ݺߣ

ݺߣShare a Scribd company logo

e-Learning at Universidade Católica de Moçambique

•Download as PPT, PDF•
•
Andrew Moore
Andrew Moore

This presentation was presented to the PHEA ETI facilitators and discusses issues surrounding the launching of e-learning supported courses at the University.

1 of 20
Downloaded 10 times
ELearning at UCM 2008 12 09 Gerald Henzinger
Agenda Where are we right now? Our Client What is planned
Where are we right now? Platform KEWL in Pemba Up- and download area. Participating within AVOIR. Iniciative with CED Starting a Pilot with CHISIMBA Upload all documents, which are digital available. SUGIK Masters in GIS. Blended learning with presence and online learning. Using Moodle.
Where are we right now? HIV Education Capacitybuildingproject with Volunteers. Using flash. FEG Has a Server, never been used.
Our Client – October 2008 Capacity of our clients to run e-learning Interrogation of 429 Persons. Comparision of rural and urban students. Hardware Electricity Computer use Printout How long to go to the next place where internet. Internet on the cellphone Quality of the connection Software Email, Google, Internet, Excel and Word
Our Client - Electricity CED: 29% don‘t have electricity Urban regions: nearly everybody has electricity
Our Client – Computer Use CED: 25% never use computer. CED: 75% use computer once or less a week. Other Faculties use more than 50% computer every day.
Our Client - Printing Tecnical and economical 50% – 50% CED is a little better.
Our Client – Time to get to Internet CED: 60% don‘t know or has more than 2 h to go. 27% has to go less than 30min. Urban Faculties have 60% less than 30min to go.
Our Client – Internet on Cellphone Most never use internet with cellphone
Our Client – quality of connection CED: 56% don‘t know. For 30% it is slow Urban Faculties: ca. 75% the connection is slow
Our Client - Email CED: 25% can use email properly Other Faculties: 75%-90% use email
Our Client - Google CED: 60% has no or small knowledge Other Faculties: nearly 100% knowledge
Our Client – Excel, Word CED: Better knowledge than Email and Google.
Our Client - Comments ...as veces a facultade esta cheia...(MED) ...na facultade ha muitas problemas dos computadores e internet que e muito lento e sao poucos... (MED) … os computadores demoram muito… (MED) ...nao tenho possibilidade de imprimir, pois para imprimir tenho que andar muito...(TUR) não domino (CED) ...e um triste estudante do 3 ano, não conhece o não tem Dominio de programas e o propio computador... (CED) 3 horas de tempo com a corriente electrica (CED)
Our Client - Conclusion CED: 25% know Email 27% have to go less than 30min 13% have good connection. 60% have electricity in house. Some has just a few hours a day. Coordenators of CED see right now a capacity of 3% doing E-Learning. Need of capacitybuilding. Need of improve connectivity.
What is planned 2009 Master in Tourism. Master in Computer Science. CED: Pilot with the first year. Connectivity Getting a dedicated line from TDM. Fixed IP Adress. Email Server. Inhouse Improve labs.
What is planned - Chisimba Participation with the AVOIR Project Comfortable Instable Concerns about the future of Chisimba. Alternatives?
Conclusion Faculties are not pulling on one string. Our Clients and Teachers need capacitybuilding. Connectivity has to be improved. Future of Chisimba is not predictable.
Thank you! Questions?

More Related Content

e-Learning at Universidade Católica de Moçambique

  • 1. ELearning at UCM 2008 12 09 Gerald Henzinger
  • 2. Agenda Where are we right now? Our Client What is planned
  • 3. Where are we right now? Platform KEWL in Pemba Up- and download area. Participating within AVOIR. Iniciative with CED Starting a Pilot with CHISIMBA Upload all documents, which are digital available. SUGIK Masters in GIS. Blended learning with presence and online learning. Using Moodle.
  • 4. Where are we right now? HIV Education Capacitybuildingproject with Volunteers. Using flash. FEG Has a Server, never been used.
  • 5. Our Client – October 2008 Capacity of our clients to run e-learning Interrogation of 429 Persons. Comparision of rural and urban students. Hardware Electricity Computer use Printout How long to go to the next place where internet. Internet on the cellphone Quality of the connection Software Email, Google, Internet, Excel and Word
  • 6. Our Client - Electricity CED: 29% don‘t have electricity Urban regions: nearly everybody has electricity
  • 7. Our Client – Computer Use CED: 25% never use computer. CED: 75% use computer once or less a week. Other Faculties use more than 50% computer every day.
  • 8. Our Client - Printing Tecnical and economical 50% – 50% CED is a little better.
  • 9. Our Client – Time to get to Internet CED: 60% don‘t know or has more than 2 h to go. 27% has to go less than 30min. Urban Faculties have 60% less than 30min to go.
  • 10. Our Client – Internet on Cellphone Most never use internet with cellphone
  • 11. Our Client – quality of connection CED: 56% don‘t know. For 30% it is slow Urban Faculties: ca. 75% the connection is slow
  • 12. Our Client - Email CED: 25% can use email properly Other Faculties: 75%-90% use email
  • 13. Our Client - Google CED: 60% has no or small knowledge Other Faculties: nearly 100% knowledge
  • 14. Our Client – Excel, Word CED: Better knowledge than Email and Google.
  • 15. Our Client - Comments ...as veces a facultade esta cheia...(MED) ...na facultade ha muitas problemas dos computadores e internet que e muito lento e sao poucos... (MED) … os computadores demoram muito… (MED) ...nao tenho possibilidade de imprimir, pois para imprimir tenho que andar muito...(TUR) não domino (CED) ...e um triste estudante do 3 ano, não conhece o não tem Dominio de programas e o propio computador... (CED) 3 horas de tempo com a corriente electrica (CED)
  • 16. Our Client - Conclusion CED: 25% know Email 27% have to go less than 30min 13% have good connection. 60% have electricity in house. Some has just a few hours a day. Coordenators of CED see right now a capacity of 3% doing E-Learning. Need of capacitybuilding. Need of improve connectivity.
  • 17. What is planned 2009 Master in Tourism. Master in Computer Science. CED: Pilot with the first year. Connectivity Getting a dedicated line from TDM. Fixed IP Adress. Email Server. Inhouse Improve labs.
  • 18. What is planned - Chisimba Participation with the AVOIR Project Comfortable Instable Concerns about the future of Chisimba. Alternatives?
  • 19. Conclusion Faculties are not pulling on one string. Our Clients and Teachers need capacitybuilding. Connectivity has to be improved. Future of Chisimba is not predictable.