Ever heard the phrase "Your success works against you."?
Successful #executives need to be ready not for stability, but for #disruption because, over time, every business model fails eventually, due to the change of conditions, evolution, progress according to Greg Satell (Bestselling Author of Cascades and Mapping Innovation). Here's how you can help your executives move from exploitation to exploration, through Problem Framing.
Steve Blank, Stanford, SXSW Lean Startup 2013500 Startups
油
The document compares the evolution of Silicon Valley to Hollywood and notes several similarities that have emerged:
- Both became major industry clusters centered around specific locations and expertise
- As the industries grew, surrounding ecosystems developed including agents, lawyers, investors and other hangers-on not directly involved in production
- There is now more focus on founders and CEOs as brands and personalities, driven partly by ego and vanity, rather than just the work itself
The key message is that Silicon Valley has transitioned from being solely about the technical work to also having a "star ecosystem", and entrepreneurs should focus on building great products rather than getting distracted.
The document compares the evolution of Silicon Valley to Hollywood and notes several similarities that have emerged:
- Both became major industry clusters centered around specific locations and expertise
- As the industries grew, surrounding ecosystems developed including agents, lawyers, investors and other hangers-on not directly involved in production
- There is now more focus on founders and CEOs as brands and personalities, driven partly by ego and vanity, rather than just the work itself
The key message is that Silicon Valley has transitioned from being solely about the technical work to also having a "star ecosystem", and entrepreneurs should focus on building great products rather than getting distracted.
Case presentation on eastman kodak organizational life cycleShekhar kumar
油
George Eastman founded Kodak in 1880 after inventing a dry plate process for photography. Kodak grew rapidly by introducing innovations like roll film and box cameras. However, Kodak struggled to transition to digital photography as technologies changed. Despite investments in digital, Kodak was slow to react to competitors and went down the wrong innovation path. It filed for bankruptcy in 2012 after digital disruption caused severe decline. Kodak's success blinded it to changing customer needs and the company was unable to reinvent itself for the digital age.
Talking to Architects: CIMCIG Seminar: The Changing Face of Specification and...Su Butcher
油
際際滷s for a talk to Construction Product Manufacturers and Suppliers at CIMCIG (Chartered Institute of Marketing Construction Industry Group) London 22nd September 2011.
White Paper of the talk will be available on my website (see last slide)
The message: Architects are small or micro businesses and are time poor. Dont contribute the noise they have to filter out by always hoping to contact them at a good time. Listen, be helpful, and use technology wisely so they can find you when they need you.
This document is a collection of quotes and passages from Tom Peters discussing various topics related to excellence and innovation. It touches on themes like embracing failure, decentralization, execution, accountability, solving problems for customers, and tapping into opportunities like the women's market. Short snippets and ideas are presented without much additional context or connection between sections.
Analysis of Kodak's reaction to digitization Parag Deshpande
油
Analysis of Kodak's reaction to digitization and launch of Sony's Mavica in mid-80s. We also discuss other missed opportunities that Kodak had to reinvent their brand.
George Eastman founded Eastman Kodak in 1880, pioneering portable cameras and making photography accessible to the public. However, Kodak was slow to transition to digital photography in the late 20th century as technologies like digital cameras and camera-equipped smartphones became popular. By 2012, declining film sales and late entry into digital caused Kodak to file for bankruptcy and exit the photography business altogether.
Kodak was once a dominant player in photography but failed to adapt to digital photography and the rise of smartphones. It invented the first digital camera in 1975 but did not embrace digital photography as the future. Kodak focused on printing photos from film rather than the digital cameras and online photo sharing that became popular. By the time Kodak tried to transition to digital, it was too late, and the company filed for bankruptcy in 2012 as digital photography and photo sharing on social media surpassed film. Kodak's failure to reinvent itself for the digital age and its complacency ultimately led to its demise despite inventing key early digital photography technologies.
George Eastman founded Kodak in 1888, revolutionizing photography with inexpensive cameras and film (Kodak's famous slogan was "You press the button, we do the rest"). Kodak dominated the film industry for decades but struggled to adapt to the digital transition in the 1990s. Despite early digital innovations, Kodak's film focus caused it to miss key opportunities. Facing fierce competition, declining revenues, and financial troubles, Kodak filed for bankruptcy in 2012, though its brand recognition and patents portfolio provide some remaining assets.
- Kodak was a pioneer in photography in the late 19th century with inexpensive cameras and film rolls, becoming the market leader.
- In the late 1990s, Kodak began diversifying as digital cameras emerged but struggled to adapt its business model away from film.
- Multiple CEOs and strategies failed to differentiate Kodak's new products or change its culture to compete in the digital space.
- Kodak filed for bankruptcy in 2012, unable to maintain leadership without consumable film sales as competitors offered newer technology.
Next slides are the outlineDetermine each one is low or modera.docxcurwenmichaela
油
Next slides are the outline
Determine each one is low or moderate or hight.
Gives some explanations to show why
Only put key words. Then in the remark, write full sentences to explain.
1
Porters Five Force Anaylsis
Buyers bargaining power: Low? Moderate? High?
Suppliers bargainining power: Low? Moderate? High?
Threat of new entrants: : Low? Moderate? High?
Threat of subsitutes(Outside of the industry) : Low? Moderate? High?
Rivalry among competitor: : Low? Moderate? High?
The reasons why buyers bargaining power
is low or moderate or high?
1
2
3
The reasons why Suppliers bargainining power
is low or moderate or high?
The reasons why Threat of subsitutes is low or moderate or high?
The reasons why Threat of new entrants
is low or moderate or high?
The reasons why Rivalry among competitor is low or moderate or high?
1
2
3
4
Instruction:
Read the Kodak case. Create a PowerPoint to conduct Porters Five force analysis. Totally 6 slides. Outline is given under attachment. Follow the outline. Due date is 4/12/2016, 20:00 p
Note: The time period you have to focus is between 1983- 2000 !!!
Below is the case.
Kodak (A)
In February 2003, Daniel A. Carp, Kodaks chief executive officer and chairman, was reviewing 2002 data with the companys senior executives: film sales had dropped 5% from the already weak previous year and revenues were down 3%, sliding to $12.8 billion. The film industry was under pressure unlike ever before, and Carp predicted a fairly long downturn1 for traditional photography sales as more and more consumers were turning to digital cameras, which did not require film. The company had been investing heavily in digital imaging since the early 1980s, pioneering image-sensor technology in 1986 and entering the market with a variety of products during the 1990s.
In addition, Kodak was moving more of its manufacturing to China, where it could still boast film sales, and was planning to slash 2,200 jobs, or 3% of its work force, especially in the photo-finishing business. The picture for 2003 was not any brighter: Carp expected revenues to grow slightly to $13 billion and net income to be flat or down from the $770 million the company had earned in 2002.
A native of Wytheville, Virginia, Carp had graduated in management from MIT, and had begun his career at Kodak in 1970 as a statistical analyst. Since then he had held a variety of positions, including general manager of sales for Kodak Canada, general manager of the consumer electronics division, general manager of the European, African, and Middle Eastern regions in 1991, and president and chief operating officer in 1997. Carp was finally appointed CEO on January 1, 2000. After more than 30 years at the company, he realized this struggle was one of the toughest in the companys century-long history. How could he use digital imaging to revitalize Kodak?
Kodaks early days, 1880-1983
In 1880, after thr ...
KODAK is the world's first portable camera that introduced us into the world of photography. Here are the detailed information about the downfall of "KODAK" and reasons behind
it's bankruptcy.
Kodak was a pioneer in photography technology from the late 19th century until the early 2000s. It introduced roll film and mass-market cameras like the Brownie, dominating the photographic industry. However, Kodak was slow to transition to digital photography despite inventing the first digital camera in 1975. When digital cameras replaced film in the early 2000s, Kodak's business model collapsed as film sales plummeted. Kodak filed for bankruptcy in 2012, unable to complete the transition from film to digital that disrupted its entire industry.
Kodak struggled to adapt to the digital age due to its dependence on highly profitable film sales. When digital cameras emerged in the 1980s, Kodak failed to believe they could be profitable, focusing on film over new technology. By the time Kodak acknowledged digital photography in the 2000s, it was too late as the market had already shifted. Kodak's slow, evolutionary approach was not adequate to drive the revolutionary change needed to transition its business model for the digital era.
KODAK'S FOCUS ON DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY - IMAGING ON BUSINESSdenothankachan
油
Kodak focused on disruptive technology like digital cameras but failed to transition its business model from film to digital. It invented the first digital camera in 1975 but was slow to bring digital products to market. By 2005, digital photography had displaced film, leading to Kodak's bankruptcy in 2012. Today, Kodak operates as a technology company providing solutions for digital printing, packaging, and functional printing.
Case 10 Eastman Kodaks Quest for a Digital FutureOn JTawnaDelatorrejs
油
Case 10 Eastman Kodaks
Quest for a
Digital Future
On January 19, 2012, the Eastman Kodak Company declared bankruptcyit entered
voluntary Chapter油 11 business reorganization. Its two-decade journey of transition
from traditional photography into digital imaging was effectively over. In 1990, Kodak
had launched its Photo CD system for storing photographic images; in 1991, it had intro-
duced its rst digital camera and, in 1994, its new CEO, George Fisher, had declared:
We are not in the photographic business油.油.油.油we are in the picture business.
With senior executives recruited from Motorola, Apple, General Electric, Silicon
Graphics, and Hewlett-Packard, Kodaks digital imaging efforts had established some
notable successes. In digital cameras, Kodak was US market leader for most of 200410;
globally, it ranked third after Canon and Sony. It was a technological leader in mega-
pixel image sensors. It was global leader in retail printing kiosks and digital minilabs.
Financial performance was a different story. In 1991, Eastman Kodak was Americas
18th-biggest company by revenues; by 2011, it had fallen to 334th: over the same period
its employment had shrunk from 133,200 to 17,100. During 200011, its operating
losses totaled $5.2 billion.
As Antonio Perez prepared for his new role under the supervision of Kodaks chief
restructuring of cer, James Mesterharm, he re ected on Kodaks two decades of decline.
How could a company that had been a pioneer of digital imaging and had invested so
heavily in building digital capabilities and launching new digital imaging products have
failed so miserably to pro t from its efforts? And what could he have done differently
to have avoided this fate?
These same questions haunted the CEOs of other companies: if one of Americas
most successful companies could be destroyed by new technology, what did the future
hold for their own businesses?
Kodaks History, 190193
George Eastman transformed photography from a professional, studio-based activity
into an everyday consumer hobby. His key innovations were silver halide roll lm and
the rst fully portable camera. The Eastman Kodak Company established in Roches-
ter, New York, in 1901 offered a full range of products and services for the amateur
photographer: You push the button, we do the rest was its rst advertising slogan.
By the time George Eastman died in 1932, Eastman Kodak was one of the worlds
leading multinational corporations with production, distribution, and processing facil-
ities throughout the world and with one of the worlds most recognizable brand names.
This case was prepared by Robert M. Grant. 息2019 Robert M. Grant.
476 CASES TO ACCOMPANY CONTEMPORARY STRATEGY ANALYSIS
After the Second World War, Kodak entered a new growth phase with an expand-
ing core business and diversi cation into chemicals (its subsidiary, Eastman Chemical,
exploited its polymer technology) and healthcare (Eastman Pharmaceutic ...
George Eastman pioneered photography in 1888 by creating simple cameras for public use. Kodak became the market leader in photographic films for many years. In the late 1990s, as digital cameras emerged, Kodak began diversifying and acquiring technology companies but struggled with lower margins without film sales. While Kodak's success relied on consumable films, digital cameras threatened this business model. Kodak failed to effectively transition to the new digital market in time and lost leadership to competitors focused on technology hardware like Canon and Sony.
Kodaks Decision to Enter the Consumer Digital Imaging MarketJerry Boger
油
This is a case study presentation discussed at Rochester Institute of Technology on Eastman Kodak's decision in 1991 to develop the consumer still imaging market. As one of the co-leaders of the Kodak strategy team, I presented the case.
Kodak is launching a new IMC campaign called "Capturing Memories" to introduce its brand to millennial families and future entrepreneurs. The campaign objectives are to improve brand awareness among millennials through collaborations, increase followers by 40% in 12 months, and start relationships for future business partnerships. Key strategies include social media promotions, discounts for new businesses, and partnership contracts. The target audience is millennials and Gen Z who are interested in photography, branding, and entrepreneurship. The campaign positioning will focus on Kodak's history capturing memories for over 130 years.
HELLO EVERYONE,
Today in this presentation we will discuss about market analysis ok kodak cameras...
Why kodak failed ?
what marketing strategy kodak adopt?
mistakes of kodak cameras?
measures to take back their position in tne market?
Kodak Strategic Management (Strategic Blunder) Case Study, slice and dice Kodak's functional strategy, competitive strategies and their main four pillar general strategy.
The document discusses marketing opportunities for Kodak to capitalize on after entering the digital camera market due to declining film sales. It recommends that Kodak emphasize increasing sales of photo quality inkjet paper and expanding its online photo sharing and printing service, ofoto.com, which currently has over 2 million members. The case analysis also identifies additional opportunities for Kodak such as consumer segmentation, direct and indirect competition analysis, and assessing foreign market potential.
How Did George Eastman Impacted SocietyAngela Hays
油
George Eastman impacted society by donating money to organizations like dental clinics for children and scholarships at MIT. This helped provide medical care for those who could not afford it and educational opportunities for people outside the rich. Eastman founded Kodak and invented roll film and easy to use cameras, which helped popularize photography for the masses.
This document provides an overview of the external environment of organizations and the history of Eastman Kodak's decline. It discusses the macro environment including political, economic, sociocultural, technological, environmental and legal factors. It then discusses Kodak's timeline from 1884 when it patented roll film to 2012 when it filed for bankruptcy. While Kodak invented the first digital camera in 1975, it struggled to adapt to digital photography and saw its market share eroded by competitors as digital cameras grew in popularity through the 2000s.
George Eastman created the photographic industry in 1879 by founding the Eastman Kodak Company. Kodak achieved success through affordable cameras, mass production, and extensive marketing. While Kodak dominated film sales for decades, the transition to digital photography caused film sales to decline from 800 million rolls to 300 million between 2000-2005. In response, Kodak shifted focus from traditional film to digital technology and expanded into other areas like medical imaging, printing, and digital displays to remain competitive in a changing market.
Kodak, Disruptive Innovation And The Stock MarketChris Sandstr旦m
油
Kodak's stock price declined significantly from 1999 to 2009 as digital imaging replaced the need for film. While Kodak invested in digital cameras in the early 1990s, securities analysts at the time largely ignored these initiatives and praised Kodak's film-based products instead. It was not until the late 1990s and early 2000s that analysts began to recognize the importance of digital imaging for Kodak's future, by which point Kodak had fallen behind competitors in the transition. A study of analyst reports from the 1990s shows they overlooked or criticized Kodak's early digital investments that were essential to the company's long-term survival.
The opening session of the Symposium starts with a keynote speech by Professor David Olusoga OBE and an address by Angus Robertson MSP, Cabinet Secretary for Culture.
At the plenary session, speakers scan the horizon and discuss shared challenges and opportunities for Scotlands museum sector.
This is followed by a sector showcase: get a snapshot of key areas shaping current museum practice with these insights from Museums Galleries Scotland staff and sector colleagues. Topics include repatriation, LGBTQ+ inclusion, Intangible Cultural Heritage, and Modern Apprenticeships.
Kodak was once a dominant player in photography but failed to adapt to digital photography and the rise of smartphones. It invented the first digital camera in 1975 but did not embrace digital photography as the future. Kodak focused on printing photos from film rather than the digital cameras and online photo sharing that became popular. By the time Kodak tried to transition to digital, it was too late, and the company filed for bankruptcy in 2012 as digital photography and photo sharing on social media surpassed film. Kodak's failure to reinvent itself for the digital age and its complacency ultimately led to its demise despite inventing key early digital photography technologies.
George Eastman founded Kodak in 1888, revolutionizing photography with inexpensive cameras and film (Kodak's famous slogan was "You press the button, we do the rest"). Kodak dominated the film industry for decades but struggled to adapt to the digital transition in the 1990s. Despite early digital innovations, Kodak's film focus caused it to miss key opportunities. Facing fierce competition, declining revenues, and financial troubles, Kodak filed for bankruptcy in 2012, though its brand recognition and patents portfolio provide some remaining assets.
- Kodak was a pioneer in photography in the late 19th century with inexpensive cameras and film rolls, becoming the market leader.
- In the late 1990s, Kodak began diversifying as digital cameras emerged but struggled to adapt its business model away from film.
- Multiple CEOs and strategies failed to differentiate Kodak's new products or change its culture to compete in the digital space.
- Kodak filed for bankruptcy in 2012, unable to maintain leadership without consumable film sales as competitors offered newer technology.
Next slides are the outlineDetermine each one is low or modera.docxcurwenmichaela
油
Next slides are the outline
Determine each one is low or moderate or hight.
Gives some explanations to show why
Only put key words. Then in the remark, write full sentences to explain.
1
Porters Five Force Anaylsis
Buyers bargaining power: Low? Moderate? High?
Suppliers bargainining power: Low? Moderate? High?
Threat of new entrants: : Low? Moderate? High?
Threat of subsitutes(Outside of the industry) : Low? Moderate? High?
Rivalry among competitor: : Low? Moderate? High?
The reasons why buyers bargaining power
is low or moderate or high?
1
2
3
The reasons why Suppliers bargainining power
is low or moderate or high?
The reasons why Threat of subsitutes is low or moderate or high?
The reasons why Threat of new entrants
is low or moderate or high?
The reasons why Rivalry among competitor is low or moderate or high?
1
2
3
4
Instruction:
Read the Kodak case. Create a PowerPoint to conduct Porters Five force analysis. Totally 6 slides. Outline is given under attachment. Follow the outline. Due date is 4/12/2016, 20:00 p
Note: The time period you have to focus is between 1983- 2000 !!!
Below is the case.
Kodak (A)
In February 2003, Daniel A. Carp, Kodaks chief executive officer and chairman, was reviewing 2002 data with the companys senior executives: film sales had dropped 5% from the already weak previous year and revenues were down 3%, sliding to $12.8 billion. The film industry was under pressure unlike ever before, and Carp predicted a fairly long downturn1 for traditional photography sales as more and more consumers were turning to digital cameras, which did not require film. The company had been investing heavily in digital imaging since the early 1980s, pioneering image-sensor technology in 1986 and entering the market with a variety of products during the 1990s.
In addition, Kodak was moving more of its manufacturing to China, where it could still boast film sales, and was planning to slash 2,200 jobs, or 3% of its work force, especially in the photo-finishing business. The picture for 2003 was not any brighter: Carp expected revenues to grow slightly to $13 billion and net income to be flat or down from the $770 million the company had earned in 2002.
A native of Wytheville, Virginia, Carp had graduated in management from MIT, and had begun his career at Kodak in 1970 as a statistical analyst. Since then he had held a variety of positions, including general manager of sales for Kodak Canada, general manager of the consumer electronics division, general manager of the European, African, and Middle Eastern regions in 1991, and president and chief operating officer in 1997. Carp was finally appointed CEO on January 1, 2000. After more than 30 years at the company, he realized this struggle was one of the toughest in the companys century-long history. How could he use digital imaging to revitalize Kodak?
Kodaks early days, 1880-1983
In 1880, after thr ...
KODAK is the world's first portable camera that introduced us into the world of photography. Here are the detailed information about the downfall of "KODAK" and reasons behind
it's bankruptcy.
Kodak was a pioneer in photography technology from the late 19th century until the early 2000s. It introduced roll film and mass-market cameras like the Brownie, dominating the photographic industry. However, Kodak was slow to transition to digital photography despite inventing the first digital camera in 1975. When digital cameras replaced film in the early 2000s, Kodak's business model collapsed as film sales plummeted. Kodak filed for bankruptcy in 2012, unable to complete the transition from film to digital that disrupted its entire industry.
Kodak struggled to adapt to the digital age due to its dependence on highly profitable film sales. When digital cameras emerged in the 1980s, Kodak failed to believe they could be profitable, focusing on film over new technology. By the time Kodak acknowledged digital photography in the 2000s, it was too late as the market had already shifted. Kodak's slow, evolutionary approach was not adequate to drive the revolutionary change needed to transition its business model for the digital era.
KODAK'S FOCUS ON DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY - IMAGING ON BUSINESSdenothankachan
油
Kodak focused on disruptive technology like digital cameras but failed to transition its business model from film to digital. It invented the first digital camera in 1975 but was slow to bring digital products to market. By 2005, digital photography had displaced film, leading to Kodak's bankruptcy in 2012. Today, Kodak operates as a technology company providing solutions for digital printing, packaging, and functional printing.
Case 10 Eastman Kodaks Quest for a Digital FutureOn JTawnaDelatorrejs
油
Case 10 Eastman Kodaks
Quest for a
Digital Future
On January 19, 2012, the Eastman Kodak Company declared bankruptcyit entered
voluntary Chapter油 11 business reorganization. Its two-decade journey of transition
from traditional photography into digital imaging was effectively over. In 1990, Kodak
had launched its Photo CD system for storing photographic images; in 1991, it had intro-
duced its rst digital camera and, in 1994, its new CEO, George Fisher, had declared:
We are not in the photographic business油.油.油.油we are in the picture business.
With senior executives recruited from Motorola, Apple, General Electric, Silicon
Graphics, and Hewlett-Packard, Kodaks digital imaging efforts had established some
notable successes. In digital cameras, Kodak was US market leader for most of 200410;
globally, it ranked third after Canon and Sony. It was a technological leader in mega-
pixel image sensors. It was global leader in retail printing kiosks and digital minilabs.
Financial performance was a different story. In 1991, Eastman Kodak was Americas
18th-biggest company by revenues; by 2011, it had fallen to 334th: over the same period
its employment had shrunk from 133,200 to 17,100. During 200011, its operating
losses totaled $5.2 billion.
As Antonio Perez prepared for his new role under the supervision of Kodaks chief
restructuring of cer, James Mesterharm, he re ected on Kodaks two decades of decline.
How could a company that had been a pioneer of digital imaging and had invested so
heavily in building digital capabilities and launching new digital imaging products have
failed so miserably to pro t from its efforts? And what could he have done differently
to have avoided this fate?
These same questions haunted the CEOs of other companies: if one of Americas
most successful companies could be destroyed by new technology, what did the future
hold for their own businesses?
Kodaks History, 190193
George Eastman transformed photography from a professional, studio-based activity
into an everyday consumer hobby. His key innovations were silver halide roll lm and
the rst fully portable camera. The Eastman Kodak Company established in Roches-
ter, New York, in 1901 offered a full range of products and services for the amateur
photographer: You push the button, we do the rest was its rst advertising slogan.
By the time George Eastman died in 1932, Eastman Kodak was one of the worlds
leading multinational corporations with production, distribution, and processing facil-
ities throughout the world and with one of the worlds most recognizable brand names.
This case was prepared by Robert M. Grant. 息2019 Robert M. Grant.
476 CASES TO ACCOMPANY CONTEMPORARY STRATEGY ANALYSIS
After the Second World War, Kodak entered a new growth phase with an expand-
ing core business and diversi cation into chemicals (its subsidiary, Eastman Chemical,
exploited its polymer technology) and healthcare (Eastman Pharmaceutic ...
George Eastman pioneered photography in 1888 by creating simple cameras for public use. Kodak became the market leader in photographic films for many years. In the late 1990s, as digital cameras emerged, Kodak began diversifying and acquiring technology companies but struggled with lower margins without film sales. While Kodak's success relied on consumable films, digital cameras threatened this business model. Kodak failed to effectively transition to the new digital market in time and lost leadership to competitors focused on technology hardware like Canon and Sony.
Kodaks Decision to Enter the Consumer Digital Imaging MarketJerry Boger
油
This is a case study presentation discussed at Rochester Institute of Technology on Eastman Kodak's decision in 1991 to develop the consumer still imaging market. As one of the co-leaders of the Kodak strategy team, I presented the case.
Kodak is launching a new IMC campaign called "Capturing Memories" to introduce its brand to millennial families and future entrepreneurs. The campaign objectives are to improve brand awareness among millennials through collaborations, increase followers by 40% in 12 months, and start relationships for future business partnerships. Key strategies include social media promotions, discounts for new businesses, and partnership contracts. The target audience is millennials and Gen Z who are interested in photography, branding, and entrepreneurship. The campaign positioning will focus on Kodak's history capturing memories for over 130 years.
HELLO EVERYONE,
Today in this presentation we will discuss about market analysis ok kodak cameras...
Why kodak failed ?
what marketing strategy kodak adopt?
mistakes of kodak cameras?
measures to take back their position in tne market?
Kodak Strategic Management (Strategic Blunder) Case Study, slice and dice Kodak's functional strategy, competitive strategies and their main four pillar general strategy.
The document discusses marketing opportunities for Kodak to capitalize on after entering the digital camera market due to declining film sales. It recommends that Kodak emphasize increasing sales of photo quality inkjet paper and expanding its online photo sharing and printing service, ofoto.com, which currently has over 2 million members. The case analysis also identifies additional opportunities for Kodak such as consumer segmentation, direct and indirect competition analysis, and assessing foreign market potential.
How Did George Eastman Impacted SocietyAngela Hays
油
George Eastman impacted society by donating money to organizations like dental clinics for children and scholarships at MIT. This helped provide medical care for those who could not afford it and educational opportunities for people outside the rich. Eastman founded Kodak and invented roll film and easy to use cameras, which helped popularize photography for the masses.
This document provides an overview of the external environment of organizations and the history of Eastman Kodak's decline. It discusses the macro environment including political, economic, sociocultural, technological, environmental and legal factors. It then discusses Kodak's timeline from 1884 when it patented roll film to 2012 when it filed for bankruptcy. While Kodak invented the first digital camera in 1975, it struggled to adapt to digital photography and saw its market share eroded by competitors as digital cameras grew in popularity through the 2000s.
George Eastman created the photographic industry in 1879 by founding the Eastman Kodak Company. Kodak achieved success through affordable cameras, mass production, and extensive marketing. While Kodak dominated film sales for decades, the transition to digital photography caused film sales to decline from 800 million rolls to 300 million between 2000-2005. In response, Kodak shifted focus from traditional film to digital technology and expanded into other areas like medical imaging, printing, and digital displays to remain competitive in a changing market.
Kodak, Disruptive Innovation And The Stock MarketChris Sandstr旦m
油
Kodak's stock price declined significantly from 1999 to 2009 as digital imaging replaced the need for film. While Kodak invested in digital cameras in the early 1990s, securities analysts at the time largely ignored these initiatives and praised Kodak's film-based products instead. It was not until the late 1990s and early 2000s that analysts began to recognize the importance of digital imaging for Kodak's future, by which point Kodak had fallen behind competitors in the transition. A study of analyst reports from the 1990s shows they overlooked or criticized Kodak's early digital investments that were essential to the company's long-term survival.
The opening session of the Symposium starts with a keynote speech by Professor David Olusoga OBE and an address by Angus Robertson MSP, Cabinet Secretary for Culture.
At the plenary session, speakers scan the horizon and discuss shared challenges and opportunities for Scotlands museum sector.
This is followed by a sector showcase: get a snapshot of key areas shaping current museum practice with these insights from Museums Galleries Scotland staff and sector colleagues. Topics include repatriation, LGBTQ+ inclusion, Intangible Cultural Heritage, and Modern Apprenticeships.
Red blood cell (RBC) indices measure your red blood cells' size, shape, and quality. Red blood cells are also known as erythrocytes. They are made in your bone marrow (the spongy tissue inside your large bones). They contain hemoglobin, an iron-rich protein in your red blood cells that carries oxygen from your lungs to every cell in your body. Your cells need oxygen to grow, reproduce, and make energy.
Knowing the size and shape of your red blood cells can help your provider determine if you have a certain type of anemia, a condition in which your body does not make enough healthy red blood cells. There are four types of red blood cell indices:
Mean corpuscular volume (MCV), which measures the average size of your red blood cells.
Mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), which measures the average amount of hemoglobin in a single red blood cell.
Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), which measures how concentrated (close together) the hemoglobin is in your red blood cells. It also includes a calculation of the size and volume of your red blood cells.
Red cell distribution width (RDW), which measures differences in the volume and size of your red blood cells. Healthy red blood cells are usually about the same size.
If one or more of these indices are not normal, it may mean you have some type of anemia.
Other names: erythrocyte indices
What are they used for?
Red blood cell (RBC) indices are part of a complete blood count, a group of tests that measures the number and type of cells in your blood. The results of RBC indices are used to diagnose different types of anemia. There are several types of anemia, and each type has a different effect on the size, shape, and/or quality of red blood cells.
Why do I need red blood cell indices testing?
You may get this test as part of a complete blood count, which is often included in a routine checkup. You may also need this test if you have symptoms of anemia, which may include:
Shortness of breath
Weakness or fatigue
Headache
Dizziness
Arrhythmia (a problem with the rate or rhythm of your heartbeat)
Pale skin
Cold hands and feet
What happens during a red blood cell indices test?
A health care professional will take a blood sample from a vein in your arm, using a small needle. After the needle is inserted, a small amount of blood will be collected into a test tube or vial. You may feel a little sting when the needle goes in or out. This test usually takes less than five minutes.
Will I need to do anything to prepare for these tests?
You don't need any special preparations for a red blood cell (RBC) indices test.
Are there any risks to these tests?
There is very little risk to having a blood test. There may be slight pain or bruising at the spot where the needle was put in, but most symptoms go away quickly.
What do the results mean?
You will get results for each of the indices. Abnormal results may include one or more of the following:
Mean corpuscular volume (MCV)
If your red blood cells ar
Satoshi Nakamoto is not a person, Satoshi Nakamoto is a partnership of two individuals.
The partners have a formal written partnership agreement which governs the activities of the partnership.
The term Satoshi Nakamoto is actually a portmanteau of the individual pseudonyms of the two partners.
Satoshi is the pseudonym of Natasha, the maternal aunt of Vitalik Buterin and former cryptologist at the CSE's Tutte Institute for Mathematics and Computing. However, she's still a member of Canada's national security and intelligence community.
Nakamoto is the pseudonym of Anastasia, the younger sister of former Edmonton police officer Elena Sinelnikova.
The two partners can verify all of this via cryptographic proof employing either the bitcoin genesis block address or the bitcoin block 9 address. The latter being the address that was used to pay 10btc to Hal Finney on January 12, 2009.
The two will also verify that they did not mine any of the so called patoshi pattern bitcoins and that bitcoin block 9 does not adhere to that mining pattern.
The two also published the proof of stake whitepapper under the pseudonym Sunny King.
See https://academy.youngplatform.com/en/crypto-heroes/who-is-inventor-proof-of-stake/
They also published the CryptoNote whitepaper using another pseudonym, that of Nicolas van Saberhagen.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CryptoNote
They were also two of several individuals behind the thankful_for_today pseudonym who initiated the development of Monero.
see https://monero.stackexchange.com/questions/2407/what-is-the-story-with-thankful-for-today-and-the-transfer-of-dev-control
They continued to be active in the industry they helped to initiate.
They were behind the involvement of Natasha's nephew Vitalik Buterin in the founding of the Ethereum project.
They worked behind the scenes on the development of the Metis project by their sisters Natalia Ameline and Elena Sinelnikova.
They worked behind the scenes on other projects in the crypto/blockchain industry as well.
Natasha's sister Natalia Ameline is one of the cofounders of Cryptochicks.ca along with Anastasia's sister Elena Sinelnikova.
Don't take my work for it though, Natalia can be contacted at natalia.ameline@cryptochicks.ca and Elena can be contacted at elena.sinelnikova@cryptochicks.ca - give them a shout why don't you?
Natasha and Anastasia also confirm and clarify the role that the organization known as Cicada 3301 played in the origin and development of bitcoin. That is an interesting story you will not want to miss out on.
They will also confirm for you all the folks who knew the truth about the origins of bitcoin and who have been lying about it.
Natasha expressed an interest moving from the Canadian intelligence community and becoming an RCMP officer prior to revealing the truth about her involvement in the development of the industry. Her stated objective is to work in the RCMP's Federal Policing National Security Program.
Let us wish her well
Globibo Book Translation: Connect with Readers in Any Languageglobibo
油
Book translation makes knowledge, stories, and ideas accessible globally. It helps authors reach new readers, preserves cultural diversity, and supports learning across different languages and regions.
Book Translation Tips
Choose a Skilled Translator Accuracy matters.
Maintain Cultural Context Adapt idioms and references.
Ensure Consistent Terminology Avoid confusion.
Proofread Carefully Quality control is key.
Work with Experts Professional translation improves readability.
Benefits of Book Translation
Expands global readership
Increases author recognition
Preserves cultural heritage
Supports education and research
Opens new market opportunities
Bridges linguistic and cultural gaps
Helps spread knowledge and ideas
Allows books to reach non-native speakers
Globibos book translation services ensure accurate, culturally adapted translations by expert linguists. We handle various genres, maintaining the original essence while making books accessible worldwide. Our process guarantees clarity, consistency, and a smooth reading experience for diverse audiences.
Book translation connects authors with global readers, preserving ideas across languages. Choosing the right translator ensures quality. Globibo offers expert book translation, making content engaging and accessible to a broader audience.
For more information: https://globibo.com/ls/translation-book/
Learn more from:https://globibo.com/ls/unlocking-stories-the-role-of-book-translation/
This session starts with a presentation from our guest speakers on what an anti-racist curriculum can mean in practice. This will be followed by an interactive workshop on how museums can support efforts to promote and embed race equality and anti-racism in the curricula in a meaningful, effective, and sustainable way.
FIFA Friendly Match at Alberni Valley - Strategic Plan.pptxabuhasanjahangir
油
Let us make this match as the featured International friendly match between Team Canada and a popular World Cup-playing nation in Alberni Valley as part of the lead-up to FIFA 2026. This event will create global attention and drive economic and community benefits.
Panel discussion with Q&A: Planning for resilience
This session highlights why strong strategy planning is vital for museums and galleries which aim to develop their financial resilience. Speakers will share their experiences of building resilience through phased development, connecting with local audiences, internal advocacy, and museum Accreditation.
Hinter diesem komplizierten Titel verbergen sich f端nf Jahre Experimente, Versuche und Schwierigkeiten mit dem OKR-Rahmen. Definitiv eine harte Nuss: XITASO hatte, wie viele andere Organisationen auch, eine schwere Zeit, es effektiv zum Laufen zu bringen aber nach einigen m端tigen und undogmatischen nderungen haben wir es geschafft. Strategisches Motto, asynchrones Drumbeating, neue Rollen und Verantwortlichkeiten, Ressourcenzuteilung auf der Grundlage von Beyond Budgeting Prinzipien, Domains und Selbstorganisation XITASO spielt kein Buzzword-Bingo, sondern hat viel zu erz辰hlen! In diesem aufregenden Vortrag wird Baptiste kurz die holakratische Organisation von XITASO vorstellen (mit 260 Mitarbeitern, 16 Teams und 31 Kreisen) und zeigen, wie sie ihren eigenen OKR-Rahmen geschaffen hat, um Innovationen strategisch und effektiv voranzutreiben. All ihre Erkenntnisse werden auch als kostenlose Handouts in Form des OKR.X Guide zur Verf端gung stehen!
Speaker: Baptiste Grand
Panel discussion: The current and future skills landscape
This panel will explore how Historic Environment Scotland, National Museums Scotland, and Museums Galleries Scotland support training and development across the culture sector. Speakers will highlight areas including access to training, workforce confidence, and the importance of understanding and meeting the sectors needs.
Discover how museum digitisation has both positive and negative impacts on the climate. Participants will be invited to discuss their collections, approaches to digitisation, and climate strategies with the aim of forging a way forward which benefits collections, audiences, and nature.
This workshop opens with a spotlight on how National Museums Scotland has worked to create more inclusive recruitment practices. Participants will then work together to review and develop an inclusive person specification and consider changes they can apply in their own organisations.
2. How does the company that
invented digital photography end
up being ruined by its own
innovation?
History of the company
Timeline of events
When did the Kodak Moment go wrong?
What were the decision making processes and
missed opportunities that led them to failure?
Hindsight is 20/20
What we can learn from this?
3. Origins of a
Cultural Icon
Who was George Eastman?
Eastman Dry Plate and Film Company
What is a Kodak?
(Kodak,2018)
4. Business Principles:
focus on the customer
mass production at a low cost
worldwide distribution
Extensive advertising (Kodak,2018)
10. What went wrong (in a nutshell)
Kodak ignored their own market assessment
Kodak saw digital photography as an enemy
There was no trust by management in their own systems
Problem definition Identifying the
root cause
Listing solutions
Identifying the
best solution
Implementation
within time
frame
Analyzing the
results
12. References
Utterback, James M. (1995). Developing technologies: The Eastman
Kodak story. The McKinsey Quarterly, (1), 130.
Anthony, S. (2017, April 24). Kodak's Downfall Wasn't About
Technology. Retrieved January 06, 2018, from
https://hbr.org/2016/07/kodaks-downfall-wasnt-about-technology
Kodak. (n.d.). Retrieved January 06, 2018, from
https://www.kodak.com/
Original Kodak Camera, Serial No. 540. (n.d.). Retrieved January 07,
2018, from
http://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/search/object/nmah_76011
8
13. References
Mui, C. (2016, June 20). How Kodak Failed. Retrieved January 07,
2018, from
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chunkamui/2012/01/18/how-kodak-
failed/#29ca7b1d6f27
Bazerman, M. H., & Moore, D. A. (2015). Judgment in managerial
decision making. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
America, F. 0. (n.d.). What's Wrong with This Picture: Kodak's 30-year
際際滷 into Bankruptcy. Retrieved January 07, 2018, from
http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/whats-wrong-with-this-
picture-kodaks-30-year-slide-into-bankruptcy/
Editor's Notes
#3: How did the decisions made by Eastman Kodaks executive leadership lead the pioneering photography and film company to near extinction? What can we learn from their mistakes about the importance of decision making processes in organizations?
Lets consider Kodaks multi-billion dollar mistakes our billion-dollar lesson in what not to do when making organizational decisions.
In this presentation, we will first examine the innovative history of Eastman Kodak. From there we will examine the timeline and key events that contributed to the companys fall from glory. We will then explore how their decisions could have been handled differently for a more lucrative result. (HBR, 2016)
#4: George Eastman grew up poor and was raised by his widowed mother in Rochester, NY. In order to help support his struggling family he dropped out of school and went to work as an office boy at the age of fourteen. The ambitious fourteen-year olds first salary was three dollars a week and within a year it had increased to five dollars a week. He still needed to make more money, he began taking evening accounting classes to further his career.
In five years time (1874), he found himself working for Rochester Savings Bank as a junior clerk for triple his previous salary, fifteen dollars an hour. (Kodak,2018)
When Eastman was 24, a friend suggested he document a trip he was planning to take to the Dominican Republic. Eastman took his friend up on the idea and purchased a photographic kit to bring on his trip. Photography was still in its infancy so the camera Eastman purchased was huge and had to rest on a heavy tripod. There was a tent he would have to carry so he could prepare the glass plates (wet plates were used before film photography) before they were exposed.
George would have had to lug chemicals, water jugs, tanks and glass plates. Just learning how to use the equipment cost five dollars. That was a weeks salary for some people at the time! Eastman didnt end up taking the vacation.
He did develop a passion for photography. He would experiment all night in his mothers kitchen and in three years time (1880) Eastman had established a patent for both a dry plate formula and a machine that produced large numbers of the newly created plates. (Kodak,2018)
The creation of a company-
In 1880 Eastman began manufacturing his plates with power from a small one horse-power engine in his space on the third floor of a Rochester building. Eastman had an investor named Henry A. Strong who became his partner in 1881. Together they formed the Eastman Dry Plate Company. Eastman quit his day job that year to devote all his energy and time to the new venture. Eastmans vision was to simplify photography. In 1884 the firm was known as the Eastman Dry Plate and Film Company. The firm had 14 shareholders and was known to the public as the Eastman Kodak Company. (Kodak, 2018)
What or who is a Kodak?
Eastman registered the word Kodak as a trademark in 1888 and Kodak was just a word Eastman made up! Eastman was quite fond of the letter K.
Kodak cameras made photography accessible to more and more people. The advertising slogan you press the button, we do the rest was well-known and Kodak advertisements were highly visible across the United States and even on Trafalgar Square in London. The distinctive shade of yellow selected by Eastman and the Kodak Girl were well known symbols of the innovative company. (Kodak,18)
#5: Kodak was built on four basic principles that the founder saw as being closely related and interdependent:
Focus on the customer
Mass production at a low cost
Worldwide distribution
Extensive advertising
Eastman knew the top priority had to be the customer in order for the company to be successful. His dream was to make photography convenient and accessible to everyday people. As he described it, he wanted to make the camera as convenient as the pencil(Kodak,2018).
Its important to recognize that Eastmans vision and the foundation for Kodak from the very beginning was making photography convenient and accessible for the everyday consumer. This meant innovation was necessary.
#6: The original Kodak camera was released and sold for $25 in 1888. It placed the power of photography in the consumers hand with just the press of a button. Gone were the bulky glass plates used by earlier cameras for each exposure. The camera came with 100 exposures of film that were preloaded. When the exposures had all been used the consumer mailed the camera back to Kodak where the film was developed and the prints were made for $10. The camera, prints and negatives were then returned to the customer with a fresh roll of film.
The images from the first Kodak were small, just 2 5/8.
(NMAH,2018)
#7: Eastman Kodak was synonymous with cameras and film for the better part of the twentieth century.
After introducing the first roll film in 1889 in 1900 the company brought the Kodak Brownie Camera to the masses. The Brownie was more economical and made photography more accessible to everyday consumers. The camera was $1 and its film was 15 cents a roll. (Kodak,2018)
In 1935 Kodak brought the first commercially successful amateur color film to the world. Kodachrome offered a 16mm format for motion pictures and 8mm home movies followed in 1936.
1942 brought Kodacolor, the worlds first true color negative film.
Kodak introduced Kodak Colorama Display Transparencies in 1950. These displays were viewed by an estimated 650,000 commuters passing through New York Cities Grand Central Station every day.
In 1961 Carousel Projectors were introduced making way for many vacation slide parties in suburban America.
(Kodak, 2018)
The easy-to-use cartridge camera called the Instamatic was introduced in 1963.
(Kodak,2018)
#8: The Colorama Displays were famous world-wide and were often seen in film and magazines of the time.
#9: Up until 1975 Kodak has been leading the pack as far as innovations in photography. True to form, Kodak brought us the first digital camera in 1975.
This is where things begin to go south for Kodak. When Steve Sasson, the Kodak engineer who invented the camera unveiled it to management, they were not excited. Steve later recounted the initial reaction from management , thats cutebut dont tell anyone about it (Mui,2016).
From the very beginning Kodak management seemed to be biased against digital photography. In fact, Kodaks own researchers predicted in 1981 that digital photography would be a threat to film in time. The results of the study produced both bad and good news. The bad news was that digital photography had the potential capability to replace Kodaks established film based business. The good news was that it would take some time for that to occur and that Kodak had roughly ten years to prepare for the transition.(Mui,2016)
This is an example of a confirmation bias. Management only heard the information that confirmed their already established opinions. (Bazerman & Moore, 2015)
Instead of thinking towards the future as Eastman had when film was a new and a lesser technology in comparison to dry plates, Kodaks upper management seemed to want to stick with the product they knew. Eastman had also embraced innovation when he led the company into color film. Kodaks upper management seemed to have forgotten this. (Mui,2016)
Upper management at Kodak was facing a complex non-programmed decision. (Bazerman & Moore, 2015)
#10: Kodak used their digital research labs to create the first mega-pixel camera and also introduced Advantix Preview film and camera system. The Advantix system cost over $500 million dollars to develop. The Advantix system used digital technology to allow the customer to preview their prints but still used film. Advantix was not competitive in the marketplace because the customer was still paying for developing prints. It was a flop.
In 1988 Eastman Kodak unveiled the Create-a Print 35mm retail kiosk
In 1991 Kodak launched the Nikon F-3 Digital Camera for photojournalists
Kodak finally moved into a consumer grade point-and-shoot digital camera system in 1995 with the Kodak DC40 (Kodak,2018)
#11: Management at Kodak refused to acknowledge that a potential problem existed even when their own research teams gave them a 10-year time-line. The first step in the problem-solving process is acknowledging a problem exists. Because they dropped the ball at the very beginning they were unable to successfully complete the rest of the steps in the problem-solving process. (Bazerman & Moore, 2015)
Kodak was not able to adapt to the changing market.
Most importantly, Kodak was unwilling to make the decision interactively. Although they had a system in place they didnt utilize their expert resources effectively. (Mui,2016)
#12: Adapting to technological change can be especially challenging for established companies like Kodak, Wharton experts say, because entrenched leadership often finds it difficult to break old patterns that once spelled success. Kodaks history shows that innovation alone isnt enough; companies must also have a clear business strategy that can adapt to changing times. Without one, disruptive innovations can sink a companys fortunes even when the innovations are its own(Wharton,2018).
The lesson here is simple, Kodak changed its focus from innovation to business objectives. This was a short-sighted goal and kept Kodak from seeing digital photography as its own entity separate from film. They were fearful it would take away from their established business that had brought them so much success.
If Kodak had considered more outsider insights the company may have navigated the marketplace more successfully. (Wharton,2018)