The document describes a mini-grant program from Dillard University's Center for Teaching, Learning, and Academic Technology to provide funding for faculty research projects. Eligible faculty can receive up to $5,000 to conduct original research resulting in publications, exhibitions or performances. The deadline to apply is April 15th and funding decisions will be made by April 25th. Recipients must submit a progress report on October 1st detailing how funds were used and the status of their research outcomes.
The document outlines the criteria and application process for student groups and individuals to apply for funding from the Special Projects Fund administered by the Federation of Students. To be eligible, projects must benefit undergraduate students at large, not be selective or restrictive, and demonstrate that other sources of funding are insufficient. Applicants must submit an application including a description of the project, promotion plan, itemized budget, and timeline at least one month before the proposed event. If funded, recipients will submit a post-project assessment including receipts and proof that it was completed as planned.
Student Success Center Successful Communication InitativeSue Fox
油
The Student Success Center at the high school is requesting $2,353.54 to purchase a smart board, projector, and mobile conference center. This equipment will allow guests, students, and staff to give presentations and share information with students in the center. The goals are to improve communication and increase student participation in the center's career preparation and college planning activities. If funded, over 1,850 students each year will benefit from enhanced interactive presentations and resources to help them transition after high school.
Tl1 f award-nrsa-application-workshop-updated_8_march2018-2PJ Simpson-Haidaris
油
F30, F31 and F31 diversity individual fellowship award application instructions for funding opportunities released February 2018 using Adobe Forms Series E.
The document outlines the guidelines for minor and major research projects funded by the University Grants Commission (UGC) under their 12th five-year plan. It provides details on eligibility, grants, duration and procedures for applying for and completing minor (up to 5 lacs for science and 3 lacs for other subjects) and major (up to 20 lacs for science and 15 lacs for other subjects) research projects. Key requirements include forming an internal research committee to approve proposals, applying to UGC by certain deadlines, presenting work at interim reviews, and submitting utilization certificates and final reports upon completion.
The document discusses how the future of lecture capture solutions lies in cloud computing. It argues that the cloud provides significant value for higher education institutions by addressing issues like escalating IT complexity, students' expectations of 24/7 access to services, lower total cost of ownership, and the need to rapidly adopt new technologies. The cloud allows institutions to access reliable lecture capture solutions with fewer resources and without having to manage complex on-premise infrastructure.
This document outlines the establishment of Centers for Training and Research in Frontier Areas of Science and Technology (FAST) in India. Key points include:
- The centers will focus on new and emerging technologies relevant to national development goals through collaborative research between academics and industry/public agencies. Priority areas include energy, water, environment, and smart materials.
- Selection of centers will be based on the proposed research area's relevance, institutional preparedness and collaboration, reasonable budget, multidisciplinarity, potential for technological development and translation to prototypes/patents/publications, and ability to scale up PhD/Masters enrollment and sustain itself after funding.
- Envisaged center activities include improving R&D
The document describes India's SwarnaJayanti Fellowships program, which provides special assistance to young scientists to pursue research in frontier areas of science and technology. Key details include:
- The fellowship provides a monthly stipend of 25,000 rupees for up to 5 years, plus additional funding for equipment, travel, and other research costs.
- Eligible applicants must have a PhD, be aged 30-40, and have an excellent research track record as shown by publications and awards.
- Applications are evaluated by expert committees, and final selections are made by a Committee of Secretaries. The program aims to support innovative research with potential for significant impacts.
The Asian University Digital Resource Network (AUDRN) is calling for proposals for Local Knowledge projects to be implemented between December 2011 and June 2012. Proposals should be submitted by November 20, 2011 and should document local academic research, workshops, or learning plans that utilize digital tools. Successful proposals will receive between $1,000-$2,500 in funding and will be required to upload their results to the AUDRN online portfolio platform. Proposals are encouraged to focus on teaching and learning with local knowledge, building capacity for digital tools, or cross-institution collaboration.
This document provides guidance on writing effective grant and dissertation proposals. It discusses key elements to include such as an abstract, research design, methodology, significance, staffing needs, time frame, budget, letters of endorsement, and dissemination of results. The main points are:
1) An abstract should summarize the proposed work in an clear, economical way for reviewers.
2) A proposal should include the research purpose and goals, design, methods, significance, and time frame. It should demonstrate organizational skills and that necessary resources and support are secured.
3) Explaining how the study benefits others and contributes new knowledge can strengthen the case for funding.
4) Including a realistic budget, clear
The document provides an overview of proposals, including what a proposal is, types of proposals, and parts of a proposal. It defines a proposal as a request for support of a project that answers what will be done, how much it will cost, and how long it will take. The main types of proposals discussed are solicited, unsolicited, preproposals, continuation/non-competing, and renewal/competing proposals. The key parts of a proposal outlined are the title page, abstract, introduction, background/literature review, description of proposed research, description of resources, references, personnel, and budget. Resources for proposal writing assistance at the university are also listed.
The Sparkman Center at UAB provides pilot funding of up to $20,000 for one year research projects that promote health in less developed countries. Eligible projects must have a research component and align with the Sparkman Center's mission. Applications will be evaluated based on scientific impact, team qualifications, significance, innovation, and approach. Successful applicants will be expected to present their work and mentor students as Sparkman Scholars. Funding recipients must submit progress reports and publications/presentations must acknowledge the Sparkman Center's support.
The document provides information for applicants to the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (NSF GRFP). It outlines the application components, including transcripts, letters of recommendation, personal and research statements. It discusses tips for a strong application, including starting early, demonstrating passion for research, and thoroughly addressing the intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria. The application will be reviewed based on these criteria, which evaluate the intellectual importance and broader societal impacts of the proposed research. Reviewers will consider the applicant's qualifications and potential to advance their field in an innovative way.
The document provides guidelines for MBA students to follow when completing their required research project. Key details include:
- Synopses are due by May 31st without late fees, June 30th with Rs. 500 late fee, or July 31st with Rs. 1000 late fee. Rejected synopses can be resubmitted.
- Projects must be in the student's area of specialization and done under a supervisor. Synopses should be 5-10 pages including objectives, methodology, and references.
- Final reports are due at the end of the 4th semester and include introduction, literature review, analysis, conclusions, and appendices. Students must follow formatting guidelines and submit 2 hard copies and
Finalizing and Reviewing the Health Research Proposal_Ashok.pptxAshok Pandey
油
This document provides guidance on finalizing and reviewing a health research proposal. It discusses thinking like the proposal reviewer and making the review process as easy as possible for them. The objectives are to finalize the research proposal, write a brief summary, and prepare a letter of intent for funding agencies. It offers tips for finalizing each section of the proposal, including the background, objectives, methodology, and ethics. It also provides an example summary and discusses presenting the proposal to relevant authorities through a panel presentation, accompanying submission letters, and revising the proposal based on feedback. The document emphasizes clearly communicating the problem statement, objectives, methodology, expected results and importance of the study for approval and funding.
This document provides guidance for applicants seeking funding from NERC (Natural Environment Research Council) to develop public engagement resources. The funding aims to support NERC-funded researchers in engaging the public and developing a suite of reusable resources. Eligible applicants must have attended NERC training and have current or recent NERC funding. Successful applicants can receive up to 贈2,000 to create resources like lesson plans, demonstrations, exhibits or web content. Applications will be assessed based on their ability to engage the public about NERC science. Funded applicants will be expected to evaluate their resource, share results, and may participate in a workshop to exchange best practices.
This document provides guidance for applicants seeking funding from NERC to develop public engagement resources. The funding aims to support NERC-funded researchers in engaging the public and developing a suite of reusable resources. Applicants must have attended NERC training and can apply for up to 贈2,000 to create resources like lesson plans, demonstrations, exhibits or web content. Successful applications will demonstrate how the resource engages people in environmental science and is evaluated for impact. Funding recipients must submit a final report evaluating the resource's use and may be invited to a workshop to share experiences.
The document provides information about pilot project funding opportunities through the UAB Sparkman Center for Global Health. It outlines the mission of the Sparkman Center in supporting global health education, research, and training. For 2021, the Sparkman Center will fund 1-2 pilot projects up to $20,000 each that align with its mission. The timeline and application process involve submitting a 2-page concept proposal in February and full applications by invitation in May. Key review criteria include scientific and global health impact, significance, investigators' qualifications, innovation, approach, and environment. The goal is to support projects that build research capacity and involve junior faculty and international partners.
Students will work independently on this The task is.docxsdfghj21
油
Students will work independently to develop a grant proposal for funding a program in the human services field. They must identify a fundable program idea, potential funding source, and develop a full grant proposal following the specified sections and requirements. The grant proposal must include a title page, abstract, introduction, background, program description, personnel details, budget, evaluation plan, dissemination plan, references, and appendices.
The United Board invites proposals in (1) Local Knowledge and (2) Interreligious Understanding and Peacebuilding for the July 1, 2012 June 30, 2013 fiscal year. Proposals should be submitted by October 31, 2011. Proposals should be emailed to grants@unitedboard.org. Decisions regarding proposal funding will be announced by June 30, 2012.
This document provides information about impact and career support for researchers. It discusses the importance of impact in securing government funding for bioscience research. It defines how research councils view impact and provides examples of impact pathways. The document encourages researchers to consider impact from the beginning of their research and describes various types of support available, including fellowships, networking opportunities, and programs to facilitate commercialization.
Funding opportunities for researchers- Dr. Sara Banu Akka & Dr. Asuman zg端r...MarikaKowalska1
油
The presentation is about Funding Opportunities for Researchers. It was conducted by Dr. Sara Banu Akka & Dr. Asuman zg端r Keysan from Middle East Technical University in Turkey.
This document provides guidelines and criteria for proposed school innovation projects in the Philippines. It outlines a standard project proposal format that includes identifying the proponent and contacts, providing a project summary with objectives and methodology, discussing the background and needs addressed by the project, outlining objectives, methodology with tasks and risks, costs, expected results, and a conclusion. Examples of completed projects are also provided, such as improving reading performance through parent involvement and establishing a school garden to fund educational resources.
Considerations in Applying for a K99 Award: the NIH "Pathway to Independence"...UCLA CTSI
油
This document provides information about the K99/R00 Career Transition Award program from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The K99 phase provides 1-2 years of mentored support for postdoctoral researchers, while the R00 phase provides 1-3 years of independent research support contingent on securing an independent research position. Eligible candidates must have a terminal degree and no more than 4 years of postdoctoral experience. The program aims to support highly motivated researchers in transitioning to independent research careers through a period of mentored research followed by independent funding.
The document announces the Donald H. Wulff Diversity Travel Fellowships Program which provides up to $1,200 grants to support travel to the annual POD conference for individuals from underrepresented groups. Eligible applicants include those from racial/ethnic minority groups, underrepresented institutions, or who can contribute to POD's mission of social justice and equity. The deadline to apply for the 2013 conference is May 24th and applications should address the applicant's eligibility and how they and POD would benefit from their attendance. Recipients will be expected to share what they learn at a conference session and participate in assessments of the program.
The Faculty Senate looks forward to seeing attendees at the general assembly meeting where a vote will be taken on the graduating seniors roster. Other standard business will also be addressed as outlined. The document also provides information about an upcoming Scholarship of Teaching and Learning event taking place May 14-17, 2013.
More Related Content
Similar to DU Mini Grant Application Spring 2010 Revised (20)
This document outlines the establishment of Centers for Training and Research in Frontier Areas of Science and Technology (FAST) in India. Key points include:
- The centers will focus on new and emerging technologies relevant to national development goals through collaborative research between academics and industry/public agencies. Priority areas include energy, water, environment, and smart materials.
- Selection of centers will be based on the proposed research area's relevance, institutional preparedness and collaboration, reasonable budget, multidisciplinarity, potential for technological development and translation to prototypes/patents/publications, and ability to scale up PhD/Masters enrollment and sustain itself after funding.
- Envisaged center activities include improving R&D
The document describes India's SwarnaJayanti Fellowships program, which provides special assistance to young scientists to pursue research in frontier areas of science and technology. Key details include:
- The fellowship provides a monthly stipend of 25,000 rupees for up to 5 years, plus additional funding for equipment, travel, and other research costs.
- Eligible applicants must have a PhD, be aged 30-40, and have an excellent research track record as shown by publications and awards.
- Applications are evaluated by expert committees, and final selections are made by a Committee of Secretaries. The program aims to support innovative research with potential for significant impacts.
The Asian University Digital Resource Network (AUDRN) is calling for proposals for Local Knowledge projects to be implemented between December 2011 and June 2012. Proposals should be submitted by November 20, 2011 and should document local academic research, workshops, or learning plans that utilize digital tools. Successful proposals will receive between $1,000-$2,500 in funding and will be required to upload their results to the AUDRN online portfolio platform. Proposals are encouraged to focus on teaching and learning with local knowledge, building capacity for digital tools, or cross-institution collaboration.
This document provides guidance on writing effective grant and dissertation proposals. It discusses key elements to include such as an abstract, research design, methodology, significance, staffing needs, time frame, budget, letters of endorsement, and dissemination of results. The main points are:
1) An abstract should summarize the proposed work in an clear, economical way for reviewers.
2) A proposal should include the research purpose and goals, design, methods, significance, and time frame. It should demonstrate organizational skills and that necessary resources and support are secured.
3) Explaining how the study benefits others and contributes new knowledge can strengthen the case for funding.
4) Including a realistic budget, clear
The document provides an overview of proposals, including what a proposal is, types of proposals, and parts of a proposal. It defines a proposal as a request for support of a project that answers what will be done, how much it will cost, and how long it will take. The main types of proposals discussed are solicited, unsolicited, preproposals, continuation/non-competing, and renewal/competing proposals. The key parts of a proposal outlined are the title page, abstract, introduction, background/literature review, description of proposed research, description of resources, references, personnel, and budget. Resources for proposal writing assistance at the university are also listed.
The Sparkman Center at UAB provides pilot funding of up to $20,000 for one year research projects that promote health in less developed countries. Eligible projects must have a research component and align with the Sparkman Center's mission. Applications will be evaluated based on scientific impact, team qualifications, significance, innovation, and approach. Successful applicants will be expected to present their work and mentor students as Sparkman Scholars. Funding recipients must submit progress reports and publications/presentations must acknowledge the Sparkman Center's support.
The document provides information for applicants to the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (NSF GRFP). It outlines the application components, including transcripts, letters of recommendation, personal and research statements. It discusses tips for a strong application, including starting early, demonstrating passion for research, and thoroughly addressing the intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria. The application will be reviewed based on these criteria, which evaluate the intellectual importance and broader societal impacts of the proposed research. Reviewers will consider the applicant's qualifications and potential to advance their field in an innovative way.
The document provides guidelines for MBA students to follow when completing their required research project. Key details include:
- Synopses are due by May 31st without late fees, June 30th with Rs. 500 late fee, or July 31st with Rs. 1000 late fee. Rejected synopses can be resubmitted.
- Projects must be in the student's area of specialization and done under a supervisor. Synopses should be 5-10 pages including objectives, methodology, and references.
- Final reports are due at the end of the 4th semester and include introduction, literature review, analysis, conclusions, and appendices. Students must follow formatting guidelines and submit 2 hard copies and
Finalizing and Reviewing the Health Research Proposal_Ashok.pptxAshok Pandey
油
This document provides guidance on finalizing and reviewing a health research proposal. It discusses thinking like the proposal reviewer and making the review process as easy as possible for them. The objectives are to finalize the research proposal, write a brief summary, and prepare a letter of intent for funding agencies. It offers tips for finalizing each section of the proposal, including the background, objectives, methodology, and ethics. It also provides an example summary and discusses presenting the proposal to relevant authorities through a panel presentation, accompanying submission letters, and revising the proposal based on feedback. The document emphasizes clearly communicating the problem statement, objectives, methodology, expected results and importance of the study for approval and funding.
This document provides guidance for applicants seeking funding from NERC (Natural Environment Research Council) to develop public engagement resources. The funding aims to support NERC-funded researchers in engaging the public and developing a suite of reusable resources. Eligible applicants must have attended NERC training and have current or recent NERC funding. Successful applicants can receive up to 贈2,000 to create resources like lesson plans, demonstrations, exhibits or web content. Applications will be assessed based on their ability to engage the public about NERC science. Funded applicants will be expected to evaluate their resource, share results, and may participate in a workshop to exchange best practices.
This document provides guidance for applicants seeking funding from NERC to develop public engagement resources. The funding aims to support NERC-funded researchers in engaging the public and developing a suite of reusable resources. Applicants must have attended NERC training and can apply for up to 贈2,000 to create resources like lesson plans, demonstrations, exhibits or web content. Successful applications will demonstrate how the resource engages people in environmental science and is evaluated for impact. Funding recipients must submit a final report evaluating the resource's use and may be invited to a workshop to share experiences.
The document provides information about pilot project funding opportunities through the UAB Sparkman Center for Global Health. It outlines the mission of the Sparkman Center in supporting global health education, research, and training. For 2021, the Sparkman Center will fund 1-2 pilot projects up to $20,000 each that align with its mission. The timeline and application process involve submitting a 2-page concept proposal in February and full applications by invitation in May. Key review criteria include scientific and global health impact, significance, investigators' qualifications, innovation, approach, and environment. The goal is to support projects that build research capacity and involve junior faculty and international partners.
Students will work independently on this The task is.docxsdfghj21
油
Students will work independently to develop a grant proposal for funding a program in the human services field. They must identify a fundable program idea, potential funding source, and develop a full grant proposal following the specified sections and requirements. The grant proposal must include a title page, abstract, introduction, background, program description, personnel details, budget, evaluation plan, dissemination plan, references, and appendices.
The United Board invites proposals in (1) Local Knowledge and (2) Interreligious Understanding and Peacebuilding for the July 1, 2012 June 30, 2013 fiscal year. Proposals should be submitted by October 31, 2011. Proposals should be emailed to grants@unitedboard.org. Decisions regarding proposal funding will be announced by June 30, 2012.
This document provides information about impact and career support for researchers. It discusses the importance of impact in securing government funding for bioscience research. It defines how research councils view impact and provides examples of impact pathways. The document encourages researchers to consider impact from the beginning of their research and describes various types of support available, including fellowships, networking opportunities, and programs to facilitate commercialization.
Funding opportunities for researchers- Dr. Sara Banu Akka & Dr. Asuman zg端r...MarikaKowalska1
油
The presentation is about Funding Opportunities for Researchers. It was conducted by Dr. Sara Banu Akka & Dr. Asuman zg端r Keysan from Middle East Technical University in Turkey.
This document provides guidelines and criteria for proposed school innovation projects in the Philippines. It outlines a standard project proposal format that includes identifying the proponent and contacts, providing a project summary with objectives and methodology, discussing the background and needs addressed by the project, outlining objectives, methodology with tasks and risks, costs, expected results, and a conclusion. Examples of completed projects are also provided, such as improving reading performance through parent involvement and establishing a school garden to fund educational resources.
Considerations in Applying for a K99 Award: the NIH "Pathway to Independence"...UCLA CTSI
油
This document provides information about the K99/R00 Career Transition Award program from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The K99 phase provides 1-2 years of mentored support for postdoctoral researchers, while the R00 phase provides 1-3 years of independent research support contingent on securing an independent research position. Eligible candidates must have a terminal degree and no more than 4 years of postdoctoral experience. The program aims to support highly motivated researchers in transitioning to independent research careers through a period of mentored research followed by independent funding.
The document announces the Donald H. Wulff Diversity Travel Fellowships Program which provides up to $1,200 grants to support travel to the annual POD conference for individuals from underrepresented groups. Eligible applicants include those from racial/ethnic minority groups, underrepresented institutions, or who can contribute to POD's mission of social justice and equity. The deadline to apply for the 2013 conference is May 24th and applications should address the applicant's eligibility and how they and POD would benefit from their attendance. Recipients will be expected to share what they learn at a conference session and participate in assessments of the program.
The Faculty Senate looks forward to seeing attendees at the general assembly meeting where a vote will be taken on the graduating seniors roster. Other standard business will also be addressed as outlined. The document also provides information about an upcoming Scholarship of Teaching and Learning event taking place May 14-17, 2013.
This document is an application for a Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) Research Retreat sponsored by the Andrew Mellon Foundation. Applicants are asked to provide information about their institution, proposed SoTL research project, goals for their SoTL program, and challenges they face. The application requires details on the project abstract, significance, methodology, broader impacts, sustainability, and dissemination plans. Applicants must also provide contact information for their research team and obtain endorsement from a senior administrator to be considered for the retreat.
This document is a request form for changing an educational program at a university. It collects information about the proposed change such as the program name, department, type of change requested (e.g. new program, modification, deletion), rationale, impact, and requires signatures from various approving bodies like department chairs, deans, and curriculum committees.
The document provides guidelines for submitting proposals to create, change, or delete courses or educational programs to the Curriculum Committee at Dillard University. It outlines the required steps, including using the appropriate form, providing a title, course details, rationale, and supporting documents like syllabi. Meeting dates for the spring semester are also listed. Proposals are due by certain dates to be considered for the following year's academic catalog.
Callers will receive training on February 19, 2013 from 5:00-8:00pm for an upcoming Call-A-Thon on the same date in the on-campus call center located in Rosenwald Hall near room 230 at Delaware University. Refreshments will be provided at the convenient on-campus location and more details can be obtained by calling Ms. Tiffany Jones, the Phonathon Coordinator, at (504) 816-4696.
This document summarizes a lecture series on multiculturalism at Dillard University. [1] It introduces the session leaders - Dr. Steve Buddington, Dr. Eartha Lee Johnson, and Ms. Diane Magee. [2] The discussion will focus on faculty learning communities reviewing, reconnecting and reflecting on multicultural issues. [3] The document outlines Dillard University's mission and strategic pillars which include producing globally aware graduates and demonstrating commitment to diversity.
This document contains course listings for 14 cohorts in the Spring 2013 QEP program. It lists the courses, times, instructors, and locations for cohorts focused on social sciences, STEM, public health, pre-nursing, business, and nursing. The cohorts include 5-17 credit hours of courses that fulfill general education and major requirements, including classes in English, math, science, and first year seminar.
The two-day SOAR orientation event provided incoming students information and resources to help them succeed at the university. On the first day, students attended informational sessions on student services, had health screenings, met with advisors, and socialized at a block party. The second day focused on academic advising, language placement tests, and social activities like bowling to help students connect with current students. The detailed schedule aimed to smoothly guide new students through the registration and onboarding process.
This document provides a resource and referral guide for Dillard University faculty and staff. It contains contact information for various campus offices that can help students with academic, health, counseling, and other issues. The guide is intended to help faculty and staff identify students who may be struggling and refer them to appropriate support services on campus. Some key services and contacts mentioned include the Center for the First Year Experience, financial aid, counseling, tutoring resources, and more.
The document outlines Dillard University's final examination schedule for the fall 2012 semester from December 10-14. It provides the exam dates and times for Monday-Wednesday-Friday classes and Tuesday-Thursday classes based on normal class meeting times. It also lists common exam dates for mathematics, biology, and first year experience courses. Exams for 12:00pm classes and evening classes from 6-9pm will be given during the scheduled exam period. Saturday class exams will be on December 8th. All final grades are due by 12:00pm on December 15th.
The document announces a workshop to help students prepare graduate school personal statements by providing assistance drafting statements from personal data and helping applicants understand how to highlight their unique qualities. The workshop, hosted by the Louisiana Association of Black Psychologists, will be held on November 17th from 9:30AM to 12PM at Dillard University and students are encouraged to bring laptops and application materials.
A speaker from the University of New Orleans Department of Economics and Finance will present on "Obama Care versus Romney Care" as part of the Quality Enhancement Plan series at the Georges Auditorium on October 19th, 2012 from 2-3 pm. The presentation will discuss the potential social, economic, and political impacts of the Presidential Election on issues of healthcare and gun control. The event will be facilitated by an assistant professor from Dillard University.
(1) The American Association of Blacks in Higher Education (AABHE) is offering doctoral student conference grants to attend their 2013 National Conference from February 28-March 2 in Atlanta, Georgia.
(2) The top grant award provides $1,200, conference registration, and one-year AABHE membership. Second through fourth place winners receive $600, registration, and membership.
(3) To apply, students must submit an application form, resume, recommendation letter, and 2-page research statement describing their completed or ongoing research and its implications for African American communities by December 3, 2012.
The American Association of Blacks in Higher Education (AABHE) will hold its 2013 National Conference on Blacks in Higher Education from February 28-March 2, 2013 in Atlanta, Georgia. The conference theme is "Pathways to Success within Higher Education." AABHE is seeking proposals that address one of five strands: pathways to leadership, publishing/research, health/STEM, diversity/ethnic studies, or cultural arts. Proposals are due by October 12, 2012 and should include presenter information, presentation type (general session or roundtable), selected strand(s), program title, 85-word abstract, and 500-word description.
This research and writing boot camp is a three-part program designed to help new and experienced faculty strengthen their research and writing skills. The first segment will provide practical writing strategies. The second will give insights from journal editors on getting published. The third will cover critical elements for developing a tenure dossier, such as maintaining a research agenda. The overall goal is to underscore the key elements needed for success in the tenure and promotion process. Participants are encouraged to bring work-in-progress to get feedback.
The document announces an event called "Take Back the Night 2012" happening on October 23rd to address the issue of sexual assault on college campuses. Buses will leave Dillard University at 5pm and return at 9pm to take students to Loyola University's horseshoe at 6pm for the event. T-shirts for the event are $8 and can be purchased from the student organizer Candace Banks by October 5th. Faculty and staff are encouraged to wear denim and teal that day in support of the cause. The event is being organized by students and professors from Dillard University's psychology department.
1. DILLARD UNIVERSITY
CENTER FOR TEACHING, LEARNING, AND ACADEMIC TECHNOLOGY
FACULTY RESEARCH/CREATIVE ACTIVITY INCENTIVE
(For Tenure Track and Tenured Faculty)
MINI-GRANT PROGRAM
Call for Proposals Due April 15th
Dr. Bernard Singleton and Dr. Dorothy Smith, Co-Coordinators
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
PURPOSE
The purpose of the Faculty Research Incentive Grants Program is to provide
seed funding for primarily tenure track faculty members to conduct original
research or artistic creation disseminated through publication(s), exhibitions, and
performances. The intention of the program is to encourage faculty members to
use this seed funding as leverage to establish or expand a sustainable research
agenda. The faculty in the area of the Humanities and Social Sciences is
especially encouraged to apply as acknowledged in the Mellon Foundation Grant
Proposal. This is a competitive process.
GUIDELINES
1. Qualifications: The competition is now open to full-time tenure- track
and tenured faculty members who will remain on the faculty during the
upcoming academic year. Tenure-track faculty will be given priority.
Proposals may be submitted by a single faculty member or by teams of
faculty members. Proposals may have Fall start dates or Spring start
dates. Priority will be given to faculty who did not receive a Presidential
Research or Incentive Mini-Grant. Faculty who did not successfully
complete the Presidential Research Mini Grant will not qualify. Faculty
already awarded a Mini-Grant this Academic Year will not qualify.
2. Amount. Investigators may request up to $5,000.00.
3. Expenditures. Allowable expenditures include, but are not limited to:
stipend, travel, equipment, supplies, software, and books.
2. 4. Deliverable. It is expected that the deliverable of this project will be a
paper submitted for publication in a refereed journal or some other final
creative product that is peer reviewed, e.g. exhibitions, artistic show
FORMAT
1. Proposals shall not exceed seven pages total in length single space. The
cover sheet shall not exceed one page, the abstract should not exceed
250 words, the narrative shall be no longer than five pages, and the
budget shall not exceed one page. The proposal should be typed in word
format and in 12 point font size and Times New Roman. The margins
should be 1 around and text is justified right and left.
2. All proposals should include a cover sheet with the title of the project, the names,
academic ranks, e-mail addresses, and telephone numbers of all investigators. If
it is a collaborative proposal only one principal investigator (PI) should be
specified. This person will receive all official correspondence. The cover sheet
must also state whether the starting date of the project is at the beginning of the
Fall or the beginning of the Spring. (Form attached )
3. All proposals must include a detailed line-by-line item budget with justification
on a separate page. (Form attached)
4. Any deviations from the required format will result in disqualification.
5. Abstract of Project-Include an overview of the conduct of project (250 words
maximum). The Abstract should be a stand along document which should specify
the propose/hypothesis of project, merit, methodology and the importance of the
outcomes, and how it will be sustained beyond the funding period. All elements
of the abstract should be descriptive and clear. The title of the project should be
stated on the abstract.
6. The project narrative should include subheadings describing the intellectual
merit of the project- stated purpose and significance of the research/project,
hypothesis/research question/statement of creative vision, methodology,
explanation on how the research/project will impact/benefit the
community(broader impact) and the faculty and student development,
explanation of how the project will be sustained beyond the initial funding to
include potential other funding sources (e.g. BOR, NSF), how will the data be
distributed to or shared with the community (e.g. Journal, exhibitions, etc.) (See
attachment)
7. Proposals will be subjected to a blind review. Cover sheets will be removed
before proposals are distributed to reviewers. Identifying information should
not appear anywhere in the proposal except on the cover sheet. An
individual proposal number will be assigned to each proposal application. The
grant proposals will be reviewed by a committee composed of senior members of
the faculty respected for their grantsmanship and research portfolio.
8. A Bibliography must be included
3. DATES FOR SUBMISSION, NOTIFICATIONS, AND OUTCOMES
Deadline for Submission: Friday, April 15, 2010.
It is anticipated that the investigators will be notified by April 25, 2010.
Resource request for the funds will be available for disbursement immediately upon
notification. The stipend will be available upon the submission of the article for
publication or the presentation of a creative work.
All investigators awarded funds will be required to turn a report into the Office of
Academic Affairs documenting how the funds were used and providing a progress report
on the status of the final publication/presentation.
The progress report is due October 1, 2010 for projects.
QUESTIONS
Any questions can be forwarded to Dr. Phyllis W. Dawkins, Associate Provost and
Director of CTLAT, at pdawkins@dillard.edu or 816-4368; or to Dr. Bernard Singleton at
816-4368 or bsingleton@dillard.edu the Coordinator for the Mini-Grant process of the
Center for Teaching, Learning, and Academic Technology.
PROCESS FOR SUBMISSION
Proposals should be submitted electronically to Dr. Bernard Singleton, Coordinator and
the Associate Provost, by e-mail, as a Word attachment, no later than 5:00pm on the
due date.
The official submission address is: bsingleton@dillard.edu.
4. CRITERIA
PROPOSAL #______________(Assigned at time of submission)
Proposals will be evaluated based on the following criteria: Points
A. Intellectual Merit
1. Is there a clearly stated purpose and significance of the
research/project? ___ of_15
2. Is there a clearly stated hypothesis/research question/statement ___of _5_
of creative vision? (Expected Results)
3. Research Plan/Activity ( qualitative/quantitative Data) ____of 20_
A. How sound is the methodology?
4. Is there value of the research/activity to the applicants ___ of__5
and student development?
5. How will the research impact the community- What are the benefits? ___ of_10
Is it publishable? What is the broader impact
6. Bibliography ___of_5_
B. Potential Competitiveness
1. Likelihood that funding of project will result in competitive status ___of 10__
for outside support. (e.g. BOR, NSF).
2. Does the proposal demonstrate that the project can be sustained ____of10_
beyond the initial funding period?
C. Appropriateness of the Budget
1. Budget is reasonable for the scope of work to be performed ____of 10_
2. Budget demonstrates a detailed and appropriate use of funds- ____of_10_
It is written in a clear line-by-line item format.
Score A thru C of 100
The CTLAT Committee will evaluate, score, and rank proposals based on the criteria
stated above and make funding recommendations to the Director, who will seek final
approval from the Provost.
5. Dillard University
MINI-GRANT COVER PAGE
PROPOSAL #_________________________________(Assigned at time of submission)
Please indicate the project schedule preference below:
Fall 2009_______________________ Spring 2010____________________________
Principal Investigator (Only one PI) ________________________________________
Department____________________ Rank: (i.e., Asst. Prof., Prof., etc.) ____________
E-mail address:____________ Phone #s: Office _______________Cell____________
Joint Proposals:
Co-PI(s) ______________________________________________________________
Department(s) _________________________________________________________
Rank: (i.e., Asst. Prof., Assoc. Prof., etc.)_____________________________________
(Please put additional individuals on an extra sheet and indicate it here)
Title of Project:
This project will use (check what is applicable):
_______Animal Subjects (IRB required) ______Biohazards/Human Blood
_______Human Subjects (IRB required) ______Recombinant DNA
_______Radiation/Isotopes/Lasers ______Controlled Substances
_______Additional Space Allocations ______Student participation
Resources Requested:
1. Amount Requested from Dillard Uni.$_________________
2. Budget Summary (include the line budget with application)
a. Travel $_______________
b. Operating $_______________
c. Other $_______________
d. Total: $________________
Applicants signature: Indicates agreement to the stipulations listed in the Application
Instructions.
Applicants Signature___________________________ Date_____________________
6. PROPOSAL BUDGET
PROPOSAL #______________(Assigned at time of submission)
1. Material and Supplies: $___________
List of items, Vendor
2. Travel: Itemize in detail $___________
e.g. food/dates/participants/in/out of state/plane tickets, ground transportation,
parking. Have to support research project.
3. Equipment: List $___________
Itemize in detail e.g. type of equipment, vendor, use
4. Software: List $___________
Itemize e.g. use, vendor
5. Books: vendors $___________
6. Conference $___________
Fees/Activities: itemize, participants, registration fees, room rate,
7. Publication/ $__________
Presentation/Creative work
Project display Cost:
8. Stipends: $__________
Amount and for whom
9. Other: List items $__________
Justification of Budget: By-the-numbers: (Use an extra sheet if need to and indicate
here)
9. Center for Teaching, Learning, and Academic Technology
Committee
Phyllis Worthy Dawkins, Chair
Members CONTACT INFORMATION
Johnson, Eartha DCF Rm. 231, 816-4429
Mell, Marylin CK Rm. 149J, 816-4361
Okapaleaze, Azubike DENT Rm. 135, 816-4779
Smart, Anthony ITT
Smith, Dorothy DCF Rm. 214, 816-4527
Chitman-Washington, Clinette CK Rm. 149E, 816-4102
Carla Morelon-Quainoo Dent Hall
Ridell Rose Student Success
Ellen Robinson Student Success
Darwish, Abdalla Stern Rm. 307B, 816-4840
Charles, Cynthia WWA Library 2nd Floor
Marina, Sherri CKFS Rm. 113, 816-4762
Buddington, Steve DCF Rm. 233, 816-4178
Hill, Freddye DCF Rm. 217, 816-4613
Center Coordinators
Member CONTACT INFORMATION
Singleton, Bernard Stern Rm. 122E, 816-4308
Jean-Perkins, Ramona DCF Rm. 239, 816-4744
10. Dear Faculty,
The Dillard University Center for Teaching, Learning, and Academic Technology
(CTLAT) is continuing the Faculty Research Incentive Mini-Grants Program. We are
seeking to encourage more faculty members to engage in research especially in the
areas of Humanities and Social Sciences as mentioned in the Mellon Foundation Grant.
To promote faculty research, the CTLAT will award twenty (20) mini-grants over two
years, the life of the Mellon Foundation Grant, (10 each year) to support faculty
research. Deadline for Submission: 5:00 p.m. Friday, April 15, 2010 It is anticipated
that the investigators will be notified by Friday, April 25, 2010
Resource request for the funds will be available for disbursement immediately upon
notification? Stipends will be available upon the submission of the article for publication
or the presentation of the creative work.
All Principal Investigators awarded funds will be required to turn a report into the Office
of Academic Affairs documenting how the funds were used and providing a progress
report on the status of the final publication/project.
For this round the progress report is due October 1, 2010 for projects.
All the guidelines and forms are attached to this announcement.
QUESTIONS
Any questions can be forwarded to Dr. Phyllis W. Dawkins, Associate Provost, at
pdawkins@dillard.edu or 816-4368; or to Dr. Bernard Singleton at 816-4308 or
bsingleton@dillard.edu A Coordinator of the Center for Teaching, Learning, and
Academic Technology.