際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Effective thinking
Effective thinking
These words of the Philosopher Rene Descartes
illustrate the importance of thinking.
We exist because we think.
   Thinking may be described as mental
    processing of information.

   Thinking is done voluntarily or involuntarily.

   Thinking may be in forms of fantasizing,
    daydreaming, reasoning and problem-solving.

   Systemic thinking acts as a filter & helps in
    separating the important from the unimportant.
According to Psychologist Robert Sternberg,
people acquire their thinking styles through
socialization. However, it is also possible to teach
thinking styles.
Sternbergs conceptions of thinking style are
   based on following hypothesis:
1) Thinking styles are preferences in the use of
   abilities, & not the abilities themselves.

2)   A match between styles & abilities creates a
     synergy which is more than mere sum of its
     parts.

3)   The life choices we make should fit styles as
     well as abilities.

4)   People have profiles of styles, not just a single
     style.
5)   Styles vary across tasks, situations as well as
     across the life span.

6)   People differ in the strength of their
     preferences and in their stylistic flexibility.

7)   Styles are socialized, measurable & teachable.

8)   The value of styles may change.

9)   Styles are not good or bad  its a question of
     suitability
Effective thinking
Our thinking styles help us to carry out three
  functions.
1)   Legislative Style:

    People with legislative style of thinking like doing things
     their own way.


    The legislative style of thinking favors creativity.


    Individuals with this style like activities such as creative
     writing, inventing new things, starting new businesses,
     etc.
2) Executive       Thinking

 Here people prefer the need of guidelines that WHAT to do
  and HOW to do.


 This type of thinking is valued in schools and organizations.


 Individuals with this style like activities such as solving well-
  defined mathematical problem, applying rules, giving lessons on
   others peoples ideas, etc.
3)   Judicial Thinking:-
    This type of thinking prefers evaluating rules &
     procedures & judging situations. They favor problems
     which can be analyzed & evaluated.


    This style of thinking is often not given importance it
     deserves.


    Individuals with this style like activities such as
     giving opinions, writing critiques, judging people
     and their work, etc.
Effective thinking
Sternberg also distinguished between four
different forms of thinking styles & they
are :-


           1)    Monarchic Form,
            2)   Hierarchic Form,
            3)   Oligarchic Form,
            4)   Anarchic Form.
Effective thinking
Sternberg identified 2 levels thinking
Styles :-


     1.Global thinking Styles

     2.Local thinking Styles
Effective thinking
Effective thinking
  The de Bono Hats system (also known as "Six
Hats" or "Six Thinking Hats") is a thinking tool for
group discussion and individual thinking.
Combined with the idea of parallel thinking which is
associated with it, it provides a means for groups to
think together more effectively, and a means to plan
thinking processes in a detailed and cohesive way.
The method is attributed to Dr. Edward de Bono and
is the subject of his book, Six Thinking Hats.
1)Information: (White) - considering purely what
  information is available, what are the facts?
2)Emotions (Red) - instinctive gut reaction or
  statements of emotional feeling (but not any
  justification)
3)Bad points judgment (Black) - logic applied to
  identifying flaws or barriers, seeking mismatch
4)Good points judgment (Yellow) - logic applied to
  identifying benefits, seeking harmony
5)Creativity (Green) - statements of provocation
  and investigation, seeing where a thought goes
6)Thinking (Blue) - thinking about thinking
Effective thinking
Effective thinking
Effective thinking

More Related Content

Effective thinking

  • 3. These words of the Philosopher Rene Descartes illustrate the importance of thinking. We exist because we think.
  • 4. Thinking may be described as mental processing of information. Thinking is done voluntarily or involuntarily. Thinking may be in forms of fantasizing, daydreaming, reasoning and problem-solving. Systemic thinking acts as a filter & helps in separating the important from the unimportant.
  • 5. According to Psychologist Robert Sternberg, people acquire their thinking styles through socialization. However, it is also possible to teach thinking styles.
  • 6. Sternbergs conceptions of thinking style are based on following hypothesis: 1) Thinking styles are preferences in the use of abilities, & not the abilities themselves. 2) A match between styles & abilities creates a synergy which is more than mere sum of its parts. 3) The life choices we make should fit styles as well as abilities. 4) People have profiles of styles, not just a single style.
  • 7. 5) Styles vary across tasks, situations as well as across the life span. 6) People differ in the strength of their preferences and in their stylistic flexibility. 7) Styles are socialized, measurable & teachable. 8) The value of styles may change. 9) Styles are not good or bad its a question of suitability
  • 9. Our thinking styles help us to carry out three functions. 1) Legislative Style: People with legislative style of thinking like doing things their own way. The legislative style of thinking favors creativity. Individuals with this style like activities such as creative writing, inventing new things, starting new businesses, etc.
  • 10. 2) Executive Thinking Here people prefer the need of guidelines that WHAT to do and HOW to do. This type of thinking is valued in schools and organizations. Individuals with this style like activities such as solving well- defined mathematical problem, applying rules, giving lessons on others peoples ideas, etc.
  • 11. 3) Judicial Thinking:- This type of thinking prefers evaluating rules & procedures & judging situations. They favor problems which can be analyzed & evaluated. This style of thinking is often not given importance it deserves. Individuals with this style like activities such as giving opinions, writing critiques, judging people and their work, etc.
  • 13. Sternberg also distinguished between four different forms of thinking styles & they are :- 1) Monarchic Form, 2) Hierarchic Form, 3) Oligarchic Form, 4) Anarchic Form.
  • 15. Sternberg identified 2 levels thinking Styles :- 1.Global thinking Styles 2.Local thinking Styles
  • 18. The de Bono Hats system (also known as "Six Hats" or "Six Thinking Hats") is a thinking tool for group discussion and individual thinking. Combined with the idea of parallel thinking which is associated with it, it provides a means for groups to think together more effectively, and a means to plan thinking processes in a detailed and cohesive way. The method is attributed to Dr. Edward de Bono and is the subject of his book, Six Thinking Hats.
  • 19. 1)Information: (White) - considering purely what information is available, what are the facts? 2)Emotions (Red) - instinctive gut reaction or statements of emotional feeling (but not any justification) 3)Bad points judgment (Black) - logic applied to identifying flaws or barriers, seeking mismatch 4)Good points judgment (Yellow) - logic applied to identifying benefits, seeking harmony 5)Creativity (Green) - statements of provocation and investigation, seeing where a thought goes 6)Thinking (Blue) - thinking about thinking