This document provides guidelines for designing public engagement in policy deliberation. It outlines a spectrum for the level of dialogue and influence citizens can have, ranging from low-interaction methods like public opinion polls to high-interaction approaches like citizens juries and consensus conferences. The guidelines suggest choosing methods based on the goals of engagement, level of interactivity desired, and whether competitors or attacks will be allowed.
1 of 9
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Elevator mb
1. GUIDELINES FO
R DESIGNING P
UBLIC ENGAGE
MENT IN POLICY
DELIBERATION
Maurice Berix // Multiplicity & Visual Identities 2010
3. In rebus quoque apertis noscere
possis, si non advertas animum,
proinde esse, quasi omni
tempore semotae fuerint,
longeque remotae.*
Lucretius,
De Rerum Natura IV (50 B.C.)
6. high
VOICE (level of dialogue)
CITIZENS JURY /
INTERVIEWS /
CONSENSUS
FOCUS GROUPS
CONFERENCE
low VOTE (level of in?uence)
high
commu-
nities
polls/forums
PUBLIC OPINION POLL REFERENDUM
weblogs
low
8. movies, non-interactive
entertainment
books, etc
interactive
no goals
toys playthings
goals
no competitor
puzzles challenges
competitor
no attacks
competitions
attacks allowed
games