received by the Creditor. (E.g. By post or
other electronic medium).
MODE OF PROOF OF DEBT
9. By verifying Affidavit deposed to before any Commissioner of Oaths. The
Affidavit must state the debt and necessary particulars and must be submitted
to the Liquidator within the specified time.
The Deponents to the Affidavit must be the creditor or a person who has
authority to make the deposition at his instance and he must state so.
CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT:
It must contain all necessary facts showing the debt including Statements of
Accounts, Receipts, Vouchers etc.
PROCESS OF PROOF OF DEBT
(a). Examination of the verifying Affidavit by the Liquidator and upon
reasonable satisfaction of the Liquidator in the verification exercise. See
Rule 90 of the Rules.
(b) Issuance of certificate of indebtedness to be marked without prejudice
of the proved debt.
(c) Notice of Rejection to be issued against unsubstantiated claims for debt.
Where a Notice of rejection is issued and served on a creditor, he is entitled
under the Winding up Rules to challenge same in Court within thirty (30) days of
service. The Court may vary or reverse same. See Rule 91.
6.
10. RANKING OF CLAIMS IN LIQUIDATION (ISSUE OF PRIORITY)
The manner of applying the assets of the Company in Liquidation is as
prescribed under the Companies and Allied Matters Act and the Companies
Winding up Rules.
CLASS A
Costs, Expenses, Fees
1. Cost of Winding Up
2. Debts of the Company
3. Remuneration of Special Manager
4. Cost of any Person properly employed by the Liquidator
5. Remuneration of the Liquidator
6. The out-of-Pocket expenses incurred by the Committee of
Inspection
CLASS B SECTION 494
PREFERENTIAL PAYMENTS.
a. Local rates and charges from the Company, all pay as you earn tax
deductions and taxes due from the Company as prescribed under
Section 494 (1) (a) and (6) of CAMA.
b. Deductions under the National Provident Fund Act.
c. All wages of any workman or Labourer whether payable for time or
piece of work for service rendered to the Company.
d. All accrued holiday remuneration payable to any staff.
11. e. All amounts due in respect of workmens compensation under the
workmens compensation Act 1987 unless where the Company is
being wound up voluntarily for purposes of reconstruction or
amalgamation.
The above debts are to be paid even where the funds are insufficient. In which
case it will be pro-rated among preferential debtors.
7.
CLASS C
DISTRIBUTION AMONGST OTHER CREDITORS.
1. Secured Creditors are to be paid first unless where they surrender their
security. Secured Creditors include holders of Debentures under any
Floating charge as may be created by the company.
2. Unsecured Creditors.
These Creditors are ranked equally.
FORM OF PAYMENT TO UNSECURED CREDITORS
12. Payment is made in form of Dividends and subject to be shared equally based
on available assets.
DISTRIBUTION AMONGST CONTRIBUTORIES
Upon full payment to Creditors- Any surplus may be distributed among
contributories. Section 446.
8.
PARI-PASSU PRINCIPLES
13. The pari-passu principle stipulates equal treatment of the same class of
creditors and in relation to insolvency matters. It is a principle recognized in
insolvency law and which applies to insolvency proceedings. (e.g, winding up).
According to Riz Mokal in the Article Global Initiative on Insolvency and
Creditor/Debtor Regimes
Pari-passu Principle provides that the Creditors of a Company ranked at par
with each other under the general law should similarly be treated on par with
each other in Insolvency Proceedings.
The Pari-passu principle in winding up discloses equal distribution of available
assets among all classes of Debtors and unsecured creditors without any
preference, depending on the payment due and available funds realized from
sell of the assets.
EXCEPTION TO THE PARI-PASSU PRINCIPLE
1. Section 425 (1) (d)-
The liquidator may with the sanction of a resolution of the company, in
members voluntary winding up or with the sanction of the committee of
Inspection or meeting of creditors pay any class of creditors in full.
2. Section 425 (1) (e)-
The liquidator can make any compromise or arrangement with creditors
regarding their claims.
3. Section 197 and Section 208 (secured creditors)
14. Beneficiaries of charges property registered and as prescribed under
Section 197 of the Act.
9.
CONCLUSION
Management of assets in Liquidation is critical to the success of the Insolvency
Proceedings and Process. It is therefore of great need to ensure due
compliance with statutory provisions to ensure appropriate discharge of the
requisite obligations.
While it is possible that assets of a Company in Liquidation may not be
adequate to satisfy all claims against the Company in liquidation, proper
approach, compliance with the relevant laws and standard practice will
guarantee satisfaction among all persons entitled to benefit and as may be
affected by the process.
CHIMEZIE VICTOR C. IHEKWEAZU