際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Emotional intelligence; is
that all there is?
New proposals for the EI
assessment



    Edgar Bres坦 Esteve Ph.D.

         Associate Professor
 Emotionally Intelligent Organization Research Group
LOGO
Model/Hypothesis
LOGO
Emotional Intelligence        (Mayer & Salovey, 1997)




                   1
                           ABILITIES                USING
     PERCEIVING                                2



                             EI
   UNDERSTANDING       3                   4       MANAGING
LOGO
 EI Assessment
Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i)
Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue)
Genos Emotional Intelligence Inventory
Trait Meta-Mood Scale (TMMS-24)
Emotional Skills and Competence Questionnaire (ESCQ)

             Emotion Recognition
LOGO
EI Assessment
LOGO
Which one seems to be better
LOGO
Output
LOGO
Assesment #1 (n=152)
                              Correlations
                      1        2        3        4      5       6      7

   1. Emotional       -
   Intelligence
     2. VIGOR        -.06      -

3. DEDICATION        .10     .58**      -

4. EXHAUSTION       -.28**   .31**    -.20**     -

 5. DEPERSON.        -.10    -.56**   -.38**   .21**    -

6. PER. ACOMP.       -.14    .63**    .51**    -.23** -.51**     -

7. PERFORMANCE       .18     .38**    .19**    -.31** -.19**   .31**   -

Note: All 留  .70
LOGO
Assesment #2 (n=116)
                              Correlations
                      1        2        3        4      5       6      7

   1. Emotional       -
   Intelligence
     2. VIGOR        .13       -

3. DEDICATION        .09     .58**      -

4. EXHAUSTION       -.12**   .31**    -.20**     -

 5. DEPERSON.        -.10    -.56**   -.38**   .21**    -

6. PER. ACOMP.       .12     .63**    .51**    -.23** -.51**     -

7. PERFORMANCE       .10     .38**    .19**    -.31** -.19**   .31**   -

Note: All 留  .70
LOGO
4th.   Branch (n=116)

                            Correlations
                    1        2        3        4      5       6      7

  1. EI (4th.)      -

   2. VIGOR       .21*       -

3. DEDICATION     .15**    .58**      -

4. EXHAUSTION     -.27**   .31**    -.20**     -

 5. DEPERSON.     -.19**   -.56**   -.38**   .21**    -

6. PERSONAL AC.    .14     .63**    .51**    -.23** -.51**     -

7. PERFORMANCE    .16*     .38**    .19**    -.31** -.19**   .31**   -
LOGO
 1st.   vs   4th.   Branch (n=116)

                          Correlations


                              1            2    3

        1. EI (1st.)          -

        2. EI (4th.)        .39*           -

        3. Empathy*          21+         57**   -


*Empathy Quotient (Baron & Wheelwright, 2003)
LOGO
   EI Assessment (Other surveys)

v金POFA (Pictures of Facial Affect) Ekman & Fresen, 1976.
v金JACBART (Japanese and Caucasian Brief Affect Recognition
  Test) Matsumoto et. al, 2000.
v金METT       (Micro-expressions Training Tool) Ekman, 2004.


Roberts, 2006: Do not correlate* with the 1st scale of MSCEIT

 The MSCEIT method of rating the extend of emotions in a still
  photo of a face seems to capture a different skill from multiple-
  choice assessment of facial expression presented for only a
  fraction of second (as in the JACBART)


 *Correlation
LOGO
LOGO
 Interviews (n=97)

v金 This is the best assessment method I have
   ever used.
v金 Is not very boring, not long, useful, etc.

      BUT (Respondents told me)
1.- Pictures were not enough to make me feel
2.- I was not very involved in the task (less than into
the other three)
3.- Probably in the next time I would answer
differently
4.- Honestly, I do not believe on its reliability
LOGO
Time Flows Very quick!
LOGO
Speculations

v金Faces are NOT SPANISH so the
   Spanish population do not understand
   their emotions

1.- This survey has been already tested by
  Extremera & Berrocal, 2009.
2.- Facial expression of emotions is
  universal (Ekman, 1970).
3.- The real problem was not about faces
LOGO
Speculations

v金In the 21st. Century, pictures are not
   enough. People don t feel anything by
   pictures. We are used to other
   technologies it seems artificial



- But, in other contexts pictures work Or
   not?
- Have you had similar problems?
LOGO
Speculations


v金An Emotionally Intelligent person is
   not (only) a person who is able to
   give the right answer



- He/She must be able to find the answer at
   the first attempt, and quickly.
LOGO
 Conclusions


v金On the other hand, if the perception is
   actually an important branch, and it needs to
   be assessed, maybe I could design a new
   assessment method for this branch.
LOGO
 Conclusions
v金If I want to develop and implement an
   intervention based on the four branches model,
   I need to be sure that each branch is assessed
   properly.

v金 An alternative could be forgetting the four
   branches and focus just on the management of
   emotions (the fourth branch).

v金Thus, we should speak about the Management
   of Emotions instead of the Emotional
   Intelligence and the intervention should be
   developed for increasing just this competence.
LOGO
Proposals


         v金 The importance of TIME
                    Control.

         v金 Possibility for correcting/
                changing answers

             v金 Less artificial , more
                      dynamic .
jjjjjjjj
jjjjjjjj
jjjjjjjj
jjjjjjjj
jjjjjjjj
jjjjjjjj
jjjjjjjj

breso@uji.es
 Edgar Breso
 jjjjjj

More Related Content

Ei assessment

  • 1. Emotional intelligence; is that all there is? New proposals for the EI assessment Edgar Bres坦 Esteve Ph.D. Associate Professor Emotionally Intelligent Organization Research Group
  • 3. LOGO Emotional Intelligence (Mayer & Salovey, 1997) 1 ABILITIES USING PERCEIVING 2 EI UNDERSTANDING 3 4 MANAGING
  • 4. LOGO EI Assessment Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i) Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue) Genos Emotional Intelligence Inventory Trait Meta-Mood Scale (TMMS-24) Emotional Skills and Competence Questionnaire (ESCQ) Emotion Recognition
  • 6. LOGO Which one seems to be better
  • 8. LOGO Assesment #1 (n=152) Correlations 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1. Emotional - Intelligence 2. VIGOR -.06 - 3. DEDICATION .10 .58** - 4. EXHAUSTION -.28** .31** -.20** - 5. DEPERSON. -.10 -.56** -.38** .21** - 6. PER. ACOMP. -.14 .63** .51** -.23** -.51** - 7. PERFORMANCE .18 .38** .19** -.31** -.19** .31** - Note: All 留 .70
  • 9. LOGO Assesment #2 (n=116) Correlations 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1. Emotional - Intelligence 2. VIGOR .13 - 3. DEDICATION .09 .58** - 4. EXHAUSTION -.12** .31** -.20** - 5. DEPERSON. -.10 -.56** -.38** .21** - 6. PER. ACOMP. .12 .63** .51** -.23** -.51** - 7. PERFORMANCE .10 .38** .19** -.31** -.19** .31** - Note: All 留 .70
  • 10. LOGO 4th. Branch (n=116) Correlations 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1. EI (4th.) - 2. VIGOR .21* - 3. DEDICATION .15** .58** - 4. EXHAUSTION -.27** .31** -.20** - 5. DEPERSON. -.19** -.56** -.38** .21** - 6. PERSONAL AC. .14 .63** .51** -.23** -.51** - 7. PERFORMANCE .16* .38** .19** -.31** -.19** .31** -
  • 11. LOGO 1st. vs 4th. Branch (n=116) Correlations 1 2 3 1. EI (1st.) - 2. EI (4th.) .39* - 3. Empathy* 21+ 57** - *Empathy Quotient (Baron & Wheelwright, 2003)
  • 12. LOGO EI Assessment (Other surveys) v金POFA (Pictures of Facial Affect) Ekman & Fresen, 1976. v金JACBART (Japanese and Caucasian Brief Affect Recognition Test) Matsumoto et. al, 2000. v金METT (Micro-expressions Training Tool) Ekman, 2004. Roberts, 2006: Do not correlate* with the 1st scale of MSCEIT The MSCEIT method of rating the extend of emotions in a still photo of a face seems to capture a different skill from multiple- choice assessment of facial expression presented for only a fraction of second (as in the JACBART) *Correlation
  • 13. LOGO
  • 14. LOGO Interviews (n=97) v金 This is the best assessment method I have ever used. v金 Is not very boring, not long, useful, etc. BUT (Respondents told me) 1.- Pictures were not enough to make me feel 2.- I was not very involved in the task (less than into the other three) 3.- Probably in the next time I would answer differently 4.- Honestly, I do not believe on its reliability
  • 16. LOGO Speculations v金Faces are NOT SPANISH so the Spanish population do not understand their emotions 1.- This survey has been already tested by Extremera & Berrocal, 2009. 2.- Facial expression of emotions is universal (Ekman, 1970). 3.- The real problem was not about faces
  • 17. LOGO Speculations v金In the 21st. Century, pictures are not enough. People don t feel anything by pictures. We are used to other technologies it seems artificial - But, in other contexts pictures work Or not? - Have you had similar problems?
  • 18. LOGO Speculations v金An Emotionally Intelligent person is not (only) a person who is able to give the right answer - He/She must be able to find the answer at the first attempt, and quickly.
  • 19. LOGO Conclusions v金On the other hand, if the perception is actually an important branch, and it needs to be assessed, maybe I could design a new assessment method for this branch.
  • 20. LOGO Conclusions v金If I want to develop and implement an intervention based on the four branches model, I need to be sure that each branch is assessed properly. v金 An alternative could be forgetting the four branches and focus just on the management of emotions (the fourth branch). v金Thus, we should speak about the Management of Emotions instead of the Emotional Intelligence and the intervention should be developed for increasing just this competence.
  • 21. LOGO Proposals v金 The importance of TIME Control. v金 Possibility for correcting/ changing answers v金 Less artificial , more dynamic .